‘If Republican senators acquit Trump, they will own the violence that follows.’

Not so veiled threats are always good for Democracy?

Okay.

Then so be it. Personally I think a conviction in their kangaroo court will spark a lot more violence. But we accept the responsibility.

A few dozen unarmed protesters had them worried. That’s funny. You ain’t seen nuthin yet.
Well, BLM and Antifa are afraid to come into conservative areas, and will just burn and loot the Democrat-controlled areas (finishing the job of turning them into complete shitholes), so who cares?????

The paid rioters won’t burn and loot a business in a conservative town. Those business owners will not hesitate to open fire in self defense. Yet somehow the anti gun liberals have a problem with that. “We are entitled to burn and loot your business as free form of protest and not be shot”.
 
Well, they'll be partial owners, along with Trump and all those who enable him. Let's just hope his jihadis don't attack again.
That’s funny. Biden keeping himself surrounded by piles of razor wire and 30,000 troops he doesn’t trust says it all. Democrats run a Banana Republic.
Ol' Mac can cause the Trumpsters to derail their own thread.

:laugh:

It just shows how violent the left is and how they project that violence.
What does that have to do with the attack on our nation's capitol and our electoral process?
Hows that different than ARMED protesters breaking into and destroying Federal Courts, City Halls and police stations?

Oh yeah. Political affiliation.
I'm sure that's the only difference you see. Okay.
It is the only difference, NAZI. Please list some other differences.
I see you are unable to list any differences. Using that laughing emoji as a response is the sure sign of a coward with no ammunition.
 
Not so veiled threats are always good for Democracy?

Okay.

Then so be it. Personally I think a conviction in their kangaroo court will spark a lot more violence. But we accept the responsibility.

A few dozen unarmed protesters had them worried. That’s funny. You ain’t seen nuthin yet.
Well, BLM and Antifa are afraid to come into conservative areas, and will just burn and loot the Democrat-controlled areas (finishing the job of turning them into complete shitholes), so who cares?????

The paid rioters won’t burn and loot a business in a conservative town. Those business owners will not hesitate to open fire in self defense. Yet somehow the anti gun liberals have a problem with that. “We are entitled to burn and loot your business as free form of protest and not be shot”.
When they tried that in a conservative Missouri town, the property owners came out armed and escorted them off the property, and then the DA had them arrested!
 
Well, they'll be partial owners, along with Trump and all those who enable him. Let's just hope his jihadis don't attack again.
That’s funny. Biden keeping himself surrounded by piles of razor wire and 30,000 troops he doesn’t trust says it all. Democrats run a Banana Republic.
Ol' Mac can cause the Trumpsters to derail their own thread.

:laugh:

It just shows how violent the left is and how they project that violence.
What does that have to do with the attack on our nation's capitol and our electoral process?
Hows that different than ARMED protesters breaking into and destroying Federal Courts, City Halls and police stations?

Oh yeah. Political affiliation.
I'm sure that's the only difference you see. Okay.
It is the only difference, NAZI. Please list some other differences.
I see you are unable to list any differences. Using that laughing emoji as a response is the sure sign of a coward with no ammunition.
I'm not trying to convince you of anything, Trumpster. I never am.

You're free to hump my leg all you want. I'm not obligated to enable you.
 
So, what is the WaPo saying here? To avoid possible violence we should convict somebody even if the court decides that the evidence does not prove guilt? Is that our new form or definition of justice now? Convict somebody whether the evidence convinces the court of guilt or not, because there could be violence if there's no conviction? That is going to be a factor in determining the court's decision? Somebody is guilty because some people don't like him? Fuck that.
 
Well, they'll be partial owners, along with Trump and all those who enable him. Let's just hope his jihadis don't attack again.
That’s funny. Biden keeping himself surrounded by piles of razor wire and 30,000 troops he doesn’t trust says it all. Democrats run a Banana Republic.
Ol' Mac can cause the Trumpsters to derail their own thread.

:laugh:

It just shows how violent the left is and how they project that violence.
What does that have to do with the attack on our nation's capitol and our electoral process?
Hows that different than ARMED protesters breaking into and destroying Federal Courts, City Halls and police stations?

Oh yeah. Political affiliation.
I'm sure that's the only difference you see. Okay.
It is the only difference, NAZI. Please list some other differences.
I see you are unable to list any differences. Using that laughing emoji as a response is the sure sign of a coward with no ammunition.
I'm not trying to convince you of anything, Trumpster. I never am.

You're free to hump my leg all you want. I'm not obligated to enable you.
Yeah, right, you have no interest in whether anyone believes your retarded opinions, said no retard ever. And you're also not a winger! right?
 
So, what is the WaPo saying here? To avoid possible violence we should convict somebody even if the court decides that the evidence does not prove guilt? Is that our new form or definition of justice now? Convict somebody whether the evidence convinces the court of guilt or not, because there could be violence if there's no conviction? That is going to be a factor in determining the court's decision? Somebody is guilty because some people don't like him? Fuck that.
The Dim version of justice: Accept our verdict or we'll burn down your neighborhood!

