protectionist
Diamond Member
- Oct 20, 2013
- 57,077
- 18,336
- 2,250
- Thread starter
- #541
Translation: I am just making shit up as I go along, and I do not have to verify or reference shit. Simply because I said so is good enough.
Hey, try doing a little fucking research next time, so you do not look like a total ass when somebody like me comes along and makes you look like a total idiot.
Or at least have the integrity of another poster in here, percysunshine.
At least he had the integrity to admit he made a mistake and own up to it, instead of trying to blow off their freaking baobab tree sized boner by trying to claim "oh, I was just estimating".
You shut your mouth you fuckin JACKASS. What's the matter you don't understand English, Bozo ? I didn't change a damn thing. I said probably in the first place, and say probably now.
Wait a minute, *I* am deceitful?
You claim "hundreds", multiple references state somewhere in the 50's.
And you call me a "jackass"?
Why can't you just admit you exaggerated things, instead of getting all belligerent and offensive? Is that so freaking hard? To say "Yea, I made a mistake, it is around 50"?
Sorry, any respect I may have had for you has not gone into the sewer with yesterday's lunch. You blow it, you scream at me, I back up what I stated and give multiple references, and you get all offensive and insult me yet again.
Nothing you say has any merit as far as I am concerned. You are simply another ignorant racist bastard, and I could not care less about anything you have to say.
Have a nice day.
NO, I didn't "claim hundreds". YOU said that, I didn't say that. Some people need to be told 2 or 3 times, before they get it in their thick skulls.
Once again, (read carefully now) > I said "It could easily be, and probably is, in the hundreds.
There! I put it in bold print and red. No excuses anymore. Got it now ?
What's the matter dude ? HA HA. Didn't you read my response ? You've already BEEN REFUTED. I handed you your ass on that "multiple references state" thing. As I told you before. Those are just definitively (that means DEFINITE) documented cases. You think that's all there were ? You've got to be kidding.
AGAIN, I HAVE TO REPEAT (sorry but your asking for this) >> "But it is a fact that MM was born in 1869, and her condition wasn't discovered until 1906 (when she was 37 years old). This leaves lots of years of possible infection spreading before the investigation even begins. Is there anyone who can confirm that they know ALL of Typhoid Mary's infected people ? I'd say that's quite impossible. The 53 number you have are only the confirmed cased that are definitively known and documented. By no means are they all, or necessarily even close to the total number.
So then MM was isolated in a New York isolation hospital for 3 years (North Brother Island). In 1910, she got out, and disappeared and remained that way until 1915. How many infections also, during THAT 5 years ? Neither the New York Times or anybody else knows. She could have infected 100+ people in any one of those 5 years. "Exactly how many people were infected or killed by her is not known. She refused to cooperate with health authorities, withheld information about her past, and used different pseudonyms when she changed cities.Three deaths have been definitively attributed to her, with estimates running as high as 50" (Wikipedia)
Note: that is "deaths", not cases. Not everyone who gets typhoid dies, as Typhoid Mary herself was an example."
Are you really unable to get it into your head that the "around 50" cases are just the definitive/documented ones ? Please tell me your not that stupid.
Dude. when I say there could be hundreds of cases, I could be UNDERestimating. There could be THOUSANDS of them. NOBODY knows, and anybody who would attempt to equivocate a DOCUMENTED number with what would be the ACTUAL number, from MM's whole life, would have to be a liar, incredibly stupid, or incredibly crazy (and yes that would include the New York Times, or anyone else) But I don't think the Times ever said that. I think they (and Wikipedia too) only mentioned the documented cases as just that > Documented cases, and nothing more. Which has NO BEARING WHATSOEVER on the ACTUAL total cases. Pheeeeeww! (high-pitched whistle) Got it now ?
PS - if you think you have a shred of evidence to base calling me a racist on, let's hear it.
Last edited: