How Simple Is It To Hide The Truth....?

[NYcarbineer]

liberals control the media ... just another poor excuse to cover up how totally inept the right really is.

For your education:

1. The radicals of the sixties did not remain within the universities…They realized that the apocalypse never materialized. “…they were dropping off into environmentalism and consumerism and fatalism…I watched many of my old comrades apply to graduate school in universities they had failed to burn down, so they could get advanced degrees and spread the ideas that had been discredited in the streets under an academic cover.” Collier and Horowitz, “Destructive Generation: Second Thoughts About The Sixties,” p. 294-295.
2. “The radicals were not likely to go into business or the conventional practice of the professions. They were part of the chattering class, talkers interested in policy, politics, culture. They went into politics, print and electronic journalism, church bureaucracies, foundation staffs, Hollywood careers, public interest organizations, anywhere attitudes and opinions could be influenced. And they are exerting influence.” Robert H. Bork, “Slouching Toward Gomorrah,” p. 51
3. “[The radicals] did not go away or change their minds; the New Left shattered into a multitude of single-issue groups. We now have, to name a few, radical feminists, black extremists, animal rights groups, radical environmentalists, activist homosexual organizations, multiculturalists, organizations such as People for the American Way, the American Civil Liberties Union, the National Abortion Rights Action League (NARAL), the National Organization for Women (NOW), and Planned Parenthood.” Ibid p. 53

I guess you regret that conservatives didn't oppress liberals sufficiently in the last 30 years.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Try asking the OP what rights liberals have taken away from her that she wants back.

See if any of you have better luck getting any semblance of an answer.

 

[PoliticalChic]

liberals control the media ... just another poor excuse to cover up how totally inept the right really is.

For your education:

1. The radicals of the sixties did not remain within the universities…They realized that the apocalypse never materialized. “…they were dropping off into environmentalism and consumerism and fatalism…I watched many of my old comrades apply to graduate school in universities they had failed to burn down, so they could get advanced degrees and spread the ideas that had been discredited in the streets under an academic cover.” Collier and Horowitz, “Destructive Generation: Second Thoughts About The Sixties,” p. 294-295.
2. “The radicals were not likely to go into business or the conventional practice of the professions. They were part of the chattering class, talkers interested in policy, politics, culture. They went into politics, print and electronic journalism, church bureaucracies, foundation staffs, Hollywood careers, public interest organizations, anywhere attitudes and opinions could be influenced. And they are exerting influence.” Robert H. Bork, “Slouching Toward Gomorrah,” p. 51
3. “[The radicals] did not go away or change their minds; the New Left shattered into a multitude of single-issue groups. We now have, to name a few, radical feminists, black extremists, animal rights groups, radical environmentalists, activist homosexual organizations, multiculturalists, organizations such as People for the American Way, the American Civil Liberties Union, the National Abortion Rights Action League (NARAL), the National Organization for Women (NOW), and Planned Parenthood.” Ibid p. 53

for your information, I don't give a crap.

"...for your information, I don't give a crap."



Hmmm......the very same motto you evinced throughout your school career.

You serve as a warning to others.

 

[PoliticalChic]

liberals control the media ... just another poor excuse to cover up how totally inept the right really is.

For your education:

1. The radicals of the sixties did not remain within the universities…They realized that the apocalypse never materialized. “…they were dropping off into environmentalism and consumerism and fatalism…I watched many of my old comrades apply to graduate school in universities they had failed to burn down, so they could get advanced degrees and spread the ideas that had been discredited in the streets under an academic cover.” Collier and Horowitz, “Destructive Generation: Second Thoughts About The Sixties,” p. 294-295.
2. “The radicals were not likely to go into business or the conventional practice of the professions. They were part of the chattering class, talkers interested in policy, politics, culture. They went into politics, print and electronic journalism, church bureaucracies, foundation staffs, Hollywood careers, public interest organizations, anywhere attitudes and opinions could be influenced. And they are exerting influence.” Robert H. Bork, “Slouching Toward Gomorrah,” p. 51
3. “[The radicals] did not go away or change their minds; the New Left shattered into a multitude of single-issue groups. We now have, to name a few, radical feminists, black extremists, animal rights groups, radical environmentalists, activist homosexual organizations, multiculturalists, organizations such as People for the American Way, the American Civil Liberties Union, the National Abortion Rights Action League (NARAL), the National Organization for Women (NOW), and Planned Parenthood.” Ibid p. 53

