Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
ummmm....race had nothing to do with it. You're a sensitive one aren't you?You watch too much crime TV. And I noticed that ALL of you always throw in the adjective "violent" when discussing black people. I can't recall any of you ever using such descriptors when discussing the cases of white mass shooters, generally the killer is described as "mentally ill" as opposed to "violent".The only other problem is the guy was a convicted violent felon facing a lot more time. Such a person is very dangerous to society because he has pretty much nothing to lose. They cannot just let such a person escape and hope he doesn't kill innocent people out of desperation before they can catch him again.The range on a taser is approximately 10 feet. Since he was running away from them and he had already fired the taser the weapon was effectively useless at that point. Unless he had a supply of cartridges on hand at home or where ever he was planning on running off to, the taser was no more useful than a paperweight to him.The way this has been presented to me is it the guy was running off with a weapon. I've heard new facts that he already fired that weapon. If that's the case and the cops shot him anyway, you have a good point.
Cops cannot let people run off a deadly weapons when that person has done so while resisting arrest. Far too many other people get hurt when that happens.
I would ask why that is, except I know it's part of the white racist psyche propaganda to portray black people, particularly black men as inherently violent and criminally inclined.
Do you all ever look at any of your own people?
www.thegatewaypundit.com
Who is DeShawn?It's not just white people DeShawn. People the world over know that those from sub-Saharan African origin are not only limited in intelligence, but the most violent in the world. It seems to go hand-in-hand.I would ask why that is, except I know it's part of the white racist psyche propaganda to portray black people, particularly black men as inherently violent and criminally inclined.
Do you all ever look at any of your own people?
Race has everything to do with how black people are described and portrayed in the media and court documents. You repeat the same false premise over and over and over again and people will accept it at face value even when it's not true. This has nothing to do with me being sensitive, I just happen to have first hand experience in situations that many others haven't.ummmm....race had nothing to do with it. You're a sensitive one aren't you?You watch too much crime TV. And I noticed that ALL of you always throw in the adjective "violent" when discussing black people. I can't recall any of you ever using such descriptors when discussing the cases of white mass shooters, generally the killer is described as "mentally ill" as opposed to "violent".The only other problem is the guy was a convicted violent felon facing a lot more time. Such a person is very dangerous to society because he has pretty much nothing to lose. They cannot just let such a person escape and hope he doesn't kill innocent people out of desperation before they can catch him again.The range on a taser is approximately 10 feet. Since he was running away from them and he had already fired the taser the weapon was effectively useless at that point. Unless he had a supply of cartridges on hand at home or where ever he was planning on running off to, the taser was no more useful than a paperweight to him.The way this has been presented to me is it the guy was running off with a weapon. I've heard new facts that he already fired that weapon. If that's the case and the cops shot him anyway, you have a good point.
Cops cannot let people run off a deadly weapons when that person has done so while resisting arrest. Far too many other people get hurt when that happens.
I would ask why that is, except I know it's part of the white racist psyche propaganda to portray black people, particularly black men as inherently violent and criminally inclined.
Do you all ever look at any of your own people?
He was convicted of violently beating the shit out of his children, a felony. He was released due to COVID-19. Whose brilliant idea was that, Georgia?
And, what the fuck do you call someone punching and fighting with cops making a lawful arrest?
Violent???
Well, I figured your name was NewsVine and it seemed a good name for a thug.Who is DeShawn?It's not just white people DeShawn. People the world over know that those from sub-Saharan African origin are not only limited in intelligence, but the most violent in the world. It seems to go hand-in-hand.I would ask why that is, except I know it's part of the white racist psyche propaganda to portray black people, particularly black men as inherently violent and criminally inclined.
Do you all ever look at any of your own people?
I tried to find out exactly which taser the Atlanta PD uses but was not able to find it easily enough.Most tasers will still work at close range even after being fired and some tazers have multiple shots loaded in them without the need to reload. Does anyone actually know what piece of equipment was used?The range on a taser is approximately 10 feet. Since he was running away from them and he had already fired the taser the weapon was effectively useless at that point. Unless he had a supply of cartridges on hand at home or where ever he was planning on running off to, the taser was no more useful than a paperweight to him.The way this has been presented to me is it the guy was running off with a weapon. I've heard new facts that he already fired that weapon. If that's the case and the cops shot him anyway, you have a good point.
Cops cannot let people run off a deadly weapons when that person has done so while resisting arrest. Far too many other people get hurt when that happens.
From what I have seen (and we all have limited info here) I do not think I would be able to convict either. That does not bode well for a jury.
Nonetheless, Brooks dropped the taser and was still running away from the officer when they shot him in the back so all of the people here talking about the myriad of "what if" scenarios of things Brooks "could have done" with a "dangerous weapon" is nothing more than an attempt to further justify the killing of unarmed black people who were not posing an imminent threat of death of grievous bodiy harm at the time they were killed by the police.
