Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Women's lib opened up job opportunities for all women making them less dependent on welfareWhere did Dems do that?Seems to me that if Democrats cared about families, they wouldn't have the government usurp the role of the father.
When they got behind the Women's lib movement. They promoted getting rid of dad, being independent and get out of the house and start a career.
Really? Do tell! I fully expect this is yet another ditsy comment exiting your ass.It was conservatives who insisted that unemployed fathers could not live with his family receiving welfare
Women's lib opened up job opportunities for all women making them less dependent on welfareWhere did Dems do that?Seems to me that if Democrats cared about families, they wouldn't have the government usurp the role of the father.
When they got behind the Women's lib movement. They promoted getting rid of dad, being independent and get out of the house and start a career.
It did increase divorce because women no longer had to live with an abusive husband
Really? Do tell! I fully expect this is yet another ditsy comment exiting your ass.It was conservatives who insisted that unemployed fathers could not live with his family receiving welfare
You do realize that families did not break down during periods of high unemployment throughout American history, even in the Great Depression. It was in the 60s when LBJ's Great Society expanded government entitlements that families began to fall apart. Many of today's social ills are squarely on government programs which compensated mothers for lack of fathers in the home.Really? Do tell! I fully expect this is yet another ditsy comment exiting your ass.It was conservatives who insisted that unemployed fathers could not live with his family receiving welfare
The breakdown of our families correlates to the loss of good paying jobs not the welfare taking the place of those jobs
Since when did the American family disintegrate? I have a very happy non-disintegrated family. Pretty much everybody that I work with has the same.
The whole notion of the demise of the American family is B.S. propagated by conservatives.
The only gripe I have against woman's lib is that the number of workers on the market doubled, causing the real market value of each worker to half in a generation. Meanwhile employers expectations for workers education and job skills skyrocketed.
Nowadays, it takes two college educated (and then some) workers to live at the same relative standard of living that required only one a generations ago.
Yet, since worker productivity has increased exponentially, so has wealth production. Employers are reaping the benefits.
So do conservative mothersNot enough for a mother to bond with her child.Mandated 6 weeks?
You are looney
You think 6 weeks is alot?
Conservative mothers do not bond with their children
Kind of explains why they are so callous
Liberal mothers abort their children....
Since when did the American family disintegrate? I have a very happy non-disintegrated family. Pretty much everybody that I work with has the same.
The whole notion of the demise of the American family is B.S. propagated by conservatives.
The only gripe I have against woman's lib is that the number of workers on the market doubled, causing the real market value of each worker to half in a generation. Meanwhile employers expectations for workers education and job skills skyrocketed.
Nowadays, it takes two college educated (and then some) workers to live at the same relative standard of living that required only one a generations ago.
Yet, since worker productivity has increased exponentially, so has wealth production. Employers are reaping the benefits.
https://dalrock.files.wordpress.com/2012/06/divorcesper1000marriedwomen1.png
I suppose you have some sort of proof or other for any of that.Women's lib opened up job opportunities for all women making them less dependent on welfareWhere did Dems do that?Seems to me that if Democrats cared about families, they wouldn't have the government usurp the role of the father.
When they got behind the Women's lib movement. They promoted getting rid of dad, being independent and get out of the house and start a career.
It did increase divorce because women no longer had to live with an abusive husband
Rightwinger inhabits a world only he can see.You do realize that families did not break down during periods of high unemployment throughout American history, even in the Great Depression. It was in the 60s when LBJ's Great Society expanded government entitlements that families began to fall apart. Many of today's social ills are squarely on government programs which compensated mothers for lack of fathers in the home.Really? Do tell! I fully expect this is yet another ditsy comment exiting your ass.It was conservatives who insisted that unemployed fathers could not live with his family receiving welfare
The breakdown of our families correlates to the loss of good paying jobs not the welfare taking the place of those jobs
I'm still waiting for you to show me when and how conservatives insisted that unemployed fathers not live with their families.
That's some pretty bizarre shit, even by the standards of a hack.
Since when did the American family disintegrate? I have a very happy non-disintegrated family. Pretty much everybody that I work with has the same.
The whole notion of the demise of the American family is B.S. propagated by conservatives.
The only gripe I have against woman's lib is that the number of workers on the market doubled, causing the real market value of each worker to half in a generation. Meanwhile employers expectations for workers education and job skills skyrocketed.
Nowadays, it takes two college educated (and then some) workers to live at the same relative standard of living that required only one a generations ago.
