Hur Hearing Backfires on Republicans

And what level was the classified material?
Confidential
Secret
Top Secret
SAP

Remember, if Biden wrote down what he told a foreign leader, in private, that would be "classified".
Classified could be confidential......but regardless what classification.....his Ghost Writer knew they revealed sensitive or damaging information......and attempting to dispose of them is obstruction of justice and unauthorized destruction of classified material.
 
Yeah, tapes.

Recorded audio tapes, discs, whatever the media was, showing Biden discussing classified information with a Ghost Writer who did not have a security clearance.
Did any of this alleged classified info make it in to Biden's book, without govt. Clearance?
 
Did any of this alleged classified info make it in to Biden's book, without govt. Clearance?
I don't know.
The fact that he was spreading classified information should be enough for you.

You go into a tizzy when Trump holds up a newspaper and says something.
You should feel the same way when Biden tells somebody without a clearance in private that he knows something that happened that is still classified.
You're willing to believe the worst about Trump without vetting sources but you question every aspect of the truth when it concerns your demented president.
 
Classified could be confidential......but regardless what classification.....his Ghost Writer knew they revealed sensitive or damaging information......and attempting to dispose of them is obstruction of justice and unauthorized destruction of classified material.
Then you have to realize that some "classified" material is never marked as "classified", but because of their nature, like conversations with foreign leaders, are later retroactively classified when later discovered embedded in unclassified reports, journals, etc.
 
Classified could be confidential......but regardless what classification.....his Ghost Writer knew they revealed sensitive or damaging information......and attempting to dispose of them is obstruction of justice and unauthorized destruction of classified material.
Destruction of classified material only holds for material MARKED AS CLASSIFIED. Meaning original source material.
Copies and derivatives of classified materials are routinely destroyed.
 
Did you catch the Trump gaffe reel? It is getting longer every time he speaks. He forgot his own wife's name a week ago.
Yeah....they had to edit that quite a bit to make their false accusations seem plausible.

Biden is an old demented fuck who cannot stand trial because of incompetence.....so of course you libs have to circulate rumors about Trump being demented too.
It's liberalism 101. You cannot resist doing it.
 
Destruction of classified material only holds for material MARKED AS CLASSIFIED. Meaning original source material.
Copies and derivatives of classified materials are routinely destroyed.
WRONG!!!!

It doesn't have to be marked to be classified. According to the law, information is automatically classified if it deals with specific issues such as presidential schedules. Everything Biden put in his book has to be screened for classification. The only way it could be used is if it were declassified by proper authorities.

Besides, it was evidence. The Ghost Writer attempted to destroy it. Classified or not, you cannot destroy evidence.
 
I don't know.
The fact that he was spreading classified information should be enough for you.
Doesn't the level of classification make a difference. Biden could be spreading "confidential" information, about conversations he had, as opposed to Trump who told a foreigner about the capabilities of Russian and American submarines.
 
WRONG!!!!

It doesn't have to be marked to be classified. According to the law, information is automatically classified if it deals with specific issues such as presidential schedules. Everything Biden put in his book has to be screened for classification. The only way it could be used is if it were declassified by proper authorities.

Besides, it was evidence. The Ghost Writer attempted to destroy it. Classified or not, you cannot destroy evidence.
What you forget is that Dick Cheney had George W. Bush change the national security executive order, to include the Vice President, to have the same classification and declassification authority as the President.

“Is it your view that a Vice President has the authority to declassify information?” Vice President Cheney was asked yesterday by Fox News’ Brit Hume.

“There is an executive order to that effect,” replied the Vice President.


 
I don't know.
The fact that he was spreading classified information should be enough for you.

You go into a tizzy when Trump holds up a newspaper and says something.
You should feel the same way when Biden tells somebody without a clearance in private that he knows something that happened that is still classified.
You're willing to believe the worst about Trump without vetting sources but you question every aspect of the truth when it concerns your demented president.
Details matter, Mud. Comparisons are meant to fully compare....not to just claim without the detailed facts, that the two situations are the same.

If Trump had ONLY DONE what Biden had done, there would not be the 40 charges against him, or any charges at all....
 
What you forget is that Dick Cheney had George W. Bush change the national security executive order, to include the Vice President, to have the same classification and declassification authority as the President.
The president can delegate declassification authority. That order only applied to Dick Cheney.
 
What you forget is that Dick Cheney had George W. Bush change the national security executive order, to include the Vice President, to have the same classification and declassification authority as the President.
And Obama did the same, and continued the same clearance for his VP.
 
Besides, it was evidence. The Ghost Writer attempted to destroy it. Classified or not, you cannot destroy evidence.

Again, evidence is destroyed every day. It is only "protected" evidence, such as under subpoena, or the subject of a retention letter, that is illegal to destroy.
 
Details matter, Mud. Comparisons are meant to fully compare....not to just claim without the detailed facts, that the two situations are the same.

If Trump had ONLY DONE what Biden had done, there would not be the 40 charges against him, or any charges at all....
However the two situations aren't the same.
Biden wasn't president when this took place.
Trump was president.
Speaking of details....you really blew that one.

The difference that sticks out more than anything, is that this corrupt DOJ is bringing charges against a president for what he had full authority to do, but choosing not to bring charges against someone who didn't have that authority. And to top it off they're using a lame excuse at that.

From all of my training it doesn't matter if you're a forgetful asshole who neglected to protect classified material. Being incompetent and careless has never been a valid excuse before now.
 
Again, evidence is destroyed every day. It is only "protected" evidence, such as under subpoena, or the subject of a retention letter, that is illegal to destroy.
Bull shit.
Evidence can or can not be entered into the record, but it is still evidence, and attempting to destroy evidence shows intent to conceal that a crime has been committed.
 

Forum List

Back
Top