Huckabee Backs Denying Abortion To 10-Year-Old Raped By Stepfather

[The Rabbi]

It's sick to subject her to the added risk of abortion to protect and enrich her abusers.

But it's ok to expose her to the added risk of giving birth. You make no sense.

Shoving a vacuum up her and sucking out a baby is safer to you ?

Sent from my SM-G386T1 using Tapatalk

We're talking about a 10 yr old child - a CHILD - forceably made pregnant. And you loons can't even see the wrong in that? The chances of her dying or being permanently affected by giving birth (especially in a country like that) are huge.

And wha are the chances of the baby dying as a result? Yeah, 100%.

So it's life is more important than the mother's. Thanks for finally being honest.

You've got a slight increased risk with the mother and 100% risk to the child. Yeah, I'll take those odds.
You get this, right?

 

[koshergrl]

It's sick to subject her to the added risk of abortion to protect and enrich her abusers.

But it's ok to expose her to the added risk of giving birth. You make no sense.

Shoving a vacuum up her and sucking out a baby is safer to you ?

Sent from my SM-G386T1 using Tapatalk

We're talking about a 10 yr old child - a CHILD - forceably made pregnant. And you loons can't even see the wrong in that? The chances of her dying or being permanently affected by giving birth (especially in a country like that) are huge.

And wha are the chances of the baby dying as a result? Yeah, 100%.

So it's life is more important than the mother's. Thanks for finally being honest.

So you're going to just go ahead and ignore the fact that aborting a ten year old is more risky and traumatic than pregnancy and birth. You lie to protect the abuse and murder of children. Again I have to ask...are you a PP scout? Do you target at risk girls, hide their abuse and help their abusers get them abortions? A school counselor who gets a commission?

 

[Coyote]

But it's ok to expose her to the added risk of giving birth. You make no sense.

Shoving a vacuum up her and sucking out a baby is safer to you ?

Sent from my SM-G386T1 using Tapatalk

We're talking about a 10 yr old child - a CHILD - forceably made pregnant. And you loons can't even see the wrong in that? The chances of her dying or being permanently affected by giving birth (especially in a country like that) are huge.

And wha are the chances of the baby dying as a result? Yeah, 100%.

So it's life is more important than the mother's. Thanks for finally being honest.

You've got a slight increased risk with the mother and 100% risk to the child. Yeah, I'll take those odds.
You get this, right?

When the mother is under 15, she is 5 times more likely to die in childbirth. Doesn't she have a right to life and choose her risks?

 

[koshergrl]

Shoving a vacuum up her and sucking out a baby is safer to you ?

Sent from my SM-G386T1 using Tapatalk

We're talking about a 10 yr old child - a CHILD - forceably made pregnant. And you loons can't even see the wrong in that? The chances of her dying or being permanently affected by giving birth (especially in a country like that) are huge.

And wha are the chances of the baby dying as a result? Yeah, 100%.

So it's life is more important than the mother's. Thanks for finally being honest.

You've got a slight increased risk with the mother and 100% risk to the child. Yeah, I'll take those odds.
You get this, right?

When the mother is under 15, she is 5 times more likely to die in childbirth. Doesn't she have a right to life and choose her risks?

How dishonest. No citation..because you know you're being dishonest. You know that underage maternal death stats include girls who have been aborted. And you know that abortion is still more risky than birth.

 

[Carla_Danger]

It is sick to insist a 10 yr old little girl MUST have a baby.

It's sick to subject her to the added risk of abortion to protect and enrich her abusers.

But it's ok to expose her to the added risk of giving birth. You make no sense.

It's not added, dolt. She's already pregnant. The added risk is the abortion.

The added risk of GIVING BIRTH, dolt.

It's not ADDED if she's already pregnant. The ADDED risk and the greater risk is abortion that isn't medically necessary, and increases her trauma and risk of a horrible death.

That's complete bullshit.

