Mac-7
Diamond Member
- Oct 9, 2019
- 67,770
- 49,194
- 3,565
And to you thats ok?China wants to be an empire and be in control of the world economy just like we did and do.....
you hate your country so much that now you are cheering for our enemies
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And to you thats ok?China wants to be an empire and be in control of the world economy just like we did and do.....
All he needed to do was enact tariffs. That’s how manufacturing jobs are protected, that’s how domestic manufacturing can compete with Chinese slave labor. Personally I hope we never make another trade deal with China unless it benefits our manufacturing sector. We should divorce ourselves from Communists that want to dominate the world.He enacted tariffs and walked away while China created new alliances around the world.
1. I support the democrat's "fix" for SS, as long as it is paid for.1. No, I refer to expanded Social Security -- in other words, not austerity cuts but boosting benefits.....1. I think you refer to "Medicare for all", not expanded SS.and that is fair....I voted for Trump twice. I like his "promises kept" list.Obama ran on Change. He was not. Trump ran on changing . He did not.
I understand voting for Obama the first time. I do not the second. I understand people voting for Trump the first time. I do not the second.
Once you realize the person you thought knew what he was doing just turned out to be another liar, dump them.
His personality sucks, but I agree with most of his policies, except for the personal tax cut.
The democrats have no policies that I agree with.
and that doesn't mean Democrats are evil and want to rape all of your kids just because they want to expand Social Security and make sure everyone has adequate healthcare...
But, if you were honest.........it seems for the past 3 or 4 republican presidential campaigns/administrations --- the views of those who once supported them have not aged well......do you think the same will be said with Trump years from now??
Will people open up and be more honest about it or will they continue to claim he was the greatest leader in human history like they do now?
View attachment 442185
2. Healthcare needs to be paid for, its not free. More and better jobs with healthcare is the answer.
3. IMHO Trump's new "populism" is here to stay, replacing "conservatism", which is another name for "protect the wealthy".
4. What does "open up and be more honest" even mean?? We will vote for the populist candidates over the socialist candidates. Simple.
2. Healthcare is paid for, it is not free....but health insurance is a parasitic unnecessary middle man that inflates costs for the purpose of a profit motive, period....ALSO, if Trump came out in favor of M4A -- Trumpers will instantly support it because that is what Trumpers always do....i.e $2000 stimulus checks that they initially called socialist...
3. Trump isn't a populist if his policies are not populist -- his policies are the same ole conservative policies...tax cuts for the rich or as you called it "protect the wealthy" -- Trump does as many other GOP politicians before him did (Pat Buchanan, Newt Gingrich, etc) -- they manipulate and prey on the frustrations, fear and ignorance of their base and tell them the reason things are the way are is because of the "others" and other culture war BS...
4. Open up and be more honest means simply this.....instead of waiting until after it is clear a certain administration or candidate was a disaster -- say it when you see it....it's easy for folks to say "I always knew Bush was a moron, globalist, blah, blah, blah) -- there is a reason current day Trumpers claim to hate their last 4 presidential nominees, even tho policy wise, Trump has passed the same policies they did....
Since there aren't many digital receipts from the Bush years, lots of current day Trumpers pretend they were not equally onboard with Bush from 2000 to 2007 or so....that bothers me because I was old enough to remember the Bush years -- I remember being called a traitor and a terrorist because I didn't buy into the Saddam was behind 9/11, gung-ho Iraq war bullshit....I am old enough to remember people just going along with it just to avoid being called these things....
Then after the smoke clears and the dust settled -- now these same people want to rewrite history and pretend they knew all along it was BS....if only they were honest about it then
That is more than the GOP put forward. Without a fix, SS is insolvent ~2030.
Democrats Push Plan to Increase Social Security Benefits and Solvency (Published 2019)
More than 200 members of Congress are supporting a bill that would increase payroll taxes to shore up Social Security and increase benefits for retirees.www.nytimes.com
Someone also needs to fix Medicare, or it will be bankrupt in 2026.
2. The big question is, do you really want the government running your healthcare? My answer is NO. Just imagine "Lois Lerner" in-charge of your access to healthcare. Sorry, your access is denied, Mr. Republican.
3. Agree that the tax cuts were a bad idea, but the GOP always sucks for shekels. That said, Trump's tariffs are not "globalist", Trump's efforts to bring back manufacturing are not globalist. The pandemic showed how dependent we are on China for medical PPP among other necessities. Culture War? Like destroying statues of the Founding Fathers? Like "Critical Race Theory"? Like "defund the police"?
