Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
thats just one of ten items."Conduct toward Manafort" is not a crime. Try listing actual crimes.Heat map of obstructionLink?A sitting president cannot be indictedPost the exact quote from the Mueller report where HE say this, and provide the link.Mueller didn't indict Trump because the OLC guidelines say he cannot indict a sitting president.
You are a desperate, pathetic LIAR.
THINKING about firing Mueller but not going through with it is NOT a crime dumbass...
...Unless you can also show me the link to the 'THOUGHT CRIMES' Bill the Socialist Democrats passed...
Mueller began by noting that the Office of Legal Counsel in the White House wrote in a 2000 memo that sitting presidents can’t be indicted because it would undermine their ability to oversee the nation’s criminal justice system. But he adds that doesn’t mean that a special counsel couldn’t investigate a presidential actions, since charges could be brought after they’ve left office.
“Given those considerations, the facts known to us, and the strong public interest in safeguarding the integrity of the criminal justice system, we conducted a thorough factual investigation in order to preserve the evidence when memories were fresh and documentary materials were available,” he wrote.
Again...THINKING about doing something and not doing it is NOT a crime...unless you can post the link to the ''THOUGHT CRIME' Bill Democrats passed.
Alot more than thinking.
Your chart is just more fake news conspiracy theory horseshit.
In other words, the report doesn't say what you claim.Jayzus! If you were straightjacketed, strapped to a,chair, and had your eyelids clamped open a la Alex DeLarge in A Clockwork Orange, you could not be taught that literalism is a flaw in thinking.In other words, Mueller's report doesn't say that's a reason for not indicting Trump.It says so in the 2000 OLC policy statement. A Justice Department policy.Where does the report say that a sitting president can't be indicted?A sitting president cannot be indictedPost the exact quote from the Mueller report where HE say this, and provide the link.
You are a desperate, pathetic LIAR.
THINKING about firing Mueller but not going through with it is NOT a crime dumbass...
...Unless you can also show me the link to the 'THOUGHT CRIMES' Bill the Socialist Democrats passed...
Mueller began by noting that the Office of Legal Counsel in the White House wrote in a 2000 memo that sitting presidents can’t be indicted because it would undermine their ability to oversee the nation’s criminal justice system. But he adds that doesn’t mean that a special counsel couldn’t investigate a presidential actions, since charges could be brought after they’ve left office.
“Given those considerations, the facts known to us, and the strong public interest in safeguarding the integrity of the criminal justice system, we conducted a thorough factual investigation in order to preserve the evidence when memories were fresh and documentary materials were available,” he wrote.
Thanks for playing!
ROFL! So the president isn't allowed to comment on the investigation? Really? You and the SP are a couple of monomaniacal morons.thats just one of ten items."Conduct toward Manafort" is not a crime. Try listing actual crimes.Heat map of obstructionLink?A sitting president cannot be indictedPost the exact quote from the Mueller report where HE say this, and provide the link.
You are a desperate, pathetic LIAR.
THINKING about firing Mueller but not going through with it is NOT a crime dumbass...
...Unless you can also show me the link to the 'THOUGHT CRIMES' Bill the Socialist Democrats passed...
Mueller began by noting that the Office of Legal Counsel in the White House wrote in a 2000 memo that sitting presidents can’t be indicted because it would undermine their ability to oversee the nation’s criminal justice system. But he adds that doesn’t mean that a special counsel couldn’t investigate a presidential actions, since charges could be brought after they’ve left office.
“Given those considerations, the facts known to us, and the strong public interest in safeguarding the integrity of the criminal justice system, we conducted a thorough factual investigation in order to preserve the evidence when memories were fresh and documentary materials were available,” he wrote.
Again...THINKING about doing something and not doing it is NOT a crime...unless you can post the link to the ''THOUGHT CRIME' Bill Democrats passed.
Alot more than thinking.
Your chart is just more fake news conspiracy theory horseshit.
Regarding Manafort, “there is evidence that the President’s actions had the potential” to influence Manafort’s thinking on cooperation, and his public statements “had the potential to influence the trial jury.”
