Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You're confused about where the stupid is coming from. Even a 5-year-old can understand the hypocrisy of opposing the wall and then building a fence around your convention.
According to the above, eternal moron, the placing of a chain link fence for a 4 day convention is the SAME as building a 2000 miles, 8 to 20 foot high permanent wall........Can you imagine the horror of this moron breeding other morons?
I can see how a wall might staunch the flow of undocumented immigrants for a time. Until people figure out how to get over, around, or underneath of it. Mr. Trump's position on the issue seems to be focused on Mexico though, with no mention of Chinese or Indian immigrants, who are arriving at a faster pace than Mexicans. They come across the southern border because it is easy. Erecting an effective barrier there makes the Canadian border easier to cross. If a person can afford an airline ticket / berth from Mumbai or Guangzhou to Mexico City, why not to Vancouver or Toronto? Will we be discussing another wall and tripling of border guards in 4 years time. I also don't see much, if anything, on Mr. Trump's campaign site (someone misspelled wall) about changing the entry requirements into the US. Right now a BCC gets a Mexican citizen 55 miles into the US (farther in Arizona) while a passport (for most nationalities) allows them to come in anywhere for 90 days. Other than raising the fees on BCCs and a vaguely worded stance on "enhanced" and "criminal" penalties for people overstaying their visas, what is the proposed policy? A visa tracking system that has so far been a failure? I don't need the nuts and bolts but I do need more than just "Build a wall."
Right wing, you used all your brainpower coming up with that one, didn't you? Still no examples though, LOL.So why do Democrats need a wall if they don't work?
Another right wing idiot chimes in to demand his share of stupid comments.....
A FENCE for crowd control over a 4 day period does NOT equate with a fucking 10 foot permanent WALL over a 2,000 mile span..............Surely there's a grown up to explain it to you, moron.
A visa tracking system that has so far been a failure? I don't need the nuts and bolts but I do need more than just "Build a wall."
Of course, you're correct.....But demagoguery works best when simple solutions are offered to not too bright minds, so building a beautiful wall "sounds" like an answer that nitwits readily swallow....
(BTW, don't forget that much of our drugs' importation is done by sea crafts......and we have over 96.000 miles of coastal areas..
So why do Democrats need a wall if they don't work?
Another right wing idiot chimes in to demand his share of stupid comments.....
A FENCE for crowd control over a 4 day period does NOT equate with a fucking 10 foot permanent WALL over a 2,000 mile span..............Surely there's a grown up to explain it to you, moron.
Except when Democrats are in power, there IS no border security, monitoring, or deportation, as we can clearly see with this administration and with Hillary's plan to legalize the ones who are currently here ILLEGALLY. A wall will still be there, even when Democrats are in power.Immigration enforcement has cost billions. We also make billions off of immigrants. Building a wall is a waste of money. I'm fine with funding boarder security and better monitoring and making areas of legal immigration, deportation, and visa programs much more efficient.And how many billions has illegal immigration cost us? And how many billions will it continue to cost us, especially every time Democrats are in power and want more voters?I would expect that we understand the problem and know the stats before investing billions of dollars in building a wall.
Immigration enforcement has cost billions. We also make billions off of immigrants. Building a wall is a waste of money. I'm fine with funding boarder security and better monitoring and making areas of legal immigration, deportation, and visa programs much more efficient.And how many billions has illegal immigration cost us? And how many billions will it continue to cost us, especially every time Democrats are in power and want more voters?I would expect that we understand the problem and know the stats before investing billions of dollars in building a wall.
It's not just a wall and your done . The plan calls for extra patrols , helicopters , upkeep , drones flying 24/7 ! Think of the cost vs the benefit ! ?
So why do Democrats need a wall if they don't work?
Another right wing idiot chimes in to demand his share of stupid comments.....
A FENCE for crowd control over a 4 day period does NOT equate with a fucking 10 foot permanent WALL over a 2,000 mile span..............Surely there's a grown up to explain it to you, moron.
One is longer than the other. Now explain how length means one would work and the other wouldn't.
So why do Democrats need a wall if they don't work?
Another right wing idiot chimes in to demand his share of stupid comments.....
A FENCE for crowd control over a 4 day period does NOT equate with a fucking 10 foot permanent WALL over a 2,000 mile span..............Surely there's a grown up to explain it to you, moron.
One is longer than the other. Now explain how length means one would work and the other wouldn't.
Because he wanted to say that
Dude you are an idiot if you keep backing up this lame arguement. It's plain as day. Give it up, you just make yourself look more stupidThe equivalence was between one fence and another. The motive behind each one is where the hypocrisy comes in.The poster made the equivalence between a security measure taken at an event and a national political policy... It was a rediculous comparison just like the gun scenario I made.His post was that a fence was used to keep people out of the DNC. Guns were banned from the RNC for safety measures... Do I really need to explain this furtherBecause your logic would imply that a gun ban be used to protect us, which I know you wouldn't support. It shows the flaw in your arguement about the fence
How does a gun ban equate to a physical barrier?
You may as well have claimed that a fish is a bicycle. Yo uhaven't pointed out any kind of equivalence between the two. One is a barrier, the other is a weapon.
