If selling a gay couple a wedding cake means a "Christian" baker participated in the marriage...

[DandyDonovan]

If I want into a Muslim bakery and wanted them to make me a cake celebrating National Booze Day or something like that, and I was turned away. I wouldn't feel discriminated against. I'd expect it.

BTW, why aren't these deviant sex addicts trying this cry by targeting Muslim bakeries? Anyone? Any thoughts?

Can you stop screaming long enough to admit that both sides are asshole??

If the Christian baker would just give the nasty queers a price that was too high or a delivery date that was beyond the nasty gay wedding date, or just give any other reason for refusing service than the queer wouldn't have a legal justification for crying.d

But the Christian baker wants that queer to know exactly why he doesn't want to bake him a cake.

Now, IMO the Christian ought be able to say to the queer "get out fudge packer" and that be that, but unless and until this law gets over turned or removed, it IS the law.

They'd have to prove discrimination. Again, race and religion are prohibited to discriminate against. You can't say "we don't serve Jews here". But you can say "I won't make a cake to celebrate (****) Jewish ritual" if you feel strongly opposed to such a ritual in your deeply held beliefs.

No screaming. Rituals cannot be forced upon others to celebrate if they defy their fundamentally deeply held beliefs opposing such a ritual.

When you have to twist logic around like a pretzel to defend your position, you hold a weak position.

Mayhaps you should change your name to Christian Pretzel

 

[DandyDonovan]

God you are stupid.

Religion should hold no import in this conversation. What if an atheist baker just hates gays? Too bad, he has to serve the cake because his sky god doesn't tell him he can't?

We're talking about the 1st & 14th Amendments so religion most definitely does belong here. Butt sex or other deviant sex addictions have no Constitutional protections that I'm aware of. If they did, the list would have to be very very comprehensive, which it is not under "LGBT".

False stupid, because if the government punished people who discriminated for non religious reasons while allowing those who had religious reasons to discriminate that would a direct violation of the 14th Amendment which calls for ALL laws to be applied equally.

 

[mdk]

God you are stupid.

Religion should hold no import in this conversation. What if an atheist baker just hates gays? Too bad, he has to serve the cake because his sky god doesn't tell him he can't?

We're talking about the 1st & 14th Amendments so religion most definitely does belong here. Butt sex or other deviant sex addictions have no Constitutional protections that I'm aware of. If they did, the list would have to be very very comprehensive, which it is not under "LGBT".

*You have to serve me, but I don’t have to serve you...b/c reasons.*

This isn’t about some noble cause of liberty and property rights for you. This about your mentally ill obsession with hating homos. Nothing more

 

[Silhouette]

If I want into a Muslim bakery and wanted them to make me a cake celebrating National Booze Day or something like that, and I was turned away. I wouldn't feel discriminated against. I'd expect it.

BTW, why aren't these deviant sex addicts trying this cry by targeting Muslim bakeries? Anyone? Any thoughts?

Can you stop screaming long enough to admit that both sides are asshole??

If the Christian baker would just give the nasty queers a price that was too high or a delivery date that was beyond the nasty gay wedding date, or just give any other reason for refusing service than the queer wouldn't have a legal justification for crying.d

But the Christian baker wants that queer to know exactly why he doesn't want to bake him a cake.

Now, IMO the Christian ought be able to say to the queer "get out fudge packer" and that be that, but unless and until this law gets over turned or removed, it IS the law.

They'd have to prove discrimination. Again, race and religion are prohibited to discriminate against. You can't say "we don't serve Jews here". But you can say "I won't make a cake to celebrate (****) Jewish ritual" if you feel strongly opposed to such a ritual in your deeply held beliefs.

No screaming. Rituals cannot be forced upon others to celebrate if they defy their fundamentally deeply held beliefs opposing such a ritual.

Sorry. I can’t sell you groceries for Shabbat dinner.

Exactly. You're really getting good at this. But if nobody informed you the groceries were for Shabbat, you'd sell them and not defy your faith. Part of the USSC Ruling that will soon come on this will include language about "informed of the ritual intended". And, they will sift out Race, Religion from the endless escalating "identities" formed around deviant sex addictions, which are not and cannot be covered under the US Constitution. Not even implied.