Yet, since worker productivity has increased exponentially, so has wealth production. Employers are reaping the benefits.
https://dalrock.files.wordpress.com/2012/06/divorcesper1000marriedwomen1.png
16.4 per 1000 married women now? 22.6 at it's peak in the late 70s? Wow, all that proves is that the disintegration has been a complete fabrication. Thanks for proving my point!
No-Fault divorce allowed people to get out of bad marriages, and there were a lot of them, obviously.Since when did the American family disintegrate? I have a very happy non-disintegrated family. Pretty much everybody that I work with has the same.
The whole notion of the demise of the American family is B.S. propagated by conservatives.
The only gripe I have against woman's lib is that the number of workers on the market doubled, causing the real market value of each worker to half in a generation. Meanwhile employers expectations for workers education and job skills skyrocketed.
Nowadays, it takes two college educated (and then some) workers to live at the same relative standard of living that required only one a generations ago.
Yet, since worker productivity has increased exponentially, so has wealth production. Employers are reaping the benefits.
https://dalrock.files.wordpress.com/2012/06/divorcesper1000marriedwomen1.png
16.4 per 1000 married women now? 22.6 at it's peak in the late 70s? Wow, all that proves is that the disintegration has been a complete fabrication. Thanks for proving my point!
Nope, it only proves mine.
Divorce rates dramatically increased throughout the women's lib movement which Democrats stood strongly behind. It wasn't until Reagan took office when the rates started to decrease slightly. We are still on a downtrend of divorce but not nearly to the point we were at before it started.
Since when did the American family disintegrate? I have a very happy non-disintegrated family. Pretty much everybody that I work with has the same.
The whole notion of the demise of the American family is B.S. propagated by conservatives.
The only gripe I have against woman's lib is that the number of workers on the market doubled, causing the real market value of each worker to half in a generation. Meanwhile employers expectations for workers education and job skills skyrocketed.
Nowadays, it takes two college educated (and then some) workers to live at the same relative standard of living that required only one a generations ago.
Yet, since worker productivity has increased exponentially, so has wealth production. Employers are reaping the benefits.
https://dalrock.files.wordpress.com/2012/06/divorcesper1000marriedwomen1.png
16.4 per 1000 married women now? 22.6 at it's peak in the late 70s? Wow, all that proves is that the disintegration has been a complete fabrication. Thanks for proving my point!
Nope, it only proves mine. ?
Divorce rates dramatically increased throughout the women's lib movement which Democrats stood strongly behind. It wasn't until Reagan took office when the rates started to decrease slightly. We are s Most marry for hot romance and sextill on a downtrend of divorce but not nearly to the point we were at before it started.
No-Fault divorce allowed people to get out of bad marriages, and there were a lot of them, obviously.Since when did the American family disintegrate? I have a very happy non-disintegrated family. Pretty much everybody that I work with has the same.
The whole notion of the demise of the American family is B.S. propagated by conservatives.
The only gripe I have against woman's lib is that the number of workers on the market doubled, causing the real market value of each worker to half in a generation. Meanwhile employers expectations for workers education and job skills skyrocketed.
Nowadays, it takes two college educated (and then some) workers to live at the same relative standard of living that required only one a generations ago.
Yet, since worker productivity has increased exponentially, so has wealth production. Employers are reaping the benefits.
https://dalrock.files.wordpress.com/2012/06/divorcesper1000marriedwomen1.png
16.4 per 1000 married women now? 22.6 at it's peak in the late 70s? Wow, all that proves is that the disintegration has been a complete fabrication. Thanks for proving my point!
Nope, it only proves mine.
Divorce rates dramatically increased throughout the women's lib movement which Democrats stood strongly behind. It wasn't until Reagan took office when the rates started to decrease slightly. We are still on a downtrend of divorce but not nearly to the point we were at before it started.
Democrats are to blame for women not wanting to stay in bad marriages? Did we offer them a free car if they left? Two nights free in Vegas?No-Fault divorce allowed people to get out of bad marriages, and there were a lot of them, obviously.Since when did the American family disintegrate? I have a very happy non-disintegrated family. Pretty much everybody that I work with has the same.
The whole notion of the demise of the American family is B.S. propagated by conservatives.
The only gripe I have against woman's lib is that the number of workers on the market doubled, causing the real market value of each worker to half in a generation. Meanwhile employers expectations for workers education and job skills skyrocketed.
Nowadays, it takes two college educated (and then some) workers to live at the same relative standard of living that required only one a generations ago.
Yet, since worker productivity has increased exponentially, so has wealth production. Employers are reaping the benefits.
https://dalrock.files.wordpress.com/2012/06/divorcesper1000marriedwomen1.png
16.4 per 1000 married women now? 22.6 at it's peak in the late 70s? Wow, all that proves is that the disintegration has been a complete fabrication. Thanks for proving my point!