Trump floated manafort pardon.ROFL! So the president isn't allowed to comment on the investigation? Really? You and the SP are a couple of monomaniacal morons.thats just one of ten items."Conduct toward Manafort" is not a crime. Try listing actual crimes.Heat map of obstructionLink?A sitting president cannot be indicted
Mueller began by noting that the Office of Legal Counsel in the White House wrote in a 2000 memo that sitting presidents can’t be indicted because it would undermine their ability to oversee the nation’s criminal justice system. But he adds that doesn’t mean that a special counsel couldn’t investigate a presidential actions, since charges could be brought after they’ve left office.
“Given those considerations, the facts known to us, and the strong public interest in safeguarding the integrity of the criminal justice system, we conducted a thorough factual investigation in order to preserve the evidence when memories were fresh and documentary materials were available,” he wrote.
Again...THINKING about doing something and not doing it is NOT a crime...unless you can post the link to the ''THOUGHT CRIME' Bill Democrats passed.
Alot more than thinking.
Your chart is just more fake news conspiracy theory horseshit.
Regarding Manafort, “there is evidence that the President’s actions had the potential” to influence Manafort’s thinking on cooperation, and his public statements “had the potential to influence the trial jury.”
Trump floated manafort pardon.ROFL! So the president isn't allowed to comment on the investigation? Really? You and the SP are a couple of monomaniacal morons.thats just one of ten items."Conduct toward Manafort" is not a crime. Try listing actual crimes.Heat map of obstructionLink?
Again...THINKING about doing something and not doing it is NOT a crime...unless you can post the link to the ''THOUGHT CRIME' Bill Democrats passed.
Alot more than thinking.
Your chart is just more fake news conspiracy theory horseshit.
Regarding Manafort, “there is evidence that the President’s actions had the potential” to influence Manafort’s thinking on cooperation, and his public statements “had the potential to influence the trial jury.”
And tampered manafort jury.
Okay, people, let's cut through the haze of goalpost-moving and "outrage" du jour.
Mueller's investigation was supposed to be about Russian interference in the 2016 election. As much as you deranged leftists want to ignore it, Mueller cleared him on this:
"Although the investigation established that the Russian government perceived it would benefit from a Trump presidency and worked to secure that outcome, and that the Campaign expected it would benefit electorally from information stolen and released through Russian efforts, the investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities."
For Mueller to then broaden his investigation to "obstruction of justice", and THEN punt was directly contrary to the basics of good prosecutorial behavior, and was FAR more suspicious than the decision Barr made (which he only had to make because Mueller refused to do so).
Furthermore, his definition of "obstruction of justice" is far broader than the legal standard, and would be ultimately unworkable in our legal system. And even then, after having defined "obstruction of justice" as basically anything that might ever let people know you don't enjoy being investigated, he STILL couldn't come up with enough to say, "Yes, I believe he obstructed justice and should be prosecuted".
As much as the rabid left would like to ignore it and pretend otherwise, Mueller's report provided counter-evidence for every insinuation of obstruction.
So no, lefties. You have nothing. Trump's a jackass; we already knew that. Being a jackass is neither illegal nor grounds for impeachment; it's past time that you leftists learn that.
Manafort is currently in jail on federal charges.Trump floated manafort pardon.ROFL! So the president isn't allowed to comment on the investigation? Really? You and the SP are a couple of monomaniacal morons.thats just one of ten items."Conduct toward Manafort" is not a crime. Try listing actual crimes.
Your chart is just more fake news conspiracy theory horseshit.
Regarding Manafort, “there is evidence that the President’s actions had the potential” to influence Manafort’s thinking on cooperation, and his public statements “had the potential to influence the trial jury.”
And tampered manafort jury.
What the fuck does "floated It" mean? Did he announce it in public, or just discuss it with his colleagues? Trump can't even pardon Manafort for non-federal crimes.
What do you think Trump did after he said, ‘This is the End of My Presidency. I’m F*cked’ After Mueller’s Appointment?...and your point is?
