Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
the question wasn't ambiguous...i clearly provided guidance, it's outlined...that's how you answer the question. If little Xiden didn't know the law, it's on him for lying....he should of educated himself when he wanted the gun....I didnt say the law was ambiguous. this thread is about an answer on a form to an ambiguous question. I’m not contesting the legalities of abusing controlled substances while in procession of firearms. I’m contesting the claims that Hunter marking that form No was a provable felony.
Correct and the question is ambiguous so good luck proving somebody lied. Are they talking about current status or past? If past, how far in the past?
Ok then let me ask, if I blacked out a couple of times in college and 15 years later I’m sober and have a family and go to get a gun. If I mark that box NO and say I don’t abuse substances and I’m not addicted to substances…. Would I be lying and committing a felony?the question wasn't ambiguous...i clearly provided guidance, it's outlined...that's how you answer the question. If little Xiden didn't know the law, it's on him for lying....he should of educated himself when he wanted the gun....
the question is what did this crackhead need a gun for??
Ok, so you want to disqualify anybody from owning a gun if they have ever been in rehab or recovery? Then Ask that question on the form or make it part of the BG check. Let’s see how that idea goes over.
The case wouldn’t make it to court because a prosector wouldn’t be able to prove that he was lying. No respectable attorney would even try. That’s the point.That would be up to a judge if the case ever made it to court. But the point of the topic is special treatment so it doesn't make it to court for them to decide what the question was asking.
What if he was sure when he answered. Despite his past he believe that he was not addicted to and he was not taking controlled substances while filling out that form so marking NO was his truth. How in the world are you going to prove that a felony lie?? What’s your case?I didn't say that's what I want. I'm just posing the question of whether or not he lied on the application. If he was not sure how to answer, he should have consulted his attorney before answering like any one of us would likely have done.
He was discharged from the military because of his addiction to drugs therefore he lied on the ATF 4473.I’m not confused. The question on that form only backs up what I’ve been saying. What exactly are you taking issue with?
Right, seems unenforceable. Unless you hand them a cup to pee in when they submit the form.What if he was sure when he answered. Despite his past he believe that he was not addicted to and he was not taking controlled substances while filling out that form so marking NO was his truth. How in the world are you going to prove that a felony lie?? What’s your case?
His previous problem with drugs that caused him to be discharged from the military. So tell me why his sister in law/ fuck partner threw the gun in a dumpsterThe case wouldn’t make it to court because a prosector wouldn’t be able to prove that he was lying. No respectable attorney would even try. That’s the point.
Or unless you're Jo Biden son. Anyone else would be doing time.Right, seems unenforceable. Unless you hand them a cup to pee in when they submit the form.
Here's the point that is trying to be made. Anti gunners call for enhanced background checks. But when we have an obvious violation of the background check system they defend the guy who violated current laws.then its not due process,,,
and why do you keep ignoring my questions??
where in the 2nd A does it say you have to apply to purchase a gun or that youre restricted if you do drugs??
Actually yes it does. It is what it is.it doesnt ask that,,
He should be so why was the secret service involved? Why did his sister in law/ fuck partner throw the gun away?If Hunter broke a law then arrest him. I don’t know they guy or care. But the No box isn’t a crime that any prosecuted can prove in court. If I’m understanding you correctly are wanting to charge everybody that had a past substance abuse problem with a felony if they checked no on that form and got a gun? Do you want to restrict everybody who has Undergone recovery from owning a gun?
Convicted felon 5 years ago is still convicted felon unless you got your rights restored.He does have a history of it dating back to his military days. If I am a user, I can answer that question as 'No, I'm not using drugs" I used drugs yesterday, I'll use them again tonight, but I currently am not using drugs if you want to get into semantics.
Am I a convicted felon? No. I was a convicted felon five years ago, but I'm out of prison and no longer convicted.
If some guy gets loaded up on dope, takes his gun and goes on a mass shooting, and reporters found that this guy bought the gun legally answering the question he's not a dope user, the left would be having a cow, telling us our gun laws are not strict enough. This guy had a history of using dope and attending rehab. They should have known that. He claims technically, he was off of dope six months ago when he bought the gun. We all know rehab has a terrible long term success rate.
i provided the link, you should read it, so you don’t pull a hunter bidenOk then let me ask, if I blacked out a couple of times in college and 15 years later I’m sober and have a family and go to get a gun. If I mark that box NO and say I don’t abuse substances and I’m not addicted to substances…. Would I be lying and committing a felony?
I have to agree with that.And the question is worded in such a way that semantics comes in to play. Personally I think it was done that way be design.
I don't think I'd need a gun if I had Secret Service protection.the question wasn't ambiguous...i clearly provided guidance, it's outlined...that's how you answer the question. If little Xiden didn't know the law, it's on him for lying....he should of educated himself when he wanted the gun....
the question is what did this crackhead need a gun for??
Not so fast. Until he showed he was no longer a user or addicted he lied. Question EAnd the question is worded in such a way that semantics comes in to play. Personally I think it was done that way be design.
why do you keep running away from my question on the law known as the 2nd amendment??i provided the link, you should read it, so you don’t pull a hunter biden
