I do find Schiffs comment about the fact a president cannot be above the law...

[Siete]

link to treaty -

I'd like to read the details of said treaty.

RW's are famous for leaving out details then spinning the rest to suit their talking point.


waiting ................................

Look it up yourself. I'm not your servant.

I'll take that as a you're full of shit and lying.

as if no one knew -

Text - Treaty Document 106-16 - Treaty with Ukraine on Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters

I am guessing this is the one they are writing about that BILL CLINTON signed...

from your link -

Article 20 provides that the Treaty is subject to
ratification and the instruments shall be exchanged at
Washington as soon as possible. The Treaty enters into force
upon the exchange of instruments of ratification. Article 20
further provides that either Contracting State may terminate
the Treaty by written notice to the other Contracting State,
with termination to be effective six months following the date
of notification.
A Technical Analysis explaining in detail the provisions of
the Treaty is being prepared by the United States negotiating
delegation, consisting of representatives from the Departments
of Justice and State, and will be transmitted separately to the
Senate Committee on Foreign Relations.
The Department of Justice joins the Department of State in
favoring approval of this Treaty by the Senate as soon as
possible.
Respectfully submitted,
Strobe Talbott.



that was in 98 - AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE

still no detailed treaty that backs up anything from RW bullshit artists

treaty yawnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn-er.

I gave you a direct link to what they are discussing which you claimed was not real.

It took me just two seconds to find it, so maybe next time you should do as I did and look for it.

Notice I did not use any blog or MSM site but a direct link to the treaty they are referring to.

It is between you and claudette to discuss if the treaty protects Trump or not and all I did is hand you the information because you are lazy and did not want to bring, google or for news duck duck go the treaty...

read your own goddamn link - I C/P'd the text on the last paragraph

you or none of your bots have jackshit as far as a treaty goes that protects Trump.

hump each other till you're green.


YOU'RE ALL DISMISSED

 

[Bruce_T_Laney]

Look it up yourself. I'm not your servant.

I'll take that as a you're full of shit and lying.

as if no one knew -

Text - Treaty Document 106-16 - Treaty with Ukraine on Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters

I am guessing this is the one they are writing about that BILL CLINTON signed...

from your link -

Article 20 provides that the Treaty is subject to
ratification and the instruments shall be exchanged at
Washington as soon as possible. The Treaty enters into force
upon the exchange of instruments of ratification. Article 20
further provides that either Contracting State may terminate
the Treaty by written notice to the other Contracting State,
with termination to be effective six months following the date
of notification.
A Technical Analysis explaining in detail the provisions of
the Treaty is being prepared by the United States negotiating
delegation, consisting of representatives from the Departments
of Justice and State, and will be transmitted separately to the
Senate Committee on Foreign Relations.
The Department of Justice joins the Department of State in
favoring approval of this Treaty by the Senate as soon as
possible.
Respectfully submitted,
Strobe Talbott.



that was in 98 - AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE

still no detailed treaty that backs up anything from RW bullshit artists

treaty yawnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn-er.

I gave you a direct link to what they are discussing which you claimed was not real.

It took me just two seconds to find it, so maybe next time you should do as I did and look for it.

Notice I did not use any blog or MSM site but a direct link to the treaty they are referring to.

It is between you and claudette to discuss if the treaty protects Trump or not and all I did is hand you the information because you are lazy and did not want to bring, google or for news duck duck go the treaty...

read your own goddamn link - I C/P'd the text on the last paragraph

you or none of your bots have jackshit as far as a treaty goes that protects Trump.

hump each other till you're green.


YOU'RE ALL DISMISSED

1. You have no authority on this site to dismiss anyone at all.

2. It was you claiming the treaty did not exist and I provided it. I did not give any commentary about the content of the link and just provided you a direct link to the treaty and that is all!

So why are you upset by being proven wrong that the treaty existed?

 

[Rambunctious]

Schiff is the most dishonest weasel in the house...hands down he has all the other liars beat by a mile....his district must be full of absolute zombie morons....

 

[Rambunctious]

Look it up yourself. I'm not your servant.

