Hunter Biden’s $450,000 Tax Debt Gets Suddenly ‘RESOLVED’ Despite Claiming NO Income

Shokin already tried that. The Democrat ambassador to Ukraine, Marie Yovanovitch, denied his visa request. Trump fired her corrupt ass. So Shokin should have no problem getting a visa now.
She was fired a long time ago but Shokin still hasn't set foot here.

Know why?

Because they all know he's a corrupt piece of shit and but can't tell that to the useful idiots like yourself because they need you to be ignorant of that fact.
 
What does any of this have to do with the fact that Trump is trying to defund social security and Medicare??

I guarantee you that more people are more interested in that than they are in whatever Hunter Biden fantasies you have floating around in your head.....

Is it because he is not making any attempt to do that?

And because the law should be blind?

Yeah those are probably it.
 
Hunter Biden’s $450,000 Tax Debt Gets Suddenly ‘RESOLVED’ Despite Claiming NO Income


23 Aug 2020 ~~ By Jonathan Jones

A large tax debt owed to the government by the son of former Vice President Joe Biden has disappeared, according to a report.
Hunter Biden, who has faced scrutiny over allegedly profiting from businesses internationally using his father’s influence, recently told a court in his Arkansas paternity case that he was out of work and broke.
The Washington Free Beacon reported Saturday that despite the younger Biden’s reported personal and financial woes, he was able to resolve a six-figure tax debt in a short period of time.
“Hunter Biden was hit with a $450,000 lien in July over delinquent state income taxes, which he paid off in six days despite having no discernible income,” the Free Beacon’s Alana Goodman reported.
The ability to pay nearly half a million dollars in back taxes in less than a week seems to contradict statements from Biden to an Arkansas court that he could not afford to pay child support.
In January, Biden agreed to pay the mother of a child he fathered in Arkansas, despite not having a job, retroactive to November 2018, Fox News reported.
Biden failed to turn over documents relevant to his income and was held in contempt of court, according to Fox.
After a court-ordered paternity test, Biden was found to be the child’s father.
There was also a legal dustup concerning how much Biden’s permanent monthly child support payment would be calculated.
The paternity and child support case in Arkansas furthers the mystery surrounding Biden’s ability to pay off the reported tax debt.
“A spokesman for D.C.’s Office of the Chief Financial Officer confirmed that Hunter Biden’s lien was released on July 15 after the ‘tax issue was resolved.’ The office declined to say whether Biden had paid off the debt,” The Free Beacon reported.
It is unclear what income, if any, Biden has at the moment, as his father seeks to unseat President Donald Trump in November.
Biden has been linked to a series of financial scandals.
After being hired by Ukrainian energy company Burisma Holdings in 2014, Biden was paid a salary of $83,333 a month, Fox reported.
The high salary was paid despite the former VP’s son holding a job as a non-executive “ceremonial figure.”
It was also said by three individuals close to Biden’s Burisma deal that he never visited Ukraine, despite the exorbitant salary, according to Reuters.
Biden was reportedly paid that salary from April 2014 until November 2015.
[Snip]
In Biden’s 2017 divorce, his former wife claimed he sent the family into financial ruin by spending money on “drugs, alcohol, prostitutes, strip clubs and gifts for women with whom he had sexual relations.”
Kathleen Biden said the family was left with massive debts by Biden’s alleged activities, including tax debt, medical bills and credit cards that were maxed out.
This article appeared originally on The Western Journal.

Comment:
Hmm...., If it is any consolation, I don’t think Hunter is going to help him during the election.
Trump is going to highlight this early and often and frankly it does not take a rocket scientist to see that something is wrong with the Ukraine and China deals, but wait.... there is even more to come out.
The Biden’s played the same scheme in other Eastern European countries as well as Iraq where Biden’s brother landed a lucrative contract in an area where he had no expertise.
It would be a shame if Hunter put all those dollars up hi nose...
the question is where is that $1.4 billion dollar China deal money?
Hunter Biden was not hired to the Burisma board as a "ceremonial figure". He was hired to head Burisma's legal team.


BY MICHAEL SCHERER

JULY 7, 2014 10:39 PM EDT

When Vice President Joe Biden’s son, R. Hunter Biden, joined the board of a private Ukrainian oil and natural gas company this spring, he explained his new job as a legal one, disconnected from any effort to influence the Obama Administration. In a press release, the younger Biden boasted of his abilities on issues like improving corporate transparency.


And Burisma certainly had their share of legal troubles for Hunter Biden to solve for them. Burisma owner Nikolai Zlochevskyi had fled the country to Moscow to avoid prosecution.

Joe Biden held back $1 billion in US treasury loan guarantees, which were needed to secure over $30 brillion in other loans to bail out Ukraine.

Biden certainly took care of Burisma's legal problems. He gave President Poroshenko and Prime Minister Yatsenyuk an ultimatum. Either fire the prosecutor general who is investigating Burisma, and replace him with a puppet, or Ukraine becomes financially insolvent.

That puppet was Biden's "solid", Yuriy Lutsenko, who had recently served prison time for corruption in office until his sentence was commuted after an appeal by Hunter Biden's fellow Burisma board member, Alexander Kwasniewski.
,

But there was a problem. Biden's corrupt puppet didn't have a law degree and had never practiced law. He never even went to law school, fer crissakes. And under Ukrainian law, the Prosecutor General was required to have a law degree and a minimum number of years experience as an attorney.

Facing Quid Pro Joe's threats, the Ukrainian parliament had no choice. In a special session, they actually changed the law that required the country's top attorney be an actual fucking real life attorney with a law degree and everything.

As much of scandal as that was, no matter how embarrassing and degrading it was, no matter how outraged the people were, the Ukrainian parliament had to do it. Joe Biden made them an offer they couldn't refuse.

It's horrible.
So they went with someone that had no training or experience in Ukrainian law???
We went with a president who had no prior training or even the slightest knowledge of the constitution -- so lets not pretend that experience and expertise is supposed to matter now...You trumpers take pride in hating expertise....

No Biffy Boy -

The delusions in your head, do not represent reality.
I do get that worshipers of Government only want other people who worship Government to be in Government.
It's a Government worshipping cult.

One does not need to be in your cult to be President.
Clearly.
So again, you can't refute what I said?

Got it......

There is a reason why everyone (even those who work for Trump) thinks he's a moron...

There is a reason why folks like you have to engage in self projection daily in order to compensate for the fact that your current cult leader is a moron...

Just like yall had to carry water for your last cult leader -- before you all decided to admit "AFTER THE FACT" that he was a moron....and lets not even talk about the guy yall started worshipping after him....

