If Progressives win the Culture War, would we still be living in a Free Society?

[Rigby5]

They impose censorship on all Social Media networks. They have destroyed careers of tens of thousands of people for disagreeing with them.

Censorship, like Twitter was doing, was NOT at all "progressive".
Twitter has its own agenda, and it was not at all "progressive" in any way.
In fact, it likely was attempting to reduce political controversy in order to make more money.
That is very conservative.
Generally is it conservatives who censor, because they do not want people to question or want change.
Progressives want change, so want provocative content.

 

[Rigby5]

Hey - the Stalinists are leaving town.

I don't give a flying fuck what party they're from.

Right now they're all Democrats, so they're going first.

If we ever get a right wing version, they'll go too.

Not fucking around

Stalinism will NOT BE ALLOWED in this country

All capitalists are or want to be Stalinists if given the chance.
Stalinism is motivated by profits and power, like all capitalists.

 

[Rigby5]

All of them imposed Censorship on existing Media. Social Media did not exist then.

Not really.
Totalitarian regimes generally do not need to impose censorship because they already control all the media simply by ownership, due to wealth.
That is because it takes capital to create a viable source of media.
The issue of censorship only comes up now because social media is free, so is not controlled by wealth.

 

[beagle9]

Thank G-d, Elon Musk now owns Twitter. But a won battle is not a won war. Progressives can still win the Culture War.

The year is 2030. All Social Media and all Internet Hosts have been pressured by Progressives to ban any material Progressives find offensive. The First Amendment is intact, yet no material critical of Progressives can be posted anywhere on the Internet. Is it still a Free Society?

Nope

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

The Progressive movement started by workers in WI in the 1890s, who realized that large corporations were taking over, and a populist movement was need to reform things like working conditions.
Progressive just means "improvement".
It is the opposite of Conservative since that means leave things the way they were.

It was the Marxists who usurped the terms of "liberals, or Progressives", because they knew that if they came out saying that they were Marxists, only worthless lazy fucks would vote for them...

 

[Natural Citizen]

Thank G-d, Elon Musk now owns Twitter. But a won battle is not a won war. Progressives can still win the Culture War.

The year is 2030. All Social Media and all Internet Hosts have been pressured by Progressives to ban any material Progressives find offensive. The First Amendment is intact, yet no material critical of Progressives can be posted anywhere on the Internet. Is it still a Free Society?

You're not living in a free society now.

So it doesn't really matter what they do.

 

[Rigby5]

Thank G-d, Elon Musk now owns Twitter. But a won battle is not a won war. Progressives can still win the Culture War.

The year is 2030. All Social Media and all Internet Hosts have been pressured by Progressives to ban any material Progressives find offensive. The First Amendment is intact, yet no material critical of Progressives can be posted anywhere on the Internet. Is it still a Free Society?

The First Amendment is NOT at all "intact" if there is any censorship beyond that of what is legally harmful, such as slander, inciting violence, violating privacy, etc.

Social media can not legally censor beyond that is required by law to protect rights, or else they lose their common carrier protections and can be sued.

 

[Rigby5]

It was the Marxists who usurped the terms of "liberals, or Progressives", because they knew that if they came out saying that they were Marxists, only worthless lazy fucks would vote for them...

Could be.
The actual Progressive Party was mostly around the 1930's, by governor and senator La Follette and La Follette Jr.
But no one really knows that a "Marxist" is because Karl Marx never actually implemented anything.

 

[beagle9]

The Communist founder of Twitter is about to release his new Social Media Platform,,,,Tweeter
Leftists are eager to sign up

Or should just call it "Tweety bird's"... ROTFLMBO

 

[beagle9]

The First Amendment is NOT at all "intact" if there is any censorship beyond that of what is legally harmful, such as slander, inciting violence, violating privacy, etc.

Social media can not legally censor beyond that is required by law to protect rights, or else they lose their common carrier protections and can be sued.

Then stop prop 230 then... Oops you forgot about that one didn't you ?

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

Could be.
The actual Progressive Party was mostly around the 1930's, by governor and senator La Follette and La Follette Jr.
But no one really knows that a "Marxist" is because Karl Marx never actually implemented anything.

It was Theodore Roosevelt who first started the Bull Moose Progressive Republicans. Dick Nixon was a astute follower, then came George Bush 41 and his son 43. They really fucked over America with the "Progressive ideas"..

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

Could be.
The actual Progressive Party was mostly around the 1930's, by governor and senator La Follette and La Follette Jr.
But no one really knows that a "Marxist" is because Karl Marx never actually implemented anything.

Do you know anything about "Followers"?

 

[JWBooth]

If Progressives win the Culture War, would we still be living in a Free Society?​

I guess they won some time ago then.

 

[JoeB131]

Thank G-d, Elon Musk now owns Twitter. But a won battle is not a won war. Progressives can still win the Culture War.

The year is 2030. All Social Media and all Internet Hosts have been pressured by Progressives to ban any material Progressives find offensive. The First Amendment is intact, yet no material critical of Progressives can be posted anywhere on the Internet. Is it still a Free Society?

Yup.

Nothing is stopping you wingnuts from starting your own social media platforms. Hey, what ever happened to Parler, anyway?

The First Amendment is only preventing CONGRESS From banning speech. Twitter can ban speech to it's heart's content. For that matter, so can USMB.

