I Still Don't Know What It Is That Trump Opponents (Haters) Are Upset About

As if that could be done without formal proceedings taking place afterwards..... 1st comes the protest, and if ears are opened, then comes the formal proceedings in order to make change.. Nothing gets done in Washington without formal proceedings.
As if that could be done without formal proceedings taking place afterwards..
Stop the f..ing stupid already.
 
It doesn't matter how many men (or women) say it. Numbers don't lie, and math doesn't lie. You WISH it were based on the word of one man. That's the whole stupidity with leftards, they think they can wish something to be true just by saying it often enough. Russia Russia Russia all over again, ad nauseum.
What math? What numbers?
 
As if that could be done without formal proceedings taking place afterwards..... 1st comes the protest, and if ears are opened, then comes the formal proceedings in order to make change.. Nothing gets done in Washington without formal proceedings.
The violence of 1/6 was not a formal proceeding.
 
Biden's DoJ has not threatened to resign.
That's because the DOJ leadership is corrupt deep state authoritarians. They feared loosing power under Trump. As long as someone like Biden is president they retain all they power. Stop calling others stupid while showing your god damn ignorance.
 
That's because the DOJ leadership is corrupt deep state authoritarians. They feared loosing power under Trump. As long as someone like Biden is president they retain all they power. Stop calling others stupid while showing your god damn ignorance.
THEY ARE APPOINTED BY THE PRESIDENT, YOU F..ING STUMP!
 
Ok, Ray..

Tell me how it "works".

The grand jury is not a trial. There are no defense lawyers, no cross examinations, nobody to object to what is being said, and no judge to sustain or over rule any objections. In a GJ they only hear one side of a case which is the prosecutors, hence the saying you can indict a ham sandwich.

It's not until a trial where the defendants team is allowed to examine the prosecutors evidence, point out the flaws and lies, and then present their evidence. In an actual trial, the defense is allowed to object to lines of questioning, cross examine their witnesses, and bring in their own witnesses.

We don't know what was said in the Trump GJ case. But given Fat Alvin is a complete sleeze ball, we can only imagine.

For instance Fat Alvin could have told the GJ jury he has a star witness that was Trump's attorney. What the jurors may not have known is that Cohen is a habitual liar looking for a break, he's a convicted perjurer, and even told his own lawyer that Trump knew nothing about the payment to Stormy. None of that can come out until the actual trial unless we get a non-biased judge to throw the case out.
 
The grand jury is not a trial. There are no defense lawyers, no cross examinations, nobody to object to what is being said, and no judge to sustain or over rule any objections. In a GJ they only hear one side of a case which is the prosecutors, hence the saying you can indict a ham sandwich.

It's not until a trial where the defendants team is allowed to examine the prosecutors evidence, point out the flaws and lies, and then present their evidence. In an actual trial, the defense is allowed to object to lines of questioning, cross examine their witnesses, and bring in their own witnesses.

We don't know what was said in the Trump GJ case. But given Fat Alvin is a complete sleeze ball, we can only imagine.

For instance Fat Alvin could have told the GJ jury he has a star witness that was Trump's attorney. What the jurors may not have known is that Cohen is a habitual liar looking for a break, he's a convicted perjurer, and even told his own lawyer that Trump knew nothing about the payment to Stormy. None of that can come out until the actual trial unless we get a non-biased judge to throw the case out.
The grand jury is not a trial. There are no defense lawyers, no cross examinations, nobody to object to what is being said, and no judge to sustain or over rule any objections
Not this f...ing crap, AGAIN.

Grifty WAS afforded a chance to address the GJ.

But it would have been under oath.
 
Not this f...ing crap, AGAIN.

Grifty WAS afforded a chance to address the GJ.

But it would have been under oath.

How stupid. No attorney in the country would allow their client to do that. Again, it's all one sided and Trump would never be allowed to present his side of the story. All he would have been allowed to do is answer Fat Alvin's questions.
 
How stupid. No attorney in the country would allow their client to do that. Again, it's all one sided and Trump would never be allowed to present his side of the story. All he would have been allowed to do is answer Fat Alvin's questions.

A grand jury is presented evidence supporting an indictment.

That is the process for every criminal defendant in the country.

It is no different for spoiled children in fake tans.
 
The violence of 1/6 was not a formal proceeding.
The violence was not included in my post, otherwise the schedule should have went as planned - Protest - Change of mind's - formal proceedings to review the evidence - then the outcome found within the formal proceedings.

The violence disrupted the process.
 
How stupid. No attorney in the country would allow their client to do that. Again, it's all one sided and Trump would never be allowed to present his side of the story. All he would have been allowed to do is answer Fat Alvin's questions.
The same shake down they are doing on Trump will be applied to every unfavorable politician from these days forward. The precedences are being set.
 

Forum List

Back
Top