Wait for it, because it's coming. The language will include "informed of intended ritual" and "right to refuse participation in offending rituals", not individual people just buying cakes without informing.

When gays usurped our way of making Laws in the country by falsely assigning a special class to JUST their type of deviant sex addiction (but illegally excluding all other potentials), they deluded themselves into believing they could force Christians to participate in their deviant sex addiction ritual celebrations ("gay marriage"). The gay marriage Ruling was arrived at illegally. It may very well become the law of the land via Congress, or after a proper Hearing where one of the Justices hasn't gone on local media to announce weeks before the Hearing how she would cast. It's just that that hasn't happened yet.

If you think Obergefell is going to save the day on this gay vs moral baker thing, you're asking for Obergefell's rationale to be opened up to deep introspection again. That's like opening a wall of a house that looks solid, but is completely filled with termites in the studs.

 

[DandyDonovan]

If I want into a Muslim bakery and wanted them to make me a cake celebrating National Booze Day or something like that, and I was turned away. I wouldn't feel discriminated against. I'd expect it.

BTW, why aren't these deviant sex addicts trying this cry by targeting Muslim bakeries? Anyone? Any thoughts?

Can you stop screaming long enough to admit that both sides are asshole??

If the Christian baker would just give the nasty queers a price that was too high or a delivery date that was beyond the nasty gay wedding date, or just give any other reason for refusing service than the queer wouldn't have a legal justification for crying.d

But the Christian baker wants that queer to know exactly why he doesn't want to bake him a cake.

Now, IMO the Christian ought be able to say to the queer "get out fudge packer" and that be that, but unless and until this law gets over turned or removed, it IS the law.

They'd have to prove discrimination. Again, race and religion are prohibited to discriminate against. You can't say "we don't serve Jews here". But you can say "I won't make a cake to celebrate (****) Jewish ritual" if you feel strongly opposed to such a ritual in your deeply held beliefs.

No screaming. Rituals cannot be forced upon others to celebrate if they defy their fundamentally deeply held beliefs opposing such a ritual.

Sorry. I can’t sell you groceries for Shabbat dinner.

Exactly. You're really getting good at this. But if nobody informed you the groceries were for Shabbat, you'd sell them and not defy your faith. Part of the USSC Ruling that will soon come on this will include language about "informed of the ritual intended". And, they will sift out Race, Religion from the endless escalating "identities" formed around deviant sex addictions, which are not and cannot be covered under the US Constitution. Not even implied.

Wait for it, because it's coming.

This would be funny if it wasn't so scary.

 

[mdk]

If I want into a Muslim bakery and wanted them to make me a cake celebrating National Booze Day or something like that, and I was turned away. I wouldn't feel discriminated against. I'd expect it.

BTW, why aren't these deviant sex addicts trying this cry by targeting Muslim bakeries? Anyone? Any thoughts?

Can you stop screaming long enough to admit that both sides are asshole??

If the Christian baker would just give the nasty queers a price that was too high or a delivery date that was beyond the nasty gay wedding date, or just give any other reason for refusing service than the queer wouldn't have a legal justification for crying.d

But the Christian baker wants that queer to know exactly why he doesn't want to bake him a cake.

Now, IMO the Christian ought be able to say to the queer "get out fudge packer" and that be that, but unless and until this law gets over turned or removed, it IS the law.

They'd have to prove discrimination. Again, race and religion are prohibited to discriminate against. You can't say "we don't serve Jews here". But you can say "I won't make a cake to celebrate (****) Jewish ritual" if you feel strongly opposed to such a ritual in your deeply held beliefs.

No screaming. Rituals cannot be forced upon others to celebrate if they defy their fundamentally deeply held beliefs opposing such a ritual.

Sorry. I can’t sell you groceries for Shabbat dinner.

Exactly. You're really getting good at this. But if nobody informed you the groceries were for Shabbat, you'd sell them and not defy your faith. Part of the USSC Ruling that will soon come on this will include language about "informed of the ritual intended". And, they will sift out Race, Religion from the endless escalating "identities" formed around deviant sex addictions, which are not and cannot be covered under the US Constitution. Not even implied.