4. You missed the original binary choice.
Trump or Hillary
Biden or Trump
GOP or Kamala, etc.
I'm very old, and I can't remember a time when a choice wasn't a "lesser of the evils" choice. You need to hold your nose and vote for someone.
That tooSteal.......we give our technology away to access the 1.5 billion person market.
chinese law demands 50% chinese ownership of foreign companies in china
but that only covers the manufacturing process of finished products
china targets research and development in the US also
and yes some of that is given away but American academics who are bought and paid for by china
but the rest is simply stolen
We’ve been in a trade war with China for 45 plus years, and we’ve been losing this whole time. Tariffs are a useful and effective tool in that war.Tariffs are what protect a nations industries. If tariffs are so bad, then why does the EU use them against the US? Why does China use them against the US? Why is it you call it a “trade war” when President Trump enacts tariffs, but not when every other country uses them against us?
A trade war vs tariffs is the difference between a battle and a war.
All he needed to do was enact tariffs. That’s how manufacturing jobs are protected, that’s how domestic manufacturing can compete with Chinese slave labor. Personally I hope we never make another trade deal with China unless it benefits our manufacturing sector. We should divorce ourselves from Communists that want to dominate the world.He enacted tariffs and walked away while China created new alliances around the world.
Why would we care if other countries are buying cheap Chinese slave made shit? Their trade doesn’t hurt the US, it only hurts their own industries. The US should be leading by example. We should be moving away from dependence on China, not embracing more of it.
Can you be specific? All you have are these stupid generic statements, with nothing to back it up. Can you even name one of his policies that did any of these things?Trump has destroyed many lives, their careers and the death of their loved ones based on putting his wants and needs first. He has alienated our allies, weakened our nation's standing as the longest living and lasting democratic republic in world history, and abused the highest office of trust and divided out nation into tribes, one of which vandalized our nation's capitol.
1. I agree with democrats on very few issues. IMHO both parties have a "gentleman's agreement" to not fix SS, then when it goes insolvent the payments get reduced to 70% of what is owed. Problem solved with no pain.It is always the lesser of 2 evils -- but in the little exchange with had -- you seem to agree more with what Democrats are proposing than what Reps are...1. I support the democrat's "fix" for SS, as long as it is paid for.1. No, I refer to expanded Social Security -- in other words, not austerity cuts but boosting benefits.....1. I think you refer to "Medicare for all", not expanded SS.and that is fair....I voted for Trump twice. I like his "promises kept" list.Obama ran on Change. He was not. Trump ran on changing . He did not.
I understand voting for Obama the first time. I do not the second. I understand people voting for Trump the first time. I do not the second.
Once you realize the person you thought knew what he was doing just turned out to be another liar, dump them.
His personality sucks, but I agree with most of his policies, except for the personal tax cut.
The democrats have no policies that I agree with.
and that doesn't mean Democrats are evil and want to rape all of your kids just because they want to expand Social Security and make sure everyone has adequate healthcare...
But, if you were honest.........it seems for the past 3 or 4 republican presidential campaigns/administrations --- the views of those who once supported them have not aged well......do you think the same will be said with Trump years from now??
Will people open up and be more honest about it or will they continue to claim he was the greatest leader in human history like they do now?
View attachment 442185
2. Healthcare needs to be paid for, its not free. More and better jobs with healthcare is the answer.
3. IMHO Trump's new "populism" is here to stay, replacing "conservatism", which is another name for "protect the wealthy".
4. What does "open up and be more honest" even mean?? We will vote for the populist candidates over the socialist candidates. Simple.
2. Healthcare is paid for, it is not free....but health insurance is a parasitic unnecessary middle man that inflates costs for the purpose of a profit motive, period....ALSO, if Trump came out in favor of M4A -- Trumpers will instantly support it because that is what Trumpers always do....i.e $2000 stimulus checks that they initially called socialist...
3. Trump isn't a populist if his policies are not populist -- his policies are the same ole conservative policies...tax cuts for the rich or as you called it "protect the wealthy" -- Trump does as many other GOP politicians before him did (Pat Buchanan, Newt Gingrich, etc) -- they manipulate and prey on the frustrations, fear and ignorance of their base and tell them the reason things are the way are is because of the "others" and other culture war BS...
