If Manhattan Gets Hit,You Think New York Will Vote For Hillary In 2016?

:stupid: Well, New York voted for Obama twice, apparently they assumed so long as we have a Democrat in office, we will be safe. This also goes for the other deep blue states that voted for Obama in a 55/45 or 60/40 landslide.
Now what if any of these deep blue cities get hit by ISIS, anyone think they will still vote for Hillary being she wont do anything to defend our nation and also wants to cut the Syrian refugees loose in the USA.
Maybe for the first time ever (well, at least since the Reagan Years) New York will finally wake up and "The Stupid Vote" will vote for the GOP in 2016?:bow3::woohoo:

The stupid vote always votes for the GOP.
 
:stupid: Well, New York voted for Obama twice, apparently they assumed so long as we have a Democrat in office, we will be safe. This also goes for the other deep blue states that voted for Obama in a 55/45 or 60/40 landslide.
Now what if any of these deep blue cities get hit by ISIS, anyone think they will still vote for Hillary being she wont do anything to defend our nation and also wants to cut the Syrian refugees loose in the USA.
Maybe for the first time ever (well, at least since the Reagan Years) New York will finally wake up and "The Stupid Vote" will vote for the GOP in 2016?:bow3::woohoo:

Democrats have already lost 2016. In addition to the historic alternating of Presidents by-party, it's just the GOP talking tough about ISIS and refugees. People want strength and safety, not touchy-feely peacetime thinking.

Sanders would make a great peacetime President, but we don't have peace and our enemy is gearing up. We need a wartime President. And that's best encapsulated by the Republicans.

Republicans will turn up the fear mongering and claim they are the only party that can keep you safe (while expecting everyone to forget 9-11)
Fact is, we have had very few Americans killed by outside terrorists in the last ten years while we look the other way as 32,000 Americans are killed by guns each year

Isn't fear mongering if there really are monsters coming for you.

The real "monsters" live in our neighborhoods and are armed to the teeth. They are not muslim terrorists but typical americans you meet every day.
They kill 8500 a year and we don't blink an eye

So now you want to put a stop to ghetto killings?
 
I will be surprised if Minnesota votes for Hillary, arent they a major target too? is senator Stuart Smalley gaurding the mall this december?
 
its been five days since the horror, why havent we heard from Black Lives Matter? maybe its because it wasnt 130 black people that were killed?

I don't follow your logic

Are you claiming those french concert goers were gunned down by police?
 
:stupid: Well, New York voted for Obama twice, apparently they assumed so long as we have a Democrat in office, we will be safe. This also goes for the other deep blue states that voted for Obama in a 55/45 or 60/40 landslide.
Now what if any of these deep blue cities get hit by ISIS, anyone think they will still vote for Hillary being she wont do anything to defend our nation and also wants to cut the Syrian refugees loose in the USA.
Maybe for the first time ever (well, at least since the Reagan Years) New York will finally wake up and "The Stupid Vote" will vote for the GOP in 2016?:bow3::woohoo:
If Jackson Mississippi gets hit.........................would anyone notice? (since we're gonna play games)
 
:stupid: Well, New York voted for Obama twice, apparently they assumed so long as we have a Democrat in office, we will be safe. This also goes for the other deep blue states that voted for Obama in a 55/45 or 60/40 landslide.
Now what if any of these deep blue cities get hit by ISIS, anyone think they will still vote for Hillary being she wont do anything to defend our nation and also wants to cut the Syrian refugees loose in the USA.
Maybe for the first time ever (well, at least since the Reagan Years) New York will finally wake up and "The Stupid Vote" will vote for the GOP in 2016?:bow3::woohoo:

Democrats have already lost 2016. In addition to the historic alternating of Presidents by-party, it's just the GOP talking tough about ISIS and refugees. People want strength and safety, not touchy-feely peacetime thinking.

Sanders would make a great peacetime President, but we don't have peace and our enemy is gearing up. We need a wartime President. And that's best encapsulated by the Republicans.

Which of the Republicans is best suited to lead us in wartime?

Trump?
Carson?
Cruz?
Rubio?


A better question is which Democrat is best suited to be dog catcher, leaving the other two to fight over streets and sanitation-)
 

Forum List

Back
Top