If it's so "plain," then why can't any of you dumbasses explain it? Saying a 2000 mile wall is different from a 4 mile fence isn't an explanation.Dude you are an idiot if you keep backing up this lame arguement. It's plain as day. Give it up, you just make yourself look more stupidThe equivalence was between one fence and another. The motive behind each one is where the hypocrisy comes in.The poster made the equivalence between a security measure taken at an event and a national political policy... It was a rediculous comparison just like the gun scenario I made.His post was that a fence was used to keep people out of the DNC. Guns were banned from the RNC for safety measures... Do I really need to explain this furtherHow does a gun ban equate to a physical barrier?
You may as well have claimed that a fish is a bicycle. Yo uhaven't pointed out any kind of equivalence between the two. One is a barrier, the other is a weapon.
There's nothing to explain its fucking obvious, it speaks for itself... The two things are completely different!!! Wake the fuck upIf it's so "plain," then why can't any of you dumbasses explain it? Saying a 2000 mile wall is different from a 4 mile fence isn't an explanation.Dude you are an idiot if you keep backing up this lame arguement. It's plain as day. Give it up, you just make yourself look more stupidThe equivalence was between one fence and another. The motive behind each one is where the hypocrisy comes in.The poster made the equivalence between a security measure taken at an event and a national political policy... It was a rediculous comparison just like the gun scenario I made.His post was that a fence was used to keep people out of the DNC. Guns were banned from the RNC for safety measures... Do I really need to explain this further
You may as well have claimed that a fish is a bicycle. Yo uhaven't pointed out any kind of equivalence between the two. One is a barrier, the other is a weapon.
There's nothing to explain its fucking obvious, it speaks for itself... The two things are completely different!!! Wake the fuck upIf it's so "plain," then why can't any of you dumbasses explain it? Saying a 2000 mile wall is different from a 4 mile fence isn't an explanation.Dude you are an idiot if you keep backing up this lame arguement. It's plain as day. Give it up, you just make yourself look more stupidThe equivalence was between one fence and another. The motive behind each one is where the hypocrisy comes in.The poster made the equivalence between a security measure taken at an event and a national political policy... It was a rediculous comparison just like the gun scenario I made.You may as well have claimed that a fish is a bicycle. Yo uhaven't pointed out any kind of equivalence between the two. One is a barrier, the other is a weapon.
You have yet to demonstrate that it's lame.Dude you are an idiot if you keep backing up this lame arguement. It's plain as day. Give it up, you just make yourself look more stupidThe equivalence was between one fence and another. The motive behind each one is where the hypocrisy comes in.The poster made the equivalence between a security measure taken at an event and a national political policy... It was a rediculous comparison just like the gun scenario I made.His post was that a fence was used to keep people out of the DNC. Guns were banned from the RNC for safety measures... Do I really need to explain this furtherHow does a gun ban equate to a physical barrier?
You may as well have claimed that a fish is a bicycle. Yo uhaven't pointed out any kind of equivalence between the two. One is a barrier, the other is a weapon.
Right wing, you used all your brainpower coming up with that one, didn't you? Still no examples though, LOL.So why do Democrats need a wall if they don't work?
Another right wing idiot chimes in to demand his share of stupid comments.....
A FENCE for crowd control over a 4 day period does NOT equate with a fucking 10 foot permanent WALL over a 2,000 mile span..............Surely there's a grown up to explain it to you, moron.
Spin, spin, spin ... A fence maintained keeps people from crossing it whether it's a mile or 2000 miles.
No my claim and pure logic says that setting up a baracade at an event is different than building a wall that covers thousands of miles of land. You dumbshitThere's nothing to explain its fucking obvious, it speaks for itself... The two things are completely different!!! Wake the fuck upIf it's so "plain," then why can't any of you dumbasses explain it? Saying a 2000 mile wall is different from a 4 mile fence isn't an explanation.Dude you are an idiot if you keep backing up this lame arguement. It's plain as day. Give it up, you just make yourself look more stupidThe equivalence was between one fence and another. The motive behind each one is where the hypocrisy comes in.The poster made the equivalence between a security measure taken at an event and a national political policy... It was a rediculous comparison just like the gun scenario I made.
ROFL! In other words, you can't explain it. the principle of gravity works whether we are talking about something the size of Jupiter or something the size of a marble. Is your claim that small fences work but big fences don't? Really? Why would that be? If it's some other theory, you haven't posted it, and it certainly isn't obvious to anyone who can commit logic.
No my claim and pure logic says that setting up a baracade at an event is different than building a wall that covers thousands of miles of land. You dumbshitThere's nothing to explain its fucking obvious, it speaks for itself... The two things are completely different!!! Wake the fuck upIf it's so "plain," then why can't any of you dumbasses explain it? Saying a 2000 mile wall is different from a 4 mile fence isn't an explanation.Dude you are an idiot if you keep backing up this lame arguement. It's plain as day. Give it up, you just make yourself look more stupidThe equivalence was between one fence and another. The motive behind each one is where the hypocrisy comes in.
ROFL! In other words, you can't explain it. the principle of gravity works whether we are talking about something the size of Jupiter or something the size of a marble. Is your claim that small fences work but big fences don't? Really? Why would that be? If it's some other theory, you haven't posted it, and it certainly isn't obvious to anyone who can commit logic.
nah. We only need a couple of thousand. Two guys to a guard tower every couple of miles.Build the wall. Just think of the govt jobs it will create. Then we need about 25000 or so govt workers to man it.
