How the FBI Could Derail Hillary Clinton’s Presidential Run

[Bassman007]

If you had an ounce of sense you wouldn't want another liar as President.

Hmmm OK tell me a President THAT NEVER LIED??

Sorry never has been one to my knowledge

Find one that has lied as consistently and blatantly as OBAMA or HILLARY you dumbass!

Go fuck yourself, goofy cocksucker both the Bush's and Nixon, ever heard of Watergate,? i suppose a dumbass like you will probably blame that on Carter..

Looks like Hillary is having a tantrum....................

PS. This scandal makes Watergate look like a kid stealing candy, as you will soon know.

CIAO

...Your as Naive as the day is long, not gonna happen..

Exactly what Nixon said....................

Really.

 

[Tehon]

ummm, no she didn't.

Hillary Clinton emails included very secret satellite images « Hot Air

Hot air?

Hot Air, Pajamas Media, Townhall, Drudge, Briebart, The Daily Beast, Cns, Wnd, Forbes business, etc etc etc is all the Right Wing MEDIA ECHO CHAMBER....a big circle jerk of quoting each other, not news, not reliable, not even close to a trusted source...surely you know this?

The article you posted is from last August and since then the Inspector General of Intelligence has POSTED ON A GOVERNMENT DOCUMENT WHAT THEY ARE INVESTIGATING....

And IT IS NOT even close to what the right wing echo chamber was saying last August...

Read the darn link on WHAT IS being investigated. don't you want to know the truth?

https://oig.state.gov/system/files/esp-15-04-05.pdf

That deals only with the way State would screen emails for release under FOIA requests, has nothing to do with the FBI investigation on the handling, storage and access allowed to information on the server.

And that's the point. Americans are aware of the FBI involvement with the screening for release related to FOIA requests. Only brain addled republicans have been made aware of any other investigation, through unnamed sources quoted in the likes of the NY Post. You only believe that shit because it feeds your emotional being, exactly as propaganda is intended to do. Dupe.

So why would the FBI need the server and related thumb drives if all they were doing is screening emails the hildabeast already turned over?

To verify they had been given everything and for safe keeping.

 

[OKTexas]

Hillary Clinton emails included very secret satellite images « Hot Air

Hot air?

Hot Air, Pajamas Media, Townhall, Drudge, Briebart, The Daily Beast, Cns, Wnd, Forbes business, etc etc etc is all the Right Wing MEDIA ECHO CHAMBER....a big circle jerk of quoting each other, not news, not reliable, not even close to a trusted source...surely you know this?

The article you posted is from last August and since then the Inspector General of Intelligence has POSTED ON A GOVERNMENT DOCUMENT WHAT THEY ARE INVESTIGATING....

And IT IS NOT even close to what the right wing echo chamber was saying last August...

Read the darn link on WHAT IS being investigated. don't you want to know the truth?

https://oig.state.gov/system/files/esp-15-04-05.pdf

That deals only with the way State would screen emails for release under FOIA requests, has nothing to do with the FBI investigation on the handling, storage and access allowed to information on the server.

And that's the point. Americans are aware of the FBI involvement with the screening for release related to FOIA requests. Only brain addled republicans have been made aware of any other investigation, through unnamed sources quoted in the likes of the NY Post. You only believe that shit because it feeds your emotional being, exactly as propaganda is intended to do. Dupe.

So why would the FBI need the server and related thumb drives if all they were doing is screening emails the hildabeast already turned over?

Good question. Security concerns I would say. It could be that they are looking to see if HRC had turned everything over. The point is that no one knows what the FBI is doing

Hillary Clinton emails included very secret satellite images « Hot Air

Hot air?

Hot Air, Pajamas Media, Townhall, Drudge, Briebart, The Daily Beast, Cns, Wnd, Forbes business, etc etc etc is all the Right Wing MEDIA ECHO CHAMBER....a big circle jerk of quoting each other, not news, not reliable, not even close to a trusted source...surely you know this?

The article you posted is from last August and since then the Inspector General of Intelligence has POSTED ON A GOVERNMENT DOCUMENT WHAT THEY ARE INVESTIGATING....

And IT IS NOT even close to what the right wing echo chamber was saying last August...