View attachment 379463
Must deflect, must deflect. Can't let any discussion of Biden stand on its own merits. Must deflect, must deflect.

How about Biden’s taxes are none of your damn business?
No one cares about the content of his taxes. They find it interesting that a guy who claims to have no income so as to duck his child support obligations can easily and suddenly erase a six figure tax debt. Obviously, he's either lying to the court about his income and assets or someone gave him a lot of money to settle the tax debt but not take care of his child.
Um, this thread is about Biden’s taxes (it’s in the thread title) and it’s none of your business.
If think it's none of your business, then why the fuck are you so concerned about it that you are posting in this thread, jackass?

When Quid Pro Joe's crony in the Ukraine extortion racket suddenly has a huge windfall of money, it's our business.
Nope. He’s finances are none of your business. People have constitutional rights and you aren’t allowed to violate them because of politics.
No one is violating anyone's constitutional rights by talking about someone with no income being able to "resolve" a six figure tax debt in a very short period of time. Man, you're really trying to stop people from talking about it.
What’s there to talk about? He had a tax debt. Now he doesn’t.
Exactly, but you forgot a few things.

1. He had a massive tax debt.
2. He declared he had no income to avoid child support payments.
3. Suddenly, his tax debt disappeared.

That's kind of like saying, "He committed suicide, there's nothing to see here" when there's a gunshot wound in the back of the head. Since Hunter's dad is running for president, naturally people would want to know if he paid off his son's tax debt but doesn't want to take care of his grandchild. They also would want to know if Hunter is in bed with other big money interests and if that spills over onto Quid Pro Joe, like did Joe trade his office for money? Face it, if Hunter's dad wasn't running for president, he wouldn't even be mentioned in the news.

Obviously if his dad wasn't running for President the debt wouldn't have gotten paid
Whoever paid it did so to help Joe's campaign

Need to make sure that there were no campaign finance violations.
Total hoax.

Dismissed.

As long as the payment is properly documented and within legal parameters,
if not, then no.
If it wasn’t, the IRS would have caught it.

Dismissed.
It's obvious what you're doing here. You're attempting to conflate this situation with TRUMP! wanting to keep his taxes under wraps, but it's not working. In this case, no one is demanding to plow through Hunter's taxes in the off chance they'll find something incriminating to affect the election. They're reacting to a specific incident that invites curiosity. You're stretching.
So it’s just baseless speculation?
If you want to throw away any ethical and moral imperative you may have had for going after Trump's finances to protect Quid Pro Joe from this, go right ahead. You're the one trying to conflate the two, even though they are not in the same ballpark. But baseless? No. We want to know why Quid Pro Joe doesn't want to make sure his grandchild is properly cared for.
So you just want to dig through Hunter Biden’s finances on the off chance there’s something damaging to use against Joe Biden?

When it comes to Trump’s finances, we were told it’s none of our business. But totally different when it comes to Biden. It’s a double standard.
Oh brother--the evidence clearly already shows that Joe Biden was using his family including Hunter to funnel bribe money through......from both Burisima and China I might add. Unlike with the FBI hounding of trump based all on lies an no evidence or reasonable expectation of crime---there is probable cause and evidence to go through the Bidens bank information and then arrest them for bribes and treason.

But of course if we go after the bidens, we have to be fair and go after the Pelosis as there is also clear evidence that Pelosi was using her sons bank account to funnel bribe money from another ukranian energy company. Hell Pelosi even made a promotional video for the company.
LOL

You prove the old adage... conservatives are fucking morons.

No, fucking moron, Pelosi's son was not involved with funneling money from a Ukraine energy company.

:cuckoo:


XXXXXXXXXXXX
LOLOLOLOL

Rightwingnews and redstate......

1348488761322-smiley_rofl.gif


Dumbfuck, Paul Pelosi sold off his share that company before the fraud was committed. Your moronic link claims...

Paul Pelosi Jr. co-founded the company Natural Blue Resources, which the SEC charged with securities fraud in 2014.

Yes, he cofounded the company. He also left the company years before the fraud which is why he was not among those indicted for fraud...


From August 24, 2009, to January 10, 2010, Pelosi served as President and Board member of Natural Blue.

... how come your bullshit rightwingnut fake news sources failed to mention that?

And your fake news falsely claims Pelosi was a board member of NRGLab...

BOOM: Nancy Pelosi’s son Paul Pelosi Jr. (who went to Ukraine in 2017) was a board member of Viscoil and executive at its related company NRGLab, which DID ENERGY Business in UKRAINE!

It's true he was on the board with Viscoil, but he left before they dissolved and there's no evidence he ever worked for NRGLab...


Paul Pelosi Jr. once served on the board of an American energy company, Viscoil, that dissolved and re-formed in Singapore under a different name. But Paul Pelosi had no part in the new entity, and it’s unclear to what extent the company has done business in Ukraine.

And your fake news also states...

Junior Pelosi’s company, Viscoil is under investigation for securities fraud. It seems as though the public management of the company, which included Paul Pelosi, Jr., as President and COO, was actually a Potemkin arrangement that hid the fact that the company was actually controlled by a pair of convicted felons.

... which is also bullshit since it was Natural Blue, not Viscoil, that was investigated for securities fraud and controlled by a couple of felons. Your source is such an idiot, it mixed up the two companies.

So in a nutshell, to reduce this to the lowest common denominator.... you’re a fucking moron who intentionally dumbs himself down with rightarded fake news.


1233796371590.gif
 
An angry little tyke you are. Let me know when you want to talk grown up
LOL

Kaz thinks people who laugh at him are "angry."

:abgg2q.jpg:

No one said that but you. If you ever have a grown up point to make then shoot
LOLOL

You think I'm the only one to laugh at you?


Ssssttttttttttrrrrrrrriiiiiiiiiikkkkkkkkkkkkeeeeeeeeeeee ....

Faun takes a big old swing and falls flat on his ass. The stands erupt in wild laughter pointing at Faun. Wow, that was embarrassing.

Telling you that you speak only for yourself doesn't say anything about what other people think, moron. Just it's hilarious how you need your ego propped up with the validation of others.

Faun: You're with me, right guys? You agree with me? Please tell me you do. Please, please, please, I need you to agree with me. Guys, you're with me, right? Aren't you?
 
There's a ton of evidence!

Dozens of payments were made to Rosemont Seneca by Burisma, an entity known to use bribery. The bank records of every one of those payments is evidence!

Biden confessed in a live stream that he extorted Ukrainian officials into firing Shokin. That video is evidence!

Shokin testified under oath that he was fired because he wouldn't drop the criminal case against Burisma. The transcript of that deposition is evidence!