Is this Glenn Beck regurgitating Ann Coulter?

Only the very dumbest imagine attacking the one who provided the message is equivalent to disputing the truth of the message itself.

Raise your paw.

 

[nat4900]

The left doesn't control the media.

Well, true....but lets give the O/P some "credit" for being honest in admitting that Fox and Rush and Levin, et al have NOTHING in common with media.

 

[nat4900]

Amazingly simple, when huge swaths of voters are trained to look at the truth and simply ignore it.
This is the result of Leftists control of the media and the education industry.
Sadly.

But.....holding up the fabrication and the truth together.....one can only hope that truth wills out.
Today.....the cage match between Dalton Trumbo and Joseph McCarthy.




1. There are dozens of Leftist propaganda lies that are purveyed by the Liberals, and Progressives....and, often, it is astoundingly simple to shred them.

Yet, all too often....their Janissaries, acolytes, Lock-Step cadres simply nod their empty heads and mutter "duh...yup,yup....."
...and accept the lies.
They wail "is not.....isss noottttttt!" and off they go.


One of the simplest fabrications to dismember is the slander and contumely heaped on the true American hero, Senator Joseph McCarthy.

The basis of the hatred is that he exposed the manufacturer of Liberal collectivism....Joseph Stalin, via his control of the Roosevelt administration.


This is the typical theme: "Senator Joseph McCarthy, the most prominent Communist-hunter of the period, was a reckless alcoholic demagogue. Unknown numbers of innocents had their lives ruined...."
McCarthyism & Red Scare

The unintended humor is the word 'unknown,' because there are no known "innocents whose lives were ruined..."



I said it was an easy lie to shred: When the vituperation begins.....all one has to do is ask the parrots to name one single innocent...meaning non-communist or supporter of Stalin, - whose life was "ruined" by Senator McCarthy.
When the debate is joined, I ask that very question.....and there has never been one such individual to be found.


Yet....the lie persists.



2. Recently, Leftist Hollywood attempted to raise Dalton Trumbo from the infamous, and hold him up as some hero of free speech and victim of 'the Hollywood Blacklist.'
They gave the lead actor, Bryan Cranston 'Best Actor' at the Academy Awards, proving that Hollywood is the either the home of Leftist propaganda and deserves its own award as "the Abode of Abject Stupidity."


Perhaps we can regain Senator McCarthy's reputation by turning the tables.....
Here's the plan: if Dalton Trumbo is a hero....then Joseph McCarthy is a villain.
But.....if Trumbo is a villain.......guess what?



3. The accolades for Trumbo suggests that this nation's elites see the American public as ignorant, easily led, drones.....and, unfortunately, the last presidential election seems to be proof of same.

"Hollywood relishes making anti-American movies, but maybe even more, loves to lavish fulsome tributes on full-blown Communists, those fellows who swooned at Joe Stalin’s feet, teamed up with Hitler as he bombed the hell out of London at the beginning of World War II and worked overtime to inflict deadly harm on America.


[In 1997, at] the Samuel Goldwyn Theater in Beverly Hills, ... Hollywood was honoring several long-time Stalinists, including Hollywood Ten celebrity Ring Lardner Jr. and the former head of the Communist Party in Hollywood, Paul Jarrico. They received First Amendment awards, no less, for refusing to tell the House Un-American Activities Committee whether they were conspiring with the Kremlin leader to impose a Soviet-style government in America.