Read the darn link on WHAT IS being investigated. don't you want to know the truth?

https://oig.state.gov/system/files/esp-15-04-05.pdf

That deals only with the way State would screen emails for release under FOIA requests, has nothing to do with the FBI investigation on the handling, storage and access allowed to information on the server.

And that's the point. Americans are aware of the FBI involvement with the screening for release related to FOIA requests. Only brain addled republicans have been made aware of any other investigation, through unnamed sources quoted in the likes of the NY Post. You only believe that shit because it feeds your emotional being, exactly as propaganda is intended to do. Dupe.

So why would the FBI need the server and related thumb drives if all they were doing is screening emails the hildabeast already turned over?

To verify they had been given everything and for safe keeping.

Security, of what, you claim there is nothing there that needs to be secured. Also are you accusing the hildabeast of violations of the federal records keeping laws by not turning over all work related materials?

 

[Tehon]

Hot air?

Hot Air, Pajamas Media, Townhall, Drudge, Briebart, The Daily Beast, Cns, Wnd, Forbes business, etc etc etc is all the Right Wing MEDIA ECHO CHAMBER....a big circle jerk of quoting each other, not news, not reliable, not even close to a trusted source...surely you know this?

The article you posted is from last August and since then the Inspector General of Intelligence has POSTED ON A GOVERNMENT DOCUMENT WHAT THEY ARE INVESTIGATING....

And IT IS NOT even close to what the right wing echo chamber was saying last August...

Read the darn link on WHAT IS being investigated. don't you want to know the truth?

https://oig.state.gov/system/files/esp-15-04-05.pdf

That deals only with the way State would screen emails for release under FOIA requests, has nothing to do with the FBI investigation on the handling, storage and access allowed to information on the server.

And that's the point. Americans are aware of the FBI involvement with the screening for release related to FOIA requests. Only brain addled republicans have been made aware of any other investigation, through unnamed sources quoted in the likes of the NY Post. You only believe that shit because it feeds your emotional being, exactly as propaganda is intended to do. Dupe.

So why would the FBI need the server and related thumb drives if all they were doing is screening emails the hildabeast already turned over?

Good question. Security concerns I would say. It could be that they are looking to see if HRC had turned everything over. The point is that no one knows what the FBI is doing

Hot air?

Hot Air, Pajamas Media, Townhall, Drudge, Briebart, The Daily Beast, Cns, Wnd, Forbes business, etc etc etc is all the Right Wing MEDIA ECHO CHAMBER....a big circle jerk of quoting each other, not news, not reliable, not even close to a trusted source...surely you know this?

The article you posted is from last August and since then the Inspector General of Intelligence has POSTED ON A GOVERNMENT DOCUMENT WHAT THEY ARE INVESTIGATING....

And IT IS NOT even close to what the right wing echo chamber was saying last August...

Read the darn link on WHAT IS being investigated. don't you want to know the truth?

https://oig.state.gov/system/files/esp-15-04-05.pdf

That deals only with the way State would screen emails for release under FOIA requests, has nothing to do with the FBI investigation on the handling, storage and access allowed to information on the server.

And that's the point. Americans are aware of the FBI involvement with the screening for release related to FOIA requests. Only brain addled republicans have been made aware of any other investigation, through unnamed sources quoted in the likes of the NY Post. You only believe that shit because it feeds your emotional being, exactly as propaganda is intended to do. Dupe.

So why would the FBI need the server and related thumb drives if all they were doing is screening emails the hildabeast already turned over?

To verify they had been given everything and for safe keeping.

Security, of what, you claim there is nothing there that needs to be secured. Also are you accusing the hildabeast of violations of the federal records keeping laws by not turning over all work related materials?

My only claim is that you do not know for sure what the FBI is or isn't doing other than what we know from the Intelligence directive.

Did Hillary hand over her server to the FBI or the Justice Dept.? Is the FBI stonewalling?
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news...-emails-fbi-refuses-cooperate-serve/?page=all

“We still do not know whether the FBI — or any other government agency for that matter — has possession of the email server that was used byMrs. Clinton and Ms. Abedin to conduct official government business during their four years of employment at the State Department,” Judicial Watch said.