Payments for being a board of director is not evidence of illegal activity without further evidence.

Biden saying that Shokin being fired because he was corrupt is not evidence of illegal activity without further information.

Shokin is not a credible witness. Allegations have to come from credible sources to be used as evidence of illegal activity.

Strike out.

When Biden is responsible for the Ukraine relationship and Ukraine is paying his son millions of dollars, that is clear conflict of interest. Obviously you have no business or management experience if you don't know that
Dumbfuck, who denied it was a conflict of interest?

You're one angry little guy
LOL

Translation from kaz-to-English: no one denied it was a conflict of interest.

Of course Democrats deny it's a conflict of interest. A conflict of interest would be investigated.

Do you ever NOT rage post?
 
Hunter Biden’s $450,000 Tax Debt Gets Suddenly ‘RESOLVED’ Despite Claiming NO Income


23 Aug 2020 ~~ By Jonathan Jones

A large tax debt owed to the government by the son of former Vice President Joe Biden has disappeared, according to a report.
Hunter Biden, who has faced scrutiny over allegedly profiting from businesses internationally using his father’s influence, recently told a court in his Arkansas paternity case that he was out of work and broke.
The Washington Free Beacon reported Saturday that despite the younger Biden’s reported personal and financial woes, he was able to resolve a six-figure tax debt in a short period of time.
“Hunter Biden was hit with a $450,000 lien in July over delinquent state income taxes, which he paid off in six days despite having no discernible income,” the Free Beacon’s Alana Goodman reported.
The ability to pay nearly half a million dollars in back taxes in less than a week seems to contradict statements from Biden to an Arkansas court that he could not afford to pay child support.
In January, Biden agreed to pay the mother of a child he fathered in Arkansas, despite not having a job, retroactive to November 2018, Fox News reported.
Biden failed to turn over documents relevant to his income and was held in contempt of court, according to Fox.
After a court-ordered paternity test, Biden was found to be the child’s father.
There was also a legal dustup concerning how much Biden’s permanent monthly child support payment would be calculated.
The paternity and child support case in Arkansas furthers the mystery surrounding Biden’s ability to pay off the reported tax debt.
“A spokesman for D.C.’s Office of the Chief Financial Officer confirmed that Hunter Biden’s lien was released on July 15 after the ‘tax issue was resolved.’ The office declined to say whether Biden had paid off the debt,” The Free Beacon reported.
It is unclear what income, if any, Biden has at the moment, as his father seeks to unseat President Donald Trump in November.
Biden has been linked to a series of financial scandals.
After being hired by Ukrainian energy company Burisma Holdings in 2014, Biden was paid a salary of $83,333 a month, Fox reported.
The high salary was paid despite the former VP’s son holding a job as a non-executive “ceremonial figure.”
It was also said by three individuals close to Biden’s Burisma deal that he never visited Ukraine, despite the exorbitant salary, according to Reuters.
Biden was reportedly paid that salary from April 2014 until November 2015.
[Snip]
In Biden’s 2017 divorce, his former wife claimed he sent the family into financial ruin by spending money on “drugs, alcohol, prostitutes, strip clubs and gifts for women with whom he had sexual relations.”
Kathleen Biden said the family was left with massive debts by Biden’s alleged activities, including tax debt, medical bills and credit cards that were maxed out.
This article appeared originally on The Western Journal.

Comment:
Hmm...., If it is any consolation, I don’t think Hunter is going to help him during the election.
Trump is going to highlight this early and often and frankly it does not take a rocket scientist to see that something is wrong with the Ukraine and China deals, but wait.... there is even more to come out.
The Biden’s played the same scheme in other Eastern European countries as well as Iraq where Biden’s brother landed a lucrative contract in an area where he had no expertise.
It would be a shame if Hunter put all those dollars up hi nose...
the question is where is that $1.4 billion dollar China deal money?
Hunter Biden was not hired to the Burisma board as a "ceremonial figure". He was hired to head Burisma's legal team.


BY MICHAEL SCHERER

JULY 7, 2014 10:39 PM EDT

When Vice President Joe Biden’s son, R. Hunter Biden, joined the board of a private Ukrainian oil and natural gas company this spring, he explained his new job as a legal one, disconnected from any effort to influence the Obama Administration. In a press release, the younger Biden boasted of his abilities on issues like improving corporate transparency.


And Burisma certainly had their share of legal troubles for Hunter Biden to solve for them. Burisma owner Nikolai Zlochevskyi had fled the country to Moscow to avoid prosecution.

Joe Biden held back $1 billion in US treasury loan guarantees, which were needed to secure over $30 brillion in other loans to bail out Ukraine.

Biden certainly took care of Burisma's legal problems. He gave President Poroshenko and Prime Minister Yatsenyuk an ultimatum. Either fire the prosecutor general who is investigating Burisma, and replace him with a puppet, or Ukraine becomes financially insolvent.

That puppet was Biden's "solid", Yuriy Lutsenko, who had recently served prison time for corruption in office until his sentence was commuted after an appeal by Hunter Biden's fellow Burisma board member, Alexander Kwasniewski.
,

But there was a problem. Biden's corrupt puppet didn't have a law degree and had never practiced law. He never even went to law school, fer crissakes. And under Ukrainian law, the Prosecutor General was required to have a law degree and a minimum number of years experience as an attorney.

Facing Quid Pro Joe's threats, the Ukrainian parliament had no choice. In a special session, they actually changed the law that required the country's top attorney be an actual fucking real life attorney with a law degree and everything.

As much of scandal as that was, no matter how embarrassing and degrading it was, no matter how outraged the people were, the Ukrainian parliament had to do it. Joe Biden made them an offer they couldn't refuse.

It's horrible.
So they went with someone that had no training or experience in Ukrainian law???
We went with a president who had no prior training or even the slightest knowledge of the constitution -- so lets not pretend that experience and expertise is supposed to matter now...You trumpers take pride in hating expertise....

No Biffy Boy -

The delusions in your head, do not represent reality.
I do get that worshipers of Government only want other people who worship Government to be in Government.
It's a Government worshipping cult.

One does not need to be in your cult to be President.
Clearly.
So again, you can't refute what I said?

Got it......

There is a reason why everyone (even those who work for Trump) thinks he's a moron...

There is a reason why folks like you have to engage in self projection daily in order to compensate for the fact that your current cult leader is a moron...

Just like yall had to carry water for your last cult leader -- before you all decided to admit "AFTER THE FACT" that he was a moron....and lets not even talk about the guy yall started worshipping after him....

