In 1948, Arabs threatened Palestinians with violence if they didn't leave Israel before the attack

[montelatici]

No, the women and children were evacuated for their safety, yeah, because the Arabs had told them to, and NOWHERE DOES IT ACCUSE THE JEWS OF MAKING THEM EVACUATE as stated in the British reports to the UN. Misrepresenting and mutilating a document again, that's not what it says, retard.

The Arabs in Haifa stopped shooting and after the truce, the Jews evicted them. Yeah, where does it say "Jews evicted them" ya lying asshole? But at least the document admits that the Palestinians had joined their Arab brethern in attacking the Jews, DUFUS. Haifa was attacked by the Jews in January 1948. BULL. AGAIN, THAT'S NOT WHAT THE DOCUMENT SAYS. The neighboring countries intervened in May 1948. MORE "MONTE CONCLUSIONS" brought to you by an antisemitic lying asshole.

You need to consult the timeline before making stupid illogical comments. Tell your handlers at the Hasbara, their lame response did not work.

YOU NEED TO STOP POSTING IRRELEVANT DOCUMENTS AND THEN ADDING YOUR OWN LIES AND COMMENTARY TO IT.

Of course, the official documents are irrelevant when they disprove your bullshit.

(c) The representative of the Mandatory Power informed the Commission at its sixteenth meeting on 21 January 1948, that

• • 
    
    
    “in the present circumstances the Jewish story that the Arabs are the attackers and the Jews the attacked is not tenable. The Arabs are determined to show that they will not submit tamely to the United Nations Plan of Partition; while the Jews are trying to consolidate the advantages gained at the General Assembly by a succession of drastic operations designed to intimidate and cure the Arabs of any desire for further conflict."
    
    A AC.21 7 of 29 January 1948

Another manipulated propaganda piece by the islamocatholic Nazi Jew hater. It actually says this


7. Consultations with the Representative of the Mandatory Power
(a) Sir Alexander Cadogan, the representative designated by the Mandatory Power, has appeared before the commission at its sixth and sixteenth meetings on 14 and 21 January 1948, respectively.

(b) In his review of the present situation in Palestine, on 14 January 1948, Sir Alexander stated that the Arabs had made it clear that “they proposed to resist with all the forces at their disposal the implementation of the partition plane. Moreover, since the first week in December the situation in Palestine had deteriorated rapidly. Violence conflict between the two communities had been intensified, courts and essential government services had been either unable to operate or were seriously crippled; there was but one month’s supply of certain types of fuel oil in the country; there was general insecurity; communications were obstructed; the collection of public revenue was expected to drop sharply. Sir Alexander described the situation as one in which generally speaking, there has been a very severe diminution in the functions and authority of Civil Government, and in view of recent developments, it would be optimistic to hope for any improvement in the future.


(c) The representative of the Mandatory Power informed the Commission at its sixteenth meeting on 21 January 1948, that

• • 
    
    
    “in the present circumstances the Jewish story that the Arabs are the attackers and the Jews the attacked is not tenable. The Arabs are determined to show that they will not submit tamely to the United Nations Plan of Partition; while the Jews are trying to consolidate the advantages gained at the General Assembly by a succession of drastic operations designed to intimidate and cure the Arabs of any desire for further conflict. Elements on each side are thus engaged in attacking or in taking reprisals indistinguishable from attacks…The Government of Palestine fear that strife in Palestine will be greatly intensified when the Mandate is terminated, and that the international status of the United Nations Commission will mean little or nothing to the Arabs in Palestine, to whom the killing of Jews now transcends all other considerations. Thus, the Commission will be faced with the problem of how to avert certain bloodshed on a very much wider scale than prevails at present.”
  (d) Mr. Fletcher-Cooke of the United Kingdom delegation elaborated on the above by further informing the commission that:
  • • 
      “The view held by the Government of Palestine is that the arrival of the Commission will be the signal for widespread attacks by the Arabs both on the Jews and on the members of Commission itself. In addition, some 62 per cent of the present Government staff in Palestine are Arabs, and there is reason to believe that none of these will be willing or able to serve the commission. The Arabs have made it quite clear and have told the Palestine government that the do not propose to co-operate or to assist the Commission, and that, far from it, they propose to attack and impede its work in every possible way. We have no reason to suppose that they do not mean what they say.”
    • 
      SO we can see that the blame lies with the arabs who are just aggressive greedy violent scum who where attacking the Jews and British from 1947

Have you noticed, every time Monte pits up supposedly "official document" to prove his point, the document actually demolishes his claim? In this case it it even explains how some Palestinians cleared as instructed by the Arab armies, while some actually joined the Arab armies in the attack! Ha ha ha. OMG.

Really? care to cite an example where his claims are "demolished"?

Keep up will ya? I already did that, I included the parts of the paragraph and other relevant text that Monte the fraudster had conviently omitted, which demolished his claim. Go back a few posts and see for yourself. It was quite humiliating.

You are so hilarious. It is you that is constantly humiliated. Let's do it again. There is one and only one statement from the British to the UN that invalidates all the bullshit you have been spewing. Reported ion January 21 1948, months before the neighboring states intervened in an attempt to save the Christians and Muslims from the Jewish onslaught. Anything else is superfluous.

"(c) The representative of the Mandatory Power informed the Commission at its sixteenth meeting on 21 January 1948, that

• • 
    
    
    “in the present circumstances the Jewish story that the Arabs are the attackers and the Jews the attacked is not tenable. The Arabs are determined to show that they will not submit tamely to the United Nations Plan of Partition; while the Jews are trying to consolidate the advantages gained at the General Assembly by a succession of drastic operations designed to intimidate and cure the Arabs of any desire for further conflict."
    