"The placenta preferentially will take nutrition from the mother, who really is a child," said Sherry Thomas, an ob/gyn at Mission Community Hospital in Panorama City, Calif. That means that the developing fetus will leach calcium and other nutrients from a child who should still be growing herself. Likewise, pregnancy puts a major strain on the cardiovascular system, according to Wall. Pregnant women have about 50 percent more blood circulating through their bodies compared with non-pregnant women. [8 Odd Bodily Changes During Pregnancy]

The greatest danger, however, is to the pelvic floor.

Just because a girl can get pregnant, though, doesn't mean she can safely deliver a baby. The pelvis does not fully widen until the late teens, meaning that young girls may not be able to push the baby through the birth canal.

The results are horrific, said Wall and Thomas, who have both worked in Africa treating women in the aftermath of such labors. Girls may labor for days; many die. Their babies often don't survive labor either.

Why 10-Year-Olds Shouldn t Give Birth Pregnancy Health

 

[Coyote]

But it's ok to expose her to the added risk of giving birth. You make no sense.

Shoving a vacuum up her and sucking out a baby is safer to you ?

Sent from my SM-G386T1 using Tapatalk

We're talking about a 10 yr old child - a CHILD - forceably made pregnant. And you loons can't even see the wrong in that? The chances of her dying or being permanently affected by giving birth (especially in a country like that) are huge.

And wha are the chances of the baby dying as a result? Yeah, 100%.

So it's life is more important than the mother's. Thanks for finally being honest.

So you're going to just go ahead and ignore the fact that aborting a ten year old is more risky and traumatic than pregnancy and birth. You lie to protect the abuse and murder of children. Again I have to ask...are you a PP scout? Do you target at risk girls, hide their abuse and help their abusers get them abortions? A school counselor who gets a commission?

I'm ignoring nothing - you are making all kinds of unfounded claims, not surprising - in order to justify forcing a child to carry a pregnancy to term. You can't come up with a rational argument or evidence showing an abortion is a higher risk than birth in this case so you result in slinging monkey poo like a good little monkey. You pretend that an abortion "hides" the abuser - which is total bullshit. What do you think they used to do with pregnant girls? Hide them away until they gave birth and then transfer the baby. It has nothing to do with protecting or EXPOSING the abuser because you have no interest in that and in a country like that? There's probably few laws to protect girls as you well know, so this is nothing more than a rational to force a child to have a child. Sick.

You're position is abundently clear - no matter how young, no matter if they were forceably raped - no matter how high to the risk to her life - she must carry the pregnancy to term.

 

[Coyote]

We're talking about a 10 yr old child - a CHILD - forceably made pregnant. And you loons can't even see the wrong in that? The chances of her dying or being permanently affected by giving birth (especially in a country like that) are huge.

And wha are the chances of the baby dying as a result? Yeah, 100%.

So it's life is more important than the mother's. Thanks for finally being honest.

You've got a slight increased risk with the mother and 100% risk to the child. Yeah, I'll take those odds.
You get this, right?

When the mother is under 15, she is 5 times more likely to die in childbirth. Doesn't she have a right to life and choose her risks?

How dishonest. No citation..because you know you're being dishonest. You know that underage maternal death stats include girls who have been aborted. And you know that abortion is still more risky than birth.

I already cited a citation in this thread where that came from and it excludes abortion - it's for live births. Don't whine if you are incapable of reading. There is no reputable evidence to show abortion, particularly done early - is higher risk. Late term - risks are equivalent to birth.

 

[Carla_Danger]

We're talking about a 10 yr old child - a CHILD - forceably made pregnant. And you loons can't even see the wrong in that? The chances of her dying or being permanently affected by giving birth (especially in a country like that) are huge.

And wha are the chances of the baby dying as a result? Yeah, 100%.

So it's life is more important than the mother's. Thanks for finally being honest.

You've got a slight increased risk with the mother and 100% risk to the child. Yeah, I'll take those odds.
You get this, right?

When the mother is under 15, she is 5 times more likely to die in childbirth. Doesn't she have a right to life and choose her risks?

