Hunter Biden trial predictions poll .

[yidnar]

I believe Hunter will not be found guilty in the democrat stronghold he is being tried in ..

 

[yidnar]

I voted for a hung jury .. even though the evidence is overwhelming there will be dem holdouts on the jury that will refuse a guilty verdict ..leftists don't hold their own accountable for their actions .

 

[leftwinger]

His current "wife" has a stroke hearing/reading all the TEXT messages about all the hoes & blow he was rolling in back in dem days. Are the good times really over for good?

 

[jackflash]

I believe Hunter will not be found guilty in the democrat stronghold he is being tried in ..

That's definitely a SAFE BET!

 

[wamose]

I can't see Joe's crooked DOJ letting Hunter be convicted. When it's over, I predict a free Hunter will relapse into crack. I hope not. MAGA

 

[Wild Bill Kelsoe]

I believe Hunter will not be found guilty in the democrat stronghold he is being tried in ..

It's another rigged trial.

Jill Biden showed up in court today to intimidate the jurors.

 

[Auld Phart]

I believe Hunter will not be found guilty in the democrat stronghold he is being tried in ..

guilty, suspended sentence.

 

[Freedomisneverfree]

I voted for a hung jury .. even though the evidence is overwhelming there will be dem holdouts on the jury that will refuse a guilty verdict ..leftists don't hold their own accountable for their actions .

Leftists eat their own. I think the Liberal jury will say poor little baby Biden is not guilty. Daddy will be so proud!

 

[Rogue AI]

That's a tough one, the gun grabbing urge of rabid liberals vs loyalty to Joe Biden. I'm going with guilty.

 

[whitehall]

The Hunter jury will be out twice as long for a simple gun count than they were for Trump's 34 technical complicated charges.

 

[BULLDOG]

A federal appeals court recently ruled that drug users cannot be banned from owning guns. That should throw 2/3 of the case out of court before they ever get started.

Drug user cannot be barred from owning guns, US court rules

A federal appeals court on Wednesday ruled that a decades-old law prohibiting users of illegal drugs from owning firearms was unconstitutional as applied to the case of a marijuana user, the latest fallout from a U.S. Supreme Court ruling last year that expanded gun rights.

www.reuters.com

 

[Rogue AI]

A federal appeals court recently ruled that drug users cannot be banned from owning guns. That should throw 2/3 of the case out of court before they ever get started.

Drug user cannot be barred from owning guns, US court rules

A federal appeals court on Wednesday ruled that a decades-old law prohibiting users of illegal drugs from owning firearms was unconstitutional as applied to the case of a marijuana user, the latest fallout from a U.S. Supreme Court ruling last year that expanded gun rights.

www.reuters.com

That ruling doesn't give drug addicts free reign to lie to the federal government.

 

[BULLDOG]

That ruling doesn't give drug addicts free reign to lie to the federal government.

It did in that case. The guy checked the same boxes as Hunter did, and they let him go.

 

[struth]

A federal appeals court recently ruled that drug users cannot be banned from owning guns. That should throw 2/3 of the case out of court before they ever get started.

Drug user cannot be barred from owning guns, US court rules

A federal appeals court on Wednesday ruled that a decades-old law prohibiting users of illegal drugs from owning firearms was unconstitutional as applied to the case of a marijuana user, the latest fallout from a U.S. Supreme Court ruling last year that expanded gun rights.

www.reuters.com

That case dealt with pot users not crack heads, or lying on a back ground check

 

[Rogue AI]

It did in that case. The guy checked the same boxes as Hunter did, and they let him go.

No, it didn't say that all. If you read it, the judges agreed that some limits for intoxication were acceptable. They were ruling on the government disarming an individual. When did they do that to Hunter? Oh, right, they didn't. His gun was tossed in a public trash can for anyone to pick up.

 

[BULLDOG]

That case dealt with pot users not crack heads, or lying on a back ground check

It delt with possessing a weapon while using illegal drugs. Pot, crack ---- they are both illegal,

 

[struth]

It delt with possessing a weapon while using illegal drugs. Pot, crack ---- they are both illegal,

Yeah, this case isn’t about possessing a weapon

 

[BULLDOG]

No, it didn't say that all. If you read it, the judges agreed that some limits for intoxication were acceptable. They were ruling on the government disarming an individual. When did they do that to Hunter? Oh, right, they didn't. His gun was tossed in a public trash can for anyone to pick up.

Correct. They didn't disarm him while he was high.

 

[BULLDOG]

No, it didn't say that all. If you read it, the judges agreed that some limits for intoxication were acceptable. They were ruling on the government disarming an individual. When did they do that to Hunter? Oh, right, they didn't. His gun was tossed in a public trash can for anyone to pick up.

So where is the proof that Hunter was high while he possessed the gun? Doesn't seem to be any drug tests that prove he was high.

 

[struth]

So where is the proof that Hunter was high while he possessed the gun? Doesn't seem to be any drug tests that prove he was high.

He isn’t charged with being high while possessing a gun.

Try again