    A AC.21 7 of 29 January 1948

 

[Roudy]

Of course, the official documents are irrelevant when they disprove your bullshit.

(c) The representative of the Mandatory Power informed the Commission at its sixteenth meeting on 21 January 1948, that

• • 
    
    
    “in the present circumstances the Jewish story that the Arabs are the attackers and the Jews the attacked is not tenable. The Arabs are determined to show that they will not submit tamely to the United Nations Plan of Partition; while the Jews are trying to consolidate the advantages gained at the General Assembly by a succession of drastic operations designed to intimidate and cure the Arabs of any desire for further conflict."
    
    A AC.21 7 of 29 January 1948

Another manipulated propaganda piece by the islamocatholic Nazi Jew hater. It actually says this


7. Consultations with the Representative of the Mandatory Power
(a) Sir Alexander Cadogan, the representative designated by the Mandatory Power, has appeared before the commission at its sixth and sixteenth meetings on 14 and 21 January 1948, respectively.

(b) In his review of the present situation in Palestine, on 14 January 1948, Sir Alexander stated that the Arabs had made it clear that “they proposed to resist with all the forces at their disposal the implementation of the partition plane. Moreover, since the first week in December the situation in Palestine had deteriorated rapidly. Violence conflict between the two communities had been intensified, courts and essential government services had been either unable to operate or were seriously crippled; there was but one month’s supply of certain types of fuel oil in the country; there was general insecurity; communications were obstructed; the collection of public revenue was expected to drop sharply. Sir Alexander described the situation as one in which generally speaking, there has been a very severe diminution in the functions and authority of Civil Government, and in view of recent developments, it would be optimistic to hope for any improvement in the future.


(c) The representative of the Mandatory Power informed the Commission at its sixteenth meeting on 21 January 1948, that

• • 
    
    
    “in the present circumstances the Jewish story that the Arabs are the attackers and the Jews the attacked is not tenable. The Arabs are determined to show that they will not submit tamely to the United Nations Plan of Partition; while the Jews are trying to consolidate the advantages gained at the General Assembly by a succession of drastic operations designed to intimidate and cure the Arabs of any desire for further conflict. Elements on each side are thus engaged in attacking or in taking reprisals indistinguishable from attacks…The Government of Palestine fear that strife in Palestine will be greatly intensified when the Mandate is terminated, and that the international status of the United Nations Commission will mean little or nothing to the Arabs in Palestine, to whom the killing of Jews now transcends all other considerations. Thus, the Commission will be faced with the problem of how to avert certain bloodshed on a very much wider scale than prevails at present.”
  (d) Mr. Fletcher-Cooke of the United Kingdom delegation elaborated on the above by further informing the commission that:
  • • 
      “The view held by the Government of Palestine is that the arrival of the Commission will be the signal for widespread attacks by the Arabs both on the Jews and on the members of Commission itself. In addition, some 62 per cent of the present Government staff in Palestine are Arabs, and there is reason to believe that none of these will be willing or able to serve the commission. The Arabs have made it quite clear and have told the Palestine government that the do not propose to co-operate or to assist the Commission, and that, far from it, they propose to attack and impede its work in every possible way. We have no reason to suppose that they do not mean what they say.”
    • 
      SO we can see that the blame lies with the arabs who are just aggressive greedy violent scum who where attacking the Jews and British from 1947

Have you noticed, every time Monte pits up supposedly "official document" to prove his point, the document actually demolishes his claim? In this case it it even explains how some Palestinians cleared as instructed by the Arab armies, while some actually joined the Arab armies in the attack! Ha ha ha. OMG.

Really? care to cite an example where his claims are "demolished"?

Keep up will ya? I already did that, I included the parts of the paragraph and other relevant text that Monte the fraudster had conviently omitted, which demolished his claim. Go back a few posts and see for yourself. It was quite humiliating.

You are so hilarious. It is you that is constantly humiliated. Let's do it again. There is one and only one statement from the British to the UN that invalidates all the bullshit you have been spewing. Reported ion January 21 1948, months before the neighboring states intervened in an attempt to save the Christians and Muslims from the Jewish onslaught. Anything else is superfluous.

"(c) The representative of the Mandatory Power informed the Commission at its sixteenth meeting on 21 January 1948, that

• • 
    
    
    “in the present circumstances the Jewish story that the Arabs are the attackers and the Jews the attacked is not tenable. The Arabs are determined to show that they will not submit tamely to the United Nations Plan of Partition; while the Jews are trying to consolidate the advantages gained at the General Assembly by a succession of drastic operations designed to intimidate and cure the Arabs of any desire for further conflict."
    
    A AC.21 7 of 29 January 1948

You of course are a shameless Nazi dirtbag who can't own up to who you are, so I have to keep bitchslapping you.

A AC.21 7 of 29 January 1948

• 
  “in the present circumstances the Jewish story that the Arabs are the attackers and the Jews the attacked is not tenable. The Arabs are determined to show that they will not submit tamely to the United Nations Plan of Partition; while the Jews are trying to consolidate the advantages gained at the General Assembly by a succession of drastic operations designed to intimidate and cure the Arabs of any desire for further conflict. Elements on each side are thus engaged in attacking or in taking reprisals indistinguishable from attacks…The Government of Palestine fear that strife in Palestine will be greatly intensified when the Mandate is terminated, and that the international status of the United Nations Commission will mean little or nothing to the Arabs in Palestine, to whom the killing of Jews now transcends all other considerations. Thus, the Commission will be faced with the problem of how to avert certain bloodshed on a very much wider scale than prevails at present.”

