How many countries can we migrate to and get paid to have babies?

This is a serious question. Are we the only suckers?
We hear Lefties complain nonstop about how folks don’t get enough free shit here...Are they happy with how we ‘take care’ of the worlds poor?
$20 trillion in debt....do we keep saving the world?
Is it time to strongly consider a constitutional amendment?

The premise of this thread is false .

How so...explain?
 
This is a serious question. Are we the only suckers?
We hear Lefties complain nonstop about how folks don’t get enough free shit here...Are they happy with how we ‘take care’ of the worlds poor?
$20 trillion in debt....do we keep saving the world?
Is it time to strongly consider a constitutional amendment?
Only socialism does that; capitalism is about being, natural.

Lousy management accounts for the rest. We could be making money instead of losing money. The right wing is willing to eschew applied capitalism for their socialism on a national basis, If and Only if, the Poor may Benefit.
 
This is a serious question. Are we the only suckers?
We hear Lefties complain nonstop about how folks don’t get enough free shit here...Are they happy with how we ‘take care’ of the worlds poor?
$20 trillion in debt....do we keep saving the world?
Is it time to strongly consider a constitutional amendment?
If it's such a serious question, then research it yourself.
duh duh
what do you think forums are for?
 
This is a serious question. Are we the only suckers?
We hear Lefties complain nonstop about how folks don’t get enough free shit here...Are they happy with how we ‘take care’ of the worlds poor?
$20 trillion in debt....do we keep saving the world?
Is it time to strongly consider a constitutional amendment?

The premise of this thread is false .

How so...explain?

When you immigrate to the US you have a sponcer (usually family via chain immigration) . They are responsible for you and you can’t be eligible for welfare for a number of years .
 
Change the amendment to anyone born in the US has to have at least one parent a US citizen to be recognized as a US citizen.

That would get rid of loads of the illegals sucking off our welfare system. Get rid of the anchor baby bullshit and they would get nothing.

no----because it is inhumane

Is it humane for people to enter countries illegally and FORCE the native people to pay for the invaders kids?

the issue comes down to .......<are you ready? > CHILDREN ---or, even just
SICK people. We of the USA are a moral people------we do not withhold food or
medical care from the hungry and the sick

Government taking the property of peaceful people by force and "redistributing" is "moral" ? Does theft magically become moral when government does it ?

If "We of the USA" were a moral people then we'd hold government to the same moral standards that individuals are held to but we don't, because we're not a "moral people" , we're a bunch of sheep gorging ourselves on propaganda and cognitive dissonance.

yes-----taxes used to PROMOTE THE GENERAL WELFARE OF THE PEOPLE----
is moral and constitutional
LOL, it's neither....

One *might* be able to formulate a credible case that voluntarily giving up one's property to help another (aka charity) is moral but only in some alternate Machiavellian "ends justify the means" universe would any rational being attempt to justify forcibly taking one persons property and giving it to another (aka extortion) as moral.

------as a kid you should have learned the preamble
As a kid you should have learned the purpose and legal standing of the preamble, here's a clue; it's a statement of purpose not a component of the transfer of authority from the states to the federal government; which should be obvious to anyone that pays enough attention to grasp the fact that "promote the general welfare" can mean anything those in power want it to.

Like I said... a nation of sheeple gorging on propaganda and cognitive dissonance, no wonder the Republic is in such dire straits, if we were a "moral people" as you claimed then there would be no need to resort to extortion to help the truly needy. :rolleyes:
 
Why doesn’t congress pass laws so only citizens can collect?

I'm not sure if you are serious, or not but guessing you are being facetious. We already have laws against it, but the illegals steal people's identites, and SS#'s to get benefits. Guess what? If they have kids, they get more $$$!

Change the amendment to anyone born in the US has to have at least one parent a US citizen to be recognized as a US citizen.

That would get rid of loads of the illegals sucking off our welfare system. Get rid of the anchor baby bullshit and they would get nothing.

no----because it is inhumane

Is it humane for people to enter countries illegally and FORCE the native people to pay for the invaders kids?

the issue comes down to .......<are you ready? > CHILDREN ---or, even just
SICK people. We of the USA are a moral people------we do not withhold food or
medical care from the hungry and the sick
cry me a river
F**K the illegals
if they died of starvation/heat/etc, I would not shed a tear
 
I'm not sure if you are serious, or not but guessing you are being facetious. We already have laws against it, but the illegals steal people's identites, and SS#'s to get benefits. Guess what? If they have kids, they get more $$$!

Change the amendment to anyone born in the US has to have at least one parent a US citizen to be recognized as a US citizen.

That would get rid of loads of the illegals sucking off our welfare system. Get rid of the anchor baby bullshit and they would get nothing.

no----because it is inhumane

Is it humane for people to enter countries illegally and FORCE the native people to pay for the invaders kids?

the issue comes down to .......<are you ready? > CHILDREN ---or, even just
SICK people. We of the USA are a moral people------we do not withhold food or
medical care from the hungry and the sick
cry me a river
F**K the illegals
if they died of starvation/heat/etc, I would not shed a tear

not nice
 
Change the amendment to anyone born in the US has to have at least one parent a US citizen to be recognized as a US citizen.

That would get rid of loads of the illegals sucking off our welfare system. Get rid of the anchor baby bullshit and they would get nothing.

no----because it is inhumane

Is it humane for people to enter countries illegally and FORCE the native people to pay for the invaders kids?

the issue comes down to .......<are you ready? > CHILDREN ---or, even just
SICK people. We of the USA are a moral people------we do not withhold food or
medical care from the hungry and the sick
cry me a river
F**K the illegals
if they died of starvation/heat/etc, I would not shed a tear

not nice
---it's not nice for them to come here and screw over American children--and that's what they are doing
---
 
Change the amendment to anyone born in the US has to have at least one parent a US citizen to be recognized as a US citizen.

