Impeachment

oh begeezus ANOTHER rw impeachment thread :eusa_wall: EVEN AFTER you people elected Bu$h 2X :rolleyes:

You rw'ers need to come up w/ some new material.

Bush was not perfect, but he was a far better President than B. Hussein Obama, you dumbass! :cool:


Hussein Obama is the worst.

My word.

And assholes like you that advocate the assination of a President, any President, should lose their citizenship.
 
Bush was not perfect, but he was a far better President than B. Hussein Obama, you dumbass! :cool:


Hussein Obama is the worst.

My word.

And assholes like you that advocate the assination of a President, any President, should lose their citizenship.

Coming from the party affiliate that wrote a book about assassinating bush. So tell me, which flight will you be taking?
 
The partisan ignorance of the OP and other conservatives who agree with him is remarkable, not surprising, but remarkable nonetheless.

the morans seem to start an impeachment thread every 2-3 dys if not sooner. Predictable they are.

Who are the "morans"?

Years ago, Leftists staged a rally to protest Bush.

They held signs that said "Please let my child be the next to die in Iraq." and "Blood for Oil is a good trade."

One of the signs held up said "Get a brain morans."

To this day, the scumfuck leftists are still trying to pass it off as a real sign.

Remember, leftists are gutter scum...
 
why Hussein Obama should deserve a better end than JFK?

just asking.
nutter says what? :eusa_eh:
Why impeach ?

let him

follow JFKs steps..............

let him become

a legend??? :eusa_whistle:


... a legend

Perhaps you would like to become the focus of some sharp questioning by the Secret Service considering what you just advocated.
yep, they take all potential threats seriously.
Bush was not perfect, but he was a far better President than B. Hussein Obama, you dumbass! :cool:


Hussein Obama is the worst.

My word.

And assholes like you that advocate the assination of a President, any President, should lose their citizenship.

she's a whack job :cuckoo: Has been since the day she got here. I also notice deep Red Stater hacks like Jackson & Loverbears65 pile on these rw hate threads as well. Color me surprised :doubt:
 
Ronald Reagan sold weapons to the leading terrorist nation ... behind congresses' back ...

No he didn't - but you're a leftist, so lying is your standard method of discourse.

in direct violation of the Constitution. Research Iran-Contra.

Izzatrite Comrade?

You real worried about the Constitution? You know it real well?

So, which article or amendment was violated?

No answer? I'll wait for you to scour the hate sites - but you won't find and answer.

George Bush, after being warned by his legal staff, conducted the largest warrantless wiretapping program in U.S. History. And he got caught.

Is that the one that Obama continues to this day, to the smiling approval of you sleazy leftists?

A mountain of evidence suggests that the plan to invade Iraq was decided long before 9/11, and that George Bush made the intelligence fit the policy.

"Evidence" gathered on the hate sites you spend your time at?

Damn, that's convincing, Comrade.

If Reagan and Bush were not Impeached, there is no way Obama comes close to getting impeached.

Da, no way GLORIOUS PEOPLES RULER will ever leave his post..


Leftists - stupid as a bag of hammers....
 
Uncensored a Raygun fluffer. :eusa_eh: Quelle surprise. :doubt: The Gipper broke every rule in the book and then some. Sorry to burst your bubble there bubble boi.
 
If the American people have rock solid proof that a candidate lied repeatedly in order to win an election (a closely won election) then I believe that should be grounds for impeachment. If the truth about Obamacare and the real unemployment numbers were known Obama would have lost big time. He lied, the government lied, and he got reelected and for those of you that are all a flutter over President Hilary you can forget it because when she has an opponent her lies will surface as well.

I truly don't know why liberals have accepted this kind of behavior but you have.
Liberals of the 70's were deeply concerned about the federal government spying on the American people today's liberal is not.

Yesterdays liberal would be appalled at the use of drones but today's liberal is not.

Yesterdays liberal would be terrified at an IRS that is lead by the nose by the current occupant of the Oval Office but today's liberal is silent.

Yesterdays liberal would be storming the White House if the President lied about their healthcare and taxes but today's liberal is blind to it.

Yesterdays liberal would be angered to no end to discover that the IRS and other federal agencies have lost, misplaced or stolen hundreds of millions of dollars but today's liberal is totally uncaring about the lost money and the national debt.