I'll take that as a you're full of shit and lying.

as if no one knew -

Text - Treaty Document 106-16 - Treaty with Ukraine on Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters

I am guessing this is the one they are writing about that BILL CLINTON signed...

from your link -

Article 20 provides that the Treaty is subject to
ratification and the instruments shall be exchanged at
Washington as soon as possible. The Treaty enters into force
upon the exchange of instruments of ratification. Article 20
further provides that either Contracting State may terminate
the Treaty by written notice to the other Contracting State,
with termination to be effective six months following the date
of notification.
A Technical Analysis explaining in detail the provisions of
the Treaty is being prepared by the United States negotiating
delegation, consisting of representatives from the Departments
of Justice and State, and will be transmitted separately to the
Senate Committee on Foreign Relations.
The Department of Justice joins the Department of State in
favoring approval of this Treaty by the Senate as soon as
possible.
Respectfully submitted,
Strobe Talbott.



that was in 98 - AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE

still no detailed treaty that backs up anything from RW bullshit artists

treaty yawnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn-er.

I gave you a direct link to what they are discussing which you claimed was not real.

It took me just two seconds to find it, so maybe next time you should do as I did and look for it.

Notice I did not use any blog or MSM site but a direct link to the treaty they are referring to.

It is between you and claudette to discuss if the treaty protects Trump or not and all I did is hand you the information because you are lazy and did not want to bring, google or for news duck duck go the treaty...

read your own goddamn link - I C/P'd the text on the last paragraph

you or none of your bots have jackshit as far as a treaty goes that protects Trump.

hump each other till you're green.


YOU'RE ALL DISMISSED

whaaaaa nothing is sticking...whaaaaaaa must be all of that orange powder...Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

 

[xyz]

The Truth About Trump’s Insane Ukraine ‘Server’ Conspiracy

This is relevant to the Russian trolling on this forum as well.

 

[Rambunctious]

Daily...BuuuuuuaaaaahahahahaBeast?Buuuuaaahahahahahahaha

 

[Siete]

I'll take that as a you're full of shit and lying.

as if no one knew -

Text - Treaty Document 106-16 - Treaty with Ukraine on Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters

I am guessing this is the one they are writing about that BILL CLINTON signed...

from your link -

Article 20 provides that the Treaty is subject to
ratification and the instruments shall be exchanged at
Washington as soon as possible. The Treaty enters into force
upon the exchange of instruments of ratification. Article 20
further provides that either Contracting State may terminate
the Treaty by written notice to the other Contracting State,
with termination to be effective six months following the date
of notification.
A Technical Analysis explaining in detail the provisions of
the Treaty is being prepared by the United States negotiating
delegation, consisting of representatives from the Departments
of Justice and State, and will be transmitted separately to the
Senate Committee on Foreign Relations.
The Department of Justice joins the Department of State in
favoring approval of this Treaty by the Senate as soon as
possible.
Respectfully submitted,
Strobe Talbott.



that was in 98 - AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE

still no detailed treaty that backs up anything from RW bullshit artists

treaty yawnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn-er.

I gave you a direct link to what they are discussing which you claimed was not real.

It took me just two seconds to find it, so maybe next time you should do as I did and look for it.

Notice I did not use any blog or MSM site but a direct link to the treaty they are referring to.

It is between you and claudette to discuss if the treaty protects Trump or not and all I did is hand you the information because you are lazy and did not want to bring, google or for news duck duck go the treaty...

read your own goddamn link - I C/P'd the text on the last paragraph

you or none of your bots have jackshit as far as a treaty goes that protects Trump.

hump each other till you're green.


YOU'RE ALL DISMISSED

1. You have no authority on this site to dismiss anyone at all.

2. It was you claiming the treaty did not exist and I provided it. I did not give any commentary about the content of the link and just provided you a direct link to the treaty and that is all!

So why are you upset by being proven wrong that the treaty existed?

QUOTE ME SAYING THE TREATY DIDNT EXIST.

its out there ok, and nothing about it protects Trumps fat ass.

 

[Bruce_T_Laney]

If, as he said in the Hearing today, a sitting president cannot be above the law, how can there be any anger about a former VP (or his son)?

There are two threads out there right now about how the US has a treaty with the Ukraine to look into illegalities.

Kinda puts a fork in the Dem hearing don't you think??

link to treaty -

I'd like to read the details of said treaty.

RW's are famous for leaving out details then spinning the rest to suit their talking point.


waiting ................................

Right here you were asking for a link while acting like it did not exist. If you knew it existed why ask for the link?

Simple, you thought it was some blogger making something up and now you know it exists you are upset and wonder can it be used to protect Trump?

In the end it matter not because even if the House goes forward with Impeachment the Senate will never convict.

Now tell the board why you did not look up this treaty yourself?

