imagine a GOP senate candidate saying this if a liberal justice died

[Juan de Fuca]

Looks more like separate rules for righties.

 

[TooTall]

Let me help you out. Medical EXPERTS say the same thing when it comes to the disease.

Well lo and behold that doesn't change the fact it was a cheap shot 7 years ago and she survived.

Bunning is no longer in the Senate. And since when is quoting a medical experts opinion a cheap shot?

Since the OP is a question of ethical tact, this applies equally.

"The paper reports that Bunning reiterated his support of conservative judges, saying “that’s going to be in place very shortly because Ruth Bader Ginsburg…has cancer.”

“Bad cancer. The kind you don’t get better from,” Bunning went on. “Even though she was operated on, usually nine months is the longest that anybody would live after being diagnosed with pancreatic cancer.”

This proved to be quite a stink for Bunning and there was discussion of running a primary campaign against Bunning with Mitch McConnell tasked to survey an opponent.

Bunning is no longer in the Senate. Didn't you get the memo?

What didn't you understand about this being ethically similar to the OP?

I don't find anything unethical about quoting a medical expert. If you get lung cancer and undergo chemo, medical experts give you up to five more years to live.
Saying what a great thing it was for labor that Scalia died is not even close to being ethically similar to what Jim Bunning said..

 

[Yousaidwhat]

Dem Senate candidate: Scalia's death 'happened at a good time'

It would be national news, the board looney left would have a fit. But since this is a dem saying this a about the late Justice Scalia it won't matter.

Scalia was a NaziCon asshole!

Anyone who disagrees with you is a NaziCon.

 

[Conservative65]

February 22, 2009
Categories:

• Kentucky

Bunning: Ginsburg will be dead in nine months
Sen. Jim Bunning (R-Ky.), already in political trouble for 2010, didn’t help matters any over the weekend.

At a Lincoln Day Dinner speech over the weekend, Bunning predicted that Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg would likely be dead from pancreatic cancer in nine months, according to the Louisville Courier-Journal.

Let me help you out. Medical EXPERTS say the same thing when it comes to the disease.

Well lo and behold that doesn't change the fact it was a cheap shot 7 years ago and she survived.

Bunning is no longer in the Senate. And since when is quoting a medical experts opinion a cheap shot?

Since the OP is a question of ethical tact, this applies equally.

"The paper reports that Bunning reiterated his support of conservative judges, saying “that’s going to be in place very shortly because Ruth Bader Ginsburg…has cancer.”

“Bad cancer. The kind you don’t get better from,” Bunning went on. “Even though she was operated on, usually nine months is the longest that anybody would live after being diagnosed with pancreatic cancer.”

This proved to be quite a stink for Bunning and there was discussion of running a primary campaign against Bunning with Mitch McConnell tasked to survey an opponent.

His statement about 9 months and it being a bad cancer are very accurate. One person living longer when 99,999 live less than a year, makes it a medical fact.

 

[Conservative65]

Well lo and behold that doesn't change the fact it was a cheap shot 7 years ago and she survived.

Bunning is no longer in the Senate. And since when is quoting a medical experts opinion a cheap shot?

Since the OP is a question of ethical tact, this applies equally.

"The paper reports that Bunning reiterated his support of conservative judges, saying “that’s going to be in place very shortly because Ruth Bader Ginsburg…has cancer.”

“Bad cancer. The kind you don’t get better from,” Bunning went on. “Even though she was operated on, usually nine months is the longest that anybody would live after being diagnosed with pancreatic cancer.”

This proved to be quite a stink for Bunning and there was discussion of running a primary campaign against Bunning with Mitch McConnell tasked to survey an opponent.

Bunning is no longer in the Senate. Didn't you get the memo?

What didn't you understand about this being ethically similar to the OP?

I don't find anything unethical about quoting a medical expert. If you get lung cancer and undergo chemo, medical experts give you up to five more years to live.
Saying what a great thing it was for labor that Scalia died is not even close to being ethically similar to what Jim Bunning said..

Seems Liberals are getting upset at what any medical EXPERT would tell you.

 

[TooTall]

Bunning is no longer in the Senate. And since when is quoting a medical experts opinion a cheap shot?

Since the OP is a question of ethical tact, this applies equally.

"The paper reports that Bunning reiterated his support of conservative judges, saying “that’s going to be in place very shortly because Ruth Bader Ginsburg…has cancer.”

“Bad cancer. The kind you don’t get better from,” Bunning went on. “Even though she was operated on, usually nine months is the longest that anybody would live after being diagnosed with pancreatic cancer.”

This proved to be quite a stink for Bunning and there was discussion of running a primary campaign against Bunning with Mitch McConnell tasked to survey an opponent.

Bunning is no longer in the Senate. Didn't you get the memo?

What didn't you understand about this being ethically similar to the OP?

I don't find anything unethical about quoting a medical expert. If you get lung cancer and undergo chemo, medical experts give you up to five more years to live.
Saying what a great thing it was for labor that Scalia died is not even close to being ethically similar to what Jim Bunning said..

Seems Liberals are getting upset at what any medical EXPERT would tell you.

They only claim to believe in science.