“We also do not know whether the server purportedly in the possession of the FBI — an assumption based on unsworn statements by third parties — is the actual email server that was used by Mrs. Clinton and Ms. Abedin to conduct official government business during their four years of employment at the State Department or whether it is a copy of such an email server. Nor do we know whether any copies of the email server or copies of the records from the email server exist,” the group said in its own court filing Monday afternoon.

 

[Two Thumbs]

The man I originally replied to, was man enough to admit he was wrong w/o being called out.

You are not a man, not even close.

I've got a box full of medals that say otherwise. What do you have?

I have the same thing.

But your actions prove that you are liar, so your claims of medals is most likely bullshit.

Guy, that psych discharge they gave you in boot camp isn't a medal.

Oh, I get it.

you claim to be a heroic Vet, but all your medals are digital call of duty type stuff

oora pussyfied, oora

are you still talking, you sad loser? Or just wanking off to the Starr Report.

Anytime you want to admit you're just a pathetic liar would be the day time stood still.

I'll repeat, since you're dumb.

The poster I replied to, admitted he was wrong, I thanked his post, quoted it and thanked him directly.

Why? b/c of leftist posers like you, that lie, get caught, then can't man up and admit they lied.

you are not a man, you are nothing but leftist filth.

 

[Bassman007]

Hot air?

Hot Air, Pajamas Media, Townhall, Drudge, Briebart, The Daily Beast, Cns, Wnd, Forbes business, etc etc etc is all the Right Wing MEDIA ECHO CHAMBER....a big circle jerk of quoting each other, not news, not reliable, not even close to a trusted source...surely you know this?

The article you posted is from last August and since then the Inspector General of Intelligence has POSTED ON A GOVERNMENT DOCUMENT WHAT THEY ARE INVESTIGATING....

And IT IS NOT even close to what the right wing echo chamber was saying last August...

Read the darn link on WHAT IS being investigated. don't you want to know the truth?

https://oig.state.gov/system/files/esp-15-04-05.pdf

That deals only with the way State would screen emails for release under FOIA requests, has nothing to do with the FBI investigation on the handling, storage and access allowed to information on the server.

And that's the point. Americans are aware of the FBI involvement with the screening for release related to FOIA requests. Only brain addled republicans have been made aware of any other investigation, through unnamed sources quoted in the likes of the NY Post. You only believe that shit because it feeds your emotional being, exactly as propaganda is intended to do. Dupe.

So why would the FBI need the server and related thumb drives if all they were doing is screening emails the hildabeast already turned over?

Good question. Security concerns I would say. It could be that they are looking to see if HRC had turned everything over. The point is that no one knows what the FBI is doing

Hot air?

Hot Air, Pajamas Media, Townhall, Drudge, Briebart, The Daily Beast, Cns, Wnd, Forbes business, etc etc etc is all the Right Wing MEDIA ECHO CHAMBER....a big circle jerk of quoting each other, not news, not reliable, not even close to a trusted source...surely you know this?

The article you posted is from last August and since then the Inspector General of Intelligence has POSTED ON A GOVERNMENT DOCUMENT WHAT THEY ARE INVESTIGATING....

And IT IS NOT even close to what the right wing echo chamber was saying last August...

Read the darn link on WHAT IS being investigated. don't you want to know the truth?

https://oig.state.gov/system/files/esp-15-04-05.pdf

That deals only with the way State would screen emails for release under FOIA requests, has nothing to do with the FBI investigation on the handling, storage and access allowed to information on the server.

And that's the point. Americans are aware of the FBI involvement with the screening for release related to FOIA requests. Only brain addled republicans have been made aware of any other investigation, through unnamed sources quoted in the likes of the NY Post. You only believe that shit because it feeds your emotional being, exactly as propaganda is intended to do. Dupe.

So why would the FBI need the server and related thumb drives if all they were doing is screening emails the hildabeast already turned over?

To verify they had been given everything and for safe keeping.

Security, of what, you claim there is nothing there that needs to be secured. Also are you accusing the hildabeast of violations of the federal records keeping laws by not turning over all work related materials?

Actually the FBI will be making those accusations.

 

[OKTexas]

That deals only with the way State would screen emails for release under FOIA requests, has nothing to do with the FBI investigation on the handling, storage and access allowed to information on the server.