Tinseltown is at it again, insisting that Dalton Trumbo, a major Hollywood Ten figure and longtime Stalin enthusiast, must, first and foremost, be honored as a courageous champion of our constitutional liberties." http://media.glennbeck.com/blaze/mag/august2015theblazemag.pdf


Hollywood, Leftist central.....and Dalton Trumbo is their champion.

Is there a tacit admission on your part that you belong to the group of LOSERS in not being able to control either the media or education????
(Especially the education segment since.....obviously.....you did not indulge in much of it.....LOL)

 

[DGS49]

(1) Few people under the age of 50 can even conceive of the kind of subversive mentality that drove the Communist Party USA in the years before the fall of the Soviet Union. American Communists both overtly and covertly supported the Soviet communists (mainly Stalin) and sought to BRING DOWN THE U.S. GOVERNMENT in a communist revolution similar to what occurred in Russia. It is not just a matter of being extremely Left-wing, politically, like Bernie Sanders. These people were actively taking orders from the Kremlin. Seriously. Check out the TV series, The Americans. This was no joke.

(2) Leftists control the media and academe because the individuals who seek out those careers share the Leftist arrogance of believing that The Population is ignorant, and requires education, instruction, and even compulsion to realize the great socialist dream of "from each according to his means; to each according to his needs." The fact that this philosophy has never worked anywhere on the planet (other than in a convent or a monastery) notwithstanding. People who actually want to produce something valuable or perform valuable services to make money have no interest in academe or media (or politics, for that matter).

(3) Dalton Trumbo was, in a sense, a "hero." He made a personal sacrifice for what he believed was the betterment of his community; that's what "heroism" is. The fact that he was mis-guided doesn't change the fact that he could have come out much better by simply lying and moving on with his life.

(4) All "advocacy," to one extent or another, emphasizes the facts that support the case, suppresses or ignores the facts that don't support the case, and interprets the "facts" in the manner most supportive of the case. Advocacy encompasses political campaigns, advertising, legal representation, union representation, sales presentations, and so on. Indeed, most forms of public communication constitute advocacy to a greater or lesser extent.

(5) When journalists pretend or claim to be "neutral," they are lying. Simple as that. The reason they became journalists was because they wanted to promote their own world view. Case in point: George Stefanopolous. Objective journalist? Are you serious?

I personally think "advocacy" is borderline unethical, but I'm on the losing side. Even when I'm selling something, I never fail to point out all the "bad stuff." Can't help myself.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Amazingly simple, when huge swaths of voters are trained to look at the truth and simply ignore it.
This is the result of Leftists control of the media and the education industry.
Sadly.

But.....holding up the fabrication and the truth together.....one can only hope that truth wills out.
Today.....the cage match between Dalton Trumbo and Joseph McCarthy.




1. There are dozens of Leftist propaganda lies that are purveyed by the Liberals, and Progressives....and, often, it is astoundingly simple to shred them.

Yet, all too often....their Janissaries, acolytes, Lock-Step cadres simply nod their empty heads and mutter "duh...yup,yup....."
...and accept the lies.
They wail "is not.....isss noottttttt!" and off they go.


One of the simplest fabrications to dismember is the slander and contumely heaped on the true American hero, Senator Joseph McCarthy.

The basis of the hatred is that he exposed the manufacturer of Liberal collectivism....Joseph Stalin, via his control of the Roosevelt administration.


This is the typical theme: "Senator Joseph McCarthy, the most prominent Communist-hunter of the period, was a reckless alcoholic demagogue. Unknown numbers of innocents had their lives ruined...."
McCarthyism & Red Scare

The unintended humor is the word 'unknown,' because there are no known "innocents whose lives were ruined..."