The Tea Party deeply cares and is worried about all of these things but the Tea Party is somehow blamed. False accusations also used to concern good liberals but maybe today's liberal is.....not so good.

The people have no say in the impeachment of a president other than contacting representatives. It's all up to the House of Representatives.
 
Can not impeach Bush, he is no longer president.

More to the point that if Bush didn't get impeach for anything that happened with Iraq...I REALLY don't see how it's justified to impeach Obama for anything.

There were 3 INDEPENDENT Congressional Investigations into the supposed lying that got us into Iraq. ALL 3 found ZERO grounds for making the claim. The last one was run by the Democrats.

.....not only did the Bush Administration lie to the people and to the US Congress, but knew they were doing something illegal at the time that they did it.

All the talk about "Intelligence failure" is just another lie. There was no failure. Indeed the Army agents who erroneously claimed that missile tubes were parts for a uranium centrifuge received bonuses, while the Pentagon smeared Hans Blix, and John Bolton orchestrated the firing of Jose Bustani, the director of the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, because Bustani was trying to send chemical weapons inspectors to Baghdad.

The President of the United States and his Neocon associates lied to the people of the United States to send them off on a war of conquest.

THE LIE OF THE CENTURY | WHAT REALLY HAPPENED
 
Criticizing Obama is per se racism. Impeachment would be...well it would be too much.

He has told a calculated bald faced lie to every American over and over as part of a scheme and a fraud on the citizens....and he deserves to be impeached....but I don't think we can do that to Black Americans.

Impeach the first Black President? No, we can't do that.

But, its not because he doesn't deserve it.

It was the greatest fraud ever perpetrated in the United States.

Those of us that voted for Mitt Romney, or 3rd Party, knew Obama was lying. It's why he didn't get our vote. What's the excuse for those that did vote for him? I guess they could claim stupidity. Obama can't be impeached because the American voting public is stupid. I think that's what Justice Roberts was essentially telling us in his mandate ruling.
 
Ronald Reagan sold weapons to the leading terrorist nation ... behind congresses' back ... in direct violation of the Constitution. Research Iran-Contra.

George Bush, after being warned by his legal staff, conducted the largest warrantless wiretapping program in U.S. History. And he got caught.

A mountain of evidence suggests that the plan to invade Iraq was decided long before 9/11, and that George Bush made the intelligence fit the policy.

If Reagan and Bush were not Impeached, there is no way Obama comes close to getting impeached.

(Yawn)

(More rightwing spam)

Ron Suskind: Ron Suskind: Articles

Impeachment is an up down vote in the House. The GOP has the numbers to do it. Of course he would not be convicted or removed from office by the Senate, but as a matter of fact they could vote to impeach him.
 
Uncensored a Raygun fluffer. :eusa_eh: Quelle surprise. :doubt: The Gipper broke every rule in the book and then some. Sorry to burst your bubble there bubble boi.

Leftists are demagogues who put Goebbels to shame. Tiny fragments of facts are occasionally mixed in the slime to concoct whatever smear is on the agenda.

That the left attacks Reagan is no more remarkable than a Saudi Prince attacking Jews.

Now let's get you red in the face...

The Boland Amendment was unconstitutional and not binding.

Not only did Reagan ignore it - Clinton virtually pissed on it - as well he should. While you are a leftist and your goal is to slander, not to rationally discuss, I must point out that under Boland, Clinton's little "wag the dog" response was illegal.
 
Uncensored a Raygun fluffer. :eusa_eh: Quelle surprise. :doubt: The Gipper broke every rule in the book and then some. Sorry to burst your bubble there bubble boi.

Leftists are demagogues who put Goebbels to shame. Tiny fragments of facts are occasionally mixed in the slime to concoct whatever smear is on the agenda.

That the left attacks Reagan is no more remarkable than a Saudi Prince attacking Jews.

Now let's get you red in the face...

The Boland Amendment was unconstitutional and not binding.

Not only did Reagan ignore it - Clinton virtually pissed on it - as well he should. While you are a leftist and your goal is to slander, not to rationally discuss, I must point out that under Boland, Clinton's little "wag the dog" response was illegal.

Ignored it by selling anti-tank and anti-aircraft missiles to Iran and diverting the profits to the Contra Terrorist? Or, he ignored it and allowed the Contras to import so much cocaine into the country that they drug dealers had to start selling Free-Base as Crack Rock? Both.
 