View attachment 379463
Must deflect, must deflect. Can't let any discussion of Biden stand on its own merits. Must deflect, must deflect.

How about Biden’s taxes are none of your damn business?
No one cares about the content of his taxes. They find it interesting that a guy who claims to have no income so as to duck his child support obligations can easily and suddenly erase a six figure tax debt. Obviously, he's either lying to the court about his income and assets or someone gave him a lot of money to settle the tax debt but not take care of his child.
Um, this thread is about Biden’s taxes (it’s in the thread title) and it’s none of your business.
If think it's none of your business, then why the fuck are you so concerned about it that you are posting in this thread, jackass?

When Quid Pro Joe's crony in the Ukraine extortion racket suddenly has a huge windfall of money, it's our business.
Nope. He’s finances are none of your business. People have constitutional rights and you aren’t allowed to violate them because of politics.
No one is violating anyone's constitutional rights by talking about someone with no income being able to "resolve" a six figure tax debt in a very short period of time. Man, you're really trying to stop people from talking about it.
What’s there to talk about? He had a tax debt. Now he doesn’t.
Exactly, but you forgot a few things.

1. He had a massive tax debt.
2. He declared he had no income to avoid child support payments.
3. Suddenly, his tax debt disappeared.

That's kind of like saying, "He committed suicide, there's nothing to see here" when there's a gunshot wound in the back of the head. Since Hunter's dad is running for president, naturally people would want to know if he paid off his son's tax debt but doesn't want to take care of his grandchild. They also would want to know if Hunter is in bed with other big money interests and if that spills over onto Quid Pro Joe, like did Joe trade his office for money? Face it, if Hunter's dad wasn't running for president, he wouldn't even be mentioned in the news.

Obviously if his dad wasn't running for President the debt wouldn't have gotten paid
Whoever paid it did so to help Joe's campaign

Need to make sure that there were no campaign finance violations.
Total hoax.

Dismissed.

As long as the payment is properly documented and within legal parameters,
if not, then no.
If it wasn’t, the IRS would have caught it.

Dismissed.
It's obvious what you're doing here. You're attempting to conflate this situation with TRUMP! wanting to keep his taxes under wraps, but it's not working. In this case, no one is demanding to plow through Hunter's taxes in the off chance they'll find something incriminating to affect the election. They're reacting to a specific incident that invites curiosity. You're stretching.
So it’s just baseless speculation?
If you want to throw away any ethical and moral imperative you may have had for going after Trump's finances to protect Quid Pro Joe from this, go right ahead. You're the one trying to conflate the two, even though they are not in the same ballpark. But baseless? No. We want to know why Quid Pro Joe doesn't want to make sure his grandchild is properly cared for.
So you just want to dig through Hunter Biden’s finances on the off chance there’s something damaging to use against Joe Biden?

When it comes to Trump’s finances, we were told it’s none of our business. But totally different when it comes to Biden. It’s a double standard.
Oh brother--the evidence clearly already shows that Joe Biden was using his family including Hunter to funnel bribe money through......from both Burisima and China I might add. Unlike with the FBI hounding of trump based all on lies an no evidence or reasonable expectation of crime---there is probable cause and evidence to go through the Bidens bank information and then arrest them for bribes and treason.

But of course if we go after the bidens, we have to be fair and go after the Pelosis as there is also clear evidence that Pelosi was using her sons bank account to funnel bribe money from another ukranian energy company. Hell Pelosi even made a promotional video for the company.
LOL

You prove the old adage... conservatives are fucking morons.

No, fucking moron, Pelosi's son was not involved with funneling money from a Ukraine energy company.

:cuckoo:


XXXXXXXXXXXX
LOLOLOLOL

Rightwingnews and redstate......

1348488761322-smiley_rofl.gif


Dumbfuck, Paul Pelosi sold off his share that company before the fraud was committed. Your moronic link claims...

Paul Pelosi Jr. co-founded the company Natural Blue Resources, which the SEC charged with securities fraud in 2014.

Yes, he cofounded the company. He also left the company years before the fraud which is why he was not among those indicted for fraud...

From August 24, 2009, to January 10, 2010, Pelosi served as President and Board member of Natural Blue.

... how come your bullshit rightwingnut fake news sources failed to mention that?

And your fake news falsely claims Pelosi was a board member of NRGLab...

BOOM: Nancy Pelosi’s son Paul Pelosi Jr. (who went to Ukraine in 2017) was a board member of Viscoil and executive at its related company NRGLab, which DID ENERGY Business in UKRAINE!

It's true he was on the board with Viscoil, but he left before they dissolved and there's no evidence he ever worked for NRGLab...

Paul Pelosi Jr. once served on the board of an American energy company, Viscoil, that dissolved and re-formed in Singapore under a different name. But Paul Pelosi had no part in the new entity, and it’s unclear to what extent the company has done business in Ukraine.

And your fake news also states...

Junior Pelosi’s company, Viscoil is under investigation for securities fraud. It seems as though the public management of the company, which included Paul Pelosi, Jr., as President and COO, was actually a Potemkin arrangement that hid the fact that the company was actually controlled by a pair of convicted felons.

... which is also bullshit since it was Natural Blue, not Viscoil, that was investigated for securities fraud and controlled by a couple of felons. Your source is such an idiot, it mixed up the two companies.

So in a nutshell, to reduce this to the lowest common denominator.... you’re a fucking moron who intentionally dumbs himself down with rightarded fake news.


1233796371590.gif
Bravo. The same idiots who constantly claimed about bias in legitimate journalism just gobble up the bullshit from these clickbait sketchy websites.
 
There's a ton of evidence!

Dozens of payments were made to Rosemont Seneca by Burisma, an entity known to use bribery. The bank records of every one of those payments is evidence!

Biden confessed in a live stream that he extorted Ukrainian officials into firing Shokin. That video is evidence!

Shokin testified under oath that he was fired because he wouldn't drop the criminal case against Burisma. The transcript of that deposition is evidence!

Payments for being a board of director is not evidence of illegal activity without further evidence.

Biden saying that Shokin being fired because he was corrupt is not evidence of illegal activity without further information.

Shokin is not a credible witness. Allegations have to come from credible sources to be used as evidence of illegal activity.

Strike out.

When Biden is responsible for the Ukraine relationship and Ukraine is paying his son millions of dollars, that is clear conflict of interest. Obviously you have no business or management experience if you don't know that
Dumbfuck, who denied it was a conflict of interest?

You're one angry little guy
LOL

Translation from kaz-to-English: no one denied it was a conflict of interest.

Of course Democrats deny it's a conflict of interest. A conflict of interest would be investigated.