You're reaching, snowflake...
Just saying, that this is a very good analysis.Okay, people, let's cut through the haze of goalpost-moving and "outrage" du jour.
Mueller's investigation was supposed to be about Russian interference in the 2016 election. As much as you deranged leftists want to ignore it, Mueller cleared him on this:
"Although the investigation established that the Russian government perceived it would benefit from a Trump presidency and worked to secure that outcome, and that the Campaign expected it would benefit electorally from information stolen and released through Russian efforts, the investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities."
For Mueller to then broaden his investigation to "obstruction of justice", and THEN punt was directly contrary to the basics of good prosecutorial behavior, and was FAR more suspicious than the decision Barr made (which he only had to make because Mueller refused to do so).
Furthermore, his definition of "obstruction of justice" is far broader than the legal standard, and would be ultimately unworkable in our legal system. And even then, after having defined "obstruction of justice" as basically anything that might ever let people know you don't enjoy being investigated, he STILL couldn't come up with enough to say, "Yes, I believe he obstructed justice and should be prosecuted".
As much as the rabid left would like to ignore it and pretend otherwise, Mueller's report provided counter-evidence for every insinuation of obstruction.
So no, lefties. You have nothing. Trump's a jackass; we already knew that. Being a jackass is neither illegal nor grounds for impeachment; it's past time that you leftists learn that.
Mueller started and ended his comments with Russia helped Trump, PUTIN said they helped trump And yet the AH denies russia helped A degenerate liar in our WH
any implied right wing fantasy works for the right wing. a DOJ special counsel simply cannot charge his "boss" since it is a Constitutionally provided for issue and should require Congress and a Congressional special counsel.He did NOT.
NO EVIDENCE
NO CRIME
NO RUSSIAN COLLUSION
NO OBSTRUCTION...
THUS...
NO INDICTMENTS FOR COLLUSION
NO CONVICTIONS FOR COLLUSION
NO INDICTMENTS FOR OBSTRUCTION
NO CONVICTIONS FOR OBSTRUCTION.
'Nuff time wasted.
'Nuff said.
NEXT!
Just saying, that this is a very good analysis.Okay, people, let's cut through the haze of goalpost-moving and "outrage" du jour.
Mueller's investigation was supposed to be about Russian interference in the 2016 election. As much as you deranged leftists want to ignore it, Mueller cleared him on this:
"Although the investigation established that the Russian government perceived it would benefit from a Trump presidency and worked to secure that outcome, and that the Campaign expected it would benefit electorally from information stolen and released through Russian efforts, the investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities."
For Mueller to then broaden his investigation to "obstruction of justice", and THEN punt was directly contrary to the basics of good prosecutorial behavior, and was FAR more suspicious than the decision Barr made (which he only had to make because Mueller refused to do so).
Furthermore, his definition of "obstruction of justice" is far broader than the legal standard, and would be ultimately unworkable in our legal system. And even then, after having defined "obstruction of justice" as basically anything that might ever let people know you don't enjoy being investigated, he STILL couldn't come up with enough to say, "Yes, I believe he obstructed justice and should be prosecuted".
As much as the rabid left would like to ignore it and pretend otherwise, Mueller's report provided counter-evidence for every insinuation of obstruction.
So no, lefties. You have nothing. Trump's a jackass; we already knew that. Being a jackass is neither illegal nor grounds for impeachment; it's past time that you leftists learn that.
Over 800 prosecutors have signed a letter saying that if Trump were NOT the sitting President, he would have been charge with obstruction of justice.Just saying, that this is a very good analysis.Okay, people, let's cut through the haze of goalpost-moving and "outrage" du jour.
Mueller's investigation was supposed to be about Russian interference in the 2016 election. As much as you deranged leftists want to ignore it, Mueller cleared him on this:
"Although the investigation established that the Russian government perceived it would benefit from a Trump presidency and worked to secure that outcome, and that the Campaign expected it would benefit electorally from information stolen and released through Russian efforts, the investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities."
