"So what?"So what.NO THREAT, NO IMPLIED THREAT, just a request for info, LOL you people will grasp at ANYTHING.If it doesn't contain obstruction, then you do not know how to read. The physical evidence from the voice mail is 100% obstruction of an investigation.I read it retard and it does not contain anything that is obstruction in it. As I pointed out to you before you made all your ignorant attacks on me.If you can't understand how that proves what I am saying, then you lack basic skills in logic. When lawyers for the President and when followers of Trump in Congress contact a cooperating witness in Flynn, despite Flynn's lawyers saying that with Flynn cooperating he could no longer share information from his interviews with Mueller. Even in the very first paragraph of the link it says,
"Former Trump national security adviser Michael Flynn told special counsel Robert Mueller that individuals linked to the Trump administration or Congress had reached out to him multiple times, possibly in an attempt to interfere with Mueller’s investigation."
Michael Flynn: People Tied To Trump, Congress Tried To Sway What He Told Mueller
This is EXACTLY why I said, "if true." The only liar and fool in this thread is the one that posts denial on an article they did not read.
A request for info a day after Flynn broke from Trump in a shared defense.![]()
![auiqs.jpg :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg:](/styles/smilies/new/auiqs.jpg.gif)
![auiqs.jpg :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg:](/styles/smilies/new/auiqs.jpg.gif)
![auiqs.jpg :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg:](/styles/smilies/new/auiqs.jpg.gif)