The problem with Lead Twit Musk is that he is removing policies that kind of made sense. No company wants their banner ad appearing next to a tweet from Naziboi1488. Twitter was barely making money before Musk got there. Now advertisers are leaving in droves.

 

[Batcat]

Thank G-d, Elon Musk now owns Twitter. But a won battle is not a won war. Progressives can still win the Culture War.

The year is 2030. All Social Media and all Internet Hosts have been pressured by Progressives to ban any material Progressives find offensive. The First Amendment is intact, yet no material critical of Progressives can be posted anywhere on the Internet. Is it still a Free Society?

If the Progressives take over you not only will lose freedom of speech and freedom of the press (no Fox News) but the right of civilians to own firearms.

Some lucky people may be allowed to own one single shot or double barreled shotgun and a single shot bolt action rifle. No semiautomatic firearms and no pistols or revolvers period.

Of course the firearms will have to be licensed and stored in a locked safe unloaded with the ammo stored in another room. In order to get a firearm license you will have to pay a small fortune, take a 40 hour course on gun safety and get checked out by a psychiatrist. Ammo will be difficult to obtain and each round will have a $1.00 tax applied.

At least 10% of all children in a state will be required to undergo a gender transition and boys in the process of transitioning to females will be allowed and encouraged to engage in female sports.

Christianity will be frowned on and Christian churches will be highly taxed. Synagogues and Mosques will get government grants.

Blacks whose ancestors were slaves will get a minimum of $250,000 and free college. Blacks whose ancestors were not slaves will only get $100,000. Illegal aliens will also get $100,000. Taxes would be raised on all whites to pay for the reparations.

Whites of course will try to go to Mexico but the Mexican border will be closed tightly by the Mexican Federales And the drug cartels.

Note: some of the above is

but much isn’t.

 

[j-mac]

If Progressives win the Culture War, would we still be living in a Free Society?​

No

 

[JoeB131]

If the Progressives take over you not only will lose freedom of speech and freedom of the press (no Fox News) but the right of civilians to own firearms.

Some lucky people may be allowed to own one single shot or double barreled shotgun and a single shot bolt action rifle. No semiautomatic firearms and no pistols or revolvers period.

Of course the firearms will have to be licensed and stored in a locked safe unloaded with the ammo stored in another room. In order to get a firearm license you will have to pay a small fortune, take a 40 hour course on gun safety and get checked out by a psychiatrist. Ammo will be difficult to obtain and each round will have a $1.00 tax applied.

You talk like this would be a bad thing. This is how the rest of the world does it, and they have nowhere near our levels of crime or murder.

 

[DBA]

Censorship, like Twitter was doing, was NOT at all "progressive".
Twitter has its own agenda, and it was not at all "progressive" in any way.
In fact, it likely was attempting to reduce political controversy in order to make more money.
That is very conservative.
Generally is it conservatives who censor, because they do not want people to question or want change.
Progressives want change, so want provocative content.

Let me get this straight. The self-professed Progressives that dominated Twitter and the current MSM are acting as Conservatives by censoring information that is contrary to their Progressive agenda? I think you need to put some more thought into that idea.

 

[Curried Goats]

If the Progressives take over you not only will lose freedom of speech and freedom of the press (no Fox News) but the right of civilians to own firearms.

Some lucky people may be allowed to own one single shot or double barreled shotgun and a single shot bolt action rifle. No semiautomatic firearms and no pistols or revolvers period.

Of course the firearms will have to be licensed and stored in a locked safe unloaded with the ammo stored in another room. In order to get a firearm license you will have to pay a small fortune, take a 40 hour course on gun safety and get checked out by a psychiatrist. Ammo will be difficult to obtain and each round will have a $1.00 tax applied.

At least 10% of all children in a state will be required to undergo a gender transition and boys in the process of transitioning to females will be allowed and encouraged to engage in female sports.

Christianity will be frowned on and Christian churches will be highly taxed. Synagogues and Mosques will get government grants.

Blacks whose ancestors were slaves will get a minimum of $250,000 and free college. Blacks whose ancestors were not slaves will only get $100,000. Illegal aliens will also get $100,000. Taxes would be raised on all whites to pay for the reparations.

Whites of course will try to go to Mexico but the Mexican border will be closed tightly by the Mexican Federales And the drug cartels.

Note: some of the above is View attachment 737199 but much isn’t.

All of it is a wonderful display of how the white wing turns cosplay into victimhood.

 

[DBA]

Yup.

Nothing is stopping you wingnuts from starting your own social media platforms. Hey, what ever happened to Parler, anyway?

The First Amendment is only preventing CONGRESS From banning speech. Twitter can ban speech to it's heart's content. For that matter, so can USMB.

The problem with Lead Twit Musk is that he is removing policies that kind of made sense. No company wants their banner ad appearing next to a tweet from Naziboi1488. Twitter was barely making money before Musk got there. Now advertisers are leaving in droves.

Two things wrong here. If Twitter and Facebook want to editorialize their content they should not have section 230 protection.

Secondly, do think advertizers want their adds showing next to some wack-job holding a severated Donald Trump head? Kathy Griffin di that. Was it censored? Would you consider that hate speech? It works both ways, but you want it only your way. If you don’t agree with it, it is misinformation and should be censored. Much COVID and vaccine information was censored by Twitter, not because it was misinformation, but because it didn’t fit the narrative the CDC and the Democrats wanted to promote.