How Ginny Thomas Proves Judge Jackson Can't Be Trusted On The Supreme Court

I guess it should not be a surprise that an examination of Ginny Thomas's texts between herself and Trump's Chief of Staff reveals she is a Q-tard. Mark Meadows did nothing to dissuade her from her whackjob beliefs. In fact, he kept blessing her.

When Meadows wrote to Thomas on Nov. 24, the White House chief of staff invoked God to describe the effort to overturn the election. “This is a fight of good versus evil,” Meadows wrote. “Evil always looks like the victor until the King of Kings triumphs. Do not grow weary in well doing. The fight continues. I have staked my career on it. Well at least my time in DC on it.”

Thomas replied: “Thank you!! Needed that! This plus a conversation with my best friend just now… I will try to keep holding on. America is worth it!”


[snip]

Ginni Thomas, in that interview, also acknowledged that she had attended Trump’s “Stop the Steal” rally at the Ellipse near the White House on Jan. 6, but said that she left early because it was too cold and that she did not have any role in planning the event.


[snip]

In February 2021, when the Supreme Court rejected election challenges filed by Trump and his allies, Thomas wrote in a dissent that it was “baffling” and “inexplicable” that the majority had decided against hearing the cases because he believed the Supreme Court should provide states with guidance for future elections.


Ginny goes full batshit:

“The intense pressures you and our President are now experiencing are more intense than Anything Experienced (but I only felt a fraction of it in 1991),” Thomas wrote to Meadows on Nov. 19, an apparent reference to Justice Thomas’s 1991 confirmation hearings in which lawyer Anita Hill testified that he had made unwanted sexual comments when he was her boss. Thomas strongly denied the accusations.
The first of the 29 messages between Ginni Thomas and Meadows was sent on Nov. 5, two days after the election. She sent him a link to a YouTube video labeled “TRUMP STING w CIA Director Steve Pieczenik, The Biggest Election Story in History, QFS-BLOCKCHAIN.”

Pieczenik, a former State Department official, is a far-right commentator who has falsely claimed that the 2012 massacre at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn., was a “false-flag” operation to push a gun-control agenda.

The video Thomas shared with Meadows is no longer available on YouTube. But Thomas wrote to Meadows, “I hope this is true; never heard anything like this before, or even a hint of it. Possible???”

“Watermarked ballots in over 12 states have been part of a huge Trump & military white hat sting operation in 12 key battleground states,” she wrote.

During that period, supporters of the QAnon extremist ideology embraced a false theory that Trump had watermarked mail-in ballots so he could track potential fraud. “Watch the water” was a refrain in QAnon circles at the time.

In the Nov. 5 message to Meadows, Thomas went on to quote a passage that had circulated on right-wing websites: “Biden crime family & ballot fraud co-conspirators (elected officials, bureaucrats, social media censorship mongers, fake stream media reporters, etc) are being arrested & detained for ballot fraud right now & over coming days, & will be living in barges off GITMO to face military tribunals for sedition.”

:cuckoo::cuckoo::cuckoo::spinner::spinner::spinner:


I've read most of this... haven't found anything

batsh*** yet

except in the person claiming it is there



+
 
A simple answer from the candidate would have sufficed and the woman refused to answer that question. Any judge better be able to answer simple questions as to what is a female aka woman and what is a male aka man.
That's not a simple question. It's a political gotcha question. She's not that stupid, but Blackburn is for asking it.
 
If they are illegally handled, then they are not legally cast.

What a fucking moron
How does the handling of the ballots, change whether or not they were legally cast. You're saying their status can be retroactively changed, based on occurrences after the ballot was cast, signed and sealed. By the actions of actors outside of the voters control.

This is no different than a requirement that mail-in votes have a legible postmark. And an unscrupulous election worker with a sharpie goes around defacing the postmarks on stacks of ballots.

Does that make them invalid?
 
I see that you anti-Christ fascist are out in full force against someone else's right to have their own faith and beliefs. Even the spouses of SCOTUS members have rights too.

Nobody has said she is not allowed to be bat shit crazy.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: BWK
Ha everybody, I'm at stop the steal rally to support the Jan. 6th big lie with my QANON buddies, who will attack the Capitol, and guess what? My husband is a wind up doll on the supreme court. Ya!!!!!!! 🤪 🤪 🤪 🤪
Any more racist comments today?
 

Forum List

Back
Top