Wait for it, because it's coming.

Considering your rich history of being laughably wrong concerning how the courts will rule, you’ll have to excuse me if I treat your latest prediction with a very small grain of salt.

 

[deanrd]

I think most Republicans don’t even know any gay people. So why do they hate gay people so much?

 

[koshergrl]

does selling a gun to a murderer mean a "Christian" gun store owner participated in the murder?

No, but the fact that you think that is logical proves what a failure our schools are.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

If I want into a Muslim bakery and wanted them to make me a cake celebrating National Booze Day or something like that, and I was turned away. I wouldn't feel discriminated against. I'd expect it.

BTW, why aren't these deviant sex addicts trying this cry by targeting Muslim bakeries? Anyone? Any thoughts?

Can you stop screaming long enough to admit that both sides are asshole??

If the Christian baker would just give the nasty queers a price that was too high or a delivery date that was beyond the nasty gay wedding date, or just give any other reason for refusing service than the queer wouldn't have a legal justification for crying.d

But the Christian baker wants that queer to know exactly why he doesn't want to bake him a cake.

Now, IMO the Christian ought be able to say to the queer "get out fudge packer" and that be that, but unless and until this law gets over turned or removed, it IS the law.

They'd have to prove discrimination. Again, race and religion are prohibited to discriminate against. You can't say "we don't serve Jews here". But you can say "I won't make a cake to celebrate (****) Jewish ritual" if you feel strongly opposed to such a ritual in your deeply held beliefs.

No screaming. Rituals cannot be forced upon others to celebrate if they defy their fundamentally deeply held beliefs opposing such a ritual.

Sorry. I can’t sell you groceries for Shabbat dinner.

Exactly. You're really getting good at this. But if nobody informed you the groceries were for Shabbat, you'd sell them and not defy your faith. Part of the USSC Ruling that will soon come on this will include language about "informed of the ritual intended". And, they will sift out Race, Religion from the endless escalating "identities" formed around deviant sex addictions, which are not and cannot be covered under the US Constitution. Not even implied.

Wait for it, because it's coming.

Considering your rich history of being laughablly wrong concerning how the courts will rule, you’ll have to excuse me if I treat your latest prediction with a very small grain of salt.

SCOTUS gave you a clue where it will go if pushed...and remember the court now leans right.

 

[koshergrl]

does selling a gun to a murderer mean a "Christian" gun store owner participated in the murder?

So do you think that murderers should be able to force gun shops to provide them with guns?

Obviously, you do.

 

[koshergrl]

If I want into a Muslim bakery and wanted them to make me a cake celebrating National Booze Day or something like that, and I was turned away. I wouldn't feel discriminated against. I'd expect it.

BTW, why aren't these deviant sex addicts trying this cry by targeting Muslim bakeries? Anyone? Any thoughts?

Can you stop screaming long enough to admit that both sides are asshole??

If the Christian baker would just give the nasty queers a price that was too high or a delivery date that was beyond the nasty gay wedding date, or just give any other reason for refusing service than the queer wouldn't have a legal justification for crying.d

But the Christian baker wants that queer to know exactly why he doesn't want to bake him a cake.

Now, IMO the Christian ought be able to say to the queer "get out fudge packer" and that be that, but unless and until this law gets over turned or removed, it IS the law.

They'd have to prove discrimination. Again, race and religion are prohibited to discriminate against. You can't say "we don't serve Jews here". But you can say "I won't make a cake to celebrate (****) Jewish ritual" if you feel strongly opposed to such a ritual in your deeply held beliefs.

No screaming. Rituals cannot be forced upon others to celebrate if they defy their fundamentally deeply held beliefs opposing such a ritual.

Sorry. I can’t sell you groceries for Shabbat dinner.

Exactly. You're really getting good at this. But if nobody informed you the groceries were for Shabbat, you'd sell them and not defy your faith. Part of the USSC Ruling that will soon come on this will include language about "informed of the ritual intended". And, they will sift out Race, Religion from the endless escalating "identities" formed around deviant sex addictions, which are not and cannot be covered under the US Constitution. Not even implied.