I said it was an easy lie to shred: When the vituperation begins.....all one has to do is ask the parrots to name one single innocent...meaning non-communist or supporter of Stalin, - whose life was "ruined" by Senator McCarthy.
When the debate is joined, I ask that very question.....and there has never been one such individual to be found.


Yet....the lie persists.



2. Recently, Leftist Hollywood attempted to raise Dalton Trumbo from the infamous, and hold him up as some hero of free speech and victim of 'the Hollywood Blacklist.'
They gave the lead actor, Bryan Cranston 'Best Actor' at the Academy Awards, proving that Hollywood is the either the home of Leftist propaganda and deserves its own award as "the Abode of Abject Stupidity."


Perhaps we can regain Senator McCarthy's reputation by turning the tables.....
Here's the plan: if Dalton Trumbo is a hero....then Joseph McCarthy is a villain.
But.....if Trumbo is a villain.......guess what?



3. The accolades for Trumbo suggests that this nation's elites see the American public as ignorant, easily led, drones.....and, unfortunately, the last presidential election seems to be proof of same.

"Hollywood relishes making anti-American movies, but maybe even more, loves to lavish fulsome tributes on full-blown Communists, those fellows who swooned at Joe Stalin’s feet, teamed up with Hitler as he bombed the hell out of London at the beginning of World War II and worked overtime to inflict deadly harm on America.


[In 1997, at] the Samuel Goldwyn Theater in Beverly Hills, ... Hollywood was honoring several long-time Stalinists, including Hollywood Ten celebrity Ring Lardner Jr. and the former head of the Communist Party in Hollywood, Paul Jarrico. They received First Amendment awards, no less, for refusing to tell the House Un-American Activities Committee whether they were conspiring with the Kremlin leader to impose a Soviet-style government in America.

Tinseltown is at it again, insisting that Dalton Trumbo, a major Hollywood Ten figure and longtime Stalin enthusiast, must, first and foremost, be honored as a courageous champion of our constitutional liberties." http://media.glennbeck.com/blaze/mag/august2015theblazemag.pdf


Hollywood, Leftist central.....and Dalton Trumbo is their champion.

Is there a tacit admission on your part that you belong to the group of LOSERS in not being able to control either the media or education????
(Especially the education segment since.....obviously.....you did not indulge in much of it.....LOL)

And yet another Leftist rushing in to verify this truth:

. "Principle is nothing to liberals. Winning is everything."
Coulter



"Especially the education segment since.....obviously.....you did not indulge in much of it.....LOL)"

Let me know when you are ready to compare your education with mine.

 

[nat4900]

And yet another Leftist rushing in to verify this truth:

. "Principle is nothing to liberals. Winning is everything."
Coulter

Quoting Coulter kind of speaks for itself about the individual who quotes that hate-filled nitwit, don't you think?

 

[PoliticalChic]

(1) Few people under the age of 50 can even conceive of the kind of subversive mentality that drove the Communist Party USA in the years before the fall of the Soviet Union. American Communists both overtly and covertly supported the Soviet communists (mainly Stalin) and sought to BRING DOWN THE U.S. GOVERNMENT in a communist revolution similar to what occurred in Russia. It is not just a matter of being extremely Left-wing, politically, like Bernie Sanders. These people were actively taking orders from the Kremlin. Seriously. Check out the TV series, The Americans. This was no joke.

(2) Leftists control the media and academe because the individuals who seek out those careers share the Leftist arrogance of believing that The Population is ignorant, and requires education, instruction, and even compulsion to realize the great socialist dream of "from each according to his means; to each according to his needs." The fact that this philosophy has never worked anywhere on the planet (other than in a convent or a monastery) notwithstanding. People who actually want to produce something valuable or perform valuable services to make money have no interest in academe or media (or politics, for that matter).

(3) Dalton Trumbo was, in a sense, a "hero." He made a personal sacrifice for what he believed was the betterment of his community; that's what "heroism" is. The fact that he was mis-guided doesn't change the fact that he could have come out much better by simply lying and moving on with his life.