(d) Mr. Fletcher-Cooke of the United Kingdom delegation elaborated on the above by further informing the commission that:

• • 
    “The view held by the Government of Palestine is that the arrival of the Commission will be the signal for widespread attacks by the Arabs both on the Jews and on the members of Commission itself. In addition, some 62 per cent of the present Government staff in Palestine are Arabs, and there is reason to believe that none of these will be willing or able to serve the commission. The Arabs have made it quite clear and have told the Palestine government that the do not propose to co-operate or to assist the Commission, and that, far from it, they propose to attack and impede its work in every possible way. We have no reason to suppose that they do not mean what they say.”
• 

 

[montelatici]

What point are you trying to make with the red highlights? The only point is that the Jews were attacking the Arabs in January of 1948. That the Arabs wanted to return the favor is not unusual. Let's try it again. The only important point is that your lies about the Arabs attacking the peaceful Jews are lies, as the British reported. The Jews were the attackers in January of 1948. Months before any intervention by the neighboring states.

"
'(c) The representative of the Mandatory Power informed the Commission at its sixteenth meeting on 21 January 1948, that

• • 
    
    
    “in the present circumstances the Jewish story that the Arabs are the attackers and the Jews the attacked is not tenable. The Arabs are determined to show that they will not submit tamely to the United Nations Plan of Partition; while the Jews are trying to consolidate the advantages gained at the General Assembly by a succession of drastic operations designed to intimidate and cure the Arabs of any desire for further conflict.

A AC.21 7 of 29 January 1948

 

[Roudy]

What point are you trying to make with the red highlights? The only point is that the Jews were attacking the Arabs in January of 1948. That the Arabs wanted to return the favor is not unusual. Let's try it again. The only important point is that your lies about the Arabs attacking the peaceful Jews are lies, as the British reported. The Jews were the attackers in January of 1948. Months before any intervention by the neighboring states.

"
'(c) The representative of the Mandatory Power informed the Commission at its sixteenth meeting on 21 January 1948, that

• • 
    
    
    “in the present circumstances the Jewish story that the Arabs are the attackers and the Jews the attacked is not tenable. The Arabs are determined to show that they will not submit tamely to the United Nations Plan of Partition; while the Jews are trying to consolidate the advantages gained at the General Assembly by a succession of drastic operations designed to intimidate and cure the Arabs of any desire for further conflict.

A AC.21 7 of 29 January 1948

The point you were avoiding by omitting the text. It was the Arabs that attacked the Jews.

You must enjoy being humiliated and exposed as a shameless liar.

 

[Phoenall]

No, the women and children were evacuated for their safety, yeah, because the Arabs had told them to, and NOWHERE DOES IT ACCUSE THE JEWS OF MAKING THEM EVACUATE as stated in the British reports to the UN. Misrepresenting and mutilating a document again, that's not what it says, retard.

The Arabs in Haifa stopped shooting and after the truce, the Jews evicted them. Yeah, where does it say "Jews evicted them" ya lying asshole? But at least the document admits that the Palestinians had joined their Arab brethern in attacking the Jews, DUFUS. Haifa was attacked by the Jews in January 1948. BULL. AGAIN, THAT'S NOT WHAT THE DOCUMENT SAYS. The neighboring countries intervened in May 1948. MORE "MONTE CONCLUSIONS" brought to you by an antisemitic lying asshole.

You need to consult the timeline before making stupid illogical comments. Tell your handlers at the Hasbara, their lame response did not work.

YOU NEED TO STOP POSTING IRRELEVANT DOCUMENTS AND THEN ADDING YOUR OWN LIES AND COMMENTARY TO IT.

Of course, the official documents are irrelevant when they disprove your bullshit.

(c) The representative of the Mandatory Power informed the Commission at its sixteenth meeting on 21 January 1948, that

• • 
    
    
    “in the present circumstances the Jewish story that the Arabs are the attackers and the Jews the attacked is not tenable. The Arabs are determined to show that they will not submit tamely to the United Nations Plan of Partition; while the Jews are trying to consolidate the advantages gained at the General Assembly by a succession of drastic operations designed to intimidate and cure the Arabs of any desire for further conflict."
    
    A AC.21 7 of 29 January 1948

Another manipulated propaganda piece by the islamocatholic Nazi Jew hater. It actually says this


7. Consultations with the Representative of the Mandatory Power
(a) Sir Alexander Cadogan, the representative designated by the Mandatory Power, has appeared before the commission at its sixth and sixteenth meetings on 14 and 21 January 1948, respectively.

(b) In his review of the present situation in Palestine, on 14 January 1948, Sir Alexander stated that the Arabs had made it clear that “they proposed to resist with all the forces at their disposal the implementation of the partition plane. Moreover, since the first week in December the situation in Palestine had deteriorated rapidly. Violence conflict between the two communities had been intensified, courts and essential government services had been either unable to operate or were seriously crippled; there was but one month’s supply of certain types of fuel oil in the country; there was general insecurity; communications were obstructed; the collection of public revenue was expected to drop sharply. Sir Alexander described the situation as one in which generally speaking, there has been a very severe diminution in the functions and authority of Civil Government, and in view of recent developments, it would be optimistic to hope for any improvement in the future.


