francoHFW
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #341
Probably mis-marked too. Enough already- ANOTHER phony scandal.BS. Look at the message in your stupid e-mail. What a joke. And probably mislabeled. WHO GIVES A FEQ BUT TOTAL DUPES?A clear breach of national security, I'm sure V. Putin is able to take this document and do nefarious things. Our national sovereignty is at stake when such an e-mail, something like the pie to be served at the next meeting of the security council, gets to Putin's desk.
If this is the best evidence you have to convict HRC in absentia, be prepared to be laughed at more than you usually are. Sect. Clinton didn't send it dipshit, and given "Texas Justice" i'm pretty sure you missed the boat and haven't called for the execution of the original author.
Shit happens and it is not always intentional, the recent 'deployment' of three armored vehicles by the army sans parachutes is something to consider when one looks to be captious. One data point taken from tens of thousands of e-mails is laughable when the document itself is innocuous. I suggest you get a life and read the Ten Commandments, there is something there you ought to consider.
Keep excusing the lies, and thanks for proving yourself an intellectually dishonest partisan HACK.
And you're not? How many e-mails did Sect. HRC SEND which were classified Top secret or secret? The subject matter in the example posted by you is a ridiculous, and not one which would benefit any foreign enemy; of course domestic enemies (you and the Trumpets) will react hysterically to any minor issue which arises - true or not (example the hysteria around the claim she would raise the taxes of the middle class - a lie which is the grist of members of the crazy right wing (CRW), i.e. Trump supporters.
Do you ever listen to the words of Clinton and Trump, really listen without bias? Clinton speaks without notes, when Trump does his handlers immediately issue statements on what he really meant to say. Thus his handlers have now begun to give him words to read - gee, remember the hysteria from the CRW about Obama's use of the Teleprompter? Hypocrisy isn't a virtue but seems to be one to people like you.
So perjury before congress is insignificant? She said NO emails marked classified were sent or RECEIVED on her email system. We know that statement to be an absolute LIE. At least one had a classified header and others contained portion markers indicating the information was classified. Others generated by her were automatically classified by state dept protocol. So feel free to keep excusing her deception, I'm also sure you think willies perjury was insignificant, you folks seem to loves u som criminals.
Doesn't alter the FACT that it was marked classified, does it? What kind of drugs are you on that allows you to live in such an altered reality?