(4) All "advocacy," to one extent or another, emphasizes the facts that support the case, suppresses or ignores the facts that don't support the case, and interprets the "facts" in the manner most supportive of the case. Advocacy encompasses political campaigns, advertising, legal representation, union representation, sales presentations, and so on. Indeed, most forms of public communication constitute advocacy to a greater or lesser extent.

(5) When journalists pretend or claim to be "neutral," they are lying. Simple as that. The reason they became journalists was because they wanted to promote their own world view. Case in point: George Stefanopolous. Objective journalist? Are you serious?

I personally think "advocacy" is borderline unethical, but I'm on the losing side. Even when I'm selling something, I never fail to point out all the "bad stuff." Can't help myself.

An excellent post.....except for this error:

"Dalton Trumbo was, in a sense, a "hero." He made a personal sacrifice..."


He made no sacrifice.

 

[PoliticalChic]

And yet another Leftist rushing in to verify this truth:

. "Principle is nothing to liberals. Winning is everything."
Coulter

Quoting Coulter kind of speaks for itself about the individual who quotes that hate-filled nitwit, don't you think?

How many of her dozen of so scholarly best sellers have you read....

....or does your post speak to your identity as a typical hot-air Liberal?

 

[NoNukes]

The left doesn't control the media.

It goes along with her rewriting history.

 

[PoliticalChic]

(1) Few people under the age of 50 can even conceive of the kind of subversive mentality that drove the Communist Party USA in the years before the fall of the Soviet Union. American Communists both overtly and covertly supported the Soviet communists (mainly Stalin) and sought to BRING DOWN THE U.S. GOVERNMENT in a communist revolution similar to what occurred in Russia. It is not just a matter of being extremely Left-wing, politically, like Bernie Sanders. These people were actively taking orders from the Kremlin. Seriously. Check out the TV series, The Americans. This was no joke.

(2) Leftists control the media and academe because the individuals who seek out those careers share the Leftist arrogance of believing that The Population is ignorant, and requires education, instruction, and even compulsion to realize the great socialist dream of "from each according to his means; to each according to his needs." The fact that this philosophy has never worked anywhere on the planet (other than in a convent or a monastery) notwithstanding. People who actually want to produce something valuable or perform valuable services to make money have no interest in academe or media (or politics, for that matter).

(3) Dalton Trumbo was, in a sense, a "hero." He made a personal sacrifice for what he believed was the betterment of his community; that's what "heroism" is. The fact that he was mis-guided doesn't change the fact that he could have come out much better by simply lying and moving on with his life.

(4) All "advocacy," to one extent or another, emphasizes the facts that support the case, suppresses or ignores the facts that don't support the case, and interprets the "facts" in the manner most supportive of the case. Advocacy encompasses political campaigns, advertising, legal representation, union representation, sales presentations, and so on. Indeed, most forms of public communication constitute advocacy to a greater or lesser extent.

(5) When journalists pretend or claim to be "neutral," they are lying. Simple as that. The reason they became journalists was because they wanted to promote their own world view. Case in point: George Stefanopolous. Objective journalist? Are you serious?

I personally think "advocacy" is borderline unethical, but I'm on the losing side. Even when I'm selling something, I never fail to point out all the "bad stuff." Can't help myself.

About that 'sacrifice'.....


6. Contrary to the images brought up by the term 'Blacklist', those Hollywood communists 'suffered'....sort of, like this:


a. From “blacklist survivor” Norma Barzman about her ‘exile’ in Paris:
“We had dinner with Picassoevery Tuesday night when we were at our country house in Provence. It was hard, but it was the time of my life.” (Dennis Hamilton, “Keeper of the Flame: A Blacklist Survivor,”Los Angeles Times, October 3, 2000)

The horror, the horror.




b. Let's see what the poor victims had to go through.