What's really scary is that these assholes feel free to say these things on a public forum.
 
So, what is the WaPo saying here? To avoid possible violence we should convict somebody even if the court decides that the evidence does not prove guilt? Is that our new form or definition of justice now? Convict somebody whether the evidence convinces the court of guilt or not, because there could be violence if there's no conviction? That is going to be a factor in determining the court's decision? Somebody is guilty because some people don't like him? Fuck that.
The Dim version of justice: Accept our verdict or we'll burn down your neighborhood!

What's really scary is that these assholes feel free to say these things on a public forum.
They will until people start shooting them... That's coming sooner than later...
 
Not so veiled threats are always good for Democracy?

Okay.

Then so be it. Personally I think a conviction in their kangaroo court will spark a lot more violence. But we accept the responsibility.

A few dozen unarmed protesters had them worried. That’s funny. You ain’t seen nuthin yet.

Of course the Dems will call for peace lest they be responsible for the violence
 
Well, they'll be partial owners, along with Trump and all those who enable him. Let's just hope his jihadis don't attack again.
That’s funny. Biden keeping himself surrounded by piles of razor wire and 30,000 troops he doesn’t trust says it all. Democrats run a Banana Republic.
Ol' Mac can cause the Trumpsters to derail their own thread.

:laugh:

It just shows how violent the left is and how they project that violence.
What does that have to do with the attack on our nation's capitol and our electoral process?
Hows that different than ARMED protesters breaking into and destroying Federal Courts, City Halls and police stations?

Oh yeah. Political affiliation.
I'm sure that's the only difference you see. Okay.
Oh? How about the Senate majority leader with a mob outside of the SCOTUS directly threatening the justices unless they decide in their favor?
And he admitted he was wrong, and apologized....

Unlike Trump, he didn't stick with his spreech was perfect, was beautiful... :rolleyes:
 
Well, they'll be partial owners, along with Trump and all those who enable him. Let's just hope his jihadis don't attack again.
That’s funny. Biden keeping himself surrounded by piles of razor wire and 30,000 troops he doesn’t trust says it all. Democrats run a Banana Republic.
Ol' Mac can cause the Trumpsters to derail their own thread.

:laugh:

It just shows how violent the left is and how they project that violence.
What does that have to do with the attack on our nation's capitol and our electoral process?
Hows that different than ARMED protesters breaking into and destroying Federal Courts, City Halls and police stations?

Oh yeah. Political affiliation.
I'm sure that's the only difference you see. Okay.
Oh? How about the Senate majority leader with a mob outside of the SCOTUS directly threatening the justices unless they decide in their favor?
And he admitted he was wrong, and apologized....

Unlike Trump, he didn't stick with his spreech was perfect, was beautiful... :rolleyes:
Oh. So Trump just says I’m sorry and Democrats say all is OK and forgiven.
 
So, what is the WaPo saying here? To avoid possible violence we should convict somebody even if the court decides that the evidence does not prove guilt? Is that our new form or definition of justice now? Convict somebody whether the evidence convinces the court of guilt or not, because there could be violence if there's no conviction? That is going to be a factor in determining the court's decision? Somebody is guilty because some people don't like him? Fuck that.
The Dim version of justice: Accept our verdict or we'll burn down your neighborhood!

What's really scary is that these assholes feel free to say these things on a public forum.
They will until people start shooting them... That's coming sooner than later...
I just ordered an AR-15 so I have one before Biden's gun confiscation passes. All these Democrat Reich NAZIs swore up and down that Biden had no intention of taking our guns.
 
View attachment 456649

Sounds like the left is threatening an insurrection.

Will live rounds be used on the insurrectionists like they did at the Capitol?

*****SMILE*****



:)

Where did the left do that? I read the op ed and it was all about Trumpster violence. If there is a threat in there about leftist violence, please point it out.
 
So, what is the WaPo saying here? To avoid possible violence we should convict somebody even if the court decides that the evidence does not prove guilt? Is that our new form or definition of justice now? Convict somebody whether the evidence convinces the court of guilt or not, because there could be violence if there's no conviction? That is going to be a factor in determining the court's decision? Somebody is guilty because some people don't like him? Fuck that.
The Dim version of justice: Accept our verdict or we'll burn down your neighborhood!

What's really scary is that these assholes feel free to say these things on a public forum.
From the reports out of Washington state, Antifa vandalized a Democrat Party headquarters, and spraypainted Fuck Biden!!! on it....

If they drag the Fucktard out of the White House by his hair plugs, I wonder if they will post the video on Pay-per-View...