(c) The representative of the Mandatory Power informed the Commission at its sixteenth meeting on 21 January 1948, that

• • 
    
    
    “in the present circumstances the Jewish story that the Arabs are the attackers and the Jews the attacked is not tenable. The Arabs are determined to show that they will not submit tamely to the United Nations Plan of Partition; while the Jews are trying to consolidate the advantages gained at the General Assembly by a succession of drastic operations designed to intimidate and cure the Arabs of any desire for further conflict. Elements on each side are thus engaged in attacking or in taking reprisals indistinguishable from attacks…The Government of Palestine fear that strife in Palestine will be greatly intensified when the Mandate is terminated, and that the international status of the United Nations Commission will mean little or nothing to the Arabs in Palestine, to whom the killing of Jews now transcends all other considerations. Thus, the Commission will be faced with the problem of how to avert certain bloodshed on a very much wider scale than prevails at present.”
  (d) Mr. Fletcher-Cooke of the United Kingdom delegation elaborated on the above by further informing the commission that:
  • • 
      “The view held by the Government of Palestine is that the arrival of the Commission will be the signal for widespread attacks by the Arabs both on the Jews and on the members of Commission itself. In addition, some 62 per cent of the present Government staff in Palestine are Arabs, and there is reason to believe that none of these will be willing or able to serve the commission. The Arabs have made it quite clear and have told the Palestine government that the do not propose to co-operate or to assist the Commission, and that, far from it, they propose to attack and impede its work in every possible way. We have no reason to suppose that they do not mean what they say.”
    • 
      SO we can see that the blame lies with the arabs who are just aggressive greedy violent scum who where attacking the Jews and British from 1947

Have you noticed, every time Monte pits up supposedly "official document" to prove his point, the document actually demolishes his claim? In this case it it even explains how some Palestinians cleared as instructed by the Arab armies, while some actually joined the Arab armies in the attack! Ha ha ha. OMG.

Really? care to cite an example where his claims are "demolished"?

Read above for just one example of his claims are not what his link says

 

[montelatici]

Where does it say anything about Arabs attacking Jews in the present, it says the Arabs will attack the Jews in the future, which is reasonable, given the Jew onslaught.

What the British are saying about the present is that:

". the Jews are trying to consolidate the advantages gained at the General Assembly by a succession of drastic operations designed to intimidate and cure the Arabs."

A AC.21 7 of 29 January 1948

 

[Phoenall]

No, the women and children were evacuated for their safety, yeah, because the Arabs had told them to, and NOWHERE DOES IT ACCUSE THE JEWS OF MAKING THEM EVACUATE as stated in the British reports to the UN. Misrepresenting and mutilating a document again, that's not what it says, retard.

The Arabs in Haifa stopped shooting and after the truce, the Jews evicted them. Yeah, where does it say "Jews evicted them" ya lying asshole? But at least the document admits that the Palestinians had joined their Arab brethern in attacking the Jews, DUFUS. Haifa was attacked by the Jews in January 1948. BULL. AGAIN, THAT'S NOT WHAT THE DOCUMENT SAYS. The neighboring countries intervened in May 1948. MORE "MONTE CONCLUSIONS" brought to you by an antisemitic lying asshole.

You need to consult the timeline before making stupid illogical comments. Tell your handlers at the Hasbara, their lame response did not work.

YOU NEED TO STOP POSTING IRRELEVANT DOCUMENTS AND THEN ADDING YOUR OWN LIES AND COMMENTARY TO IT.

Of course, the official documents are irrelevant when they disprove your bullshit.

(c) The representative of the Mandatory Power informed the Commission at its sixteenth meeting on 21 January 1948, that

• • 
    
    
    “in the present circumstances the Jewish story that the Arabs are the attackers and the Jews the attacked is not tenable. The Arabs are determined to show that they will not submit tamely to the United Nations Plan of Partition; while the Jews are trying to consolidate the advantages gained at the General Assembly by a succession of drastic operations designed to intimidate and cure the Arabs of any desire for further conflict."
    
    A AC.21 7 of 29 January 1948

Another manipulated propaganda piece by the islamocatholic Nazi Jew hater. It actually says this


7. Consultations with the Representative of the Mandatory Power
(a) Sir Alexander Cadogan, the representative designated by the Mandatory Power, has appeared before the commission at its sixth and sixteenth meetings on 14 and 21 January 1948, respectively.

(b) In his review of the present situation in Palestine, on 14 January 1948, Sir Alexander stated that the Arabs had made it clear that “they proposed to resist with all the forces at their disposal the implementation of the partition plane. Moreover, since the first week in December the situation in Palestine had deteriorated rapidly. Violence conflict between the two communities had been intensified, courts and essential government services had been either unable to operate or were seriously crippled; there was but one month’s supply of certain types of fuel oil in the country; there was general insecurity; communications were obstructed; the collection of public revenue was expected to drop sharply. Sir Alexander described the situation as one in which generally speaking, there has been a very severe diminution in the functions and authority of Civil Government, and in view of recent developments, it would be optimistic to hope for any improvement in the future.


(c) The representative of the Mandatory Power informed the Commission at its sixteenth meeting on 21 January 1948, that

• • 
    
    
    “in the present circumstances the Jewish story that the Arabs are the attackers and the Jews the attacked is not tenable. The Arabs are determined to show that they will not submit tamely to the United Nations Plan of Partition; while the Jews are trying to consolidate the advantages gained at the General Assembly by a succession of drastic operations designed to intimidate and cure the Arabs of any desire for further conflict. Elements on each side are thus engaged in attacking or in taking reprisals indistinguishable from attacks…The Government of Palestine fear that strife in Palestine will be greatly intensified when the Mandate is terminated, and that the international status of the United Nations Commission will mean little or nothing to the Arabs in Palestine, to whom the killing of Jews now transcends all other considerations. Thus, the Commission will be faced with the problem of how to avert certain bloodshed on a very much wider scale than prevails at present.”
  (d) Mr. Fletcher-Cooke of the United Kingdom delegation elaborated on the above by further informing the commission that:
  • • 
      “The view held by the Government of Palestine is that the arrival of the Commission will be the signal for widespread attacks by the Arabs both on the Jews and on the members of Commission itself. In addition, some 62 per cent of the present Government staff in Palestine are Arabs, and there is reason to believe that none of these will be willing or able to serve the commission. The Arabs have made it quite clear and have told the Palestine government that the do not propose to co-operate or to assist the Commission, and that, far from it, they propose to attack and impede its work in every possible way. We have no reason to suppose that they do not mean what they say.”
    • 
      SO we can see that the blame lies with the arabs who are just aggressive greedy violent scum who where attacking the Jews and British from 1947

