2aguy
Diamond Member
- Jul 19, 2014
- 112,160
- 52,413
- 2,290
- Thread starter
- #41
your risk of being killed in a mass shooting are so low as to eb insignificantIt's not even that and your risk of being killed in a mass shooting are so low as to eb insignificantIt may lower the kill rate during mass shootings. Risk reduction. It's all it is.And banning one type of semiautomatic rifle will do absolutely nothing to lower the murder rateThe most radical ideas I have heard are banning assault rifles. You know exactly what they mean, so don't start playing games over it either.And if he didn't have a car he couldn't have gotten to the campus.......
600 million guns, one guy uses one gun illegally...and you want to ban all guns....
You have 12 mass public shootings in 2018....with 93 killed...and you want to ban all guns for all Americans....even though as more Americans own and carry guns our gun murder rate went down 49%, something you can't explain.
Meanwhile...cars killed over 38,000 people and they kill about that many every single year, so according to your logic they need to be banned for everyone.....
Your theories and arguments are foolish....
Banning assault rifles is not banning all guns.
The best way to stop a mass shooting is to not let people with guns into a building.
Banning one weapon when there are countless others that won't be banned and are identical in operation will do absolutely nothing to lower murder rates or the number of mass shootings
Where I live, it is doubly remote. Am I allowed to have some concern for fellow Americans, though, or can I only worry about myself?
Those other Americans use guns to save lives....1.1 million times a year to stop rapes, robberies and murders....and you, because you don't want them to have their legal guns...want those rapes, murders and robberies to actually happen to completion....