And that's the point. Americans are aware of the FBI involvement with the screening for release related to FOIA requests. Only brain addled republicans have been made aware of any other investigation, through unnamed sources quoted in the likes of the NY Post. You only believe that shit because it feeds your emotional being, exactly as propaganda is intended to do. Dupe.

So why would the FBI need the server and related thumb drives if all they were doing is screening emails the hildabeast already turned over?

Good question. Security concerns I would say. It could be that they are looking to see if HRC had turned everything over. The point is that no one knows what the FBI is doing

That deals only with the way State would screen emails for release under FOIA requests, has nothing to do with the FBI investigation on the handling, storage and access allowed to information on the server.

And that's the point. Americans are aware of the FBI involvement with the screening for release related to FOIA requests. Only brain addled republicans have been made aware of any other investigation, through unnamed sources quoted in the likes of the NY Post. You only believe that shit because it feeds your emotional being, exactly as propaganda is intended to do. Dupe.

So why would the FBI need the server and related thumb drives if all they were doing is screening emails the hildabeast already turned over?

To verify they had been given everything and for safe keeping.

Security, of what, you claim there is nothing there that needs to be secured. Also are you accusing the hildabeast of violations of the federal records keeping laws by not turning over all work related materials?

My only claim is that you do not know for sure what the FBI is or isn't doing other than what we know from the Intelligence directive.

Did Hillary hand over her server to the FBI or the Justice Dept.? Is the FBI stonewalling?
Hillary Clinton emails: FBI refuses to cooperate in server probe - Washington Times

“We still do not know whether the FBI — or any other government agency for that matter — has possession of the email server that was used byMrs. Clinton and Ms. Abedin to conduct official government business during their four years of employment at the State Department,” Judicial Watch said.

“We also do not know whether the server purportedly in the possession of the FBI — an assumption based on unsworn statements by third parties — is the actual email server that was used by Mrs. Clinton and Ms. Abedin to conduct official government business during their four years of employment at the State Department or whether it is a copy of such an email server. Nor do we know whether any copies of the email server or copies of the records from the email server exist,” the group said in its own court filing Monday afternoon.

The FBI is investigating the security of Clinton's personal server and the thumb drives that contain emails related to her work as secretary of state during President Barack Obama's first term.

Clinton's campaign has previously acknowledged that there was an attempt to wipe the server before it was turned over last week to the FBI. But two sources with direct knowledge of the investigation told NBC News on Tuesday that the bureau may be able to recover at least some data.

'Nothing to Worry About': Clinton Dismisses Email Questions as Partisan

According to this the FBI has it and is investigating the security surrounding the server and are trying to recover deleted data.

 

[JoeB131]

Oh boy, more equivocation, when are you going to get it through your head, it wasn't the act itself, it was his lies that got him in deep shit. Had he just admitted what he did, nothing would have come of it, I know, the concept of personal responsibility is a foreign concept to the Clintons and regressivecrats.

Nothing should have come of it, period.

This was a case that WAS DISMISSED BECAUSE IT HAD NO MERIT. Paula Jones did not suffer any negative effects of the supposed harrassment. The judge threw her case out.

No reasonable person said, "Yup, he should have totally disclosed what sex acts he performed with another woman years later."

Nope, reasonable people realized- it wasn't anyone's business. Which is why he got a pass.

But Ken Starr spent 70 million dollars sniffing panties.

 

[JoeB131]

I've got a box full of medals that say otherwise. What do you have?

I have the same thing.

But your actions prove that you are liar, so your claims of medals is most likely bullshit.

Guy, that psych discharge they gave you in boot camp isn't a medal.

Oh, I get it.

you claim to be a heroic Vet, but all your medals are digital call of duty type stuff

oora pussyfied, oora

are you still talking, you sad loser? Or just wanking off to the Starr Report.

Anytime you want to admit you're just a pathetic liar would be the day time stood still.

I'll repeat, since you're dumb.

The poster I replied to, admitted he was wrong, I thanked his post, quoted it and thanked him directly.

Why? b/c of leftist posers like you, that lie, get caught, then can't man up and admit they lied.

you are not a man, you are nothing but leftist filth.

Hey,did you get to the page bout the Cigar yet? that's great wank off material for Wingnuts.