Do you ever NOT rage post?

Conflicts of interest laws don’t apply to Presidents and Vice Presidents. It’s the only reason Trump can actually be president and maintain ownership of his business.

Swing and a miss.
 
Yes, there were several posts in the middle, all were of YOU saying Trump was supposed to shock and awe you, none of me saying that he did

Except for the reply where you LITERALLY said he did.


Oh, the one you just quoted. Oh wait, you didn't. Liar.

I didn’t what? Just quote you saying what you are claiming you didn’t say?

I quoted you, twice now. Inability to recognize reality is a sign of mental disorder. But I think you’re actually just trolling.

Bullshit Democrat tactics:

1) Ignore requests for quotes for your bull shit claims

2) Then claim you already provided quotes you didn't provide

In post 261, I provided the quote you requested.

That post doesn't say anything. You cut the entire conversation, liar
It includes the quote of you saying the thing you said you didn’t say.

It’s right there. Black and white. Clear as crystal. You lose. Good day, sir!



"He did" could mean anything, Darline


Not in this case. It was an immediate to a question. Want to see what it that question was?


No, you cut it from the quote box chain

So what, dumbfuck? All the posts are still there.

If Obama was such a screw up, why didn’t Trump blow the roof off like you say?
He did.


You're a day late and a dollar short. We already covered that

No, all that happened was your insane semantic gymnastics to bend and scurry away from the dumb shit you say rather than make an argument.


colfax: No I'm not, kaz, you are!

When you have nothing, repeat to me what I said to you like any other playgrounding third grader


Instead of addressing a point substantively, you whined that you said similar and I said same, as if that has any substantive effect on the point. That’s about as pathetic as it gets.


Every time we discussed a point you changed the words changing the meaning of what was said. Go ahead and cry, little girl, here's a tissue

Oh, sure. Because the words “same” and “similar” have such different substantially different meanings.

Loser.


Strawman


It’s exactly what you did. Complained that I changed the word “similar” to “same”.


Changing words again. I said Trump's performance was way better. It's his numbers that I said were similar. I said they were better, I did not say the same. But I explained why that's different.


That was only one of the many word changes that you made. This is the endless bull shit you've pulled through this whole thing. Like here you say that was the objection I made as if it was the only one. You're still doing it


It was one of many pointless objections that you raise because clearly your argument is horse shit.

People with good arguments make their arguments. People with horse shit arguments whine about irrelevant semantics.


It's not irrelevant or just semantics when you keep changing the words because you know you're losing and you completely change the meaning of the points made. You're just desperate now
 
An angry little tyke you are. Let me know when you want to talk grown up
LOL

Kaz thinks people who laugh at him are "angry."

:abgg2q.jpg:

No one said that but you. If you ever have a grown up point to make then shoot
LOLOL

You think I'm the only one to laugh at you?


Ssssttttttttttrrrrrrrriiiiiiiiiikkkkkkkkkkkkeeeeeeeeeeee ....

Faun takes a big old swing and falls flat on his ass. The stands erupt in wild laughter pointing at Faun. Wow, that was embarrassing.

Telling you that you speak only for yourself doesn't say anything about what other people think, moron. Just it's hilarious how you need your ego propped up with the validation of others.

Faun: You're with me, right guys? You agree with me? Please tell me you do. Please, please, please, I need you to agree with me. Guys, you're with me, right? Aren't you?
LOLOLOL

Aww, you poor thing, bless your heart. I'm not the only one who laughs at you.

wtf? LOL!!!!!!!!!!! only in yer mind.... lol.... you silly. hate facts? i've posted facts & some with links - you show nothing but being a trump humper... it didn't go un noticed how you just walked on by when i gave you cold hard facts about donny....

you amuse me at best, & i pity you at worst.
 
There's a ton of evidence!

Dozens of payments were made to Rosemont Seneca by Burisma, an entity known to use bribery. The bank records of every one of those payments is evidence!

Biden confessed in a live stream that he extorted Ukrainian officials into firing Shokin. That video is evidence!

Shokin testified under oath that he was fired because he wouldn't drop the criminal case against Burisma. The transcript of that deposition is evidence!

Payments for being a board of director is not evidence of illegal activity without further evidence.

Biden saying that Shokin being fired because he was corrupt is not evidence of illegal activity without further information.

Shokin is not a credible witness. Allegations have to come from credible sources to be used as evidence of illegal activity.

Strike out.

When Biden is responsible for the Ukraine relationship and Ukraine is paying his son millions of dollars, that is clear conflict of interest. Obviously you have no business or management experience if you don't know that
Dumbfuck, who denied it was a conflict of interest?

You're one angry little guy
LOL

Translation from kaz-to-English: no one denied it was a conflict of interest.

Of course Democrats deny it's a conflict of interest. A conflict of interest would be investigated.

Do you ever NOT rage post?
So what that it was a conflict of interest? It's not a crime., ya flamin' lunatic.
icon_rolleyes.gif
 
There's a ton of evidence!

Dozens of payments were made to Rosemont Seneca by Burisma, an entity known to use bribery. The bank records of every one of those payments is evidence!

Biden confessed in a live stream that he extorted Ukrainian officials into firing Shokin. That video is evidence!

Shokin testified under oath that he was fired because he wouldn't drop the criminal case against Burisma. The transcript of that deposition is evidence!

Payments for being a board of director is not evidence of illegal activity without further evidence.

Biden saying that Shokin being fired because he was corrupt is not evidence of illegal activity without further information.

Shokin is not a credible witness. Allegations have to come from credible sources to be used as evidence of illegal activity.

Strike out.

When Biden is responsible for the Ukraine relationship and Ukraine is paying his son millions of dollars, that is clear conflict of interest. Obviously you have no business or management experience if you don't know that
Dumbfuck, who denied it was a conflict of interest?

You're one angry little guy
LOL

Translation from kaz-to-English: no one denied it was a conflict of interest.

Of course Democrats deny it's a conflict of interest. A conflict of interest would be investigated.

Do you ever NOT rage post?

Conflicts of interest laws don’t apply to Presidents and Vice Presidents. It’s the only reason Trump can actually be president and maintain ownership of his business.

Swing and a miss.

Suddenly you only care about technical violations of the law.

That while you don't care that Trump has fourth amendment rights and you support Democrats being able to subpoena his taxes just to see what's in them and you don't care there is no law requiring disclosure of his taxes. For Democrats, not a violation of the law and you're fine with it. Corruption doesn't matter. With Trump, you don't care if he violates the law at all, he's corrupt!

