If Hillary runs she may win 45 states

[Warrior102]

FDR was in a wheelchair and beat the shit out of Republicans four times

There's a difference between polio and insanity.

 

[rightwinger]

She's older than Reagan and McCain - combined. Her "proven leadership" resulted in the deaths of innocent Americans. She's married to an adulterer. She's rich, one of Hollywood's elite, born with a silver spoon up her ass. The military loathes her. Islam uses her as a fucking door mat. The world laughs at her (and Obama).

She'll make a wonderful Liberrhoid candidate.

Reagans "proven leadership" got 241 Marines killed. Still want to harp about the 4 killed under Hillary's watch?

1983 Beirut barracks bombing - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[The Rabbi]

She's older than Reagan and McCain - combined. Her "proven leadership" resulted in the deaths of innocent Americans. She's married to an adulterer. She's rich, one of Hollywood's elite, born with a silver spoon up her ass. The military loathes her. Islam uses her as a fucking door mat. The world laughs at her (and Obama).

She'll make a wonderful Liberrhoid candidate.

Reagans "proven leadership" got 241 Marines killed. Still want to harp about the 4 killed under Hillary's watch?

1983 Beirut barracks bombing - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You're honestly comparing the president of the united states to the sec state?
Did Reagan respond when asked about the dead Marines, "At this point what difference does it make?"
How many were killed under Bill's watch?

 

[Statistikhengst]

Brent Budowsky: Clinton can win 45 states | TheHill



I see a few extra sleeping pills for you RWers tonight....

Will she be brought in on a wheel chair for the debates ?
The old bitch falls every other day. Senile old skank.

FDR was in a wheelchair and beat the shit out of Republicans four times

And how, [MENTION=20321]rightwinger[/MENTION]

1932: FDR 57.41%, Hoover 39.65%, other 2.94%. Margin: FDR +17.76%
1936: FDR 60.80%, Landon 36.54%, other 2.66%. Margin: FDR +24.66%
1940: FDR 54.72%, Willkie 44.77%, other 0.50%. Margin: FDR +9.95%
1944: FDR 53.39%, Dewey 45.89%, other 0.72%. Margin: FDR +7.49%

Even in his worst election (1944), he still did better than any Republican has since after 1984. And his best election (1936) is only surpassed by Harding 1920 and Coolidge 1924 in margin and by LBJ 1964 in winning margin.

Poor Republicans. They keep making the same mistakes all over again, but expect different results.

I believe that is the definition of insanity.

 

[rightwinger]

She's older than Reagan and McCain - combined. Her "proven leadership" resulted in the deaths of innocent Americans. She's married to an adulterer. She's rich, one of Hollywood's elite, born with a silver spoon up her ass. The military loathes her. Islam uses her as a fucking door mat. The world laughs at her (and Obama).

She'll make a wonderful Liberrhoid candidate.

Reagans "proven leadership" got 241 Marines killed. Still want to harp about the 4 killed under Hillary's watch?

1983 Beirut barracks bombing - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You're honestly comparing the president of the united states to the sec state?
Did Reagan respond when asked about the dead Marines, "At this point what difference does it make?"
How many were killed under Bill's watch?

241 Marines killed under Reagan.......Not my fault!
3000 killed under Bush..........Not my fault!

4 killed in Benghazi.....Its Hillarys fault!

 

[The Rabbi]

Will she be brought in on a wheel chair for the debates ?
The old bitch falls every other day. Senile old skank.

FDR was in a wheelchair and beat the shit out of Republicans four times

And how, [MENTION=20321]rightwinger[/MENTION]

1932: FDR 57.41%, Hoover 39.65%, other 2.94%. Margin: FDR +17.76%
1936: FDR 60.80%, Landon 36.54%, other 2.66%. Margin: FDR +24.66%
1940: FDR 54.72%, Willkie 44.77%, other 0.50%. Margin: FDR +9.95%
1944: FDR 53.39%, Dewey 45.89%, other 0.72%. Margin: FDR +7.49%

Even in his worst election (1944), he still did better than any Republican has since 1984. And his best election (1936) is only surpassed by Harding 1920 and Coolidge 1924 in margin and by LBJ 1964 in winning margin.