'When anti-communism took its toll in Hollywood, the blacklisting took the “deadly” form of not having ones name in the credits, or living in Paris, or not being able to sell a teleplay for as much as three years. This for folks who had no problem with Ukrainian farmers and their children eating their shoes.'
Coulter






7. How about that poor, suffering Dalton Trumbo?

"At the 1957 AcademyAwards,Robert Richwon the Oscar for best original story of 1956 forThe Brave One(1956). Rich was not present to accept theaward, which was accepted on his behalf byJesse Lasky Jr.of the Screen Writers Guild."
Dalton Trumbo - Biography - IMDb


Remember this? "..... andspent a lot of dark days on the blacklist, meaning he couldn’t openly workfor the studios because he refused to tell a congressional committee whether or not he was a party member."


Of course, 'Robert Rich' was none other than the 'suffering' Dalton Trumbo....the poor, poor "victim" whose "suffering" amounted to having to write under a nom de plume....for enormous paychecks.




Turns out 'hand-wringing' for poor Dalton is unnecessary.

 

[NYcarbineer]

The left doesn't control the media.

It goes along with her rewriting history.

If liberals controlled the media, would AM political talk radio be almost all conservative?

 

[PoliticalChic]

The left doesn't control the media.

It goes along with her rewriting history.

Is this your attempt to brag about finally learning how to write cursive???

 

[NYcarbineer]

The left doesn't control the media.

It goes along with her rewriting history.

If conservatives think liberals control the tv networks, CBS, NBC, ABC, whatever, why don't conservatives just buy them out?
Why don't conservatives just start 3 competing networks, and make them as conservative as they want?

Less crying, more trying.

 

[NYcarbineer]

The left doesn't control the media.

It goes along with her rewriting history.

Is this your attempt to brag about finally learning how to write cursive???

I see you don't deny his charge that you're trying to rewrite history.

 

[Moonglow]

This is the result of Leftists control of the media and the education industry.
Sadly.

Yes, sadly, two lies that evidently she thought were hidden..

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

The left doesn't control the media.

1) In 2008 85% of media donated money to Democrats!
1,160 (85%) of the 1,353 of the Senior executives, on-air personalities, producers, reporters, editors, writers and other self-identifying employees of ABC, CBS and NBC contributed more than $1 million to Democrats candidates and campaign committees in 2008, according to an analysis by The Examiner of data compiled by the Center for Responsive Politics.
Obama, Democrats got 88 percent of 2008 contributions by TV network execs, writers, reporters

And then the MSM responded to Romney with these BIASED stories.
2) 130,213 stories can't be swept under the rug that show that the Democrat Bias is very evident!
Study of 130,213 stories shows Obama bias in 2012 election BY PAUL BEDARD | MARCH 16, 2015 | 10:49 AM
A sweeping study of some 130,213 news articles on the 2012 presidential match between President Obama and Mitt Romney has proven anew
that there was a strong pro-Democratic bias in the U.S. and international press.
The study, published in the authoritative journal Big Data Society, also tested the campaign themes the media focused on and determined that Obama succeeded in stealing the economic issue from Republican Romney.
"Overall, media reporting contained more frequently positive statements about the Democrats than the Republicans.
Overall, the Republicans were more frequently the object of negative statements," wrote the study authors, Their conclusion:
"The Republican Party is the most divisive subject in the campaign, and is portrayed in a more negative fashion than the Democrats."
Paul Bedard, the Washington Examiner's "Washington Secrets" columnist, can be contacted at [email protected].
Smooch: Study of 130,213 stories shows Obama bias in 2012 election

Did you just notice how NYCarbinated just ignored your FACTS? I repeat myself, by posting picture once again.

View attachment 66630

His facts don't prove anything.

Let's start here:

Who controls AM radio?

