I mean no disrespect...no, that's a lie. I mean all disrespect.

[SAYIT]

I'm agnostic, dumbass...

Then why do you hate Jews so much?

I don't. I hate Zionists.

Wow! Now there's an original (yet incredibly lame) defense!

 

[bripat9643]

Post an example of conservatives treating the poor like animals.

Those here calling them stupid violent chimps, only those are reactionaries, GOP voters, not conservatives.

The only poster I've seen use the term "chimp" is asclepias.

Obviously, you are unable to find any examples of what you claim.

Obama isn't poor, moron.

Oklahoma Republican Party Compares Poor People To Animals In Facebook Post

People are animals in the sense that many of the same things that motivate animals also motivate humans. However, where do you see anyone suggesting the poor people should be put in cages?

 

[bripat9643]

I'm agnostic, dumbass...

Then why do you hate Jews so much?

I don't. I hate Zionists.

Wow! Now there's an original (yet incredibly lame) defense!

These days, virtually all antisemites claim they are "anti-zionists."

 

[PaintMyHouse]

I'm agnostic, dumbass...

Then why do you hate Jews so much?

I don't. I hate Zionists.

Wow! Now there's an original (yet incredibly lame) defense!

These days, virtually all antisemites claim they are "anti-zionists."

Changes nothing. There are plenty of Jews who oppose Zionism.

 

[SAYIT]

I'm agnostic, dumbass...

Then why do you hate Jews so much?

I don't. I hate Zionists.

Wow! Now there's an original (yet incredibly lame) defense!

These days, virtually all antisemites claim they are "anti-zionists."

Changes nothing. There are plenty of Jews who oppose Zionism.

And far more leftists and liberals who are Nazis.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Those here calling them stupid violent chimps, only those are reactionaries, GOP voters, not conservatives.

The only poster I've seen use the term "chimp" is asclepias.

Obviously, you are unable to find any examples of what you claim.

Obama isn't poor, moron.

Oklahoma Republican Party Compares Poor People To Animals In Facebook Post

People are animals in the sense that many of the same things that motivate animals also motivate humans. However, where do you see anyone suggesting the poor people should be put in cages?

That is hardly necessary since nearly all animals are not in cages. All the darkies in cages is a GOP wet-dream.

 

[bripat9643]

I'm agnostic, dumbass...

Then why do you hate Jews so much?

I don't. I hate Zionists.

Wow! Now there's an original (yet incredibly lame) defense!

These days, virtually all antisemites claim they are "anti-zionists."

Changes nothing. There are plenty of Jews who oppose Zionism.

no, not really.

 

[bripat9643]

The only poster I've seen use the term "chimp" is asclepias.

Obviously, you are unable to find any examples of what you claim.

Obama isn't poor, moron.

Oklahoma Republican Party Compares Poor People To Animals In Facebook Post

People are animals in the sense that many of the same things that motivate animals also motivate humans. However, where do you see anyone suggesting the poor people should be put in cages?

That is hardly necessary since nearly all animals are not in cages. All the darkies in cages is a GOP wet-dream.

Horseshit. You live in a fantasyland.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Then why do you hate Jews so much?

I don't. I hate Zionists.

Wow! Now there's an original (yet incredibly lame) defense!

These days, virtually all antisemites claim they are "anti-zionists."

Changes nothing. There are plenty of Jews who oppose Zionism.

And far more leftists and liberals who are Nazis.

Nope. No liberal is a Nazi, they hated liberals.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Obama isn't poor, moron.

Oklahoma Republican Party Compares Poor People To Animals In Facebook Post

People are animals in the sense that many of the same things that motivate animals also motivate humans. However, where do you see anyone suggesting the poor people should be put in cages?

That is hardly necessary since nearly all animals are not in cages. All the darkies in cages is a GOP wet-dream.

Horseshit. You live in a fantasyland.

Nope. The GOP hates *******, and sand *******...

 

[SAYIT]

These days, virtually all antisemites claim they are "anti-zionists."

Changes nothing. There are plenty of Jews who oppose Zionism.

And far more leftists and liberals who are Nazis.

Nope. No liberal is a Nazi, they hated liberals.