Such a constant suck ass hypocrite you are
 
An angry little tyke you are. Let me know when you want to talk grown up
LOL

Kaz thinks people who laugh at him are "angry."

:abgg2q.jpg:

No one said that but you. If you ever have a grown up point to make then shoot
LOLOL

You think I'm the only one to laugh at you?


Ssssttttttttttrrrrrrrriiiiiiiiiikkkkkkkkkkkkeeeeeeeeeeee ....

Faun takes a big old swing and falls flat on his ass. The stands erupt in wild laughter pointing at Faun. Wow, that was embarrassing.

Telling you that you speak only for yourself doesn't say anything about what other people think, moron. Just it's hilarious how you need your ego propped up with the validation of others.

Faun: You're with me, right guys? You agree with me? Please tell me you do. Please, please, please, I need you to agree with me. Guys, you're with me, right? Aren't you?
LOLOLOL

Aww, you poor thing, bless your heart. I'm not the only one who laughs at you.

wtf? LOL!!!!!!!!!!! only in yer mind.... lol.... you silly. hate facts? i've posted facts & some with links - you show nothing but being a trump humper... it didn't go un noticed how you just walked on by when i gave you cold hard facts about donny....
you amuse me at best, & i pity you at worst.​

Didn't say you were, Stewie. Here's another pat on the head. There there
 
There's a ton of evidence!

Dozens of payments were made to Rosemont Seneca by Burisma, an entity known to use bribery. The bank records of every one of those payments is evidence!

Biden confessed in a live stream that he extorted Ukrainian officials into firing Shokin. That video is evidence!

Shokin testified under oath that he was fired because he wouldn't drop the criminal case against Burisma. The transcript of that deposition is evidence!

Payments for being a board of director is not evidence of illegal activity without further evidence.

Biden saying that Shokin being fired because he was corrupt is not evidence of illegal activity without further information.

Shokin is not a credible witness. Allegations have to come from credible sources to be used as evidence of illegal activity.

Strike out.

When Biden is responsible for the Ukraine relationship and Ukraine is paying his son millions of dollars, that is clear conflict of interest. Obviously you have no business or management experience if you don't know that
Dumbfuck, who denied it was a conflict of interest?

You're one angry little guy
LOL

Translation from kaz-to-English: no one denied it was a conflict of interest.

Of course Democrats deny it's a conflict of interest. A conflict of interest would be investigated.

Do you ever NOT rage post?
So what that it was a conflict of interest? It's not a crime., ya flamin' lunatic.
icon_rolleyes.gif

Corruption, ya flamin' hypocrite
icon_rolleyes.gif
 
An angry little tyke you are. Let me know when you want to talk grown up
LOL

Kaz thinks people who laugh at him are "angry."

:abgg2q.jpg:

No one said that but you. If you ever have a grown up point to make then shoot
LOLOL

You think I'm the only one to laugh at you?


Ssssttttttttttrrrrrrrriiiiiiiiiikkkkkkkkkkkkeeeeeeeeeeee ....

Faun takes a big old swing and falls flat on his ass. The stands erupt in wild laughter pointing at Faun. Wow, that was embarrassing.

Telling you that you speak only for yourself doesn't say anything about what other people think, moron. Just it's hilarious how you need your ego propped up with the validation of others.

Faun: You're with me, right guys? You agree with me? Please tell me you do. Please, please, please, I need you to agree with me. Guys, you're with me, right? Aren't you?
LOLOLOL

Aww, you poor thing, bless your heart. I'm not the only one who laughs at you.

wtf? LOL!!!!!!!!!!! only in yer mind.... lol.... you silly. hate facts? i've posted facts & some with links - you show nothing but being a trump humper... it didn't go un noticed how you just walked on by when i gave you cold hard facts about donny....
you amuse me at best, & i pity you at worst.​

Didn't say you were, Stewie. Here's another pat on the head. There there
LOLOL

Poor kaz, he struggles to post without kazzing...

Faun: You think I'm the only one to laugh at you?

kaz: Ssssttttttttttrrrrrrrriiiiiiiiiikkkkkkkkkkkkeeeeeeeeeeee ....
 
There's a ton of evidence!

Dozens of payments were made to Rosemont Seneca by Burisma, an entity known to use bribery. The bank records of every one of those payments is evidence!

Biden confessed in a live stream that he extorted Ukrainian officials into firing Shokin. That video is evidence!

Shokin testified under oath that he was fired because he wouldn't drop the criminal case against Burisma. The transcript of that deposition is evidence!

Payments for being a board of director is not evidence of illegal activity without further evidence.

Biden saying that Shokin being fired because he was corrupt is not evidence of illegal activity without further information.

Shokin is not a credible witness. Allegations have to come from credible sources to be used as evidence of illegal activity.

Strike out.

When Biden is responsible for the Ukraine relationship and Ukraine is paying his son millions of dollars, that is clear conflict of interest. Obviously you have no business or management experience if you don't know that
Dumbfuck, who denied it was a conflict of interest?

You're one angry little guy
LOL

Translation from kaz-to-English: no one denied it was a conflict of interest.

Of course Democrats deny it's a conflict of interest. A conflict of interest would be investigated.

Do you ever NOT rage post?
So what that it was a conflict of interest? It's not a crime., ya flamin' lunatic.
icon_rolleyes.gif

Corruption, ya flamin' hypocrite
icon_rolleyes.gif
LOL

Stop kazzing, ya bald-faced kazzer, there was no corruption.
 
Hunter Biden’s $450,000 Tax Debt Gets Suddenly ‘RESOLVED’ Despite Claiming NO Income