Up to the 1990's there was NO alternative news source, the big 3 American Broadcasting Communists(ABC), National Broadcasting Communists(NBC) and Communist Broadcasting Service) had no competition, so could say what they wanted and "that was the way it was"(thank you Walter Cronkite). Then the Clinton News Network(CNN) started operating and was somewhat balanced but soon the liberal machine FORCED them to go to the dark side. People started to move farther away from the liberal propaganda machines, looking for other sources of news, which eventually had the birth of Faux News. At first balance and fair, was presented, but the liberal commies like William Jefferson Clinton, (who did not have sexual relations with that woman) and his wife, Barrack Hussein Obama who was questioned about his Muslim faith(but was corrected by the diminutive journalist from ABC(Stepanapolis) about his Christian Faith) has put so much pressure on Faux, that they are now almost as liberal as the other TV "NEWS" sources. Which leaves the rest of the intelligent Americans, with radio. You enemies of the country must really hate radio, because you cant get the FAIRNESS DOCTRINE enforced on those channels, to silence the truth.

 

[Moonglow]

The left doesn't control the media.

1) In 2008 85% of media donated money to Democrats!
1,160 (85%) of the 1,353 of the Senior executives, on-air personalities, producers, reporters, editors, writers and other self-identifying employees of ABC, CBS and NBC contributed more than $1 million to Democrats candidates and campaign committees in 2008, according to an analysis by The Examiner of data compiled by the Center for Responsive Politics.
Obama, Democrats got 88 percent of 2008 contributions by TV network execs, writers, reporters

And then the MSM responded to Romney with these BIASED stories.
2) 130,213 stories can't be swept under the rug that show that the Democrat Bias is very evident!
Study of 130,213 stories shows Obama bias in 2012 election BY PAUL BEDARD | MARCH 16, 2015 | 10:49 AM
A sweeping study of some 130,213 news articles on the 2012 presidential match between President Obama and Mitt Romney has proven anew
that there was a strong pro-Democratic bias in the U.S. and international press.
The study, published in the authoritative journal Big Data Society, also tested the campaign themes the media focused on and determined that Obama succeeded in stealing the economic issue from Republican Romney.
"Overall, media reporting contained more frequently positive statements about the Democrats than the Republicans.
Overall, the Republicans were more frequently the object of negative statements," wrote the study authors, Their conclusion:
"The Republican Party is the most divisive subject in the campaign, and is portrayed in a more negative fashion than the Democrats."
Paul Bedard, the Washington Examiner's "Washington Secrets" columnist, can be contacted at [email protected].
Smooch: Study of 130,213 stories shows Obama bias in 2012 election

Did you just notice how NYCarbinated just ignored your FACTS? I repeat myself, by posting picture once again.

View attachment 66630

His facts don't prove anything.

Let's start here:

Who controls AM radio?

Up to the 1990's there was NO alternative news source, the big 3 American Broadcasting Communists(ABC), National Broadcasting Communists(NBC) and Communist Broadcasting Service) had no competition, so could say what they wanted and "that was the way it was"(thank you Walter Cronkite). Then the Clinton News Network(CNN) started operating and was somewhat balanced but soon the liberal machine FORCED them to go to the dark side. People started to move farther away from the liberal propaganda machines, looking for other sources of news, which eventually had the birth of Faux News. At first balance and fair, was presented, but the liberal commies like William Jefferson Clinton, (who did not have sexual relations with that woman) and his wife, Barrack Hussein Obama who was questioned about his Muslim faith(but was corrected by the diminutive journalist from ABC(Stepanapolis) about his Christian Faith) has put so much pressure on Faux, that they are now almost as liberal as the other TV "NEWS" sources. Which leaves the rest of the intelligent Americans, with radio. You enemies of the country must really hate radio, because you cant get the FAIRNESS DOCTRINE enforced on those channels, to silence the truth.

View attachment 66635

Again you lie, since all cable channels were not the sole property of the former big 3 network broadcasters...GE is not a liberal, sorry..It's a conglomeration of two deceased capitalist that merged...