I STAND WITH ISRAEL..........DO YOU?

[georgephillip]

The remaining Palestinians have to go.

How many "remaining Palestinians" are required to leave? What level of compensation would you think appropriate?

 

[eagle1462010]

 

[georgephillip]

Far better to leave, and to begin new lives, elsewhere, where they have a future, and can once again be safe, and begin to prosper once again.

Begin to prosper once again?
To what end?
So the next iteration of Zionism will have new victims?
There are equal numbers of Jews and Arabs currently living in historical Palestine; neither nation has any intention of moving. Therefore, they will have to share the land in one form or another, or Palestine will have no future.

 

[georgephillip]

 

[boedicca]

Yes. Israel is a bastion of individual liberty in a sea of Totalitarian oppression.

The motives of those who attack Israel and support de facto dictators are highly suspect.

 

[eagle1462010]

Far better to leave, and to begin new lives, elsewhere, where they have a future, and can once again be safe, and begin to prosper once again.

Begin to prosper once again?
To what end?
So the next iteration of Zionism will have new victims?
There are equal numbers of Jews and Arabs currently living in historical Palestine; neither nation has any intention of moving. Therefore, they will have to share the land in one form or another, or Palestine will have no future.

For what purposes do you show the Nuclear Weapon and the supposed destruction of a city?

GEORGE???????????? Speak into the microphone.

 

[eagle1462010]

I understand that is your purpose and Iran's...........Now isn't it.............

Destruction, Terror, and Murder is your lots methods NOT CIVILIZED SOCIETY.............

Which your side is anything but Civilized.

 

[eagle1462010]

 

[georgephillip]

Yes. Israel is a bastion of individual liberty in a sea of Totalitarian oppression.

Individual liberty for Jews or for all Israelis? Since Israel spends three times more on schools for Jews than it does for Arab schools, does that mean the individual liberty for Jews is three times greater than for Arabs?
The Seattle Mideast Awareness Campaign s discussion Israel s apartheid policies against Palestinians.

 

[Kondor3]

The remaining Palestinians have to go.

How many "remaining Palestinians" are required to leave? What level of compensation would you think appropriate?

How many? As many as the Israelis say. It's their turf now. All several million of them, for all I (or a great many others) care. A matter of complete indifference.

Compensation? Good point. Enough to pay for their emigration and to give them a good start and to sustain them during the early weeks or months in their new environment.

And, for those who had some sort of ancient land-claim that can be proven, 10 cents on the dollar, and a modest per capita lump sum, as a walk-away consolation prize.

Contributed by the Israelis, and the UN at-large, which can finally put its money where its mouth is, and oversee evacuation transport and logistics, doing something useful for once, rather than just sitting in New York and clucking tongues like a bunch of old ladies.

 

[Kondor3]

...There are equal numbers of Jews and Arabs currently living in historical Palestine; neither nation has any intention of moving. Therefore, they will have to share the land in one form or another, or Palestine will have no future...

Wake me up when you've got nukes, Achmed.

 

[georgephillip]

For what purposes do you show the Nuclear Weapon and the supposed destruction of a city?

To remind those who blindly support Israel they support "a form of insanity":
"Shortly after the 1982 invasion of Lebanon, which left some 15-20,000 killed in an unprovoked effort to secure Israel's control of the occupied territories, Aryeh Eliav, one of Israel's best-known doves, wrote that the attitude of 'those who brought the 'Samson complex' here, according to which we shall kill and bury all the Gentiles around us while we ourselves shall die with them,' is a form of 'insanity' that was then all too prevalent, and still is.

"US military analysts have recognised that, as Army Lt. Col. Warner Farr wrote in 1999, one 'purpose of Israeli nuclear weapons, not often stated, but obvious, is their 'use' on the United States,' presumably to ensure consistent U.S. support for Israeli policies -- or else.