Poor Republicans. They keep making the same mistakes all over again, but expect different results.

I believe that is the definition of insanity.

It's Statistheilhitler, revealing his statism.
Yes, Roosevelt got elected. Amazing what happens when you promise free shit to ignorant people. Of course Americans suffered more under Roosevelt than under any other president, since his policies prolonged and deepened the Depression.
No wonder Obamabots love him.

 

[Statistikhengst]

Reagans "proven leadership" got 241 Marines killed. Still want to harp about the 4 killed under Hillary's watch?

1983 Beirut barracks bombing - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You're honestly comparing the president of the united states to the sec state?
Did Reagan respond when asked about the dead Marines, "At this point what difference does it make?"
How many were killed under Bill's watch?

241 Marines killed under Reagan.......Not my fault!
3000 killed under Bush..........Not my fault!

4 killed in Benghazi.....Its Hillarys fault!

That's called RW whackadoodle logic.


There are, however, some sane Righties out there who know not to use this type of silly argument. They're just hard to find.

 

[rightwinger]

Will she be brought in on a wheel chair for the debates ?
The old bitch falls every other day. Senile old skank.

FDR was in a wheelchair and beat the shit out of Republicans four times

And how, [MENTION=20321]rightwinger[/MENTION]

1932: FDR 57.41%, Hoover 39.65%, other 2.94%. Margin: FDR +17.76%
1936: FDR 60.80%, Landon 36.54%, other 2.66%. Margin: FDR +24.66%
1940: FDR 54.72%, Willkie 44.77%, other 0.50%. Margin: FDR +9.95%
1944: FDR 53.39%, Dewey 45.89%, other 0.72%. Margin: FDR +7.49%

Even in his worst election (1944), he still did better than any Republican has since 1984. And his best election (1936) is only surpassed by Harding 1920 and Coolidge 1924 in margin and by LBJ 1964 in winning margin.

Poor Republicans. They keep making the same mistakes all over again, but expect different results.

I believe that is the definition of insanity.

The sad part is that their strategy for winning is.....Hillary is OLD, Hillary is UGLY
Ha...Ha.....Hillary in a wheelchair

 

[The Rabbi]

You're honestly comparing the president of the united states to the sec state?
Did Reagan respond when asked about the dead Marines, "At this point what difference does it make?"
How many were killed under Bill's watch?

241 Marines killed under Reagan.......Not my fault!
3000 killed under Bush..........Not my fault!

4 killed in Benghazi.....Its Hillarys fault!

That's called RW whackadoodle logic.


There are, however, some sane Righties out there who know not to use this type of silly argument. They're just hard to find.

That's actually called "looking at the facts of the situation". Smart people can look at two things that appear similar and discern differences.
You can't.

 

[JoeB131]

She's older than Reagan and McCain - combined. Her "proven leadership" resulted in the deaths of innocent Americans. She's married to an adulterer. She's rich, one of Hollywood's elite, born with a silver spoon up her ass. The military loathes her. Islam uses her as a fucking door mat. The world laughs at her (and Obama).

She'll make a wonderful Liberrhoid candidate.

The Dems mocked Gingrich for having ethical baggage. Gingrich is a choir boy compared to Clinton. But Gingrich actually achieved stuff. Clinton has just occupied positions based mainly on her marriage to Bill.
No ideas.
No resume
No charisma

I say she doesn't even get the nomination.

(Welcome back, btw)

If Gingrich was all that and a bag of chips, then why didn't you guys nominate him?

You nominated a guy who thought he was wearing magic underwear and talked about how he liked to fire people and then wondered why folks didn't vote for him.

Again, your problem isn't Hillary. Your problem is that the inmates took over the asylum in your party. Deal with that first.

 

[rightwinger]

FDR was in a wheelchair and beat the shit out of Republicans four times

And how, [MENTION=20321]rightwinger[/MENTION]

1932: FDR 57.41%, Hoover 39.65%, other 2.94%. Margin: FDR +17.76%
1936: FDR 60.80%, Landon 36.54%, other 2.66%. Margin: FDR +24.66%
1940: FDR 54.72%, Willkie 44.77%, other 0.50%. Margin: FDR +9.95%
1944: FDR 53.39%, Dewey 45.89%, other 0.72%. Margin: FDR +7.49%

Even in his worst election (1944), he still did better than any Republican has since 1984. And his best election (1936) is only surpassed by Harding 1920 and Coolidge 1924 in margin and by LBJ 1964 in winning margin.