Have you noticed, every time Monte puts up (mutilates) a supposedly "official document" to prove his point, once you delve into it, the document actually demolishes his claim? In this case Monte's document even explains how some Palestinians cleared out as instructed by the Arab armies, while some actually joined the Arab armies in the attack! Ha ha ha. OMG.

Thanks Monte! Keep it up.

OMG now he deleted claiming that I didn't use his document.

Does it get any better, folks? The worm keeps squirming!

Nothing was deleted, you are becoming desperate Ruddy. Get a grip, punk.

STOP LYING

Yeah, he claimed that I wasn't quoting the document he used, but then quickly deleted his text to save himself further humiliation.

Try to show anywhere where I claimed you weren't using the document I used, you clown. You get shown for the fool you are and you claim victory. Yet you lose every time you post the propaganda you get from your Hasbara handlers. Changing the font color to red does not make lies any truer.

The irrefutable part of the British dispatch of January 21, 1948 that counters any and all the Zionist claims is this below. Remembering that any attempt to intervene and stop the Jewish attacks by the neighboring states did not occur until May 1948. Full stop.


"(c) The representative of the Mandatory Power informed the Commission at its sixteenth meeting on 21 January 1948, that

• • 
    
    
    “in the present circumstances the Jewish story that the Arabs are the attackers and the Jews the attacked is not tenable. The Arabs are determined to show that they will not submit tamely to the United Nations Plan of Partition; while the Jews are trying to consolidate the advantages gained at the General Assembly by a succession of drastic operations designed to intimidate and cure the Arabs of any desire for further conflict."

More manipulation to twist the meaning and context to suit your islamocatholic Nazi agenda

 

[Phoenall]

Of course, the official documents are irrelevant when they disprove your bullshit.

(c) The representative of the Mandatory Power informed the Commission at its sixteenth meeting on 21 January 1948, that

• • 
    
    
    “in the present circumstances the Jewish story that the Arabs are the attackers and the Jews the attacked is not tenable. The Arabs are determined to show that they will not submit tamely to the United Nations Plan of Partition; while the Jews are trying to consolidate the advantages gained at the General Assembly by a succession of drastic operations designed to intimidate and cure the Arabs of any desire for further conflict."
    
    A AC.21 7 of 29 January 1948

Another manipulated propaganda piece by the islamocatholic Nazi Jew hater. It actually says this


7. Consultations with the Representative of the Mandatory Power
(a) Sir Alexander Cadogan, the representative designated by the Mandatory Power, has appeared before the commission at its sixth and sixteenth meetings on 14 and 21 January 1948, respectively.

(b) In his review of the present situation in Palestine, on 14 January 1948, Sir Alexander stated that the Arabs had made it clear that “they proposed to resist with all the forces at their disposal the implementation of the partition plane. Moreover, since the first week in December the situation in Palestine had deteriorated rapidly. Violence conflict between the two communities had been intensified, courts and essential government services had been either unable to operate or were seriously crippled; there was but one month’s supply of certain types of fuel oil in the country; there was general insecurity; communications were obstructed; the collection of public revenue was expected to drop sharply. Sir Alexander described the situation as one in which generally speaking, there has been a very severe diminution in the functions and authority of Civil Government, and in view of recent developments, it would be optimistic to hope for any improvement in the future.


(c) The representative of the Mandatory Power informed the Commission at its sixteenth meeting on 21 January 1948, that

• • 
    
    
    “in the present circumstances the Jewish story that the Arabs are the attackers and the Jews the attacked is not tenable. The Arabs are determined to show that they will not submit tamely to the United Nations Plan of Partition; while the Jews are trying to consolidate the advantages gained at the General Assembly by a succession of drastic operations designed to intimidate and cure the Arabs of any desire for further conflict. Elements on each side are thus engaged in attacking or in taking reprisals indistinguishable from attacks…The Government of Palestine fear that strife in Palestine will be greatly intensified when the Mandate is terminated, and that the international status of the United Nations Commission will mean little or nothing to the Arabs in Palestine, to whom the killing of Jews now transcends all other considerations. Thus, the Commission will be faced with the problem of how to avert certain bloodshed on a very much wider scale than prevails at present.”
  (d) Mr. Fletcher-Cooke of the United Kingdom delegation elaborated on the above by further informing the commission that:
  • • 
      “The view held by the Government of Palestine is that the arrival of the Commission will be the signal for widespread attacks by the Arabs both on the Jews and on the members of Commission itself. In addition, some 62 per cent of the present Government staff in Palestine are Arabs, and there is reason to believe that none of these will be willing or able to serve the commission. The Arabs have made it quite clear and have told the Palestine government that the do not propose to co-operate or to assist the Commission, and that, far from it, they propose to attack and impede its work in every possible way. We have no reason to suppose that they do not mean what they say.”
    • 
      SO we can see that the blame lies with the arabs who are just aggressive greedy violent scum who where attacking the Jews and British from 1947

Have you noticed, every time Monte pits up supposedly "official document" to prove his point, the document actually demolishes his claim? In this case it it even explains how some Palestinians cleared as instructed by the Arab armies, while some actually joined the Arab armies in the attack! Ha ha ha. OMG.