For Mueller to then broaden his investigation to "obstruction of justice", and THEN punt was directly contrary to the basics of good prosecutorial behavior, and was FAR more suspicious than the decision Barr made (which he only had to make because Mueller refused to do so).
Furthermore, his definition of "obstruction of justice" is far broader than the legal standard, and would be ultimately unworkable in our legal system. And even then, after having defined "obstruction of justice" as basically anything that might ever let people know you don't enjoy being investigated, he STILL couldn't come up with enough to say, "Yes, I believe he obstructed justice and should be prosecuted".
As much as the rabid left would like to ignore it and pretend otherwise, Mueller's report provided counter-evidence for every insinuation of obstruction.
So no, lefties. You have nothing. Trump's a jackass; we already knew that. Being a jackass is neither illegal nor grounds for impeachment; it's past time that you leftists learn that.
Her analysis is total bullshit. Over 800 prosecutors have signed a letter saying that if Trump were NOT the sitting President, he would have been charge with obstruction of justice.
We, the public, watched him do it in real time, on Twitter, in his pressers - threatening witnesses, their families, and dangling pardons. That's not an "overbroad" definition of obstruction. You have to be wilfully blind to ignore it, but "wilfully blind" is the most perfect description of Trumpers ever.
Over 800 prosecutors have signed a letter saying that if Trump were NOT the sitting President, he would have been charge with obstruction of justice.Just saying, that this is a very good analysis.Okay, people, let's cut through the haze of goalpost-moving and "outrage" du jour.
Mueller's investigation was supposed to be about Russian interference in the 2016 election. As much as you deranged leftists want to ignore it, Mueller cleared him on this:
"Although the investigation established that the Russian government perceived it would benefit from a Trump presidency and worked to secure that outcome, and that the Campaign expected it would benefit electorally from information stolen and released through Russian efforts, the investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities."
For Mueller to then broaden his investigation to "obstruction of justice", and THEN punt was directly contrary to the basics of good prosecutorial behavior, and was FAR more suspicious than the decision Barr made (which he only had to make because Mueller refused to do so).
Furthermore, his definition of "obstruction of justice" is far broader than the legal standard, and would be ultimately unworkable in our legal system. And even then, after having defined "obstruction of justice" as basically anything that might ever let people know you don't enjoy being investigated, he STILL couldn't come up with enough to say, "Yes, I believe he obstructed justice and should be prosecuted".
As much as the rabid left would like to ignore it and pretend otherwise, Mueller's report provided counter-evidence for every insinuation of obstruction.
So no, lefties. You have nothing. Trump's a jackass; we already knew that. Being a jackass is neither illegal nor grounds for impeachment; it's past time that you leftists learn that.
Her analysis is total bullshit. Over 800 prosecutors have signed a letter saying that if Trump were NOT the sitting President, he would have been charge with obstruction of justice.
We, the public, watched him do it in real time, on Twitter, in his pressers - threatening witnesses, their families, and dangling pardons. That's not an "overbroad" definition of obstruction. You have to be wilfully blind to ignore it, but "wilfully blind" is the most perfect description of Trumpers ever.
WOW! Sounds serious!
So that's 800 ex-prosecutors out of how many?
Not so quick I own a bunch of FBMueller started and ended his comments with Russia helped Trump, PUTIN said they helped trump And yet the AH denies russia helped A degenerate liar in our WH
Literally dozens of Dems voted for Trump because of Russian memes on Facebook.
It was awful.
We need to shutdown Facebook immediately.
Not so quick I own a bunch of FBMueller started and ended his comments with Russia helped Trump, PUTIN said they helped trump And yet the AH denies russia helped A degenerate liar in our WH
Literally dozens of Dems voted for Trump because of Russian memes on Facebook.
It was awful.
We need to shutdown Facebook immediately.
any implied right wing fantasy works for the right wing. a DOJ special counsel simply cannot charge his "boss" since it is a Constitutionally provided for issue and should require Congress and a Congressional special counsel.