4. Open up and be more honest means simply this.....instead of waiting until after it is clear a certain administration or candidate was a disaster -- say it when you see it....it's easy for folks to say "I always knew Bush was a moron, globalist, blah, blah, blah) -- there is a reason current day Trumpers claim to hate their last 4 presidential nominees, even tho policy wise, Trump has passed the same policies they did....
Since there aren't many digital receipts from the Bush years, lots of current day Trumpers pretend they were not equally onboard with Bush from 2000 to 2007 or so....that bothers me because I was old enough to remember the Bush years -- I remember being called a traitor and a terrorist because I didn't buy into the Saddam was behind 9/11, gung-ho Iraq war bullshit....I am old enough to remember people just going along with it just to avoid being called these things....
Then after the smoke clears and the dust settled -- now these same people want to rewrite history and pretend they knew all along it was BS....if only they were honest about it then
That is more than the GOP put forward. Without a fix, SS is insolvent ~2030.
Democrats Push Plan to Increase Social Security Benefits and Solvency (Published 2019)
More than 200 members of Congress are supporting a bill that would increase payroll taxes to shore up Social Security and increase benefits for retirees.www.nytimes.com
Someone also needs to fix Medicare, or it will be bankrupt in 2026.
2. The big question is, do you really want the government running your healthcare? My answer is NO. Just imagine "Lois Lerner" in-charge of your access to healthcare. Sorry, your access is denied, Mr. Republican.
3. Agree that the tax cuts were a bad idea, but the GOP always sucks for shekels. That said, Trump's tariffs are not "globalist", Trump's efforts to bring back manufacturing are not globalist. The pandemic showed how dependent we are on China for medical PPP among other necessities. Culture War? Like destroying statues of the Founding Fathers? Like "Critical Race Theory"? Like "defund the police"?
4. You missed the original binary choice.
Trump or Hillary
Biden or Trump
GOP or Kamala, etc.
I'm very old, and I can't remember a time when a choice wasn't a "lesser of the evils" choice. You need to hold your nose and vote for someone.
From social security, to Medicare to tax cuts...
And what were the things you worry about -- "critical race theory" which most Trumpers don't even understand, and their supposed love for statues of Founding Fathers while ignoring the system of government those FF's created....and statues and "critical race theory" won't do shit to improve the material conditions of your life like Social Security and Medicare does
What are we supposed to do when the people in charge up there in washington dc are globalists who want china to grow and America to shrink?We refuse to address companies giving it away and then blaming China for that.
What are we supposed to do when the people in charge up there in washington dc are globalists who want china to grow and America to shrink?We refuse to address companies giving it away and then blaming China for that.
So you are okay with our businesses using their cheap labor at the expense of US jobs?Business wants the cheap labor and the 1.5 billion people market. Tariffs do not change that.
yadda yadda yadda, keep spouting those democrat talking points without any proof, total bullshit.1. I support the democrat's "fix" for SS, as long as it is paid for.1. No, I refer to expanded Social Security -- in other words, not austerity cuts but boosting benefits.....1. I think you refer to "Medicare for all", not expanded SS.and that is fair....I voted for Trump twice. I like his "promises kept" list.Obama ran on Change. He was not. Trump ran on changing . He did not.
I understand voting for Obama the first time. I do not the second. I understand people voting for Trump the first time. I do not the second.
Once you realize the person you thought knew what he was doing just turned out to be another liar, dump them.
His personality sucks, but I agree with most of his policies, except for the personal tax cut.
The democrats have no policies that I agree with.
and that doesn't mean Democrats are evil and want to rape all of your kids just because they want to expand Social Security and make sure everyone has adequate healthcare...
But, if you were honest.........it seems for the past 3 or 4 republican presidential campaigns/administrations --- the views of those who once supported them have not aged well......do you think the same will be said with Trump years from now??
Will people open up and be more honest about it or will they continue to claim he was the greatest leader in human history like they do now?
View attachment 442185
2. Healthcare needs to be paid for, its not free. More and better jobs with healthcare is the answer.
3. IMHO Trump's new "populism" is here to stay, replacing "conservatism", which is another name for "protect the wealthy".
4. What does "open up and be more honest" even mean?? We will vote for the populist candidates over the socialist candidates. Simple.
2. Healthcare is paid for, it is not free....but health insurance is a parasitic unnecessary middle man that inflates costs for the purpose of a profit motive, period....ALSO, if Trump came out in favor of M4A -- Trumpers will instantly support it because that is what Trumpers always do....i.e $2000 stimulus checks that they initially called socialist...
