Immigration Bill A Secret No More

Wrong. The GOP and most voters want the border sealed.
Trump and Republicans want HR-2 passed.

Keep the borders open and keep losing voters, duh.
Obviously the Neo-GOP MAGANUTS are parrots who will endlessly repeat the lies of Benedict Donald.

The Neo-GOP also want to believe that an Open Border is code for No Border at all.
 
Obviously the Neo-GOP MAGANUTS are parrots who will endlessly repeat the lies of Benedict Donald.

The Neo-GOP also want to believe that an Open Border is code for No Border at all.
I really need to know how much does the dnc pay you to post your tripe?
 
It's a shit bill and most of America let the representatives know that. If it didn't get leaked out, it would've already passed. Thanks to the guy that showed America that our representatives will screw us over in a heart beat.
It is the best possible bill that can pass

Note to Republicans
You can’t always get your way
Sometimes you take the deal you can get
 
Obviously the Neo-GOP MAGANUTS are parrots who will endlessly repeat the lies of Benedict Donald.
The Neo-GOP also want to believe that an Open Border is code for No Border at all.
1. Trump sealed the border and built the wall. The CBP loves Trump and the wall. Prove Trump is a traitor, you can't, LIAR.

2. Biden has open borders, and is a national security disaster, letting in tens of thousands of Chinese and Russians.

3. Biden is the TRAITOR, as proven by his open borders policy.
 
So no proof of your claim, just a verbal attack on a source?

I'll write the commie a letter informing her of her inability to sell a good bullshit story if it pleases you.

I've a tendency to do that with some of these hacks who put that sort of pablum out there for distribution.
 
Last edited:
sneak attack

treachery

pack of lies

bad faith deal

empty promise

as worthless as the paper its written on

A POS Bill by any other name

It's dead on arrival anyway. Don't matter.

In the mean time, focus should be on keeping the magnifying glass on tater and Mayorkas and that brood for all to see.
 
A majority of both Houses and the President support it

Sure about that?

Punchbowl News:

But the bill’s release Sunday night was like pouring gasoline on the fire that is the Senate GOP internal war. Senators and aides publicly and privately questioned whether a majority of the Republican Conference would back it, a key metric. There were even calls for an immediate leadership change from some GOP senators and conservative outside groups.

Top Republicans back proposal: Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell and Sen. James Lankford (Okla.), the lead GOP negotiator, fiercely defended the bill on Sunday after its release. McConnell will brief Senate Republicans on the bill this evening, we’re told. That isn’t likely to mollify conservatives, who are already calling the bill “atrocious” and “a magnet for more illegal immigration.”

During a press call Sunday evening, Lankford said those criticizing the proposal had already come out against it before the text was released, so he didn’t expect them to reverse course.

“If we have a crisis on our southern border, and we do… we should address that and do what we can to be able to solve that problem — not just hope that the problem gets better or hope that an election solves the issue,” Lankford said.

Let’s acknowledge that Lankford and Sens. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) and Kyrsten Sinema (I-Ariz.), the three chief negotiators on the border security package, defied the odds by even reaching a compromise on an issue as politically sensitive as immigration.

But it’s unclear if there’s a path to 60 votes in the Senate. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer and McConnell are counting on a center-right plus center-left supermajority of the Senate to vote for this measure. There’s no guarantee of enough support there. (Here are statements from Murphy, Lankford, Sinema, the White House and Schumer).

The opposition: House Majority Leader Steve Scalise said definitively that the House would not vote on this measure. Speaker Mike Johnson termed the bill “dead on arrival.”

Lankford said in response to these statements that he’s “a little confused… at how it could be ‘worse than expected.’” The Oklahoma Republican added he wants to huddle with the speaker’s team. Of course, Johnson’s statement will undoubtedly cause some on-the-fence GOP senators to vote against the bill.

“We’re at the beginning points of information,” Lankford asserted, dismissing the House GOP criticisms. “There are some people who just read Facebook posts… They made their decision based on the Facebook posts, not the text.”

But hardline Senate GOP conservatives are furious over the proposal, saying it will do nothing to stop the flow of migrants trying to cross the U.S.-Mexico border illegally. And after Schumer said Sunday, “I have never worked more closely with Leader McConnell on any piece of legislation as we did on this,” McConnell’s Republican critics pounced.

That prompted Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah), a leading detractor of both the bill and McConnell, to quote-tweet us with this response: “The bromance continues…” Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) said, “That’s the problem.”

Lee later tweeted a call for “new leadership” and described the bill as a “disqualifying betrayal.” McConnell’s opponents clearly want to make a move against him. Whether that actually materializes is an entirely different question.

It’s hard to see how this bill will win over a majority of Senate Republicans at this point, which is what McConnell and others in leadership had sought. There’s already internal GOP discussion over whether McConnell — whom conservatives accuse of using the border provisions as cover for more Ukraine funding — will try to split the two off.

The path forward: Schumer reiterated Sunday night that the first procedural vote will be on Wednesday. This will be a critical test.

We expect several progressives to oppose the plan as well. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) did so on Sunday due to the Israel funding. Hispanic lawmakers and pro-immigration groups such as the ACLU are already taking aim at the changes to immigration policy. Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.) called it a “new version of Trump-era policies that will cause more chaos at the border.”

On the House side: The House Republican leadership has signaled it will move beyond the Senate’s bipartisan proposal. This week, Johnson plans to put on the floor a bill to send $17.6 billion to Israel without any spending cuts, a reversal of his earlier approach.
 
Trump sealed the border and built the wall.
Contrary to known reality. When Mexico refused to pony up the funds like he promised you MAGANUTS they'd do, Benedict Donald literally stole appropriated military funds to improve and add a few miles to the existing barriers in certain places. Illegal's and non approved recreational drugs continued to stream across the border during every year of his term.
 
DOA in the House....As it should be.

H.R.-2 was a great Bill and The Firm did not need to fuck with it after sitting on their hands for six months.
I liked HR -2 actually.
It would be worth looking at and combining the best of both. We both know that Trump has already killed it though.

But now Biden can run 2,414 ads saying the Republicans turned down a bipartisan bill, without even looking at it for political gain.

This is why this never gets better.
 
Side note -

New York City has launched a $53 million program to provide pre-paid debit cards to illegal immigrants, allowing them to spend the funds in local bodegas.
 
None of that is accurate.

NGOs traffic illegals?

Start there. Prove that
 

Forum List

Back
Top