 

[JoeB131]

The FBI is investigating the security of Clinton's personal server and the thumb drives that contain emails related to her work as secretary of state during President Barack Obama's first term.

Clinton's campaign has previously acknowledged that there was an attempt to wipe the server before it was turned over last week to the FBI. But two sources with direct knowledge of the investigation told NBC News on Tuesday that the bureau may be able to recover at least some data.

According to this the FBI has it and is investigating the security surrounding the server and are trying to recover deleted data.

So again, no crimes committed, no real security breaches, just a lot of hoping you can find a technical violation that will make her look bad because your party has a bunch of crazy people and bullshit artists she will beat easily.

 

[Two Thumbs]

I have the same thing.

But your actions prove that you are liar, so your claims of medals is most likely bullshit.

Guy, that psych discharge they gave you in boot camp isn't a medal.

Oh, I get it.

you claim to be a heroic Vet, but all your medals are digital call of duty type stuff

oora pussyfied, oora

are you still talking, you sad loser? Or just wanking off to the Starr Report.

Anytime you want to admit you're just a pathetic liar would be the day time stood still.

I'll repeat, since you're dumb.

The poster I replied to, admitted he was wrong, I thanked his post, quoted it and thanked him directly.

Why? b/c of leftist posers like you, that lie, get caught, then can't man up and admit they lied.

you are not a man, you are nothing but leftist filth.

Hey,did you get to the page bout the Cigar yet? that's great wank off material for Wingnuts.

Anytime you want to admit you're just a pathetic liar would be the day time stood still.

I'll repeat, since you're dumb.

The poster I replied to, admitted he was wrong, I thanked his post, quoted it and thanked him directly.

Why? b/c of leftist posers like you, that lie, get caught, then can't man up and admit they lied.

you are not a man, you are nothing but leftist filth.


c-p b/c filth isn't worth the effort

 

[OKTexas]

Oh boy, more equivocation, when are you going to get it through your head, it wasn't the act itself, it was his lies that got him in deep shit. Had he just admitted what he did, nothing would have come of it, I know, the concept of personal responsibility is a foreign concept to the Clintons and regressivecrats.

Nothing should have come of it, period.

This was a case that WAS DISMISSED BECAUSE IT HAD NO MERIT. Paula Jones did not suffer any negative effects of the supposed harrassment. The judge threw her case out.

No reasonable person said, "Yup, he should have totally disclosed what sex acts he performed with another woman years later."

Nope, reasonable people realized- it wasn't anyone's business. Which is why he got a pass.

But Ken Starr spent 70 million dollars sniffing panties.

So I guess you think it wasn't appropriate to have prosecuted Scooter Libby either, after all they knew he didn't out the CIA bitch, but they still nailed him for supposedly misleading investigators.

 

[OKTexas]

The FBI is investigating the security of Clinton's personal server and the thumb drives that contain emails related to her work as secretary of state during President Barack Obama's first term.

Clinton's campaign has previously acknowledged that there was an attempt to wipe the server before it was turned over last week to the FBI. But two sources with direct knowledge of the investigation told NBC News on Tuesday that the bureau may be able to recover at least some data.

According to this the FBI has it and is investigating the security surrounding the server and are trying to recover deleted data.

So again, no crimes committed, no real security breaches, just a lot of hoping you can find a technical violation that will make her look bad because your party has a bunch of crazy people and bullshit artists she will beat easily.

Sure there were security violations, it's still to be determined how sever they were. Just having sensitive and classified information on an unsecured system is a security violation.

 

[JoeB131]

Guy, that psych discharge they gave you in boot camp isn't a medal.

Oh, I get it.

you claim to be a heroic Vet, but all your medals are digital call of duty type stuff

oora pussyfied, oora

are you still talking, you sad loser? Or just wanking off to the Starr Report.

Anytime you want to admit you're just a pathetic liar would be the day time stood still.

I'll repeat, since you're dumb.

The poster I replied to, admitted he was wrong, I thanked his post, quoted it and thanked him directly.

Why? b/c of leftist posers like you, that lie, get caught, then can't man up and admit they lied.

you are not a man, you are nothing but leftist filth.

Hey,did you get to the page bout the Cigar yet? that's great wank off material for Wingnuts.