Really? care to cite an example where his claims are "demolished"?

Keep up will ya? I already did that, I included the parts of the paragraph and other relevant text that Monte the fraudster had conviently omitted, which demolished his claim. Go back a few posts and see for yourself. It was quite humiliating.

You are so hilarious. It is you that is constantly humiliated. Let's do it again. There is one and only one statement from the British to the UN that invalidates all the bullshit you have been spewing. Reported ion January 21 1948, months before the neighboring states intervened in an attempt to save the Christians and Muslims from the Jewish onslaught. Anything else is superfluous.

"(c) The representative of the Mandatory Power informed the Commission at its sixteenth meeting on 21 January 1948, that

• • 
    
    
    “in the present circumstances the Jewish story that the Arabs are the attackers and the Jews the attacked is not tenable. The Arabs are determined to show that they will not submit tamely to the United Nations Plan of Partition; while the Jews are trying to consolidate the advantages gained at the General Assembly by a succession of drastic operations designed to intimidate and cure the Arabs of any desire for further conflict."
    
    A AC.21 7 of 29 January 1948

Now for the non manipulated and unabridged version in full and proper context


7. Consultations with the Representative of the Mandatory Power
(a) Sir Alexander Cadogan, the representative designated by the Mandatory Power, has appeared before the commission at its sixth and sixteenth meetings on 14 and 21 January 1948, respectively.

(b) In his review of the present situation in Palestine, on 14 January 1948, Sir Alexander stated that the Arabs had made it clear that “they proposed to resist with all the forces at their disposal the implementation of the partition plane. Moreover, since the first week in December the situation in Palestine had deteriorated rapidly. Violence conflict between the two communities had been intensified, courts and essential government services had been either unable to operate or were seriously crippled; there was but one month’s supply of certain types of fuel oil in the country; there was general insecurity; communications were obstructed; the collection of public revenue was expected to drop sharply. Sir Alexander described the situation as one in which generally speaking, there has been a very severe diminution in the functions and authority of Civil Government, and in view of recent developments, it would be optimistic to hope for any improvement in the future.


(c) The representative of the Mandatory Power informed the Commission at its sixteenth meeting on 21 January 1948, that

• • 
    
    
    “in the present circumstances the Jewish story that the Arabs are the attackers and the Jews the attacked is not tenable. The Arabs are determined to show that they will not submit tamely to the United Nations Plan of Partition; while the Jews are trying to consolidate the advantages gained at the General Assembly by a succession of drastic operations designed to intimidate and cure the Arabs of any desire for further conflict. Elements on each side are thus engaged in attacking or in taking reprisals indistinguishable from attacks…The Government of Palestine fear that strife in Palestine will be greatly intensified when the Mandate is terminated, and that the international status of the United Nations Commission will mean little or nothing to the Arabs in Palestine, to whom the killing of Jews now transcends all other considerations. Thus, the Commission will be faced with the problem of how to avert certain bloodshed on a very much wider scale than prevails at present.”
  (d) Mr. Fletcher-Cooke of the United Kingdom delegation elaborated on the above by further informing the commission that:
  • • 
      “The view held by the Government of Palestine is that the arrival of the Commission will be the signal for widespread attacks by the Arabs both on the Jews and on the members of Commission itself. In addition, some 62 per cent of the present Government staff in Palestine are Arabs, and there is reason to believe that none of these will be willing or able to serve the commission. The Arabs have made it quite clear and have told the Palestine government that the do not propose to co-operate or to assist the Commission, and that, far from it, they propose to attack and impede its work in every possible way. We have no reason to suppose that they do not mean what they say.”
    • 
      Changes the whole meaning showing that you are a LIAR

 

[Phoenall]

Where does it say anything about Arabs attacking Jews in the present, it says the Arabs will attack the Jews in the future, which is reasonable, given the Jew onslaught.

What the British are saying about the present is that:

". the Jews are trying to consolidate the advantages gained at the General Assembly by a succession of drastic operations designed to intimidate and cure the Arabs."

A AC.21 7 of 29 January 1948

MANIPULATED TO SUIT YOUR NAZI JEW HATRED

 

[Roudy]

Where does it say anything about Arabs attacking Jews in the present, it says the Arabs will attack the Jews in the future, which is reasonable, given the Jew onslaught.

What the British are saying about the present is that:

". the Jews are trying to consolidate the advantages gained at the General Assembly by a succession of drastic operations designed to intimidate and cure the Arabs."

A AC.21 7 of 29 January 1948

Your document mutilation failed, now crawl back under the rock you came from.

 

[Challenger]

Well if Rudee-ee wants to cherry pick to support his views, must be alright for the rest of us, how about...

"..the international status of the United Nations Commission will mean little or nothing to the Arabs in Palestine, to whom the killing of Jews now transcends all other considerations. "

because

"“in the present circumstances the Jewish story that the Arabs are the attackers and the Jews the attacked is not tenable."

which means the Arabs are now keen to kill Jews because the Jews attacked them first and the U.N. knows it.

Oh, forgot the obligatory .giff

There, better..

 

[montelatici]

Where does it say anything about Arabs attacking Jews in the present, it says the Arabs will attack the Jews in the future, which is reasonable, given the Jew onslaught.

What the British are saying about the present is that:

". the Jews are trying to consolidate the advantages gained at the General Assembly by a succession of drastic operations designed to intimidate and cure the Arabs."

A AC.21 7 of 29 January 1948

Your document mutilation failed, now crawl back under the rock you came from.

No, what failed is your reading comprehension you idiot. You've made a fool of yourself again as usual.