Nope, it only proves mine.
Divorce rates dramatically increased throughout the women's lib movement which Democrats stood strongly behind. It wasn't until Reagan took office when the rates started to decrease slightly. We are still on a downtrend of divorce but not nearly to the point we were at before it started.
Of course, that must have been it. Democrats had nothing to do with it.
Since when did the American family disintegrate? I have a very happy non-disintegrated family. Pretty much everybody that I work with has the same.
The whole notion of the demise of the American family is B.S. propagated by conservatives.
The only gripe I have against woman's lib is that the number of workers on the market doubled, causing the real market value of each worker to half in a generation. Meanwhile employers expectations for workers education and job skills skyrocketed.
Nowadays, it takes two college educated (and then some) workers to live at the same relative standard of living that required only one a generations ago.
Yet, since worker productivity has increased exponentially, so has wealth production. Employers are reaping the benefits.
https://dalrock.files.wordpress.com/2012/06/divorcesper1000marriedwomen1.png
16.4 per 1000 married women now? 22.6 at it's peak in the late 70s? Wow, all that proves is that the disintegration has been a complete fabrication. Thanks for proving my point!
Nope, it only proves mine. ?
Divorce rates dramatically increased throughout the women's lib movement which Democrats stood strongly behind. It wasn't until Reagan took office when the rates started to decrease slightly. We are s Most marry for hot romance and sextill on a downtrend of divorce but not nearly to the point we were at before it started.
1.6% is hardly an epidemic. 2.2% shows that it was never an epidemic.
Why do you feel that divorce is categorically a bad thing? I'm surprised that the rate is so low. The fact is that there will always be a certain number of people who are unhappy in their marriages. It's good that they have an out.
If anything a high divorce rate shows that people should think a whole lot harder before they get married. Most marry for hot romance and sex...and 'cause the girls always dream of their wedding day. Then their supposedly stuck together for life. That sucks!
Democrats are to blame for women not wanting to stay in bad marriages? Did we offer them a free car if they left? Two nights free in Vegas?No-Fault divorce allowed people to get out of bad marriages, and there were a lot of them, obviously.
16.4 per 1000 married women now? 22.6 at it's peak in the late 70s? Wow, all that proves is that the disintegration has been a complete fabrication. Thanks for proving my point!
Nope, it only proves mine.
Divorce rates dramatically increased throughout the women's lib movement which Democrats stood strongly behind. It wasn't until Reagan took office when the rates started to decrease slightly. We are still on a downtrend of divorce but not nearly to the point we were at before it started.
Of course, that must have been it. Democrats had nothing to do with it.
Since when did the American family disintegrate? I have a very happy non-disintegrated family. Pretty much everybody that I work with has the same.
The whole notion of the demise of the American family is B.S. propagated by conservatives.
The only gripe I have against woman's lib is that the number of workers on the market doubled, causing the real market value of each worker to half in a generation. Meanwhile employers expectations for workers education and job skills skyrocketed.
Nowadays, it takes two college educated (and then some) workers to live at the same relative standard of living that required only one a generations ago.
Yet, since worker productivity has increased exponentially, so has wealth production. Employers are reaping the benefits.
https://dalrock.files.wordpress.com/2012/06/divorcesper1000marriedwomen1.png
16.4 per 1000 married women now? 22.6 at it's peak in the late 70s? Wow, all that proves is that the disintegration has been a complete fabrication. Thanks for proving my point!
Nope, it only proves mine. ?
Divorce rates dramatically increased throughout the women's lib movement which Democrats stood strongly behind. It wasn't until Reagan took office when the rates started to decrease slightly. We are s Most marry for hot romance and sextill on a downtrend of divorce but not nearly to the point we were at before it started.
1.6% is hardly an epidemic. 2.2% shows that it was never an epidemic.
Why do you feel that divorce is categorically a bad thing? I'm surprised that the rate is so low. The fact is that there will always be a certain number of people who are unhappy in their marriages. It's good that they have an out.
If anything a high divorce rate shows that people should think a whole lot harder before they get married. Most marry for hot romance and sex...and 'cause the girls always dream of their wedding day. Then their supposedly stuck together for life. That sucks!
Nevertheless it was the liberal movement that caused such high divorce rates. It also led to out of wedlock births which is still on the rise:
http://www.heritage.org/~/media/images/reports/2010/b2465/b2465_chart3.ashx?w=500&h=640&as=1