Poor Republicans. They keep making the same mistakes all over again, but expect different results.

I believe that is the definition of insanity.

It's Statistheilhitler, revealing his statism.
Yes, Roosevelt got elected. Amazing what happens when you promise free shit to ignorant people. Of course Americans suffered more under Roosevelt than under any other president, since his policies prolonged and deepened the Depression.
No wonder Obamabots love him.

Rabbi still spouting his "Prosperity is just around the corner" meme

Hoover tried that one. Let the economy self correct. How much worse can it get? Hands off government is the best government

Guess what? The Depression got worse

FDR understood that the Depression wasn't about economic indicators or trends. The Depression was about the American people suffering and yes, the Government needed to do something about it

Revisionist history that the depression would have fixed itself faster if FDR did nothing is pure rightwing fantasy

 

[The Rabbi]

And how, [MENTION=20321]rightwinger[/MENTION]

1932: FDR 57.41%, Hoover 39.65%, other 2.94%. Margin: FDR +17.76%
1936: FDR 60.80%, Landon 36.54%, other 2.66%. Margin: FDR +24.66%
1940: FDR 54.72%, Willkie 44.77%, other 0.50%. Margin: FDR +9.95%
1944: FDR 53.39%, Dewey 45.89%, other 0.72%. Margin: FDR +7.49%

Even in his worst election (1944), he still did better than any Republican has since 1984. And his best election (1936) is only surpassed by Harding 1920 and Coolidge 1924 in margin and by LBJ 1964 in winning margin.

Poor Republicans. They keep making the same mistakes all over again, but expect different results.

I believe that is the definition of insanity.

It's Statistheilhitler, revealing his statism.
Yes, Roosevelt got elected. Amazing what happens when you promise free shit to ignorant people. Of course Americans suffered more under Roosevelt than under any other president, since his policies prolonged and deepened the Depression.
No wonder Obamabots love him.

Rabbi still spouting his "Prosperity is just around the corner" meme

Hoover tried that one. Let the economy self correct. How much worse can it get? Hands off government is the best government

Guess what? The Depression got worse

FDR understood that the Depression wasn't about economic indicators or trends. The Depression was about the American people suffering and yes, the Government needed to do something about it

Revisionist history that the depression would have fixed itself faster if FDR did nothing is pure rightwing fantasy

Hoover was a progressive who sought to stop the Depression by infrastructure spending and stimulus.
Facts are tough on the stupid.

 

[The Rabbi]

She's older than Reagan and McCain - combined. Her "proven leadership" resulted in the deaths of innocent Americans. She's married to an adulterer. She's rich, one of Hollywood's elite, born with a silver spoon up her ass. The military loathes her. Islam uses her as a fucking door mat. The world laughs at her (and Obama).

She'll make a wonderful Liberrhoid candidate.

The Dems mocked Gingrich for having ethical baggage. Gingrich is a choir boy compared to Clinton. But Gingrich actually achieved stuff. Clinton has just occupied positions based mainly on her marriage to Bill.
No ideas.
No resume
No charisma

I say she doesn't even get the nomination.

(Welcome back, btw)

If Gingrich was all that and a bag of chips, then why didn't you guys nominate him?

You nominated a guy who thought he was wearing magic underwear and talked about how he liked to fire people and then wondered why folks didn't vote for him.

Again, your problem isn't Hillary. Your problem is that the inmates took over the asylum in your party. Deal with that first.

True, our problem is not Hillary. Hillary is your problem. Please, nominate her. Now! Just by acclimation. Don't let anyone else run. Please do it.

 

[Statistikhengst]

241 Marines killed under Reagan.......Not my fault!
3000 killed under Bush..........Not my fault!

4 killed in Benghazi.....Its Hillarys fault!

That's called RW whackadoodle logic.


There are, however, some sane Righties out there who know not to use this type of silly argument. They're just hard to find.