Taken together, the lies, the exposure of debasing the last election, the entire pattern of deception and using government agencies as his private stasi and gestapo should be enough to rise to the level of high crimes or misdemeanors.

Obama should be impeached, tried and removed from office.


nah.... he should leave behind a youngish body..... he should become a legend like JFK :)

Oh no. JFK became a legend (an unworthy legend perhaps). obama should live a long life, long enough to watch everything he did or try to do dismantled and demolished. He should live a long life of humiliation to the point where his daughters have to change their names to disassociate themselves from his "legacy".
 
Ignored it by selling anti-tank and anti-aircraft missiles to Iran and diverting the profits to the Contra Terrorist?

Same old lies from the same old Bolsheviks - hey, but someone will believe you this time.

{
August 1985 : Reagan approves the plan to allow Israeli [Firm] to sell U.S.-made weapons to Iran. }

Understanding the Iran-Contra Affairs


Hey, you've got to lie - you're a leftist - and he brought down your beloved USSR :mad::mad::mad:


Or, he ignored it and allowed the Contras to import so much cocaine into the country that they drug dealers had to start selling Free-Base as Crack Rock? Both.

catintinfoilhat.jpg
 
Hey, Reagan just didn't remember some of the things that was asked of him in the Iran Contra hearings, in fact Reagan didn't remember 124 times, is that a crime?
 
Ignored it by selling anti-tank and anti-aircraft missiles to Iran and diverting the profits to the Contra Terrorist?

Same old lies from the same old Bolsheviks - hey, but someone will believe you this time.

{
August 1985 : Reagan approves the plan to allow Israeli [Firm] to sell U.S.-made weapons to Iran. }

Understanding the Iran-Contra Affairs


Hey, you've got to lie - you're a leftist - and he brought down your beloved USSR :mad::mad::mad:


Or, he ignored it and allowed the Contras to import so much cocaine into the country that they drug dealers had to start selling Free-Base as Crack Rock? Both.

Summer 1985 : Israeli representatives drawn into discussion
•July 1, 1985 : President Reagan publicly denounces bartering with terrorists.
•July 3, 1985 : McFarlane meets with Israeli David Kimche, who is in the U.S. on behalf of the Israelis who had met with Khashoggi and Ghorbanifar. The arms-for-hostages deal is first outlined, as is the prospect of improving the U.S.-Iran relationship.
•July 16, 1985 : McFarlane meets with Reagan and his Chief of Staff Regan while Reagan is in the hospital recovering from surgery. They discuss the possibility of selling arms to Iran via Israeli in order to get the release of the hostages and to open communications with Iran. The details of this visit are hazy, but McFarlane came away from it with the idea that the President had encouraged him to go forward with discussions with the Iranians and Israelis.
•August 1985 : Reagan approves the plan to allow Israeli to sell U.S.-made weapons to Iran.
•August 20, 1985 : first load of missiles sent from Israeli to Iran.
•September 15, 1985 : American hostage Benjamin Weir released. Colonel Oliver North brought in to deal with logistics
•November 1985 : second load of missiles sold. Major General Richard Secord brought in to help replenish Israeli’s supply of weapons.

The Enterprise and Diversion of funds to Nicaragua Contras

Use of a third party does not absolve Raygun.

Who was the smuggler (hint he was a pilot) who got busted and blew the whole story up? What was he smuggling?
 
Ignored it by selling anti-tank and anti-aircraft missiles to Iran and diverting the profits to the Contra Terrorist?

Same old lies from the same old Bolsheviks - hey, but someone will believe you this time.

{
August 1985 : Reagan approves the plan to allow Israeli [Firm] to sell U.S.-made weapons to Iran. }

Understanding the Iran-Contra Affairs


Hey, you've got to lie - you're a leftist - and he brought down your beloved USSR :mad::mad::mad:


Or, he ignored it and allowed the Contras to import so much cocaine into the country that they drug dealers had to start selling Free-Base as Crack Rock? Both.