Which makes the leftist/liberal embrace of Nazism all the more twisted.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Then why do you hate Jews so much?

I don't. I hate Zionists.

Wow! Now there's an original (yet incredibly lame) defense!

These days, virtually all antisemites claim they are "anti-zionists."

Changes nothing. There are plenty of Jews who oppose Zionism.

no, not really.

It's not open to debate. There are Jews who aren't Zionists, and Zionists who aren't Jews. I hate all Zionists, not Jews.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

These days, virtually all antisemites claim they are "anti-zionists."

Changes nothing. There are plenty of Jews who oppose Zionism.

And far more leftists and liberals who are Nazis.

Nope. No liberal is a Nazi, they hated liberals.

Which makes the leftist/liberal embrace of Nazism all the more twisted.

No liberal embraces Fascism, it opposes liberty. You'd like it however.

 

[SAYIT]

I don't. I hate Zionists.

Wow! Now there's an original (yet incredibly lame) defense!

These days, virtually all antisemites claim they are "anti-zionists."

Changes nothing. There are plenty of Jews who oppose Zionism.

no, not really.

It's not open to debate. There are Jews who aren't Zionists, and Zionists who aren't Jews. I hate all Zionists, not Jews.

Zionism is defined as "support for the state of Israel" and 99% of all Jews are Zionists.

Claiming you "hate all Zionists, not Jews" is, in effect, hate for Jews.

You fool absolutely no one (other than perhaps yourself).

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Wow! Now there's an original (yet incredibly lame) defense!

These days, virtually all antisemites claim they are "anti-zionists."

Changes nothing. There are plenty of Jews who oppose Zionism.

no, not really.

It's not open to debate. There are Jews who aren't Zionists, and Zionists who aren't Jews. I hate all Zionists, not Jews.

Zionism is defined as "support for the state of Israel" and 99% of all Jews are Zionists.

Claiming you "hate all Zionists, not Jews" is, in effect, hate for Jews.

You fool absolutely no one (other than perhaps yourself).

Nope. And it's nothing like 99%.

The good guys, and not anti-Semites: Neturei Karta - Orthodox Jews United Against Zionism

 

[Pogo]

Who the fuck is Tashfeen Malik?

Can there be a better example of a low-info, high maintenance loony left princess than POGO? Over 4 days after the largest terrorist attack in America since 9/11 and the idiot doesn't know who Malik was.
2015 San Bernardino shooting - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Thanks, but the OP gave no indication who the picture was of. And knowing her name doesn't bring 14 lives back. I really didn't need to know her name, and more to the point I was doing something through that whole period that would have impeded that pointless quest, something called "working". Which is in turn part of something called "having a life". Which is in turn the opposite of sitting glued to a TV begging for scare stories in an endless act-out of that timeless classic Gullible's Travels.

In any case it's the OP's job -- as it is ALWAYS the OP's job -- to explain what the fuck he's talking about, let alone linking who said or did what. And in that he FAILED MISERABLY.

So fuck you too.


But I tell ya what -- prove me wrong. Show the class how anybody can just declare "Obama just cured cancer" and not have to link it.

We'll just stand here and watch.

Dumb shit....

Wow! I realize you have a major case of BUTTHURT in the matter but until you posted that response I was prepared to let it go.

Since you clearly haven't a clue ... you are and have been engaged in a thread in which the recent Jihad attack in Cali is, in part, the subject.

In the course of your mindless braying you asked "Who the fuck is Tashfeen Malik?"

Now none of this will bring back any of the lives lost, heal any of the wounded nor repair the broken families (not that Jihadi apologists like you give a flying fuck) but when you didn't know - over 4 days after the attack - about Malik, you made it clear that you really are just another ignorant loony leftard with absolutely nothing of value to add to the discourse.

That was YOUR job, Dipshit.

This isn't anyone's job, Kumquat, and if you still need to ask "Who the fuck is Tashfeen Malik?" at this stage in the conversation, you are simply too ignorant to talk with the adults.

Now back to your sandbox.

And further, that name appears NOWHERE in the OP. Go learn the fuck to read.

Whew ... and to think I once thought you reasonably intelligent. Clearly I misjudged you.