That would get rid of loads of the illegals sucking off our welfare system. Get rid of the anchor baby bullshit and they would get nothing.

no----because it is inhumane

Is it humane for people to enter countries illegally and FORCE the native people to pay for the invaders kids?

the issue comes down to .......<are you ready? > CHILDREN ---or, even just
SICK people. We of the USA are a moral people------we do not withhold food or
medical care from the hungry and the sick
cry me a river
F**K the illegals
if they died of starvation/heat/etc, I would not shed a tear

not nice
o--and another thing--nice guys finish last
 
no----because it is inhumane

Is it humane for people to enter countries illegally and FORCE the native people to pay for the invaders kids?

the issue comes down to .......<are you ready? > CHILDREN ---or, even just
SICK people. We of the USA are a moral people------we do not withhold food or
medical care from the hungry and the sick

Government taking the property of peaceful people by force and "redistributing" is "moral" ? Does theft magically become moral when government does it ?

If "We of the USA" were a moral people then we'd hold government to the same moral standards that individuals are held to but we don't, because we're not a "moral people" , we're a bunch of sheep gorging ourselves on propaganda and cognitive dissonance.

yes-----taxes used to PROMOTE THE GENERAL WELFARE OF THE PEOPLE----
is moral and constitutional
LOL, it's neither....

One *might* be able to formulate a credible case that voluntarily giving up one's property to help another (aka charity) is moral but only in some alternate Machiavellian "ends justify the means" universe would any rational being attempt to justify forcibly taking one persons property and giving it to another (aka extortion) as moral.

------as a kid you should have learned the preamble
As a kid you should have learned the purpose and legal standing of the preamble, here's a clue; it's a statement of purpose not a component of the transfer of authority from the states to the federal government; which should be obvious to anyone that pays enough attention to grasp the fact that "promote the general welfare" can mean anything those in power want it to.

Like I said... a nation of sheeple gorging on propaganda and cognitive dissonance, no wonder the Republic is in such dire straits, if we were a "moral people" as you claimed then there would be no need to resort to extortion to help the truly needy. :rolleyes:
It is not Your money if we have any problems in our Republic; that is why Congress is delegated the Power to Tax. Keep whining, right wingers.
 
This is a serious question. Are we the only suckers?
We hear Lefties complain nonstop about how folks don’t get enough free shit here...Are they happy with how we ‘take care’ of the worlds poor?
$20 trillion in debt....do we keep saving the world?
Is it time to strongly consider a constitutional amendment?
we don't need an amendment; the power to provide for the common defense and general welfare is already there.

There is no power delegated to provide for the common offense or general warfare, without the necessary and proper tax rates, to ensure successful and faithful execution of our own laws.
 
Why doesn’t congress pass laws so only citizens can collect?

I'm not sure if you are serious, or not but guessing you are being facetious. We already have laws against it, but the illegals steal people's identites, and SS#'s to get benefits. Guess what? If they have kids, they get more $$$!
According to my son restaurant manager
illegals work harder show up on time than our good old uneducated white boys.
May increase the average I q of the nation too
 
This is a serious question. Are we the only suckers?
We hear Lefties complain nonstop about how folks don’t get enough free shit here...Are they happy with how we ‘take care’ of the worlds poor?
$20 trillion in debt....do we keep saving the world?
Is it time to strongly consider a constitutional amendment?

F'n RW's are happy to spend trillions of dollars so Mohammed can have a purple thumb AND bitch about Mexicans having kids here.


the stupid shits are bonkers ..
 
Have not read thread but probably none other than USA
It's OK to let a soft heart blend into your actions but when liberals run things soft hearted becomes soft headed
The USA is not the planets charity stop.
 
Why doesn’t congress pass laws so only citizens can collect?

I'm not sure if you are serious, or not but guessing you are being facetious. We already have laws against it, but the illegals steal people's identites, and SS#'s to get benefits. Guess what? If they have kids, they get more $$$!
Garbage, learn how to spell.
Would you walk 2000 miles to get here?
They have way more initiative than native ignoramuses.
Immigrants have always had more balls and energy than natives.
Always been that way, Germans, Irish etc
Know that Muslims here have higher Ed and pay than our white boys?
 
Why doesn’t congress pass laws so only citizens can collect?

I'm not sure if you are serious, or not but guessing you are being facetious. We already have laws against it, but the illegals steal people's identites, and SS#'s to get benefits. Guess what? If they have kids, they get more $$$!
According to my son restaurant manager
illegals work harder show up on time than our good old uneducated white boys.
May increase the average I q of the nation too
Racist, semi literate and solid 3rd party heresay
 
no----because it is inhumane

Is it humane for people to enter countries illegally and FORCE the native people to pay for the invaders kids?

the issue comes down to .......<are you ready? > CHILDREN ---or, even just
SICK people. We of the USA are a moral people------we do not withhold food or
medical care from the hungry and the sick
cry me a river
F**K the illegals
if they died of starvation/heat/etc, I would not shed a tear

not nice
---it's not nice for them to come here and screw over American children--and that's what they are doing
---

Many of them have American children.

It’s not like being illegal is OK. But for the only reaction to be “get the F out” , that can be extreme in many examples.
 
So how much do illegals take?
Everybody picks their own numbers.
I think it's accepted that immigrants improve the economy.
Illegals pay SS taxes they will never see but us old white farts benefit
We are dying off, old white fart buddies.
Need young blood
 

Forum List

Back
Top