How dishonest. No citation..because you know you're being dishonest. You know that underage maternal death stats include girls who have been aborted. And you know that abortion is still more risky than birth.

Again, that's complete bullshit.

According to the World Health Organization (WHO), child pregnancies are extremely dangerous for the health of pregnant girls as they can lead to complications and death in some cases, especially as girls’ bodies are “not fully developed to carry a pregnancy,” the experts added.

In Latin America, in particular, the UN reports that the risk of maternal death is four times higher among adolescents under 16 years old with 65 per cent of cases of obstetric fistula occurring in the pregnancies of adolescents. In addition, early pregnancies are also dangerous for the babies with a mortality rate 50 per cent higher.

Nevertheless, they noted that girl’s mother had reported the ongoing sexual abuse against her daughter in 2014 and deplored the authorities’ “unresponsiveness to take action.” Moreover, they said they “deeply regret” that the State had “failed in its responsibility to act with due diligence and protect the child.”

United Nations News Centre - Paraguay UN experts deplore Government s failure to protect 10-year-old rape survivor

 

[Coyote]

It's sick to subject her to the added risk of abortion to protect and enrich her abusers.

But it's ok to expose her to the added risk of giving birth. You make no sense.

It's not added, dolt. She's already pregnant. The added risk is the abortion.

The added risk of GIVING BIRTH, dolt.

It's not ADDED if she's already pregnant. The ADDED risk and the greater risk is abortion that isn't medically necessary, and increases her trauma and risk of a horrible death.

That's complete bullshit.

"The placenta preferentially will take nutrition from the mother, who really is a child," said Sherry Thomas, an ob/gyn at Mission Community Hospital in Panorama City, Calif. That means that the developing fetus will leach calcium and other nutrients from a child who should still be growing herself. Likewise, pregnancy puts a major strain on the cardiovascular system, according to Wall. Pregnant women have about 50 percent more blood circulating through their bodies compared with non-pregnant women. [8 Odd Bodily Changes During Pregnancy]

The greatest danger, however, is to the pelvic floor.

Just because a girl can get pregnant, though, doesn't mean she can safely deliver a baby. The pelvis does not fully widen until the late teens, meaning that young girls may not be able to push the baby through the birth canal.

The results are horrific, said Wall and Thomas, who have both worked in Africa treating women in the aftermath of such labors. Girls may labor for days; many die. Their babies often don't survive labor either.

Why 10-Year-Olds Shouldn t Give Birth Pregnancy Health

And that is what KG wants for that child. Unbelievable.

 

[Carla_Danger]

It is sick to insist a 10 yr old little girl MUST have a baby.

It's sick to subject her to the added risk of abortion to protect and enrich her abusers.

But it's ok to expose her to the added risk of giving birth. You make no sense.

Shoving a vacuum up her and sucking out a baby is safer to you ?

Sent from my SM-G386T1 using Tapatalk

We're talking about a 10 yr old child - a CHILD - forceably made pregnant. And you loons can't even see the wrong in that? The chances of her dying or being permanently affected by giving birth (especially in a country like that) are huge.

Not as huge as they are if she lets one of those but her friends if yours between her legs.

That's not even a coherent sentence. Jezus Cripes!

 

[Seawytch]

When you pre birth pro lifers figure out that we don't have an abortion problem, we have an unwanted pregnancy problem...we will finally be able to reduce the number. Dumb fucks.

 

[Lakhota]

Every single time a politician says they are pro-life, a journalist, like a well-trained seal, immediately asks, "What about in cases of rape and incest?"

Every. Single. Time.

They immediately grab their human shields. It has become a reflex action.

Sick.

That's because sane people can't grasp why anyone would oppose abortion for incest, rape and life of woman.

You believe in killing the victims to protect the abusers.

The woman is the victim.

 

[idb]

This thread could care less about the Little Girl. for one it would be doubtful a 10 year old can get knocked up and for TWO. they are only USING her for their warped agenda for the butchers of abortion.