3. Trump isn't a populist if his policies are not populist -- his policies are the same ole conservative policies...tax cuts for the rich or as you called it "protect the wealthy" -- Trump does as many other GOP politicians before him did (Pat Buchanan, Newt Gingrich, etc) -- they manipulate and prey on the frustrations, fear and ignorance of their base and tell them the reason things are the way are is because of the "others" and other culture war BS...
4. Open up and be more honest means simply this.....instead of waiting until after it is clear a certain administration or candidate was a disaster -- say it when you see it....it's easy for folks to say "I always knew Bush was a moron, globalist, blah, blah, blah) -- there is a reason current day Trumpers claim to hate their last 4 presidential nominees, even tho policy wise, Trump has passed the same policies they did....
Since there aren't many digital receipts from the Bush years, lots of current day Trumpers pretend they were not equally onboard with Bush from 2000 to 2007 or so....that bothers me because I was old enough to remember the Bush years -- I remember being called a traitor and a terrorist because I didn't buy into the Saddam was behind 9/11, gung-ho Iraq war bullshit....I am old enough to remember people just going along with it just to avoid being called these things....
Then after the smoke clears and the dust settled -- now these same people want to rewrite history and pretend they knew all along it was BS....if only they were honest about it then
That is more than the GOP put forward. Without a fix, SS is insolvent ~2030.
Democrats Push Plan to Increase Social Security Benefits and Solvency (Published 2019)
More than 200 members of Congress are supporting a bill that would increase payroll taxes to shore up Social Security and increase benefits for retirees.www.nytimes.com
Someone also needs to fix Medicare, or it will be bankrupt in 2026.
2. The big question is, do you really want the government running your healthcare? My answer is NO. Just imagine "Lois Lerner" in-charge of your access to healthcare. Sorry, your access is denied, Mr. Republican.
3. Agree that the tax cuts were a bad idea, but the GOP always sucks for shekels. That said, Trump's tariffs are not "globalist", Trump's efforts to bring back manufacturing are not globalist. The pandemic showed how dependent we are on China for medical PPP among other necessities. Culture War? Like destroying statues of the Founding Fathers? Like "Critical Race Theory"? Like "defund the police"?
4. You missed the original binary choice.
Trump or Hillary
Biden or Trump
GOP or Kamala, etc.
I'm very old, and I can't remember a time when a choice wasn't a "lesser of the evils" choice. You need to hold your nose and vote for someone.
The EVIL of which you speak is superfluous, only one of those named in your post is truly EVIL, and that is Donald J. Trump.
Trump has destroyed many lives, their careers and the death of their loved ones based on putting his wants and needs first. He has alienated our allies, weakened our nation's standing as the longest living and lasting democratic republic in world history, and abused the highest office of trust and divided out nation into tribes, one of which vandalized our nation's capitol.
So you are okay with our businesses using their cheap labor at the expense of US jobs?Business wants the cheap labor and the 1.5 billion people market. Tariffs do not change that.
Businesses want their 1.5 billion people market. I suppose so, but at what cost? Why would Chinese pay more for US made goods? If those US goods are actually made in China, why would they bother with the US company to begin with, they can make it on their own.
Then of course there is the fact that any business trying to sell their product in China must adhere to Chinese Communist censorship. Like media and entertainment, all have to kiss China’s ass, and impose the censorship of the CCP in order to be allowed in China. Like the NBA, where NBA owners and players are not allowed to criticize the CCP crackdown in Hong Kong, or to support pro-democracy protests. Of course only Mao ass-kissers on the left would support that.
Your idea of helping the poor is writing bigger welfare checksYou won't go along because those who want to address the corrupt businesses largely also want to help the poor.
Why would we care if other countries are buying cheap Chinese slave made shit? Their trade doesn’t hurt the US, it only hurts their own industries. The US should be leading by example. We should be moving away from dependence on China, not embracing more of it.