Let's repeat.

What the British said in January of 1948 was.

". the Jews are trying to consolidate the advantages gained at the General Assembly by a succession of drastic operations designed to intimidate and cure the Arabs."

A AC.21 7 of 29 January 1948

 

[Roudy]

So why didn't you post the rest of the document, you lying asshole, which proves that it was the Arabs who had initiated the attacks, and were attempting to commit genocide on the Jews. Your claim that the Jews "evicted" the Arabs is bogus.

A AC.21 7 of 29 January 1948

• 
  Elements on each side are thus engaged in attacking or in taking reprisals indistinguishable from attacks…The Government of Palestine fear that strife in Palestine will be greatly intensified when the Mandate is terminated, and that the international status of the United Nations Commission will mean little or nothing to the Arabs in Palestine, to whom the killing of Jews now transcends all other considerations. Thus, the Commission will be faced with the problem of how to avert certain bloodshed on a very much wider scale than prevails at present.”

(d) Mr. Fletcher-Cooke of the United Kingdom delegation elaborated on the above by further informing the commission that:

• 
  “The view held by the Government of Palestine is that the arrival of the Commission will be the signal for widespread attacks by the Arabs both on the Jews and on the members of Commission itself. In addition, some 62 per cent of the present Government staff in Palestine are Arabs, and there is reason to believe that none of these will be willing or able to serve the commission. The Arabs have made it quite clear and have told the Palestine government that the do not propose to co-operate or to assist the Commission, and that, far from it, they propose to attack and impede its work in every possible way. We have no reason to suppose that they do not mean what they say.”

 

[Roudy]

Well if Rudee-ee wants to cherry pick to support his views, must be alright for the rest of us, how about...

"..the international status of the United Nations Commission will mean little or nothing to the Arabs in Palestine, to whom the killing of Jews now transcends all other considerations. "

because

"“in the present circumstances the Jewish story that the Arabs are the attackers and the Jews the attacked is not tenable."

which means the Arabs are now keen to kill Jews because the Jews attacked them first and the U.N. knows it.

Oh, forgot the obligatory .giff

There, better..

Wrong again:

Elements on each side are thus engaged in attacking or in taking reprisals indistinguishable from attacks.

 

[Roudy]

You guys have no leg to stand on, here is the truth:

“The Arab armies entered Palestine to protect the Palestinians from the Zionist tyranny but, instead, they abandoned them, forced them to emigrate and to leave their homeland, and threw them into prisons similar to the ghettos in which the Jews used to live.”

— Palestinian Authority (then) Prime Minister Mahmoud Abbas (Abu Mazen) (Falastin a-Thaura, (March 1976)


Arabs Urged to Flee from Palestine in 1948:

"It must not be forgotten that the Arab Higher Committee encouraged the refugees' flight from their homes in Jaffa, Haifa, and Jerusalem."
-- Near East Arabic Broadcasting Station, Cyprus, April 3, 1949

"Every effort is being made by the Jews to persuade the Arab populace to stay and carry on with their normal lives, to get their shops and businesses open and to be assured that their lives and interests will be safe."
-- Haifa District HQ of the British Police, April 26, 1948, (quoted in Battleground by Samuel Katz).


"The Arabs of Haifa fled in spite of the fact that the Jewish authorities guaranteed their safety and rights as citizens of Israel."
-- Monsignor George Hakim, Greek Catholic Bishop of Galilee, New York Herald Tribune, June 30, 1949

Sir John Troutbeck, British Middle East Office in Cairo, noted in cables to superiors (1948-49) that the refugees (in Gaza) have no bitterness against Jews, but harbor intense hatred toward Egyptians: "They say 'we know who our enemies are (referring to the Egyptians)', declaring that their Arab brethren persuaded them unnecessarily to leave their homes…I even heard it said that many of the refugees would give a welcome to the Israelis if they were to come in and take the district over."

 

[montelatici]

Let's go over it again. What does "present circumstances mean" mean in English Ruddy? Do you understand the difference between the present and future tenses.


"(c) The representative of the Mandatory Power informed the Commission at its sixteenth meeting on 21 January 1948, that

• • 
    
    
    “in the present circumstances the Jewish story that the Arabs are the attackers and the Jews the attacked is not tenable. "
    
    A AC.21 7 of 29 January 1948

 

[montelatici]

You guys have no leg to stand on, here is the truth:

“The Arab armies entered Palestine to protect the Palestinians from the Zionist tyranny but, instead, they abandoned them, forced them to emigrate and to leave their homeland, and threw them into prisons similar to the ghettos in which the Jews used to live.”

— Palestinian Authority (then) Prime Minister Mahmoud Abbas (Abu Mazen) (Falastin a-Thaura, (March 1976)


Arabs Urged to Flee from Palestine in 1948:

"It must not be forgotten that the Arab Higher Committee encouraged the refugees' flight from their homes in Jaffa, Haifa, and Jerusalem."
-- Near East Arabic Broadcasting Station, Cyprus, April 3, 1949

"Every effort is being made by the Jews to persuade the Arab populace to stay and carry on with their normal lives, to get their shops and businesses open and to be assured that their lives and interests will be safe."
-- Haifa District HQ of the British Police, April 26, 1948, (quoted in Battleground by Samuel Katz).


"The Arabs of Haifa fled in spite of the fact that the Jewish authorities guaranteed their safety and rights as citizens of Israel."
-- Monsignor George Hakim, Greek Catholic Bishop of Galilee, New York Herald Tribune, June 30, 1949

Sir John Troutbeck, British Middle East Office in Cairo, noted in cables to superiors (1948-49) that the refugees (in Gaza) have no bitterness against Jews, but harbor intense hatred toward Egyptians: "They say 'we know who our enemies are (referring to the Egyptians)', declaring that their Arab brethren persuaded them unnecessarily to leave their homes…I even heard it said that many of the refugees would give a welcome to the Israelis if they were to come in and take the district over."