This is classic dishonesty and DIRTY POLITICS about someone a Republican by the left/lib/dems who champions all you women being able to kill your offspring. they don't care about you the PERSON. NO skin off their asses

The youngest recorded pregnancy is a five year old.
List of youngest birth mothers - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

 

[Carla_Danger]

It is sick to insist a 10 yr old little girl MUST have a baby.

It's sick to subject her to the added risk of abortion to protect and enrich her abusers.

But it's ok to expose her to the added risk of giving birth. You make no sense.

Shoving a vacuum up her and sucking out a baby is safer to you ?

Sent from my SM-G386T1 using Tapatalk

We're talking about a 10 yr old child - a CHILD - forceably made pregnant. And you loons can't even see the wrong in that? The chances of her dying or being permanently affected by giving birth (especially in a country like that) are huge.

Not as huge as they are if she lets one of those but her friends if yours between her legs.

Can I get a NeoClown to translate this sentence?

 

[Carla_Danger]

But it's ok to expose her to the added risk of giving birth. You make no sense.

Shoving a vacuum up her and sucking out a baby is safer to you ?

Sent from my SM-G386T1 using Tapatalk

We're talking about a 10 yr old child - a CHILD - forceably made pregnant. And you loons can't even see the wrong in that? The chances of her dying or being permanently affected by giving birth (especially in a country like that) are huge.

And wha are the chances of the baby dying as a result? Yeah, 100%.

So it's life is more important than the mother's. Thanks for finally being honest.

Both lives are important.

You are ridiculous.

(14 yrs and under) 70,000 adolescents, in developing countries die each year from complications during pregnancy and childbirth.

United Nations News Centre - Motherhood in childhood new UN report spotlights adolescent pregnancy

 

[Lakhota]

It is sick to insist a 10 yr old little girl MUST have a baby.

It's sick to subject her to the added risk of abortion to protect and enrich her abusers.

But it's ok to expose her to the added risk of giving birth. You make no sense.

Shoving a vacuum up her and sucking out a baby is safer to you ?

Sent from my SM-G386T1 using Tapatalk

We're talking about a 10 yr old child - a CHILD - forceably made pregnant. And you loons can't even see the wrong in that? The chances of her dying or being permanently affected by giving birth (especially in a country like that) are huge.

Not as huge as they are if she lets one of those but her friends if yours between her legs.

Holy shit - that don't make no sense!

 

[idb]

Right-wing concern for children ends at birth.
The girl is ten years too old to matter for the nut-jobs.

 

[aris2chat]

At what age would this 10-year-old have qualified for an abortion according to Huckabee's thinking? Any age? 8? 6? 4?

Are you unaware that 4 year olds cannot get pregnant? Really?

The youngest mother on record was a five-year-old Peruvian girl.

What's in the water down there?

An extreme exception.

It's almost 1500 milies from peru to paraguay
Hardly the same water

 

[aris2chat]

At what age would this 10-year-old have qualified for an abortion according to Huckabee's thinking? Any age? 8? 6? 4?

Are you unaware that 4 year olds cannot get pregnant? Really?

Actually a child can give birth at 5 yrs old. Lina Medina was 5 1/2. That means she was 4 when she became pregnant. Parents took her to the doctor thinking she has a tumor, but found out she was 7 months pregnant.

No child should have to go through that at any age till they are mentally and physically ready to be a mother

Most abusers are from within the family or a friend of the family. No child should have to go through that.

Pregnancy is safer than an abortion at that age. Babies can be raised as siblings, or adopted out. Nobody proposes that a ten year old raise a child. Though....interesting factoid....Henry VIIs mom Margaret Beauford was 12 when she got pregnant. Her great granddaughter was Elizabeth I

Prove it. She is 5 times more likely to die giving birth than an adult.

And 10 times more likely to die screaming from the abortion as to die from birth.

abortion is safer than childbirth, especially so for such a young child

Did you leave your brain next to the creamer for your coffee?

 

[Coyote]

I can not understand forcing a 10 year old to have a child.