"then to shoot without justification since Mr. Brooks was no imminent danger at that time." The officer was assaulted by Brooks and a weapon was taken in order to be used by Brooks on the officer. No immediate danger? What if he shot the officer by the taser, making him open to the perp getting his gun and using it on him? Forget the race, just take a look at the actions. Who started the violence in this event? You don't assault an officer when drunk and expect him to shake his effin hand~ Whoever wrote that past behavior is a predictor of future behavior was right. The Brooks shooting was a good one.
"then to shoot without justification since Mr. Brooks was no imminent danger at that time." The officer was assaulted by Brooks and a weapon was taken in order to be used by Brooks on the officer. No immediate danger? What if he shot the officer by the taser, making him open to the perp getting his gun and using it on him? Forget the race, just take a look at the actions. Who started the violence in this event? You don't assault an officer when drunk and expect him to shake his effin hand~ Whoever wrote that past behavior is a predictor of future behavior was right. The Brooks shooting was a good one.
Yep, we've seen rightards advocating for cops to execute Mr. Brooks for the crime of resisting arrest.
Cheering on a murderous lynch mob in blue.
no one is excusing Brooks from what he did.Great. So a drunk person rolls up into a drive through and passes out. How many people can dui people kill? So along come the police wake him up, talk sweetly to him. Ask if he’s willing to take a field sobriety test, he says yes. He fails. Cops say you are to much under the influence to drive tonight, so they move to take him into custody, a battle ensues, he snatches a taser and hauls ass firing it at the police. How much abuse and lawbreaking are you people willing to take? Huh?
If I did what that cop did and tried to say I shot a man in the back in self defense it would never stand and I would be arrested for murder.Your feelings and opinions are not the law.Zero. Cops shouldnt be breaking the law or abusing people at all.Great. So a drunk person rolls up into a drive through and passes out. How many people can dui people kill? So along come the police wake him up, talk sweetly to him. Ask if he’s willing to take a field sobriety test, he says yes. He fails. Cops say you are to much under the influence to drive tonight, so they move to take him into custody, a battle ensues, he snatches a taser and hauls ass firing it at the police. How much abuse and lawbreaking are you people willing to take? Huh?
It was a Taser and the shot missed the cop by a mile.I would not vote to convict, either...
Doesn't matter whether you've been drinking or jaywalking or robbing or murdering...
You flee to avoid arrest then turn and fire upon a pursuing law enforcement officer and you earn yourself a toe-tag...
Phukk 'em...
none of those are capital offensesIf you resist arrestNo, just a guy that wants to stay alive. Why would a 'tough guy' like you want to Taze me in the first place?Oh, another tough guy needs to prove it online.No but, if you threatened me with a Taser I'd defend myself with my own weapon if I had one and if that meant putting you down before you could kill or incapacitate me you could become room temperature very quickly.Oh bullshit. If I slapped you does that mean you shoot and kill me?You’re absolutely right. The detractors will comment that the suspect was shot in the back. I have no issue with that. He actively resisted and fought back. He got what he deserved.
If you attack a police officer
If you punch a police officer...
This incident had NOTHING to do with any protests.That little tantrum has nothing to do with the Brooks incidentWith a NONLETHAL Taser that missed the cop by a mileDoesnt work like that retard. Cops are supposed to deal with any aggression in a like manner. Escalating to the use of a gun was a failure of protocol and the reason his ass is now an ex cop with soon to be murder/manslaughter charges on him.Please list the acceptable weapons criminals are allowed to fire at police officers before they can fire back.This had nothing to do with any protests.What threat was he to the cop when he was shot in the back?
Brooks resisted arrest, assaulted a police officer, then shot at a police officer with a stun gun he had stolen from the police officer.
How many police officers have been shot, beaten, injured, ambushed, run over, and killed since these 'protests' started?
Brooks' actions go far beyond 'disrespecting' the police. When someone demonstrates the willingness to assault and shoot a policeman he is not only a threat to the police but to the community as well.
Respect goes 2 ways. Want to be respected by the police, then start respecting the police.
'Don't want none? Then don't start none.' -- Don't want to get shot? Don't resist arrest, don't assault a policeman, don't try to shoot a policeman.
It's not rocket-science, and people of all color are smarter than Abrams / Abrams thinks they are - Brooks was not 'murdered' for sleeping in a fast food parking lot.
It has to do with the use of deadly force and when deadly force is justified.
So tell me at the time the cop shot a man running away from him was that cop in any danger?
Absolutely. Just 1 second prior to that the cop has incapacitating taser barbs fly by his head from his own weapon. This guy needed to be put down immediately.
Good shoot.
Not at all.
You can see how wide the taser shot went on the video.
The fact is the cops were in absolutely no danger after Brooks dropped the taser and ran.
Brooks shot a police officer. In a like manner the price officer shot back. Brooks had bad aim. The police officer did not.
Non lethal is bs and you know it.
A TAser is considered a less than lethal weapon.
a criminal is a lethal weapon
That would be a great rationalization for police brutality. Cops can kill anyone based on their potential to become violent and be a danger to society.
Every time you post your arguments get weaker. I'm hearing that only 5% of calls to police departments involve violent crimes. Why are officers armed with deadly force being sent out to respond to the 95% of calls which don't involve violent crimes in their community?