Your idea of helping the poor is writing bigger welfare checks
which only prolongs their misery
I want go put them to work
Your idea of helping the poor is writing bigger welfare checksYou won't go along because those who want to address the corrupt businesses largely also want to help the poor.
which only prolongs their misery
I want go put them to work
Things would have changed under Ron Paul, which is why he was ignored by the pressNonsenseChina kicked his ass.
it was quislings like you seeking the lowest possible price that empowered china and handcuffed America
from you Bloomberg link celebrating the growing trade deficit with china:
” Once China got the virus under control, demand for medical equipment and work-from-home gear expanded its trade surplus with the U.S. despite the levies.”
instead of US companies investing in America by making those products here they prefered to buy from china instead
So you note that nothing changed under Trump? Bravo. That has ALWAYS been the problem. The only way to address that is to address the businesses themselves. You expect China to turn business away? Also, these products bought from China are from US companies.
You see, those whom the media is preoccupied with, like Trump, should be viewed with suspicion because as the saying goes, any press is good press in terms of selling people to the public.
Things would have changed. It wasn't the press that ignored him. It was the electorate.
Nope. If you watched the video you would see that even though Ron Paul came in second or even first in certain primary states, he was completely ignored. They talked around him.
I submit that without help from the press, you can't win an election.
Our democracy is only as good as what the media wants.
The media didn't want Trump.
I disagree -- the media wanted Trump in so far as the media gave Trump more free airtime than any candidate in history.....I remember the 20 to 30 minutes the media would focus their cameras on an empty podium waiting for Trump to come out and say shit that they can feign outrage over...
The media just didn't think the country would dumb enough to vote Trump -- which is funny because it was the media who helped dumb those people down in the first place
They gave him all kinds of air time. That doesn't mean they wanted him. They figured that covering the clown show would help Hillary. It didn't because she was that bad.
No, they figured covering the clown show will get them eyeballs and they were right......
They also made sure to make a big deal of Hillary's emails and other made up scandals -- for the purposes of eye balls.....
It wasn't a made up scandal. It was an actual scandal.
Honestly, the media is insulated either way -- which is why they remain so dedicated to the bullshit "both sides do it" narrative....
It's harder to sell Viagra pills and reverse mortgages to 50% of people if you tell them they are the problem...
Are you arguing that the media shouldn't cover the lead candidate or scandals?
I think he didTrump changed nothing.
Things would have changed under Ron Paul, which is why he was ignored by the pressNonsenseChina kicked his ass.
it was quislings like you seeking the lowest possible price that empowered china and handcuffed America
from you Bloomberg link celebrating the growing trade deficit with china:
” Once China got the virus under control, demand for medical equipment and work-from-home gear expanded its trade surplus with the U.S. despite the levies.”
instead of US companies investing in America by making those products here they prefered to buy from china instead
So you note that nothing changed under Trump? Bravo. That has ALWAYS been the problem. The only way to address that is to address the businesses themselves. You expect China to turn business away? Also, these products bought from China are from US companies.
You see, those whom the media is preoccupied with, like Trump, should be viewed with suspicion because as the saying goes, any press is good press in terms of selling people to the public.
Things would have changed. It wasn't the press that ignored him. It was the electorate.
Nope. If you watched the video you would see that even though Ron Paul came in second or even first in certain primary states, he was completely ignored. They talked around him.
I submit that without help from the press, you can't win an election.
Our democracy is only as good as what the media wants.
The media didn't want Trump.
I disagree -- the media wanted Trump in so far as the media gave Trump more free airtime than any candidate in history.....I remember the 20 to 30 minutes the media would focus their cameras on an empty podium waiting for Trump to come out and say shit that they can feign outrage over...
The media just didn't think the country would dumb enough to vote Trump -- which is funny because it was the media who helped dumb those people down in the first place
They gave him all kinds of air time. That doesn't mean they wanted him. They figured that covering the clown show would help Hillary. It didn't because she was that bad.
No, they figured covering the clown show will get them eyeballs and they were right......
They also made sure to make a big deal of Hillary's emails and other made up scandals -- for the purposes of eye balls.....
It wasn't a made up scandal. It was an actual scandal.
Honestly, the media is insulated either way -- which is why they remain so dedicated to the bullshit "both sides do it" narrative....
It's harder to sell Viagra pills and reverse mortgages to 50% of people if you tell them they are the problem...
Are you arguing that the media shouldn't cover the lead candidate or scandals?
If the shit we have willfully normalized during the Trump years as "Trump being Trump" -- then yes, Hillary's emails are a made up scandal....
And the media shouldn't cover the news as "Candidate A wants to overthrow a free and fair election by inciting an insurrectionist siege of the Capitol" -- "Candidate B said something about nice about the black lives matter movement" --- guess both sides are the same....
They aren't