23 Aug 2020 ~~ By Jonathan Jones

A large tax debt owed to the government by the son of former Vice President Joe Biden has disappeared, according to a report.
Hunter Biden, who has faced scrutiny over allegedly profiting from businesses internationally using his father’s influence, recently told a court in his Arkansas paternity case that he was out of work and broke.
The Washington Free Beacon reported Saturday that despite the younger Biden’s reported personal and financial woes, he was able to resolve a six-figure tax debt in a short period of time.
“Hunter Biden was hit with a $450,000 lien in July over delinquent state income taxes, which he paid off in six days despite having no discernible income,” the Free Beacon’s Alana Goodman reported.
The ability to pay nearly half a million dollars in back taxes in less than a week seems to contradict statements from Biden to an Arkansas court that he could not afford to pay child support.
In January, Biden agreed to pay the mother of a child he fathered in Arkansas, despite not having a job, retroactive to November 2018, Fox News reported.
Biden failed to turn over documents relevant to his income and was held in contempt of court, according to Fox.
After a court-ordered paternity test, Biden was found to be the child’s father.
There was also a legal dustup concerning how much Biden’s permanent monthly child support payment would be calculated.
The paternity and child support case in Arkansas furthers the mystery surrounding Biden’s ability to pay off the reported tax debt.
“A spokesman for D.C.’s Office of the Chief Financial Officer confirmed that Hunter Biden’s lien was released on July 15 after the ‘tax issue was resolved.’ The office declined to say whether Biden had paid off the debt,” The Free Beacon reported.
It is unclear what income, if any, Biden has at the moment, as his father seeks to unseat President Donald Trump in November.
Biden has been linked to a series of financial scandals.
After being hired by Ukrainian energy company Burisma Holdings in 2014, Biden was paid a salary of $83,333 a month, Fox reported.
The high salary was paid despite the former VP’s son holding a job as a non-executive “ceremonial figure.”
It was also said by three individuals close to Biden’s Burisma deal that he never visited Ukraine, despite the exorbitant salary, according to Reuters.
Biden was reportedly paid that salary from April 2014 until November 2015.
[Snip]
In Biden’s 2017 divorce, his former wife claimed he sent the family into financial ruin by spending money on “drugs, alcohol, prostitutes, strip clubs and gifts for women with whom he had sexual relations.”
Kathleen Biden said the family was left with massive debts by Biden’s alleged activities, including tax debt, medical bills and credit cards that were maxed out.
This article appeared originally on The Western Journal.

Comment:
Hmm...., If it is any consolation, I don’t think Hunter is going to help him during the election.
Trump is going to highlight this early and often and frankly it does not take a rocket scientist to see that something is wrong with the Ukraine and China deals, but wait.... there is even more to come out.
The Biden’s played the same scheme in other Eastern European countries as well as Iraq where Biden’s brother landed a lucrative contract in an area where he had no expertise.
It would be a shame if Hunter put all those dollars up hi nose...
the question is where is that $1.4 billion dollar China deal money?
Hunter Biden was not hired to the Burisma board as a "ceremonial figure". He was hired to head Burisma's legal team.


BY MICHAEL SCHERER

JULY 7, 2014 10:39 PM EDT

When Vice President Joe Biden’s son, R. Hunter Biden, joined the board of a private Ukrainian oil and natural gas company this spring, he explained his new job as a legal one, disconnected from any effort to influence the Obama Administration. In a press release, the younger Biden boasted of his abilities on issues like improving corporate transparency.


And Burisma certainly had their share of legal troubles for Hunter Biden to solve for them. Burisma owner Nikolai Zlochevskyi had fled the country to Moscow to avoid prosecution.

Joe Biden held back $1 billion in US treasury loan guarantees, which were needed to secure over $30 brillion in other loans to bail out Ukraine.

Biden certainly took care of Burisma's legal problems. He gave President Poroshenko and Prime Minister Yatsenyuk an ultimatum. Either fire the prosecutor general who is investigating Burisma, and replace him with a puppet, or Ukraine becomes financially insolvent.

That puppet was Biden's "solid", Yuriy Lutsenko, who had recently served prison time for corruption in office until his sentence was commuted after an appeal by Hunter Biden's fellow Burisma board member, Alexander Kwasniewski.
,

But there was a problem. Biden's corrupt puppet didn't have a law degree and had never practiced law. He never even went to law school, fer crissakes. And under Ukrainian law, the Prosecutor General was required to have a law degree and a minimum number of years experience as an attorney.

Facing Quid Pro Joe's threats, the Ukrainian parliament had no choice. In a special session, they actually changed the law that required the country's top attorney be an actual fucking real life attorney with a law degree and everything.

As much of scandal as that was, no matter how embarrassing and degrading it was, no matter how outraged the people were, the Ukrainian parliament had to do it. Joe Biden made them an offer they couldn't refuse.

It's horrible.
So they went with someone that had no training or experience in Ukrainian law???
We went with a president who had no prior training or even the slightest knowledge of the constitution -- so lets not pretend that experience and expertise is supposed to matter now...You trumpers take pride in hating expertise....
You're a full of shit delusional TDS afflicted moron.

DJT has tons of experience as a bold leader and top executive. He was the president of the Trump Organization since the 1970s.
No, he doesn't have tons of experience....

Which is why dic suckers like you have to continue making excuses for him......like I said before, you dumb asses remind me of the Bush followers -- matter of fact, I am willing to bet you were a bush follower....just too ashamed to admit it....

Just like you are too ashamed to admit you were deep throating Romney when he was the nominee and definitely was deep-throating McCain..so fuck all that bullshit you talking about now
He may not of had a lot of political experience, but he has done more for this country in his first two years than O'Blamer ever thought about doing.
FB_IMG_1596484523095.jpg
This is what "experience" will get you - incompetent garbage.
 
There's a ton of evidence!

Dozens of payments were made to Rosemont Seneca by Burisma, an entity known to use bribery. The bank records of every one of those payments is evidence!

Biden confessed in a live stream that he extorted Ukrainian officials into firing Shokin. That video is evidence!

Shokin testified under oath that he was fired because he wouldn't drop the criminal case against Burisma. The transcript of that deposition is evidence!

Payments for being a board of director is not evidence of illegal activity without further evidence.

Biden saying that Shokin being fired because he was corrupt is not evidence of illegal activity without further information.

Shokin is not a credible witness. Allegations have to come from credible sources to be used as evidence of illegal activity.

Strike out.

When Biden is responsible for the Ukraine relationship and Ukraine is paying his son millions of dollars, that is clear conflict of interest. Obviously you have no business or management experience if you don't know that
Dumbfuck, who denied it was a conflict of interest?

You're one angry little guy
LOL

Translation from kaz-to-English: no one denied it was a conflict of interest.

Of course Democrats deny it's a conflict of interest. A conflict of interest would be investigated.

Do you ever NOT rage post?

Conflicts of interest laws don’t apply to Presidents and Vice Presidents. It’s the only reason Trump can actually be president and maintain ownership of his business.

Swing and a miss.

Suddenly you only care about technical violations of the law.

That while you don't care that Trump has fourth amendment rights and you support Democrats being able to subpoena his taxes just to see what's in them and you don't care there is no law requiring disclosure of his taxes. For Democrats, not a violation of the law and you're fine with it. Corruption doesn't matter. With Trump, you don't care if he violates the law at all, he's corrupt!

Such a constant suck ass hypocrite you are

No one is subpoenaing Trump’s tax records for claims of conflict of interest, they’re being subpoenaed because there is credible evidence of violations of law. The AG of New York has followed every rule and then some and the subpoenas have been upheld at nearly every turn because Trump has no legitimate cause to stop them.