Wait for it, because it's coming.

Considering your rich history of being laughablly wrong concerning how the courts will rule, you’ll have to excuse me if I treat your latest prediction with a very small grain of salt.

SCOTUS gave you a clue where it will go if pushed...and remember the court now leans right.

Tick tock, Ginsburg, you depraved old skank. Your time is winding to a close..and then Trump will appoint another justice who actually upholds the constitution.

And that is the end game. Bye bye criminal craphead jackboots.

 

[mdk]

If I want into a Muslim bakery and wanted them to make me a cake celebrating National Booze Day or something like that, and I was turned away. I wouldn't feel discriminated against. I'd expect it.

BTW, why aren't these deviant sex addicts trying this cry by targeting Muslim bakeries? Anyone? Any thoughts?

Can you stop screaming long enough to admit that both sides are asshole??

If the Christian baker would just give the nasty queers a price that was too high or a delivery date that was beyond the nasty gay wedding date, or just give any other reason for refusing service than the queer wouldn't have a legal justification for crying.d

But the Christian baker wants that queer to know exactly why he doesn't want to bake him a cake.

Now, IMO the Christian ought be able to say to the queer "get out fudge packer" and that be that, but unless and until this law gets over turned or removed, it IS the law.

They'd have to prove discrimination. Again, race and religion are prohibited to discriminate against. You can't say "we don't serve Jews here". But you can say "I won't make a cake to celebrate (****) Jewish ritual" if you feel strongly opposed to such a ritual in your deeply held beliefs.

No screaming. Rituals cannot be forced upon others to celebrate if they defy their fundamentally deeply held beliefs opposing such a ritual.

Sorry. I can’t sell you groceries for Shabbat dinner.

Exactly. You're really getting good at this. But if nobody informed you the groceries were for Shabbat, you'd sell them and not defy your faith. Part of the USSC Ruling that will soon come on this will include language about "informed of the ritual intended". And, they will sift out Race, Religion from the endless escalating "identities" formed around deviant sex addictions, which are not and cannot be covered under the US Constitution. Not even implied.

Wait for it, because it's coming.

Considering your rich history of being laughablly wrong concerning how the courts will rule, you’ll have to excuse me if I treat your latest prediction with a very small grain of salt.

SCOTUS gave you a clue where it will go if pushed...and remember the court now leans right.

They punted. I doubt they are going to scrap public accommodation laws just for gays while leaving all the others in place. The courts have rules those stupid laws constitutional on numerous occasions. I doubt this case ends well for the tranny suing, though.

 

[Silhouette]

If I want into a Muslim bakery and wanted them to make me a cake celebrating National Booze Day or something like that, and I was turned away. I wouldn't feel discriminated against. I'd expect it.

BTW, why aren't these deviant sex addicts trying this cry by targeting Muslim bakeries? Anyone? Any thoughts?

Can you stop screaming long enough to admit that both sides are asshole??

If the Christian baker would just give the nasty queers a price that was too high or a delivery date that was beyond the nasty gay wedding date, or just give any other reason for refusing service than the queer wouldn't have a legal justification for crying.d

But the Christian baker wants that queer to know exactly why he doesn't want to bake him a cake.

Now, IMO the Christian ought be able to say to the queer "get out fudge packer" and that be that, but unless and until this law gets over turned or removed, it IS the law.

They'd have to prove discrimination. Again, race and religion are prohibited to discriminate against. You can't say "we don't serve Jews here". But you can say "I won't make a cake to celebrate (****) Jewish ritual" if you feel strongly opposed to such a ritual in your deeply held beliefs.

No screaming. Rituals cannot be forced upon others to celebrate if they defy their fundamentally deeply held beliefs opposing such a ritual.

Sorry. I can’t sell you groceries for Shabbat dinner.

Exactly. You're really getting good at this. But if nobody informed you the groceries were for Shabbat, you'd sell them and not defy your faith. Part of the USSC Ruling that will soon come on this will include language about "informed of the ritual intended". And, they will sift out Race, Religion from the endless escalating "identities" formed around deviant sex addictions, which are not and cannot be covered under the US Constitution. Not even implied.

