But there isn't absence of evidence. There are more than 24,000 written manuscripts.Which is why agnostic is the only thinking person's position, because absence of evidence isn't evidence. It's faith.
No, incorrect. Absence of evidence is evidence of absence, if there's enough of it.
If A sometimes implies B, and B _never_ happens after zillions of observations, then logic says we should conclude A is wrong.
Everyone acts that way for most things in their life. Some people just make a special exception to that common sense rule for the matter of religion, which isn't logical.
Well we have to be intellectually honest though and admit that those manuscripts were written by human beings as testimony to the living God. We have nothing that was literally penned by a deity.
But I have to smile at those posting writings by famous Atheists as being somehow authoritative on the subject when those 24,000 or however many there are manuscripts written by famous Christians are summarily dismissed as delusional fiction.