Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ignore ToddsterParrot.. the Trolling Riddler with non sequitur one-line ??? 'answers.'We have evidence this century it does, cum-wipe.
I'm with you with the first paragraph. I even said the same thing. But, the second paragraph, not a chance. Like I said, in submarines, they pump in 8,000ppm. The mass extinctions were the asteroid's that hit the earth. Perhaps that created high levels of CO2. but mainly it caused no sunlight to get in and the plants died off and the food chain disappeared. More CO2 caused more plant life which helps the food change in many ways. One, there is more creatures and second, the creatures are bigger. There have been times where the parts per million was way more than it is now and the world didn't die off. In fact, there were times where the CO2 was 17,000ppm where polar caps were part green and the desserts didn't exist.*Anything* can be a pollutant if there's too much of it. If you drink too much water in a short period of time, you'll throw off your electrolyte balance and go into shock. Yet you can't go without it for more than a few days.
There's too much CO2 being pumped into the atmosphere. The oceans take in about 90% of it, but it can only do so much. Past extinction events correlate with CO2 levels, except for the first-ever mass extinction of single-cell organisms in what is referred to as the "snowball Earth" period, when our biosphere got its first dose of massive amounts of oxygen.
Which have induced CO2. What's your fucking point again, tard?
We have evidence this century it does, cum-wipe.
www.nbcnews.com
Ignore ToddsterParrot.. the Trolling Riddler with non sequitur one-line ??? 'answers.'
He can't discuss AGW/Climate change, just bust your balls with deflecting question marks/8 word BS replies.
EMH is
Mentally
Ill.
They both should be IGNORED along with high-frequency/gratuitous/no-content/7 word 'jc456.'
`
So what wiped out the dinosaurs, the asteroid hit or Co2??
I'm with you with the first paragraph.
But, the second paragraph, not a chance. Like I said, in submarines, they pump in 8,000ppm. The mass extinctions were the asteroid's that hit the earth.
Perhaps that created high levels of CO2. but mainly it caused no sunlight to get in and the plants died off and the food chain disappeared.
I think he had a moment of liberal delusion. Back then, the parts per million was in the thousands. The plants were huge as were the bugs and all manner of life. These people start on fabrication that turns into another and another and another until they can’t keep all the lie’s straight and get totally confused!So what wiped out the dinosaurs, the asteroid hit or Co2??
I think he had a moment of liberal delusion. Back then, the parts per million was in the thousands. The plants were huge as were the bugs and all manner of life. These people start on fabrication that turns into another and another and another until they can’t keep all the lie’s straight and get totally confused!
More and more delusional attempts to justify the fabrications of global warming. Of course, we know that global warming, climate change is just a cover for the old population control genocidal maniacsSorry, fag. You lose.
CO2 in the Cretaceous/dinosaurs was app 1000 PPM.I think he had a moment of liberal delusion. Back then, the parts per million was in the thousands. The plants were huge as were the bugs and all manner of life. These people start on fabrication that turns into another and another and another until they can’t keep all the lie’s straight and get totally confused!
It was probably both.
And there were No Ice poles
Okay.
Most mass extinctions are related to CO2 levels. The Permian extinction event was worse than the Cretaceous event. Likely due to volcanism. Same with the end-Triassic.
Nope, lol.
Dinosaur-killing asteroid did not trigger a long 'nuclear winter' after all
Global temperatures did not plummet in the aftermath of the asteroid impact that caused the demise of the dinosaurs, a new study suggests.www.livescience.com
Lots more tasty information provided in that link.Using the ISS as an example with ~950 m3 interior volume, a crew of seven astronauts (with moderate activity) is expected to produce a volume of 8.4 m3 of CO2 gas per day. Left uncontrolled, the ISS atmosphere would reach 0.09% CO2 concentration in 24 hours. Empirically, this does not happen in the ISS environment presumably because the astronauts are not working against gravity and produce only about 1 kg CO2 per day. Regardless, the closed environment requires removal of CO2 and supplementation of O2.
Anyone who isn’t a slave to Fix News and News Max.There's too much CO2 being pumped into the atmosphere.
What's "too much"? How do you know?
You said you gave hundreds. You gave nothing. The only reference from a denier we’ve seen, disproves what they claimed because they were to dumb to read it. It was hilarious.I gave you one. I can give you a hundred references. You gave me none. so, who's the Bozo, Bozo?
No, you have no clue how to debate or even have a discussion. You are a libertard and incapable of such things.
I do.You don’t debate.
Because that's in complete agreement with your first assertion.So why say you don’t want to get into a debate?
I think he's looking for someone to come back at him in a similar manner. If you're not up for that...You are the tyrannist that shuts down debate.
For this argument, what does it matter if he's left, right or center? This is a question of science, not politics.The leftist that sees no wrong in lying to get your way.
It's not, but it does help with getting all parties in a debate to agree on the meaning of terms.The dictionary is not a science book.
Because it is now changing due to human actions and is changing faster than at any time in millions of years and has already taken us into conditions that the human species has NEVER experienced before.The climate has always changed. So what?
CO2 does not help animals live and grow really big. And all the plants and animals on Earth did quite well for millions and millions of years on CO2 that never went above 300 ppm. We're currently at 420 ppm. A pollutant is a harmful or dangerous contaminant. Science is not trying to get humanity to control our CO2 output due to its toxicity but to it's function in the greenhouse effect.It will change tomorrow too. CO2 is not a pollutant. Pollutants kill plants and animals. CO2 helps plants and animals live and grow really big!
I did not see your reference either but I could have missed it. What did it say? Could you possibly link to it again?I gave you references and you did not. So dufus fish lips, you want to debate, then debate. Take a class in it first.
based on what? can two CO2 Molecules in the atmosphere warm each other?CO2 levels approaching 1000 ppm is a mass-extinction event, guaranteed
Read the reference provided.based on what? can two CO2 Molecules in the atmosphere warm each other?
news.climate.columbia.edu