Wait for it, because it's coming.

Considering your rich history of being laughablly wrong concerning how the courts will rule, you’ll have to excuse me if I treat your latest prediction with a very small grain of salt.

SCOTUS gave you a clue where it will go if pushed...and remember the court now leans right.

Yes, they did send a clear message last time where this would go if pushed. Straight into "Obergefell revisiting" territory. Be careful what you wish for or what you are pushy about....

 

[DandyDonovan]

If I want into a Muslim bakery and wanted them to make me a cake celebrating National Booze Day or something like that, and I was turned away. I wouldn't feel discriminated against. I'd expect it.

BTW, why aren't these deviant sex addicts trying this cry by targeting Muslim bakeries? Anyone? Any thoughts?

Can you stop screaming long enough to admit that both sides are asshole??

If the Christian baker would just give the nasty queers a price that was too high or a delivery date that was beyond the nasty gay wedding date, or just give any other reason for refusing service than the queer wouldn't have a legal justification for crying.d

But the Christian baker wants that queer to know exactly why he doesn't want to bake him a cake.

Now, IMO the Christian ought be able to say to the queer "get out fudge packer" and that be that, but unless and until this law gets over turned or removed, it IS the law.

They'd have to prove discrimination. Again, race and religion are prohibited to discriminate against. You can't say "we don't serve Jews here". But you can say "I won't make a cake to celebrate (****) Jewish ritual" if you feel strongly opposed to such a ritual in your deeply held beliefs.

No screaming. Rituals cannot be forced upon others to celebrate if they defy their fundamentally deeply held beliefs opposing such a ritual.

Sorry. I can’t sell you groceries for Shabbat dinner.

Exactly. You're really getting good at this. But if nobody informed you the groceries were for Shabbat, you'd sell them and not defy your faith. Part of the USSC Ruling that will soon come on this will include language about "informed of the ritual intended". And, they will sift out Race, Religion from the endless escalating "identities" formed around deviant sex addictions, which are not and cannot be covered under the US Constitution. Not even implied.

Wait for it, because it's coming.

Considering your rich history of being laughablly wrong concerning how the courts will rule, you’ll have to excuse me if I treat your latest prediction with a very small grain of salt.

SCOTUS gave you a clue where it will go if pushed...and remember the court now leans right.

Tick tock, Ginsburg, you depraved old skank. Your time is winding to a close..and then Trump will appoint another justice who actually upholds the constitution.

And that is the end game. Bye bye criminal craphead jackboots.

If I were Trump, no way would RBG leave that hospital in any thing other than a body bag.

 

[bodecea]

If I want into a Muslim bakery and wanted them to make me a cake celebrating National Booze Day or something like that, and I was turned away. I wouldn't feel discriminated against. I'd expect it.

BTW, why aren't these deviant sex addicts trying this cry by targeting Muslim bakeries? Anyone? Any thoughts?

Can you stop screaming long enough to admit that both sides are asshole??

If the Christian baker would just give the nasty queers a price that was too high or a delivery date that was beyond the nasty gay wedding date, or just give any other reason for refusing service than the queer wouldn't have a legal justification for crying.d

But the Christian baker wants that queer to know exactly why he doesn't want to bake him a cake.

Now, IMO the Christian ought be able to say to the queer "get out fudge packer" and that be that, but unless and until this law gets over turned or removed, it IS the law.

They'd have to prove discrimination. Again, race and religion are prohibited to discriminate against. You can't say "we don't serve Jews here". But you can say "I won't make a cake to celebrate (****) Jewish ritual" if you feel strongly opposed to such a ritual in your deeply held beliefs.

No screaming. Rituals cannot be forced upon others to celebrate if they defy their fundamentally deeply held beliefs opposing such a ritual.

Sorry. I can’t sell you groceries for Shabbat dinner.

Exactly. You're really getting good at this. But if nobody informed you the groceries were for Shabbat, you'd sell them and not defy your faith. Part of the USSC Ruling that will soon come on this will include language about "informed of the ritual intended". And, they will sift out Race, Religion from the endless escalating "identities" formed around deviant sex addictions, which are not and cannot be covered under the US Constitution. Not even implied.