It doesn't matter where in this conversation Malik's name first appeared.

What does matter is that when it did you had no idea who the bitch was or enough sense to check it out before making a raging jackass of yourself.

Given that golden op to exhibit your monumental ignorance, you jumped on it eagerly.

Go fuck yourself, smegma sipper. There IS NO excuse for this bullshit OP, flail as you might to try to legitimize a blatant lie --- which speaks volumes about your own values.

Just as there's no such thing as a link to my being a "Jihadi apologist".

I asked you for a way an assertion has any value without tangible documentation, which is the entire issue here, and you FAILED to do that. And now you're whining about it.

So go fuck yourself.

You asked me what?

You can wiggle and squirm, lie and deflect all you want but nothing will change the fact that fully 4 days after San Bernardino you were demanding to know who Tashfeen Malik was and further demanding a link.

I simiply pointed out the remarkable level of your ignorance on a subject you had been posting for days, Princess.

You've been having the predictable hissy fit ever since.

I demanded a link for the assertion in the OP, post number 1. That was about something Al Jazeera allegedly said --- but didn't. He had no link because there's no such thing. He LIED.

There was, and still IS, no name in that post. There was a picture with no explanation as to who the fuck it was. And no link to the assertion about Al Jazeera.

Had such a link actually existed, it would have explained who the fuck the picture was. That's secondary information; it's got nothing to do with the assertion. The first thing to establish is the Al Jazeera link, which does not exist. And it does not exist because the OP pulled it out of his ass. And you're still here spinning trying to enable him, even after he's already run away.

Those are facts, and they're on the record and they ain't changing. Like it or lump it, Gummo.
Next time don't take the position of defending a blatant liar and maybe you won't find yourself in a fucking hole.

 

[jc456]

In the beginning...the slaughter went both ways dude. Excess is not defense and the Christians are no innocents in religious body counts. Get real.

Wrong. In the beginning, the slaughter went all one way. Islam expanded by slaughter at the expense of Christianity. The Muslims rampaged through the Middle East for over 300 years before any Christian ever raises a finger to them.

How come the Leftist never noticed the sword on the flag of the keepers of Mecca?

That matters why? They arent Christians...

It documents that the Q'ran is a manual of warfare.

You socialists should open your eyes to that fact.

It's a religion for warriors, dumbass.

Exactly what she wrote

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Wrong. In the beginning, the slaughter went all one way. Islam expanded by slaughter at the expense of Christianity. The Muslims rampaged through the Middle East for over 300 years before any Christian ever raises a finger to them.

How come the Leftist never noticed the sword on the flag of the keepers of Mecca?

That matters why? They arent Christians...

It documents that the Q'ran is a manual of warfare.

You socialists should open your eyes to that fact.

It's a religion for warriors, dumbass.

Exactly what she wrote

I was confirming what it is. Unlike the pacifist Jesus, Muhammad was more of a Jew, who kill their enemies, not love them.

 

[jc456]

How come the Leftist never noticed the sword on the flag of the keepers of Mecca?

That matters why? They arent Christians...

It documents that the Q'ran is a manual of warfare.

You socialists should open your eyes to that fact.

It's a religion for warriors, dumbass.

I've posted this before, but you, an apologist for homicidal maniacs, support my thesis:
Islam is about submission to their political ideology....and you, socialist, demand submission to the dictates of totalitarian big government.

Not unusual....Hitler and Stalin were blood brothers until June of '41.

Islam is the submission of the believer to God, to the Will of God, period.

Then why kill innocent people and treat women and children worse than shit.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

That matters why? They arent Christians...

It documents that the Q'ran is a manual of warfare.

You socialists should open your eyes to that fact.

It's a religion for warriors, dumbass.

I've posted this before, but you, an apologist for homicidal maniacs, support my thesis:
Islam is about submission to their political ideology....and you, socialist, demand submission to the dictates of totalitarian big government.

Not unusual....Hitler and Stalin were blood brothers until June of '41.

Islam is the submission of the believer to God, to the Will of God, period.

Then why kill innocent people and treat women and children worse than shit.

Learn the faith, and of reactionaries, who always treat women and children that way no matter the faith.

Those, are Jews...