 

[Bruce_T_Laney]

Text - Treaty Document 106-16 - Treaty with Ukraine on Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters

I am guessing this is the one they are writing about that BILL CLINTON signed...

from your link -

Article 20 provides that the Treaty is subject to
ratification and the instruments shall be exchanged at
Washington as soon as possible. The Treaty enters into force
upon the exchange of instruments of ratification. Article 20
further provides that either Contracting State may terminate
the Treaty by written notice to the other Contracting State,
with termination to be effective six months following the date
of notification.
A Technical Analysis explaining in detail the provisions of
the Treaty is being prepared by the United States negotiating
delegation, consisting of representatives from the Departments
of Justice and State, and will be transmitted separately to the
Senate Committee on Foreign Relations.
The Department of Justice joins the Department of State in
favoring approval of this Treaty by the Senate as soon as
possible.
Respectfully submitted,
Strobe Talbott.



that was in 98 - AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE

still no detailed treaty that backs up anything from RW bullshit artists

treaty yawnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn-er.

I gave you a direct link to what they are discussing which you claimed was not real.

It took me just two seconds to find it, so maybe next time you should do as I did and look for it.

Notice I did not use any blog or MSM site but a direct link to the treaty they are referring to.

It is between you and claudette to discuss if the treaty protects Trump or not and all I did is hand you the information because you are lazy and did not want to bring, google or for news duck duck go the treaty...

read your own goddamn link - I C/P'd the text on the last paragraph

you or none of your bots have jackshit as far as a treaty goes that protects Trump.

hump each other till you're green.


YOU'RE ALL DISMISSED

1. You have no authority on this site to dismiss anyone at all.

2. It was you claiming the treaty did not exist and I provided it. I did not give any commentary about the content of the link and just provided you a direct link to the treaty and that is all!

So why are you upset by being proven wrong that the treaty existed?

QUOTE ME SAYING THE TREATY DIDNT EXIST.

its out there ok, and nothing about it protects Trumps fat ass.

I did not say it did now did I?

I provided the link that you were acting like that did not exist...

Show the board where I said the treaty exonerates Trump?

 

[xyz]

Trump is also hiding his calls with other world leaders on a National Security server with a password, which is not meant for that kind of content.

 

[basquebromance]

"Liddle’ Adam Schiff, who has worked unsuccessfully for 3 years to hurt the Republican Party and President, has just said that the Whistleblower, even though he or she only had second hand information, “is credible.” How can that be with zero info and a known bias. Democrat Scam!" - President Trump

 

[HappyJoy]

"Liddle’ Adam Schiff, who has worked unsuccessfully for 3 years to hurt the Republican Party and President, has just said that the Whistleblower, even though he or she only had second hand information, “is credible.” How can that be with zero info and a known bias. Democrat Scam!" - President Trump

The Trump DNI and Solicitor General have said the complaint is credible.

 

[basquebromance]

"Liddle’ Adam Schiff, who has worked unsuccessfully for 3 years to hurt the Republican Party and President, has just said that the Whistleblower, even though he or she only had second hand information, “is credible.” How can that be with zero info and a known bias. Democrat Scam!" - President Trump

The Trump DNI and Solicitor General have said the complaint is credible.

so?

 

[Bruce_T_Laney]

"Liddle’ Adam Schiff, who has worked unsuccessfully for 3 years to hurt the Republican Party and President, has just said that the Whistleblower, even though he or she only had second hand information, “is credible.” How can that be with zero info and a known bias. Democrat Scam!" - President Trump

The Trump DNI and Solicitor General have said the complaint is credible.

so?

It means a House investigation is justified.

 

[HappyJoy]

"Liddle’ Adam Schiff, who has worked unsuccessfully for 3 years to hurt the Republican Party and President, has just said that the Whistleblower, even though he or she only had second hand information, “is credible.” How can that be with zero info and a known bias. Democrat Scam!" - President Trump

The Trump DNI and Solicitor General have said the complaint is credible.

so?

Depends on what you think about bipartisan conclusion that the complaint is credible. Other than that, go away.

 

[jc456]

The constitution forbids a potus from using the powers of the office for personal political gain.

If there was a reason to investigate Hunter Biden that hasn't already been investigated, there are avenues to provide that information to Ukraine without Trump asking for election help

But Moscow Mitch will cover for the guy even if he starts a war to get reelected.

good thing he didn't then. what was political? joe was a VP of the US who extorted a Ukraine official. bragged about it. so investigation is warranted.