This isn’t hypocrisy, this is you not knowing what the hell youre talking about or, more likely, dishonestly conflating two unrelated issues because you don’t have a rational argument to make.
 
An angry little tyke you are. Let me know when you want to talk grown up
LOL

Kaz thinks people who laugh at him are "angry."

:abgg2q.jpg:

No one said that but you. If you ever have a grown up point to make then shoot
LOLOL

You think I'm the only one to laugh at you?


Ssssttttttttttrrrrrrrriiiiiiiiiikkkkkkkkkkkkeeeeeeeeeeee ....

Faun takes a big old swing and falls flat on his ass. The stands erupt in wild laughter pointing at Faun. Wow, that was embarrassing.

Telling you that you speak only for yourself doesn't say anything about what other people think, moron. Just it's hilarious how you need your ego propped up with the validation of others.

Faun: You're with me, right guys? You agree with me? Please tell me you do. Please, please, please, I need you to agree with me. Guys, you're with me, right? Aren't you?
LOLOLOL

Aww, you poor thing, bless your heart. I'm not the only one who laughs at you.

wtf? LOL!!!!!!!!!!! only in yer mind.... lol.... you silly. hate facts? i've posted facts & some with links - you show nothing but being a trump humper... it didn't go un noticed how you just walked on by when i gave you cold hard facts about donny....
you amuse me at best, & i pity you at worst.​

Didn't say you were, Stewie. Here's another pat on the head. There there
LOLOL

Poor kaz, he struggles to post without kazzing...

Faun: You think I'm the only one to laugh at you?

kaz: Ssssttttttttttrrrrrrrriiiiiiiiiikkkkkkkkkkkkeeeeeeeeeeee ....

No Stewie, all the Democrats are laughing at me. I think I can make my own decisions better than government can and you dependency whores think you can't make better decisions over your own life than government can. You still don't get it? How stupid are you?

Pat, pat, pat on the head. There there, kiddie. Don't bite the dog again
 
There's a ton of evidence!

Dozens of payments were made to Rosemont Seneca by Burisma, an entity known to use bribery. The bank records of every one of those payments is evidence!

Biden confessed in a live stream that he extorted Ukrainian officials into firing Shokin. That video is evidence!

Shokin testified under oath that he was fired because he wouldn't drop the criminal case against Burisma. The transcript of that deposition is evidence!

Payments for being a board of director is not evidence of illegal activity without further evidence.

Biden saying that Shokin being fired because he was corrupt is not evidence of illegal activity without further information.

Shokin is not a credible witness. Allegations have to come from credible sources to be used as evidence of illegal activity.

Strike out.

When Biden is responsible for the Ukraine relationship and Ukraine is paying his son millions of dollars, that is clear conflict of interest. Obviously you have no business or management experience if you don't know that
Dumbfuck, who denied it was a conflict of interest?

You're one angry little guy
LOL

Translation from kaz-to-English: no one denied it was a conflict of interest.

Of course Democrats deny it's a conflict of interest. A conflict of interest would be investigated.

Do you ever NOT rage post?

Conflicts of interest laws don’t apply to Presidents and Vice Presidents. It’s the only reason Trump can actually be president and maintain ownership of his business.

Swing and a miss.

Suddenly you only care about technical violations of the law.

That while you don't care that Trump has fourth amendment rights and you support Democrats being able to subpoena his taxes just to see what's in them and you don't care there is no law requiring disclosure of his taxes. For Democrats, not a violation of the law and you're fine with it. Corruption doesn't matter. With Trump, you don't care if he violates the law at all, he's corrupt!

Such a constant suck ass hypocrite you are

No one is subpoenaing Trump’s tax records for claims of conflict of interest, they’re being subpoenaed because there is credible evidence of violations of law. The AG of New York has followed every rule and then some and the subpoenas have been upheld at nearly every turn because Trump has no legitimate cause to stop them.

This isn’t hypocrisy, this is you not knowing what the hell youre talking about or, more likely, dishonestly conflating two unrelated issues because you don’t have a rational argument to make.

That's such a lame misrepresentation of everything I said and everything going on I have no interest in unwinding it. Pass
 
There's a ton of evidence!

Dozens of payments were made to Rosemont Seneca by Burisma, an entity known to use bribery. The bank records of every one of those payments is evidence!

Biden confessed in a live stream that he extorted Ukrainian officials into firing Shokin. That video is evidence!

Shokin testified under oath that he was fired because he wouldn't drop the criminal case against Burisma. The transcript of that deposition is evidence!

Payments for being a board of director is not evidence of illegal activity without further evidence.

Biden saying that Shokin being fired because he was corrupt is not evidence of illegal activity without further information.

Shokin is not a credible witness. Allegations have to come from credible sources to be used as evidence of illegal activity.

Strike out.

When Biden is responsible for the Ukraine relationship and Ukraine is paying his son millions of dollars, that is clear conflict of interest. Obviously you have no business or management experience if you don't know that
Dumbfuck, who denied it was a conflict of interest?

You're one angry little guy
LOL

Translation from kaz-to-English: no one denied it was a conflict of interest.

Of course Democrats deny it's a conflict of interest. A conflict of interest would be investigated.

Do you ever NOT rage post?

Conflicts of interest laws don’t apply to Presidents and Vice Presidents. It’s the only reason Trump can actually be president and maintain ownership of his business.

Swing and a miss.

Suddenly you only care about technical violations of the law.

That while you don't care that Trump has fourth amendment rights and you support Democrats being able to subpoena his taxes just to see what's in them and you don't care there is no law requiring disclosure of his taxes. For Democrats, not a violation of the law and you're fine with it. Corruption doesn't matter. With Trump, you don't care if he violates the law at all, he's corrupt!

Such a constant suck ass hypocrite you are

No one is subpoenaing Trump’s tax records for claims of conflict of interest, they’re being subpoenaed because there is credible evidence of violations of law. The AG of New York has followed every rule and then some and the subpoenas have been upheld at nearly every turn because Trump has no legitimate cause to stop them.

This isn’t hypocrisy, this is you not knowing what the hell youre talking about or, more likely, dishonestly conflating two unrelated issues because you don’t have a rational argument to make.

That's such a lame misrepresentation of everything I said and everything going on I have no interest in unwinding it. Pass

Yeah, sure. You’re always so “misunderstood”.

The reality is that you just make idiotic arguments and then try to weasel away from them after being called out on it.

If you had any evidence of actual corruption, it could be investigated. But there is precisely zero evidence connecting Hunter Biden’s employment with Burisma with any effect on US government policy.
 

Forum List

Back
Top