Wait for it, because it's coming.

Considering your rich history of being laughablly wrong concerning how the courts will rule, you’ll have to excuse me if I treat your latest prediction with a very small grain of salt.

SCOTUS gave you a clue where it will go if pushed...and remember the court now leans right.

How'd that leaning Right work out on the PP case?

 

[SassyIrishLass]

If I want into a Muslim bakery and wanted them to make me a cake celebrating National Booze Day or something like that, and I was turned away. I wouldn't feel discriminated against. I'd expect it.

BTW, why aren't these deviant sex addicts trying this cry by targeting Muslim bakeries? Anyone? Any thoughts?

Can you stop screaming long enough to admit that both sides are asshole??

If the Christian baker would just give the nasty queers a price that was too high or a delivery date that was beyond the nasty gay wedding date, or just give any other reason for refusing service than the queer wouldn't have a legal justification for crying.d

But the Christian baker wants that queer to know exactly why he doesn't want to bake him a cake.

Now, IMO the Christian ought be able to say to the queer "get out fudge packer" and that be that, but unless and until this law gets over turned or removed, it IS the law.

They'd have to prove discrimination. Again, race and religion are prohibited to discriminate against. You can't say "we don't serve Jews here". But you can say "I won't make a cake to celebrate (****) Jewish ritual" if you feel strongly opposed to such a ritual in your deeply held beliefs.

No screaming. Rituals cannot be forced upon others to celebrate if they defy their fundamentally deeply held beliefs opposing such a ritual.

Sorry. I can’t sell you groceries for Shabbat dinner.

Exactly. You're really getting good at this. But if nobody informed you the groceries were for Shabbat, you'd sell them and not defy your faith. Part of the USSC Ruling that will soon come on this will include language about "informed of the ritual intended". And, they will sift out Race, Religion from the endless escalating "identities" formed around deviant sex addictions, which are not and cannot be covered under the US Constitution. Not even implied.

Wait for it, because it's coming.

Considering your rich history of being laughablly wrong concerning how the courts will rule, you’ll have to excuse me if I treat your latest prediction with a very small grain of salt.

SCOTUS gave you a clue where it will go if pushed...and remember the court now leans right.

They punted. I doubt they are going to scrap public accommodation laws just for gays while leaving all the others in place. The courts have rules those stupid laws constitutional on numerous occasions. I doubt this case ends well for the tranny suing, though.

Me thinks you're wrong and full of wishful thinking.

PA laws are ignorant...but religious freedom is huge. They won't punt again...but go ahead and push it...the clue is already there

 

[Silhouette]

Where in the US Constitution does it say or even imply that "just some deviant sex addictions but not all of them" get "the same rights and priveleges" as men and women to marry each other?

Where? And don't cite race case law because race is innate and sex addictions are acquired behaviors..of which there could never be a comprehensive list of. You can't favor some and exclude others according, ironically, to the same Amendment Obergefell cited to justify its rationale. '
Oh what fun it will be when that is pointed out...

 

[mdk]

If I want into a Muslim bakery and wanted them to make me a cake celebrating National Booze Day or something like that, and I was turned away. I wouldn't feel discriminated against. I'd expect it.

BTW, why aren't these deviant sex addicts trying this cry by targeting Muslim bakeries? Anyone? Any thoughts?

Can you stop screaming long enough to admit that both sides are asshole??

If the Christian baker would just give the nasty queers a price that was too high or a delivery date that was beyond the nasty gay wedding date, or just give any other reason for refusing service than the queer wouldn't have a legal justification for crying.d

But the Christian baker wants that queer to know exactly why he doesn't want to bake him a cake.

Now, IMO the Christian ought be able to say to the queer "get out fudge packer" and that be that, but unless and until this law gets over turned or removed, it IS the law.

They'd have to prove discrimination. Again, race and religion are prohibited to discriminate against. You can't say "we don't serve Jews here". But you can say "I won't make a cake to celebrate (****) Jewish ritual" if you feel strongly opposed to such a ritual in your deeply held beliefs.