 

[jc456]

Text - Treaty Document 106-16 - Treaty with Ukraine on Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters

I am guessing this is the one they are writing about that BILL CLINTON signed...

from your link -

Article 20 provides that the Treaty is subject to
ratification and the instruments shall be exchanged at
Washington as soon as possible. The Treaty enters into force
upon the exchange of instruments of ratification. Article 20
further provides that either Contracting State may terminate
the Treaty by written notice to the other Contracting State,
with termination to be effective six months following the date
of notification.
A Technical Analysis explaining in detail the provisions of
the Treaty is being prepared by the United States negotiating
delegation, consisting of representatives from the Departments
of Justice and State, and will be transmitted separately to the
Senate Committee on Foreign Relations.
The Department of Justice joins the Department of State in
favoring approval of this Treaty by the Senate as soon as
possible.
Respectfully submitted,
Strobe Talbott.



that was in 98 - AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE

still no detailed treaty that backs up anything from RW bullshit artists

treaty yawnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn-er.

I gave you a direct link to what they are discussing which you claimed was not real.

It took me just two seconds to find it, so maybe next time you should do as I did and look for it.

Notice I did not use any blog or MSM site but a direct link to the treaty they are referring to.

It is between you and claudette to discuss if the treaty protects Trump or not and all I did is hand you the information because you are lazy and did not want to bring, google or for news duck duck go the treaty...

read your own goddamn link - I C/P'd the text on the last paragraph

you or none of your bots have jackshit as far as a treaty goes that protects Trump.

hump each other till you're green.


YOU'RE ALL DISMISSED

1. You have no authority on this site to dismiss anyone at all.

2. It was you claiming the treaty did not exist and I provided it. I did not give any commentary about the content of the link and just provided you a direct link to the treaty and that is all!

So why are you upset by being proven wrong that the treaty existed?

QUOTE ME SAYING THE TREATY DIDNT EXIST.

its out there ok, and nothing about it protects Trumps fat ass.

Post #4. wow, you really have no fking brain. derp derp derp for you eh? you looking for rabbit too? 'you're bringing home a baby bumble bee, sure hope your mommy will be proud of thee" nope ma

 

[basquebromance]

brothers and sisters: if we do not defend the nation, there is no constitution...but if we do not defend the constitution, there is no nation worth defending!

 

[Siete]

from your link -

Article 20 provides that the Treaty is subject to
ratification and the instruments shall be exchanged at
Washington as soon as possible. The Treaty enters into force
upon the exchange of instruments of ratification. Article 20
further provides that either Contracting State may terminate
the Treaty by written notice to the other Contracting State,
with termination to be effective six months following the date
of notification.
A Technical Analysis explaining in detail the provisions of
the Treaty is being prepared by the United States negotiating
delegation, consisting of representatives from the Departments
of Justice and State, and will be transmitted separately to the
Senate Committee on Foreign Relations.
The Department of Justice joins the Department of State in
favoring approval of this Treaty by the Senate as soon as
possible.
Respectfully submitted,
Strobe Talbott.



that was in 98 - AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE

still no detailed treaty that backs up anything from RW bullshit artists

treaty yawnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn-er.

I gave you a direct link to what they are discussing which you claimed was not real.

It took me just two seconds to find it, so maybe next time you should do as I did and look for it.

Notice I did not use any blog or MSM site but a direct link to the treaty they are referring to.

It is between you and claudette to discuss if the treaty protects Trump or not and all I did is hand you the information because you are lazy and did not want to bring, google or for news duck duck go the treaty...

read your own goddamn link - I C/P'd the text on the last paragraph

you or none of your bots have jackshit as far as a treaty goes that protects Trump.

hump each other till you're green.


YOU'RE ALL DISMISSED

1. You have no authority on this site to dismiss anyone at all.

2. It was you claiming the treaty did not exist and I provided it. I did not give any commentary about the content of the link and just provided you a direct link to the treaty and that is all!

So why are you upset by being proven wrong that the treaty existed?

QUOTE ME SAYING THE TREATY DIDNT EXIST.

its out there ok, and nothing about it protects Trumps fat ass.

Post #4. wow, you really have no fking brain. derp derp derp for you eh? you looking for rabbit too? 'you're looking for a baby bumble bee, sure hope your mommy will be proud of thee"

missed your spaceship again.

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

 

[basquebromance]

The whistleblower complaint has exposed a criminal effort to extort political dirtywork from a foreign government, and a massive cover-up orchestrated by the White House.