I asked a few weeks ago what the left exactly want in regards global warming. Not much response.

[owebo]

Tell me to what degree there is manmade global warming. Give us the data, the science is settled according to you moonbats. Tell us why the Glacier Bay glacier receded 60 miles in the 1800's before the industrial revolution and why Mars polar caps are melting since the science is settled.

We are talking about the Earth...the whole Earth

What happened at one glacier 200 years ago does not represent a trend. Neither does the Mars climate

and you members of the AGW religion are telling us that you can measure the temperature of the "whole earth" to .2 of a degree?

come on RW, even you aren't that dumb.

Why not?

Scientific measurements can be taken much closer than .2 degrees. You can sample locations around the world to make determinations on global climate

It is obvious man is changing the weather ......... measurements. Weather stations located at what was a cow pasture now a concrete jungle is of course going to change weather readings to a higher value.

New study of NOAA's U.S. Climate Network shows a lower 30-year temperature trend when high quality temperature stations unperturbed by urbanization are considered - 2015 AGU Fall Meeting

View attachment 103286
View attachment 103287
View attachment 103288
View attachment 103289
View attachment 103290
View attachment 103291

Whoop de fucking do.......

So cherry picking a few sites that you think may be compromised somehow invalidates Global Warming?

You mean MMGW...

 

[Rustic]

There is hundreds if not thousands of years of undiscovered oil/natural gas/shale oil/coal... it was put here on earth for us to use. We might as well be good stewards and use it up.

 

[rightwinger]

We are talking about the Earth...the whole Earth

What happened at one glacier 200 years ago does not represent a trend. Neither does the Mars climate

and you members of the AGW religion are telling us that you can measure the temperature of the "whole earth" to .2 of a degree?

come on RW, even you aren't that dumb.

Why not?

Scientific measurements can be taken much closer than .2 degrees. You can sample locations around the world to make determinations on global climate

It is obvious man is changing the weather ......... measurements. Weather stations located at what was a cow pasture now a concrete jungle is of course going to change weather readings to a higher value.

New study of NOAA's U.S. Climate Network shows a lower 30-year temperature trend when high quality temperature stations unperturbed by urbanization are considered - 2015 AGU Fall Meeting

View attachment 103286
View attachment 103287
View attachment 103288
View attachment 103289
View attachment 103290
View attachment 103291

Whoop de fucking do.......

So cherry picking a few sites that you think may be compromised somehow invalidates Global Warming?

Science invalidates MANMADE global warming.

Of course it doesn't

That is why 93% of scientists agree man is contributing to global warming

 

[Weatherman2020]

and you members of the AGW religion are telling us that you can measure the temperature of the "whole earth" to .2 of a degree?

come on RW, even you aren't that dumb.

Why not?

Scientific measurements can be taken much closer than .2 degrees. You can sample locations around the world to make determinations on global climate

It is obvious man is changing the weather ......... measurements. Weather stations located at what was a cow pasture now a concrete jungle is of course going to change weather readings to a higher value.

New study of NOAA's U.S. Climate Network shows a lower 30-year temperature trend when high quality temperature stations unperturbed by urbanization are considered - 2015 AGU Fall Meeting

View attachment 103286
View attachment 103287
View attachment 103288
View attachment 103289
View attachment 103290
View attachment 103291

Whoop de fucking do.......

So cherry picking a few sites that you think may be compromised somehow invalidates Global Warming?

Science invalidates MANMADE global warming.

Of course it doesn't

That is why 93% of scientists agree man is contributing to global warming

Again with the bogus 93% lie. I even provided a link in this thread exposing the lie and you still use it.
It is why no one believes the manmade global warming myth anymore - your agenda always requires you to lie and your lies have been exposed.

 

[kaz]

you know if you read more or went out to a progressive state or used something called google, you'd see that there has been new technology that looks like giant fans, and window panes that point out to the sun, and huge machines with water rushing through them, and technology harvesting energy from the heat of the earth. really, you're bringing down the curve for the whole country.

We have nowhere near the technology to make those practical and cost effective major providers of energy. Why don't you just say you want a car that flies?

 

[kaz]

you know if you read more or went out to a progressive state or used something called google, you'd see that there has been new technology that looks like giant fans, and window panes that point out to the sun, and huge machines with water rushing through them, and technology harvesting energy from the heat of the earth. really, you're bringing down the curve for the whole country.

What?

i rest my case.

You're proposing implausible technologies and calling other people stupid. Now that's stupid.

I want a wrist watch that gives me a hot, tasty healthy lunch

 

[kaz]

you know if you read more or went out to a progressive state or used something called google, you'd see that there has been new technology that looks like giant fans, and window panes that point out to the sun, and huge machines with water rushing through them, and technology harvesting energy from the heat of the earth. really, you're bringing down the curve for the whole country.

What?

i rest my case.

You really are a fucking moron. With all due disrespect.

clever. not really. but yeah, you're dumb (no offense).