You mean fabricated quotes from Zionist websites are a leg to stand on?

 

[Roudy]

yes, because the Jews were fighting back, DOY! Some Palestinian animals joined the Arab armies in trying to kill the Jews. They got what they deserved. This situation is a far cry from your claim that "Jews were evicting the Palestinians". You just shot yourself in the foot, numbnuts. Ha ha ha.

 

[Roudy]

You guys have no leg to stand on, here is the truth:

“The Arab armies entered Palestine to protect the Palestinians from the Zionist tyranny but, instead, they abandoned them, forced them to emigrate and to leave their homeland, and threw them into prisons similar to the ghettos in which the Jews used to live.”

— Palestinian Authority (then) Prime Minister Mahmoud Abbas (Abu Mazen) (Falastin a-Thaura, (March 1976)


Arabs Urged to Flee from Palestine in 1948:

"It must not be forgotten that the Arab Higher Committee encouraged the refugees' flight from their homes in Jaffa, Haifa, and Jerusalem."
-- Near East Arabic Broadcasting Station, Cyprus, April 3, 1949

"Every effort is being made by the Jews to persuade the Arab populace to stay and carry on with their normal lives, to get their shops and businesses open and to be assured that their lives and interests will be safe."
-- Haifa District HQ of the British Police, April 26, 1948, (quoted in Battleground by Samuel Katz).


"The Arabs of Haifa fled in spite of the fact that the Jewish authorities guaranteed their safety and rights as citizens of Israel."
-- Monsignor George Hakim, Greek Catholic Bishop of Galilee, New York Herald Tribune, June 30, 1949

Sir John Troutbeck, British Middle East Office in Cairo, noted in cables to superiors (1948-49) that the refugees (in Gaza) have no bitterness against Jews, but harbor intense hatred toward Egyptians: "They say 'we know who our enemies are (referring to the Egyptians)', declaring that their Arab brethren persuaded them unnecessarily to leave their homes…I even heard it said that many of the refugees would give a welcome to the Israelis if they were to come in and take the district over."

You mean fabricated quotes from Zionist websites are a leg to stand on?

No I mean actual quotes used by historians, which blows a hole in your bogus claim, fraudster.

Eric Sundquist

Andrew W. Mellon Professor of the Humanities

Department Chair


Johns Hopkins University

26 Gilman Hall

3400 N. Charles Street

Baltimore, MD 21218


Phone: (410) 516-1103

Email: [email protected]


Eric J. Sundquist teaches courses in American literature and culture, with special interests in African American literature, Jewish American literature, and the literature of the Holocaust. Before returning to Johns Hopkins, where he received his Ph.D. in 1978, he taught at Berkeley, Vanderbilt, UCLA, and Northwestern, where he was also Dean of the College of Arts and Sciences.


Professor Sundquist’s books include King’s Dream (2009); Strangers in the Land: Blacks, Jews, Post-Holocaust America (2005), which received the Weinberg Judaic Studies Institute Book Award; To Wake the Nations: Race in the Making of American Literature (1992), which received the Christian Gauss Award from Phi Beta Kappa and the James Russell Lowell Award from the Modern Language Association; The Hammers of Creation: Folk Culture in Modern African American Literature (1993); Faulkner: The House Divided (1985); and Home as Found: Authority and Genealogy in Nineteenth-Century American Literature (1979), which received the Gustave Arlt Award from the Council of Graduate Schools in the United States. He has edited essay collections devoted to Mark Twain, Ralph Ellison, Harriet Beecher Stowe, and W. E. B. Du Bois, and contributed to the Cambridge History of American Literature (reprinted as Empire and Slavery in American Literature, 1820-1865). He is a member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, and in 2007 was named a recipient of a Distinguished Achievement Award from the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation.

 

[Phoenall]

Let's go over it again. What does "present circumstances mean" mean in English Ruddy? Do you understand the difference between the present and future tenses.


"(c) The representative of the Mandatory Power informed the Commission at its sixteenth meeting on 21 January 1948, that

• • 
    
    
    “in the present circumstances the Jewish story that the Arabs are the attackers and the Jews the attacked is not tenable. "
    
    A AC.21 7 of 29 January 1948

In this context nothing as the operative words are missing, so producing the full paragraph shows this


(c) The representative of the Mandatory Power informed the Commission at its sixteenth meeting on 21 January 1948, that

• • 
    
    
    “in the present circumstances the Jewish story that the Arabs are the attackers and the Jews the attacked is not tenable. The Arabs are determined to show that they will not submit tamely to the United Nations Plan of Partition; while the Jews are trying to consolidate the advantages gained at the General Assembly by a succession of drastic operations designed to intimidate and cure the Arabs of any desire for further conflict. Elements on each side are thus engaged in attacking or in taking reprisals indistinguishable from attacks…The Government of Palestine fear that strife in Palestine will be greatly intensified when the Mandate is terminated, and that the international status of the United Nations Commission will mean little or nothing to the Arabs in Palestine, to whom the killing of Jews now transcends all other considerations. Thus, the Commission will be faced with the problem of how to avert certain bloodshed on a very much wider scale than prevails at present.”
  • 
    Then we see that both sides are attacking each other as far back as January of 1948, and that the arabs where intent on wholesale slaughter at that time. And that the representative could only see an escalation of the arab violence towards the Jews. It speaks of past as well as current actions and that is what is meant by " present circumstances "