"Others see further dangers. Gen. Lee Butler, former commander-in-chief of the US Strategic Command, observed in 1999 that 'it is dangerous in the extreme that in the cauldron of animosities that we call the Middle East, one nation has armed itself, ostensibly, with stockpiles of nuclear weapons, perhaps numbering in the hundreds, and that inspires other nations to do so.' This fact is hardly irrelevant to concerns about Iran's nuclear programmes, but is off the agenda."
Why do you suppose Israel isn't held to the same standards as Iran by US policymakers?

All options on the table by Noam Chomsky

 

[Kondor3]

Is it time to dump more elephant shit on this Arab butt-boy?

 

[Book of Jeremiah]

I don't stand with Israel because they killed Jesus. I don't stand with don't stand with Islam either, because Radical Islam is the enemy of all mankind.

Roman soldiers killed Jesus according to recorded history.

And the Roman Vatican would kill him again today if they had the chance!

 

[eagle1462010]

For what purposes do you show the Nuclear Weapon and the supposed destruction of a city?

To remind those who blindly support Israel they support "a form of insanity":
"Shortly after the 1982 invasion of Lebanon, which left some 15-20,000 killed in an unprovoked effort to secure Israel's control of the occupied territories, Aryeh Eliav, one of Israel's best-known doves, wrote that the attitude of 'those who brought the 'Samson complex' here, according to which we shall kill and bury all the Gentiles around us while we ourselves shall die with them,' is a form of 'insanity' that was then all too prevalent, and still is.

"US military analysts have recognised that, as Army Lt. Col. Warner Farr wrote in 1999, one 'purpose of Israeli nuclear weapons, not often stated, but obvious, is their 'use' on the United States,' presumably to ensure consistent U.S. support for Israeli policies -- or else.

"Others see further dangers. Gen. Lee Butler, former commander-in-chief of the US Strategic Command, observed in 1999 that 'it is dangerous in the extreme that in the cauldron of animosities that we call the Middle East, one nation has armed itself, ostensibly, with stockpiles of nuclear weapons, perhaps numbering in the hundreds, and that inspires other nations to do so.' This fact is hardly irrelevant to concerns about Iran's nuclear programmes, but is off the agenda."
Why do you suppose Israel isn't held to the same standards as Iran by US policymakers?

All options on the table by Noam Chomsky

Because the MAD Principle only applies to SANE COUNTRIES..............

Iran isn't in that group, nor are their proxies.................

Unprovoked....................Standard Propaganda BS............10,000 rockets fired at Israel Unprovoked..............

LOL

 

[eagle1462010]

Is it time to dump more elephant shit on this Arab butt-boy?

YES!

 

[georgephillip]

I understand that is your purpose and Iran's...........Now isn't it.............

Destruction, Terror, and Murder is your lots methods NOT CIVILIZED SOCIETY.............

Which your side is anything but Civilized.

You're speaking on behalf of Jewish "civilization?"
"David Ben Gurion, quoted in The Jewish Paradox, by Nahum Goldmann, Weidenfeld and Nicolson,
1978, p. 99:

"'Jewish villages were built in the place of Arab villages. You do not even know the names of these Arab villages, and I do not blame you because geography books no longer exist. Not only do the books not exist, the Arab villages are not there either. Nahlal arose in the place of Mahlul; Kibbutz Gvat in the place of Jibta; Kibbutz Sarid in the place of Huneifis; and Kefar Yehushua in the place of Tal al-Shuman. There is not a single place built in this country that did not have a former Arab population.'"

What role does ethnic cleansing play in your conception of "civilization?"

RACIST ZIONIST QUOTES Indybay

 

[eagle1462010]

 

[georgephillip]

How many? As many as the Israelis say. It's their turf now. All several million of them, for all I (or a great many others) care. A matter of complete indifference.

Only to a devout racist, Benny.
What does international law say about ethnic cleansing?
"However, ethnic cleansing in the broad sense – the forcible deportation of a population – is defined as a crime against humanity under the statutes of both International Criminal Court (ICC) and theInternational Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY).

1. Ethnic cleansing - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethnic_cleansing
   Wikipedia

Google

 

[georgephillip]