Again, the guy who wants a vacuum cleaner that puts away his toys while it vacuums the room on it's own is calling other people "dumb"

 

[Redfish]

and you members of the AGW religion are telling us that you can measure the temperature of the "whole earth" to .2 of a degree?

come on RW, even you aren't that dumb.

Why not?

Scientific measurements can be taken much closer than .2 degrees. You can sample locations around the world to make determinations on global climate

It is obvious man is changing the weather ......... measurements. Weather stations located at what was a cow pasture now a concrete jungle is of course going to change weather readings to a higher value.

New study of NOAA's U.S. Climate Network shows a lower 30-year temperature trend when high quality temperature stations unperturbed by urbanization are considered - 2015 AGU Fall Meeting

View attachment 103286
View attachment 103287
View attachment 103288
View attachment 103289
View attachment 103290
View attachment 103291

Whoop de fucking do.......

So cherry picking a few sites that you think may be compromised somehow invalidates Global Warming?

Science invalidates MANMADE global warming.

Of course it doesn't

That is why 93% of scientists agree man is contributing to global warming

total unadulterated bullshit. Everyone agrees that man is polluting the air and water. Only the far left fringe believes in a direct link between pollution and climate.

Get your facts straight for once.

 

[Slade3200]

Why not?

Scientific measurements can be taken much closer than .2 degrees. You can sample locations around the world to make determinations on global climate

It is obvious man is changing the weather ......... measurements. Weather stations located at what was a cow pasture now a concrete jungle is of course going to change weather readings to a higher value.

New study of NOAA's U.S. Climate Network shows a lower 30-year temperature trend when high quality temperature stations unperturbed by urbanization are considered - 2015 AGU Fall Meeting

View attachment 103286
View attachment 103287
View attachment 103288
View attachment 103289
View attachment 103290
View attachment 103291

Whoop de fucking do.......

So cherry picking a few sites that you think may be compromised somehow invalidates Global Warming?

Science invalidates MANMADE global warming.

Of course it doesn't

That is why 93% of scientists agree man is contributing to global warming

total unadulterated bullshit. Everyone agrees that man is polluting the air and water. Only the far left fringe believes in a direct link between pollution and climate.

Get your facts straight for once.

Does it really matter?? Shouldn't everybody agree that whether it's just pollution or a bigger effect on climate, we should work towards cleaner more efficient energy sources and be more respectful of the land we live on?

 

[Media_Truth]

FOX News lies! FOX News lies! FOX News lies! FOX News lies! FOX News lies! FOX News lies! FOX News lies! FOX News lies! FOX News lies! FOX News lies!

 

[ScienceRocks]

I want it to speed up and kill all you fucking backwards animals under 60 feet of water.

 

[Wyatt earp]

I want it to speed up and kill all you fucking backwards animals under 60 feet of water.

We don't live near huge body's of water you do

Bwahahaha...



.

 

[Wyatt earp]

and you members of the AGW religion are telling us that you can measure the temperature of the "whole earth" to .2 of a degree?

come on RW, even you aren't that dumb.

Why not?

Scientific measurements can be taken much closer than .2 degrees. You can sample locations around the world to make determinations on global climate

It is obvious man is changing the weather ......... measurements. Weather stations located at what was a cow pasture now a concrete jungle is of course going to change weather readings to a higher value.

New study of NOAA's U.S. Climate Network shows a lower 30-year temperature trend when high quality temperature stations unperturbed by urbanization are considered - 2015 AGU Fall Meeting

View attachment 103286
View attachment 103287
View attachment 103288
View attachment 103289
View attachment 103290
View attachment 103291

Whoop de fucking do.......

So cherry picking a few sites that you think may be compromised somehow invalidates Global Warming?

Science invalidates MANMADE global warming.

Of course it doesn't

That is why 93% of scientists agree man is contributing to global warming

93% of scientist also agree government funding is real swell.



.

 

[Wyatt earp]

It is obvious man is changing the weather ......... measurements. Weather stations located at what was a cow pasture now a concrete jungle is of course going to change weather readings to a higher value.

New study of NOAA's U.S. Climate Network shows a lower 30-year temperature trend when high quality temperature stations unperturbed by urbanization are considered - 2015 AGU Fall Meeting

View attachment 103286
View attachment 103287
View attachment 103288
View attachment 103289
View attachment 103290
View attachment 103291

Whoop de fucking do.......

So cherry picking a few sites that you think may be compromised somehow invalidates Global Warming?

Science invalidates MANMADE global warming.

Of course it doesn't

That is why 93% of scientists agree man is contributing to global warming

total unadulterated bullshit. Everyone agrees that man is polluting the air and water. Only the far left fringe believes in a direct link between pollution and climate.

Get your facts straight for once.

Does it really matter?? Shouldn't everybody agree that whether it's just pollution or a bigger effect on climate, we should work towards cleaner more efficient energy sources and be more respectful of the land we live on?

At what cost?

You have those types like you that sound reasonable, but the majority I found are crazy and have no clue what the economic cost to the world would be .