That's actually called "looking at the facts of the situation". Smart people can look at two things that appear similar and discern differences.
You can't.

Still trying your hardest to fart out a thought now and then, eh, Rabbi-boy? The only facts you see are your own personal rabies.

Fact is that many, many more US personnel died under a number of other administrations than this one. That is factually proven. You don't like it? Tough shit for you. Actually, your very behavior proves why this OP, with the title:

If Hillary runs she may win 45 states


exists.

Hillary is not going to win 45 states, but she is already running away with it; polling is proving that very consistently and has been now for over 16 months, and a lot of it is due to RW whackadoodles like you who say crazy shit like that.


So, thanks for your help.

 

[Warrior102]

True, our problem is not Hillary. Hillary is your problem. Please, nominate her. Now! Just by acclimation. Don't let anyone else run. Please do it.

I agree -- slap the old bitch out of her coma, tell her what day it is - and nominate her.

 

[Warrior102]

Fact is that many, many more US personnel died under a number of other administrations than this one. That is factually proven.

That's a fucking lie.

Regardless, when/where did you serve, coward?

 

[The Rabbi]

That's called RW whackadoodle logic.


There are, however, some sane Righties out there who know not to use this type of silly argument. They're just hard to find.

That's actually called "looking at the facts of the situation". Smart people can look at two things that appear similar and discern differences.
You can't.

Still trying your hardest to fart out a thought now and then, eh, Rabbi-boy? The only facts you see are your own personal rabies.

Fact is that many, many more US personnel died under a number of other administrations than this one. That is factually proven. You don't like it? Tough shit for you. Actually, your very behavior proves why this OP, with the title:

If Hillary runs she may win 45 states


exists.

Hillary is not going to win 45 states, but she is already running away with it; polling is proving that very consistently and has been now for over 16 months, and a lot of it is due to RW whackadoodles like you who say crazy shit like that.


So, thanks for your help.

Spewing stupid schoolyard taunts. That's about your level.
Hillary was a shoe in in 2007. Then she lost to a no-talent junior senator with dark skin. But this time will be different, right?

 

[JoeB131]

[

It's Statistheilhitler, revealing his statism.
Yes, Roosevelt got elected. Amazing what happens when you promise free shit to ignorant people. Of course Americans suffered more under Roosevelt than under any other president, since his policies prolonged and deepened the Depression.
No wonder Obamabots love him.

Wow, the scary thing is this is how Rabbid actually thinks.

FDR took the worse economic crisis in history, managed to turn the economy around while still maintaining American Democracy, and put the country in a position where we could turn the tide in WWII and finish the war as the dominant economic power.

"But, but, but, he required a minimum wage and social security. He hated my freedom!"

Okay, seriously, guy, get over yourself. This argument was lost by your side 80 years ago. The GOP was sane when it admitted as much under Ike and Nixon and yes, even Reagan.

 

[The Rabbi]

Fact is that many, many more US personnel died under a number of other administrations than this one. That is factually proven.

That's a fucking lie.

Regardless, when/where did you serve, coward?

No, he's right. More people died under Lyndon Johnson than under Obama. I dont recall Johnson blaming a video for those death. More people died under FDR than under Obama. I dont recall FDR blaming a video for that either. Maybe it was a newsreel.
More people died under Democrat presidents more stupidly and more pointlessly than under every Republican president combined.

 

[The Rabbi]

[

It's Statistheilhitler, revealing his statism.
Yes, Roosevelt got elected. Amazing what happens when you promise free shit to ignorant people. Of course Americans suffered more under Roosevelt than under any other president, since his policies prolonged and deepened the Depression.
No wonder Obamabots love him.

Wow, the scary thing is this is how Rabbid actually thinks.

FDR took the worse economic crisis in history, managed to turn the economy around while still maintaining American Democracy, and put the country in a position where we could turn the tide in WWII and finish the war as the dominant economic power.

"But, but, but, he required a minimum wage and social security. He hated my freedom!"

Okay, seriously, guy, get over yourself. This argument was lost by your side 80 years ago. The GOP was sane when it admitted as much under Ike and Nixon and yes, even Reagan.

^^Joe displaying his public school education.