Anytime you want to admit you're just a pathetic liar would be the day time stood still.

I'll repeat, since you're dumb.

The poster I replied to, admitted he was wrong, I thanked his post, quoted it and thanked him directly.

Why? b/c of leftist posers like you, that lie, get caught, then can't man up and admit they lied.

you are not a man, you are nothing but leftist filth.


c-p b/c filth isn't worth the effort

so did you name your blow up doll 'Monica" ?

Okay, on a serious note, you really are showing yourself to be unhinged here. I would recommend professional help.

 

[JoeB131]

Sure there were security violations, it's still to be determined how sever they were. Just having sensitive and classified information on an unsecured system is a security violation.

To bad you don't have any real proof of that. That the information was really classified, or that her system was any more "unsecured" than the Federal Servers that were breached by hackers 56,000 times last year.

 

[JoeB131]

So I guess you think it wasn't appropriate to have prosecuted Scooter Libby either, after all they knew he didn't out the CIA bitch, but they still nailed him for supposedly misleading investigators.

If you have been paying attention, I've said many times here that I thought the prosecution of Scooter Libby was not only unwarranted but a malicious attempt by a special prosecutor to prove he really wasn't wasting everyone's time.

It was ludicrous for Fitzgerald to prosecute Libby when Richard Armitage was the source of the leak.

Again, I think Iran contra was wrong. I think Monica was wrong. I think plame-gate was wrong. It's wrong to try to use the criminal justice system to acheive what you can't achieve at the ballot box.

 

[OKTexas]

Sure there were security violations, it's still to be determined how sever they were. Just having sensitive and classified information on an unsecured system is a security violation.

To bad you don't have any real proof of that. That the information was really classified, or that her system was any more "unsecured" than the Federal Servers that were breached by hackers 56,000 times last year.

Ok, ostrich let's look at one, one email she admitted sending, and keep in mind it only takes one. She admitted sending an email to an Egyptian minister on 9/12/11, telling him the attack was conducted by an al-Qaida like group. By State Dept protocol ANY communication with a foreign official is considered classified. That alone is PROOF that there was at least one classified document on that server. If you say otherwise you're a liar.

 

[JoeB131]

Ok, ostrich let's look at one, one email she admitted sending, and keep in mind it only takes one. She admitted sending an email to an Egyptian minister on 9/12/11, telling him the attack was conducted by an al-Qaida like group. By State Dept protocol ANY communication with a foreign official is considered classified. That alone is PROOF that there was at least one classified document on that server. If you say otherwise you're a liar.

So essentially, you are talking about a technicality, even IF she sent that e-mail on her private server instead of a state department server.

Guy, we are back into lying about a blow job territory here. No reasonable person is going to get horribly upset about this.

Technically, my co-worker could be fired for sending a cute cat video on the company e-mail. most people would consider that to be a really douchebag move on management's part.

 

[Bassman007]

Ok, ostrich let's look at one, one email she admitted sending, and keep in mind it only takes one. She admitted sending an email to an Egyptian minister on 9/12/11, telling him the attack was conducted by an al-Qaida like group. By State Dept protocol ANY communication with a foreign official is considered classified. That alone is PROOF that there was at least one classified document on that server. If you say otherwise you're a liar.

So essentially, you are talking about a technicality, even IF she sent that e-mail on her private server instead of a state department server.

Guy, we are back into lying about a blow job territory here. No reasonable person is going to get horribly upset about this.

Technically, my co-worker could be fired for sending a cute cat video on the company e-mail. most people would consider that to be a really douchebag move on management's part.

It's not a technicality, it is the law. Clintons server had no security at all during this time, the idiot who set it up did not give it any, and has pleaded the fifth to remain out of prison. Get over it already, he knew as he worked for the State dept, thus he can not plead ignorance.

 

[JoeB131]

It's not a technicality, it is the law. Clintons server had no security at all during this time, the idiot who set it up did not give it any, and has pleaded the fifth to remain out of prison. Get over it already, he knew as he worked for the State dept, thus he can not plead ignorance.

Uh, yeah, her IT guy might be in trouble... if he's dumb enough to testify in front of Congress, which he clearly isn't.

You do get this is exactly why we HAVE a fifth Amendment, right?