No screaming. Rituals cannot be forced upon others to celebrate if they defy their fundamentally deeply held beliefs opposing such a ritual.

Sorry. I can’t sell you groceries for Shabbat dinner.

Exactly. You're really getting good at this. But if nobody informed you the groceries were for Shabbat, you'd sell them and not defy your faith. Part of the USSC Ruling that will soon come on this will include language about "informed of the ritual intended". And, they will sift out Race, Religion from the endless escalating "identities" formed around deviant sex addictions, which are not and cannot be covered under the US Constitution. Not even implied.

Wait for it, because it's coming.

Considering your rich history of being laughablly wrong concerning how the courts will rule, you’ll have to excuse me if I treat your latest prediction with a very small grain of salt.

SCOTUS gave you a clue where it will go if pushed...and remember the court now leans right.

Yes, they did send a clear message last time where this would go if pushed. Straight into "Obergefell revisiting" territory. Be careful what you wish for.

You’ve been saying that for years. Good luck finding any standard in court. You’re going to need to bring far more to the table than saying the married queers down the street hurt my feelings. You’ll need to prove how them getting married as harmed you in a measurable away. You can’t.

 

[DandyDonovan]

Where in the US Constitution does it say or even imply that "just some deviant sex addictions but not all of them" get "the same rights and priveleges" as men and women to marry each other?

Where? And don't cite race case law because race is innate and sex addictions are acquired behaviors..of which there could never be a comprehensive list of. You can't favor some and exclude others according, ironically, to the same Amendment Obergefell cited to justify its rationale. '
Oh what fun it will be when that is pointed out...

Damn you are stupid. YOU just advocated for allowing religious people to have rights that non religious people wouldn't have under your reading of the law.

I mean damn, I'm embarrassed for you.

 

[mdk]

If I want into a Muslim bakery and wanted them to make me a cake celebrating National Booze Day or something like that, and I was turned away. I wouldn't feel discriminated against. I'd expect it.

BTW, why aren't these deviant sex addicts trying this cry by targeting Muslim bakeries? Anyone? Any thoughts?

Can you stop screaming long enough to admit that both sides are asshole??

If the Christian baker would just give the nasty queers a price that was too high or a delivery date that was beyond the nasty gay wedding date, or just give any other reason for refusing service than the queer wouldn't have a legal justification for crying.d

But the Christian baker wants that queer to know exactly why he doesn't want to bake him a cake.

Now, IMO the Christian ought be able to say to the queer "get out fudge packer" and that be that, but unless and until this law gets over turned or removed, it IS the law.

They'd have to prove discrimination. Again, race and religion are prohibited to discriminate against. You can't say "we don't serve Jews here". But you can say "I won't make a cake to celebrate (****) Jewish ritual" if you feel strongly opposed to such a ritual in your deeply held beliefs.

No screaming. Rituals cannot be forced upon others to celebrate if they defy their fundamentally deeply held beliefs opposing such a ritual.

Sorry. I can’t sell you groceries for Shabbat dinner.

Exactly. You're really getting good at this. But if nobody informed you the groceries were for Shabbat, you'd sell them and not defy your faith. Part of the USSC Ruling that will soon come on this will include language about "informed of the ritual intended". And, they will sift out Race, Religion from the endless escalating "identities" formed around deviant sex addictions, which are not and cannot be covered under the US Constitution. Not even implied.

Wait for it, because it's coming.

Considering your rich history of being laughablly wrong concerning how the courts will rule, you’ll have to excuse me if I treat your latest prediction with a very small grain of salt.

SCOTUS gave you a clue where it will go if pushed...and remember the court now leans right.

They punted. I doubt they are going to scrap public accommodation laws just for gays while leaving all the others in place. The courts have rules those stupid laws constitutional on numerous occasions. I doubt this case ends well for the tranny suing, though.

Me thinks you're wrong and full of wishful thinking.

PA laws are ignorant...but religious freedom is huge. They won't punt again...but go ahead and push it...the clue is already there

I hope they rule against all public accommodations laws. It would be pretty shitty to say you don’t have to serve G,A, and Y, but you have to serve J, E, and W.