Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
As long as the point is that Trump is the victim, they'll believe anything.There was no reason, and the committee has more than established that Trump was informed of this by all of the experts on the matter. All of the agency heads of the most powerful investigative agencies on Earth. No more definitive and final source on the matter exists, in this universe.
So, to any rational person, what you are saying is obvious nonsense.
The “nonsense” is entirely in your post. You can be “informed” that your arrogance doesn’t qualify you as being right, yet you insist on substituting your arrogance for logic and facts.There was no reason, and the committee has more than established that Trump was informed of this by all of the experts on the matter. All of the agnecy heads of the most powerful investigative agencies on Earth.
So, to any rational person, what you are saying is obvious nonsense.
He should have got a clue after all the audits, recounts failing to produce results, court failures by his legal team (if you can call them that, those that can still practice law) failure of all the state houses to find fault in their own or change the vote for him, and all states officially standing by their electoral votes submitted, two months after election day. So, no excuse for his crap existed.Not at all. There was nothing wrong with complaining about the election when there was immediate reason to believe that it had been screwed with. (Note: this isn’t the same as saying that the evidence ultimately was persuasive.)
And using the phrase “fight like hell” is obviously a figure of speech. He didn’t call for any insurrection or coup. And we didn’t have one.
But the clamor over his decision not to give a speech at the time is simply a disingenuous bit of puffery from the 1/6 Committee clown show.
Seems about right.As long as the point is that Trump is the victim, they'll believe anything.
And it was just a tour!Apparently it's what a MAGAt president does.
My post... that you did not address, in favor of talking about me.The “nonsense” is entirely in your post. You can be “informed” that your arrogance doesn’t qualify you as being right, yet you insist on substituting your arrogance for logic and facts.
I'm trying to maintain enough faith in human nature to believe that, at some level, they know.Seems about right.
I wonder how many of them are simply locked into this feedback loop by fear of embarrassment and of admitting they swallowed an embarrassing lie from one of the cheapest and dumbest conmen ever to exist?
It’s what Putin’s puppet boy doesSo he did nothing. He watched and enjoyed it.
That's not what a President does.
Are you hungover?My post... that you did not address, in favor of talking about me.
You unwittingly bolster my post, with this behavior. Thanks.
Watch the Kleppr videos. Just so entirely predictable. The guy is shooting fish in a barrel.I'm trying to maintain enough faith in human nature to believe that, at some level, they know.
They don't have the strength of character to admit it, though. And worse, this is far beyond politics for them. It's a complete lifestyle. Like their "religion".
The FBI has undercover operatives inside potentially violent groups. They do that to left wing groups and Muslims also
So. . . You are saying that the the interlocking directorate, & the deep state purposely let the Jan. 6th riot happen, it is the Deep State's fault all that happened?
The folks running security at the Capitol were purposely kept under staffed, and let all of that chaos occur, so all of this theater would make Trump and his supporters look bad?
Thanks for finally admitting what most intelligent critical thinkers knew all along.
View attachment 668163
Yes, you fucked up.
I am a REAL HUMAN. I am NOT, a "Bayesian consumer." You are trying to interact with real humans on this forum, and the studies and data you have been fed, the models you have been programmed with? Do not accurately reflect reality.
You were forced to tell two separate truths, and both those truths contradicted with an axiom that you are programmed to deny.
View attachment 668164
SO why did twitter delete the tweet asking them to stop?So he did nothing. He watched and enjoyed it.
That's not what a President does.
"What you are seeing and hearing is not what is happening."The actions or Trump, are irrelevant. The Deep State wanted the whole thing to occur.
Link, please.SO why did twitter delete the tweet asking them to stop?
When was that tweet sent? Show us the depravity of the orange slob.SO why did twitter delete the tweet asking them to stop?
“Audits” that confirm a count don’t necessarily confirm that there was no rigging of the vote. Recounting votes that included illegal votes are likely to yield the same results. The court cases were, all bit universally, dismissed prior to evidentiary hearings on the merits.He should have got a clue after all the audits, recounts failing to produce results, court failures by his legal time (if you can call them that, those that can still practice law) failure of all the state houses to find fault in their own or change the vote for him, and all states officially standing by their electoral votes submitted, two months after election day. So, no excuse for his crap existed.
Trump doesn’t need to be set up. His words and actions speak for themselves.The complaint I’m focusing on is that the President didn’t call on the component of the 1/6 protestors who had become violent to stop. The reason that “complaint” is a set up is apparent once you think it through.
Let’s assume that he had made some speech and the violent protestors could even hear it. Who says that they’d suddenly stop what they were doing? It gets worse.
Let’s say they heard the President’s speech and then DID comply. Woah! That compliance would be used as “proof” that Trump “controlled” them.
Either way, it’s just a game to the bullshit 1/6 committee. If he is allowed to go there, which he was denied, and tried to stop the violent ones, they’d claim that he had set them in motion and then couldn’t control them. And he must have realized that had put them into motion or he wouldn’t “try” to stop them.
Or he tries,it works, and that’s proof to them that he “did”‘control them.
But if he doesn’t try, he is accused of having orchestrated their behavior all the same and then failed to do anything about them.
The 1/6 fake committee accusers are disingenuous. Heads we win. Tails you lose. And if the coin lands on edge, you lose anyway. Liz Cheney and Shifty Schifthead and Pelousy etc are all worthless and dishonest vermin.
hmmmm. .. ."What you are seeing and hearing is not what is happening."
The 2nd commandment of the Trump cult.