I'll bet they could turn a good profit!!!!! :auiqs.jpg:
 
So, what is the WaPo saying here? To avoid possible violence we should convict somebody even if the court decides that the evidence does not prove guilt? Is that our new form or definition of justice now? Convict somebody whether the evidence convinces the court of guilt or not, because there could be violence if there's no conviction? That is going to be a factor in determining the court's decision? Somebody is guilty because some people don't like him? Fuck that.
The Dim version of justice: Accept our verdict or we'll burn down your neighborhood!

What's really scary is that these assholes feel free to say these things on a public forum.
They will until people start shooting them... That's coming sooner than later...
I just ordered an AR-15 so I have one before Biden's gun confiscation passes. All these Democrat Reich NAZIs swore up and down that Biden had no intention of taking our guns.

I hear ya, bro. I don't have an AR-15 or the like, but I do have 4 revolvers that I keep loaded all the time in the house. Them things will not jam up, I trust them more than a semi-auto with a spring in it. Once a month, I got out somewhere and fire off the 5 loads in each gun and then clean and reload. I swear, when I fired that .357 off in the house one time, it sounded like a freakin' cannon. The wife wasn't home, thank God. Gotta scare the shit outta anybody breakin' in.

I don't think Biden and the Dems can confiscate our guns, although I do think they'll try like hell. The SCOTUS as it is now won't let 'em do that.

Back to the thread, I don't think the Dems have the slightest leg to stand on when it comes to owning violence. Not after they way the lib/dem mayors and governors allowed nightly riots to go on for months on end.
 
Not so veiled threats are always good for Democracy?

Okay.

Then so be it. Personally I think a conviction in their kangaroo court will spark a lot more violence. But we accept the responsibility.

A few dozen unarmed protesters had them worried. That’s funny. You ain’t seen nuthin yet.
Well, BLM and Antifa are afraid to come into conservative areas, and will just burn and loot the Democrat-controlled areas (finishing the job of turning them into complete shitholes), so who cares?????

The paid rioters won’t burn and loot a business in a conservative town. Those business owners will not hesitate to open fire in self defense. Yet somehow the anti gun liberals have a problem with that. “We are entitled to burn and loot your business as free form of protest and not be shot”.
When they tried that in a conservative Missouri town, the property owners came out armed and escorted them off the property, and then the DA had them arrested!


Also in Wrightsville, Pennsylvania. BLM/Antifa was planning a march there. The handful of town cops banded together with more than one hundred veterans and others—all heavily armed—and drove them out before they could take one step down Main Street. In Elizabethtown, PA shop owners and veterans, again heavily armed, crowded rooftops with their weapons trained on BLM terrorists as they tried to march. Had one storefront window been harmed, the carnage would have been quite complete.
 
So, what is the WaPo saying here? To avoid possible violence we should convict somebody even if the court decides that the evidence does not prove guilt? Is that our new form or definition of justice now? Convict somebody whether the evidence convinces the court of guilt or not, because there could be violence if there's no conviction? That is going to be a factor in determining the court's decision? Somebody is guilty because some people don't like him? Fuck that.
The Dim version of justice: Accept our verdict or we'll burn down your neighborhood!

What's really scary is that these assholes feel free to say these things on a public forum.
They will until people start shooting them... That's coming sooner than later...
I just ordered an AR-15 so I have one before Biden's gun confiscation passes. All these Democrat Reich NAZIs swore up and down that Biden had no intention of taking our guns.

I hear ya, bro. I don't have an AR-15 or the like, but I do have 4 revolvers that I keep loaded all the time in the house. Them things will not jam up, I trust them more than a semi-auto with a spring in it. Once a month, I got out somewhere and fire off the 5 loads in each gun and then clean and reload. I swear, when I fired that .357 off in the house one time, it sounded like a freakin' cannon. The wife wasn't home, thank God. Gotta scare the shit outta anybody breakin' in.

I don't think Biden and the Dems can confiscate our guns, although I do think they'll try like hell. The SCOTUS as it is now won't let 'em do that.

Back to the thread, I don't think the Dems have the slightest leg to stand on when it comes to owning violence. Not after they way the lib/dem mayors and governors allowed nightly riots to go on for months on end.



Roger that. We consider ourselves modern Minutemen. And that's all I'll say about that.
 
That only proves that Democrat terrorists are planning violence. It's a stupid game Ds play like when they say, "Rs want to kill grandma or Rs want to shut down your government". It's really all very predictable.
Just like the attempt by Trump to overthrow the govt. to stay in power, just a stupid game played by fake Republicans.
I guess you missed where that manufactured evidence was exposed and your lie debunked.... It must suck to be a democrat today... What you all have done is coming round to bite you in the ass and its going to take chunks when it does...
He didn't miss it, he doesn't care. They're liars.
 
Nothing like threatening the jurors of a case.

Total sham “trial”. Dems got caught fabricating evidence. In a real court that would be illegal and they would be thrown in jail.
No house manager fabricated evidence... and witnesses will prove such, if allowed in the trial.
The House manglers got caught fabricating evidence. This is a lie.
 

Forum List

Back
Top