Police could have taken Mr. Brooks up on his offer to walk home, they could have let him call a friend to take him home. Issuing him with a citation for driving while intoxicated. They could have done any number of things that didn't involve treating him like a menace to society, and ultimately, shooting him down in the Wendy's parking lot, endangering the public, and killing a man who really should be alive today.
animals like you ENCOURAGE criminality. The result of filth like you is that none of the filthy disgusting animals who engaged in mass destruction of the PROPERTY OF GOOD CITIZENS will ever be prosecuted-----MAY YOU SEE YOUR HOUSE A PILE OF RUBBLE
DEFUND ALL WELFARE PROGRAMS AND COMPENSATE THE VICTIMS OF BLM FILTH
In fact it does. There is RIGHT NOW a tremendous spike in crime that includes physical confrontation and
robbery in the streets of my city------ENDORSED as
"well----it's understandable" by garbage like you and by "political leaders" conscious of the benefit to their own behinds
Creating a situation where the police officers life is in danger particularly the part where the officer is incapacitated and the criminal can grab his gun, is life-threatening, JUSTIFYING DEADLY FORCE!!!!!Yes, and as a dude getting arrested, you cannot start fighting with the cops and expect to live.As a cop you cant have a heat of the moment. Peoples lives are on the line. One of the reasons I never became a cop.
.
DUMBEST POST EVER!!!! NO ONE CAN KILL A PERSON JUST BECAUSE THEY STARTED TO FIGHT WITH THEM. RESISTING ARREST IS NOT A CAPITAL OFFENSE.
You are all full of shit if you think there is no danger to a police officer when someone resist arrest like that.
.
it was a Taser or in other words a nonlethal weapon that is only capable of firing one time. The taser had been fired and missed by a wide margin. The subject then dropped the taser and ran.The way this has been presented to me is it the guy was running off with a weapon. I've heard new facts that he already fired that weapon. If that's the case and the cops shot him anyway, you have a good point.The cops shot a guy in the back. It was the cops who prevented the court from deciding the guilt or innocence of this man.And it is not the job of black people to render a judgment as the judge on the street and decide that they must resist arrest and get away.You obviously misunderstood what you just quoted. I was speaking to someone else and telling them its not their job or the cops job to render a decision on guilt or innocence but nice try anyway.EXACTLY!!!!Let the court decide that not your or the cops.
DO NOT RESIST ARREST!!!!
LET THE FUCKING COURTS DECIDE!!!!
It's like talking to a fucking brick wall.
.
Let the court decide.
That's what's happening. These guys are not letting the court decide, they're blaming the cops.
I have demonstrated to everyone this logical flaw that you're running around with.
Again, talking to a brick wall.
.
Cops cannot let people run off a deadly weapons when that person has done so while resisting arrest. Far too many other people get hurt when that happens.
.
Tell me at what point was this cop ever in mortal danger?
I is a naive person-----do not own a taser. Can't they be recharged? The taser constituted a weapon in the hands of a fugging criminal who was so depraved that he resisted a lawful arrest
And you don't think the cop knew how is own Taser works?
You're making it about race.Race has everything to do with how black people are described and portrayed in the media and court documents. You repeat the same false premise over and over and over again and people will accept it at face value even when it's not true. This has nothing to do with me being sensitive, I just happen to have first hand experience in situations that many others haven't.ummmm....race had nothing to do with it. You're a sensitive one aren't you?You watch too much crime TV. And I noticed that ALL of you always throw in the adjective "violent" when discussing black people. I can't recall any of you ever using such descriptors when discussing the cases of white mass shooters, generally the killer is described as "mentally ill" as opposed to "violent".The only other problem is the guy was a convicted violent felon facing a lot more time. Such a person is very dangerous to society because he has pretty much nothing to lose. They cannot just let such a person escape and hope he doesn't kill innocent people out of desperation before they can catch him again.The range on a taser is approximately 10 feet. Since he was running away from them and he had already fired the taser the weapon was effectively useless at that point. Unless he had a supply of cartridges on hand at home or where ever he was planning on running off to, the taser was no more useful than a paperweight to him.The way this has been presented to me is it the guy was running off with a weapon. I've heard new facts that he already fired that weapon. If that's the case and the cops shot him anyway, you have a good point.
Cops cannot let people run off a deadly weapons when that person has done so while resisting arrest. Far too many other people get hurt when that happens.
I would ask why that is, except I know it's part of the white racist psyche propaganda to portray black people, particularly black men as inherently violent and criminally inclined.
Do you all ever look at any of your own people?
He was convicted of violently beating the shit out of his children, a felony. He was released due to COVID-19. Whose brilliant idea was that, Georgia?
And, what the fuck do you call someone punching and fighting with cops making a lawful arrest?
Violent???
I guess you all aren't picking up on the hypocrisy inherent in your assertions though huh?
Have you had any training in this area?Creating a situation where the police officer's life is in danger is not what happened in this case. The police officer's life was NEVER in danger.
Resisting arrest.It was a Taser and the shot missed the cop by a mile.
The cops life was not in danger when he shot Brooks in the back
