Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
btw, if being viewed as a political enemy was a reason not to be indicted?But it's OK for your cult to indict him, but not for him to call out your cult for indicting a political enemy.
What was I misinformed about "nitwit?"Yes. I guess the point being the info you provided is readily available. But the nitwit to which you replied uses right wing media sources for his info and therefore is willfully misinformed.
hurts your fee fees?The cult's attempts to portray everyone else as being in a cult?
hurts your fee fees?
They telling you that he threatening witnesses? Let me guess, they're also telling you that he's the bombing of the hospitalYea…threatening witnesses and members of the court is like that
Only in Bidenfluffer landThese attempts to claim Willis' prosecution is political are falling apart at an accelerating speed now that the guilty pleas are being offered.
For the moment, appealing it is all he can do, or at least all he had better do. I am kind of surprised you didn't find a quoted of some crusty old judge, no longer in the system making your point referring to this case, as gag orders have been used and effective, in the past. Though, those may be few and far between.Obviously nothing. Trump is trying to fight 91 bullshit charges in 4 different areas. He has filed an appeal to his gag order based on constitutional grounds. Many people have said gagging Trump for attacking the court and his trial is a violation of his first amendment rights.
Opinion: A federal judge's gag order against Trump may be satisfying. But it isn't constitutional
U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan's order, issued in response to a motion by special counsel Jack Smith in the Jan. 6 case, runs afoul of the 1st Amendment.www.latimes.com
Former President Trump Calls Gag Order "Unconstitutional," Says He Will Appeal
During a campaign stop in Iowa, former President Trump criticizes a limited gag order placed on him by Judge Tanya Chutkan in the election interference case in Washington, D.C., calling it "unconstitutional" and saying he plans to appeal. The gag order prevents Mr. Trump from attacking Special...www.c-span.org
There are even fake screenshots of fake Trump posts attacking the judge:
/cloudfront-us-east-2.images.arcpublishing.com/reuters/NLQ7MXUABVEYFDRCLBVKAPALSE.jpeg)
Fact Check: No evidence of Trump post on âJudge Chutneyâ after partial gag order
There is no evidence that former U.S. President Donald Trump published a Truth Social post saying that a district judge has “dared to put herself above the first amendment,” despite a screenshot circulating online.www.reuters.com
Doesn't bother me at all. I enjoy mocking intellectual lightweights who's arguments are, at best, puerile insults.Why does being told you follow a Cult-of-Personality bother you so much?
You got any examples of members of one political party indicting the leading candidate of the opposing political party, bring it on.btw, if being viewed as a political enemy was a reason not to be indicted?
Strategy for every criminal in America -- just make the DA or AG a political enemy. You're just regurgitating talking points -- it's all shit.
You Stalinist assholes are running ELECTION INTERFERENCE!!!!
That psychopath judge can go to HELL!!!!!
You are really scared, aren't ya.Stay terrified..
Trump threatened with jail time over gag order violation in New York fraud trial
A judge laced into Donald Trump on Friday, floating the possibility of heavy sanctions or even jail time against the former president, over a “blatant violation” of a partial gag order in his $250 million New York fraud trial.
“Incendiary untruths can and have led to serious physical harm,” Manhattan Supreme Court Judge Arthur Engoron warned in court, before asking a defense lawyer to explain why Trump should not be punished or imprisoned.
Trump’s attorney apologized on his behalf, saying the violation was unintentional.
The judge’s admonition is the first time that Trump has been threatened with consequences for violating court-ordered restrictions on his speech. Trump was not in court to hear the rebuke, having left New York on Wednesday after attending two more days of the civil trial.
Judge fines Trump $5,000 for gag order violation after threatening him with jail time
Manhattan Supreme Court Judge Arthur Engoron warned that future violations will subject Trump to "far more severe sanctions" — including imprisonment.www.cnbc.com
Given that Don relishes playing the victimhood card, I wonder if he believes he will benefit by going so far as to essentially force Engoron to throw his ass in jail. Or, perhaps, he just can't control himself. More or less like a petulant six year old throwing a tantrum.
These are serious charges that had to be addressed. I am in no cult and contacted nobody to have the charges brought. I believe in the Constitution of the United States and still follow the oath I took to defend it. I believe in the rule of law, and that it applies to all, not just those below the level of the presidency. He did not have to choose to do any of the things he chose to do, but he did choose. Mike Pence also chose, but he chose to support the Constitution. Some honor oaths they take, others don't but get called on it. I have no problem with it being decided in a court with a jury of his peers, rather than on twitter. If he did nothing wrong, I trust the jury to decide that. If he should be allowed to lambaste the prosecution, the judge or bring heat of public opinion on the jurors, it is up to the appeals court and the supreme court to make that call. He is supposed to be worth billion$, surely he can pay for lawyers to make the case. Lord knows, he has never had trouble hiring lawyers to sue people.But it's OK for your cult to indict him, but not for him to call out your cult for indicting a political enemy.
We'll disagree. 100% of the charges against Trump are bullshit that would never, ever, have been brought if he wasn't running for President again.These are serious charges that had to be addressed.
But you have no problem characterizing other posters as members of a cult. Don't throw rocks if you live in a glass house.I am in no cult and contacted nobody to have the charges brought.
I believe in the Constitution of the United States and still follow the oath I took to defend it. I believe in the rule of law, and that it applies to all, not just those below the level of the presidency. He did not have to choose to do any of the things he chose to do, but he did choose. Mike Pence also chose, but he chose to support the Constitution. Some honor oaths they take, others don't but get called on it. I have no problem with it being decided in a court with a jury of his peers, rather than on twitter. If he did nothing wrong, I trust the jury to decide that. If he should be allowed to lambaste the prosecution, the judge or bring heat of public opinion on the jurors, it is up to the appeals court and the supreme court to make that call. He is supposed to be worth billion$, surely he can pay for lawyers to make the case. Lord knows, he has never had trouble hiring lawyers to sue people.
You got any examples of any President doing what Trump did?You got any examples of members of one political party indicting the leading candidate of the opposing political party, bring it on.
Being told you follow a Cult-of-Personality bothers you so very much.Doesn't bother me at all. I enjoy mocking intellectual lightweights who's arguments are, at best, puerile insults.
Why would he be in jail commie? What's he been convicted of?
We'll take that as a no.You got any examples of any President doing what Trump did?
He's a private citizen. He's not King. He's facing justice.
Have a blessed day.Being told you follow a Cult-of-Personality bothers you so very much.
You haven't got any examples of any President doing what Trump did.We'll take that as a no.