.

 

[owebo]

FOX News lies! FOX News lies! FOX News lies! FOX News lies! FOX News lies! FOX News lies! FOX News lies! FOX News lies! FOX News lies! FOX News lies!

Your fake news tell you this?

 

[Wyatt earp]

Why not?

Scientific measurements can be taken much closer than .2 degrees. You can sample locations around the world to make determinations on global climate

It is obvious man is changing the weather ......... measurements. Weather stations located at what was a cow pasture now a concrete jungle is of course going to change weather readings to a higher value.

New study of NOAA's U.S. Climate Network shows a lower 30-year temperature trend when high quality temperature stations unperturbed by urbanization are considered - 2015 AGU Fall Meeting

View attachment 103286
View attachment 103287
View attachment 103288
View attachment 103289
View attachment 103290
View attachment 103291

Whoop de fucking do.......

So cherry picking a few sites that you think may be compromised somehow invalidates Global Warming?

Science invalidates MANMADE global warming.

Of course it doesn't

That is why 93% of scientists agree man is contributing to global warming

93% of scientist also agree government funding is real swell.



.

Also isn't it amazing with government funding? You can say the most crazy ass shit and no repercussions...like I don't know get your ass fired in a real job?

.

 

[rightwinger]

Why not?

Scientific measurements can be taken much closer than .2 degrees. You can sample locations around the world to make determinations on global climate

It is obvious man is changing the weather ......... measurements. Weather stations located at what was a cow pasture now a concrete jungle is of course going to change weather readings to a higher value.

New study of NOAA's U.S. Climate Network shows a lower 30-year temperature trend when high quality temperature stations unperturbed by urbanization are considered - 2015 AGU Fall Meeting

View attachment 103286
View attachment 103287
View attachment 103288
View attachment 103289
View attachment 103290
View attachment 103291

Whoop de fucking do.......

So cherry picking a few sites that you think may be compromised somehow invalidates Global Warming?

Science invalidates MANMADE global warming.

Of course it doesn't

That is why 93% of scientists agree man is contributing to global warming

Again with the bogus 93% lie. I even provided a link in this thread exposing the lie and you still use it.
It is why no one believes the manmade global warming myth anymore - your agenda always requires you to lie and your lies have been exposed.

I commented on your link
Even your own link supported manmade global warming. The only question was...how much?

 

[owebo]

It is obvious man is changing the weather ......... measurements. Weather stations located at what was a cow pasture now a concrete jungle is of course going to change weather readings to a higher value.

New study of NOAA's U.S. Climate Network shows a lower 30-year temperature trend when high quality temperature stations unperturbed by urbanization are considered - 2015 AGU Fall Meeting

View attachment 103286
View attachment 103287
View attachment 103288
View attachment 103289
View attachment 103290
View attachment 103291

Whoop de fucking do.......

So cherry picking a few sites that you think may be compromised somehow invalidates Global Warming?

Science invalidates MANMADE global warming.

Of course it doesn't

That is why 93% of scientists agree man is contributing to global warming

Again with the bogus 93% lie. I even provided a link in this thread exposing the lie and you still use it.
It is why no one believes the manmade global warming myth anymore - your agenda always requires you to lie and your lies have been exposed.

I commented on your link
Even your own link supported manmade global warming. The only question was...how much?

The MMGW hoax will end in three weeks...

 

[rightwinger]

It is obvious man is changing the weather ......... measurements. Weather stations located at what was a cow pasture now a concrete jungle is of course going to change weather readings to a higher value.

New study of NOAA's U.S. Climate Network shows a lower 30-year temperature trend when high quality temperature stations unperturbed by urbanization are considered - 2015 AGU Fall Meeting

View attachment 103286
View attachment 103287
View attachment 103288
View attachment 103289
View attachment 103290
View attachment 103291

Whoop de fucking do.......

So cherry picking a few sites that you think may be compromised somehow invalidates Global Warming?

Science invalidates MANMADE global warming.

Of course it doesn't

That is why 93% of scientists agree man is contributing to global warming

93% of scientist also agree government funding is real swell.



.

Also isn't it amazing with government funding? You can say the most crazy ass shit and no repercussions...like I don't know get your ass fired in a real job?

.

Does the US government fund climate studies around the world?

Why do scientists around the world come to the same conclusion?
Why is Trump the only leader in the world who does not believe in global warming?

 

[owebo]

Whoop de fucking do.......

So cherry picking a few sites that you think may be compromised somehow invalidates Global Warming?

Science invalidates MANMADE global warming.

Of course it doesn't

That is why 93% of scientists agree man is contributing to global warming

93% of scientist also agree government funding is real swell.



.

Also isn't it amazing with government funding? You can say the most crazy ass shit and no repercussions...like I don't know get your ass fired in a real job?

.

Does the US government fund climate studies around the world?

Why do scientists around the world come to the same conclusion?
Why is Trump the only leader in the world who does not believe in global warming?

You mean MMGW?