I am beginning to think having 300 million +guns in the country isn't working out...

Explain how guns will be banned
Will be or could be? I don't know the future but there are a lot of ways firearms could be controlled. Legislation could be passed severely restricting the ownership of handguns and military style semi automatics. Carry of long guns in an urban setting could effectively be prohibited.


BTW, you have communist and socialist leanings.....don't ya? It's ok to admit it.......
Nobody on this board has communist leanings, brainwashed functional moron LOL!
 
How many shootings in schools is that 11 in 23 days? Great job!
CCR sang "200 million guns are loaded" fifty years ago and we had virtually no school shootings then. Obviously the guns aren't the issue.
According to this there were less than 100 million in 1970
GUN WATCH: Firearms Numbers in the United States 1945 - 2012

Bolsheviks like yourself fear an armed public......why is that? (snicker)
I have no problems with the Second Amendment perhaps with bump stock options which are just stupid and only the GOP... You hater dude's have no idea what Democrats want- you just just go off on rants brainwashed tools LOL...


Are you referring to "bump stocks" as it pertains to the pathetic deep state psy-op that was the Las Vegas shooting????? Clarify, dumb ass........
 
Nobody has said anything about getting rid of 300 gun million guns idiot dupe...
And he jumps in to illustrate why we can't get things done.
.
The Democrats want an end to loopholes in background checks and no more bump stocks are automatics with a big punishment, no one says ban all weapons but stupid dupes like you. Got it?
 
How many shootings in schools is that 11 in 23 days? Great job!
CCR sang "200 million guns are loaded" fifty years ago and we had virtually no school shootings then. Obviously the guns aren't the issue.
According to this there were less than 100 million in 1970
GUN WATCH: Firearms Numbers in the United States 1945 - 2012
You need to go back in time and tell Fogerty that his 1970 stats were inaccurate.
 
Explain how guns will be banned
Will be or could be? I don't know the future but there are a lot of ways firearms could be controlled. Legislation could be passed severely restricting the ownership of handguns and military style semi automatics. Carry of long guns in an urban setting could effectively be prohibited.


BTW, you have communist and socialist leanings.....don't ya? It's ok to admit it.......
Nobody on this board has communist leanings, brainwashed functional moron LOL!


Franco, you are a socialist and a commie just begging to reveal itself........be honest with yourself......no one else can do it for you.
 
Enough talking to brainwashed functional moron hater dupes for today... Congratulations, you are unbelievable fools, the world's horror and laughing stock.
 
Nobody has said anything about getting rid of 300 gun million guns idiot dupe...
And he jumps in to illustrate why we can't get things done.
.
The Democrats want an end to loopholes in background checks and no more bump stocks are automatics with a big punishment, no one says ban all weapons but stupid dupes like you. Got it?
You're an intellectual pussy who can't rebut beyond using the funny button. You're a debate retard.
 
Nobody has said anything about getting rid of 300 gun million guns idiot dupe...
And he jumps in to illustrate why we can't get things done..
The Democrats want an end to loopholes in background checks and no more bump stocks are automatics with a big punishment, no one says ban all weapons but stupid dupes like you. Got it?
Try to calm down. Are you like this in real life?
.
 
Enough talking to brainwashed functional moron hater dupes for today... Congratulations, you are unbelievable fools, the world's horror and laughing stock.
People like this ("side" irrelevant) have to be somehow culturally marginalized before anything can be improved.

They literally don't know how to communicate with anyone who doesn't completely agree with them.

We can't fix problems if all we know how to do is attack and insult.
.
 
Last edited:
Why are you so eager to waste so much money?

The Supreme Court has ruled against such laws many times.
No, the supreme court has said the right to own firearms is not unlimited, it can certainly describe the sorts of firearms that may be legally possessed and has done so in the past. Apart from that the Constitution can be amended. But this is not to the point, those controlling American politicians have demonstrated that school kids lives are considered a reasonable price to pay for easy access to firearms. So, really, these discussions where the reality of control is pointed out are irrelevant, the greatest country in the world is helpless to change.
 
BTW, you have communist and socialist leanings.....don't ya? It's ok to admit it.......
I'm certainly not a dumb fuck US rightard.





Theeeeeeeennnnn, you're a dumb fuck US leftard?

One of the supposed school shootings "was a few rounds of loose ammunition found on school grounds. Another one was a shooting at a massive campus that sprawls all over a town, totally unrelated but the progressive left lie about everything so it isn't a surprise. Actual school shootings was two. But what the hell, your propagandists claim that everyone up to the age of 26 is a child too, so honesty ain't one of your characteristics...
 
Why are you so eager to waste so much money?

The Supreme Court has ruled against such laws many times.
No, the supreme court has said the right to own firearms is not unlimited, it can certainly describe the sorts of firearms that may be legally possessed and has done so in the past. Apart from that the Constitution can be amended. But this is not to the point, those controlling American politicians have demonstrated that school kids lives are considered a reasonable price to pay for easy access to firearms. So, really, these discussions where the reality of control is pointed out are irrelevant, the greatest country in the world is helpless to change.






Yes, US V Miller, ONLY firearms like the military would use in a war are protected.

Game. Set. Match.
 
BTW, you have communist and socialist leanings.....don't ya? It's ok to admit it.......
I'm certainly not a dumb fuck US rightard.

I believe in the organic Constitution and the Bill of Rights ( not privileges ) and I mean the organic one of 1783, dip-shit...........I am neither a fabian socialist or a necon Trotsky-ite..........I know more than you by a factor of a 1,000. Give me a wide berth because I will give you a cyber ass-kicking of monumental proportions. You want to engage in honest discussion and debate? I will do so and pay props and give back respect in a likewise manner......but if you want to throw down your cyber dick? You will find that mine is twice the size of yours.......the choice is up to you.
 
What realistic law would have prevented which of those shootings and how?
A law prohibiting the possession of handguns and military style semi-automatics would reduce the firearm homicide fatality rate. But as I say, this is not to the point when school kids are deemed an acceptable price to pay for easy access to handguns and mssa. No skin off my nose, I'm just pointing out the solutions other countries have utilised which are not acceptable to those controlling American politicians. Rather you than me.
 
Yes, US V Miller, ONLY firearms like the military would use in a war are protected.

Game. Set. Match.
Show me your 20mm cannon. Apart from that, amend the Constitution. It's not that these things are impossible, it's just the status quo is considered worthy of a few school kids by those who control American politicians. No worries, rather you than me.
 
I know more than you by a factor of a 1,000. Give me a wide berth because I will give you a cyber ass-kicking of monumental proportions.
Oh, I'm quivering. But why so sensitive? Are you a dumb fuck American rightard?
 

Forum List

Back
Top