Summer 1985 : Israeli representatives drawn into discussion
•July 1, 1985 : President Reagan publicly denounces bartering with terrorists.
•July 3, 1985 : McFarlane meets with Israeli David Kimche, who is in the U.S. on behalf of the Israelis who had met with Khashoggi and Ghorbanifar. The arms-for-hostages deal is first outlined, as is the prospect of improving the U.S.-Iran relationship.
•July 16, 1985 : McFarlane meets with Reagan and his Chief of Staff Regan while Reagan is in the hospital recovering from surgery. They discuss the possibility of selling arms to Iran via Israeli in order to get the release of the hostages and to open communications with Iran. The details of this visit are hazy, but McFarlane came away from it with the idea that the President had encouraged him to go forward with discussions with the Iranians and Israelis.
•August 1985 : Reagan approves the plan to allow Israeli to sell U.S.-made weapons to Iran.
•August 20, 1985 : first load of missiles sent from Israeli to Iran.
•September 15, 1985 : American hostage Benjamin Weir released. Colonel Oliver North brought in to deal with logistics
•November 1985 : second load of missiles sold. Major General Richard Secord brought in to help replenish Israeli’s supply of weapons.

The Enterprise and Diversion of funds to Nicaragua Contras

Use of a third party does not absolve Raygun.

Who was the smuggler (hint he was a pilot) who got busted and blew the whole story up? What was he smuggling?

Reagan approving of allowing Isreal to sell US made arms to Iran and using the money from Iran to arm th contras was really different from direct sales to Iran. Of course it was. Come on, for chist's sake. LOL

Not that it matters. It's all water under the bridge. But the gop's sick love of impeachment is really too much, and it hurts the party.
 
Reagan approving of allowing Isreal to sell US made arms to Iran and using the money from Iran to arm th contras was really different from direct sales to Iran.

Vastly different.

Arming the Anti-Communists is what has the old Bolshivik up in arms. That Reagan armed the enemies of his beloved USSR is something BlindBoo just can't abide with. The Soviets had a presence in North America, the brass ring was in SIGHT - the GLORIOUS workers paradise just a jack-boot away.

Then Reagan fucked it all up - that can ruin a Stalinists whole day - actually with Boo, his whole century... It's like Ronnie told him "NO GULAGS FOR YOU."

Legally, the use of Israel skirted prohibitions on arms exports and made it impossible for the leftists to go after Reagan, though you still pissed away $65 million trying.

Of course it was. Come on, for chist's sake. LOL

Not that it matters. It's all water under the bridge. But the gop's sick love of impeachment is really too much, and it hurts the party.

Impeaching Obama would be stupid - and would fail.

Besides, Obama is busy taking down the democrats. Napoleon Bonaparte said "Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake."

Obama is best buddy to the GOP right now.
 
Reagan approving of allowing Isreal to sell US made arms to Iran and using the money from Iran to arm th contras was really different from direct sales to Iran.

Vastly different.

Arming the Anti-Communists is what has the old Bolshivik up in arms. That Reagan armed the enemies of his beloved USSR is something BlindBoo just can't abide with. The Soviets had a presence in North America, the brass ring was in SIGHT - the GLORIOUS workers paradise just a jack-boot away.

Then Reagan fucked it all up - that can ruin a Stalinists whole day - actually with Boo, his whole century... It's like Ronnie told him "NO GULAGS FOR YOU."

Legally, the use of Israel skirted prohibitions on arms exports and made it impossible for the leftists to go after Reagan, though you still pissed away $65 million trying.

Of course it was. Come on, for chist's sake. LOL

Not that it matters. It's all water under the bridge. But the gop's sick love of impeachment is really too much, and it hurts the party.

Impeaching Obama would be stupid - and would fail.

Besides, Obama is busy taking down the democrats. Napoleon Bonaparte said "Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake."

Obama is best buddy to the GOP right now.

Not even close to different; Reagan simply used Israel as a black bag outfit. But, like I said, I don't care. And at the time, I thought arming the contras to be more counterproductive to US interests than selling military hardware to maybe get hostages back, while not wanting to let anybody know the US was willing to pay for hostages. I mean, if you're a hostage, you want out, and the niceties of how it gets done ... hell with that.

The funny thing was that back in the 80s, the dems were literally horrified to think they might have impeachment with Reagan, because they knew it'd be a political disaster ... and frankly the Boland Amendment was bordering on crossing the line on the executive's power on for policy, if not over the line.
 

Forum List

Back
Top