In 1948, Arabs threatened Palestinians with violence if they didn't leave Israel before the attack

[montelatici]

You guys have no leg to stand on, here is the truth:

“The Arab armies entered Palestine to protect the Palestinians from the Zionist tyranny but, instead, they abandoned them, forced them to emigrate and to leave their homeland, and threw them into prisons similar to the ghettos in which the Jews used to live.”

— Palestinian Authority (then) Prime Minister Mahmoud Abbas (Abu Mazen) (Falastin a-Thaura, (March 1976)


Arabs Urged to Flee from Palestine in 1948:

"It must not be forgotten that the Arab Higher Committee encouraged the refugees' flight from their homes in Jaffa, Haifa, and Jerusalem."
-- Near East Arabic Broadcasting Station, Cyprus, April 3, 1949

"Every effort is being made by the Jews to persuade the Arab populace to stay and carry on with their normal lives, to get their shops and businesses open and to be assured that their lives and interests will be safe."
-- Haifa District HQ of the British Police, April 26, 1948, (quoted in Battleground by Samuel Katz).


"The Arabs of Haifa fled in spite of the fact that the Jewish authorities guaranteed their safety and rights as citizens of Israel."
-- Monsignor George Hakim, Greek Catholic Bishop of Galilee, New York Herald Tribune, June 30, 1949

Sir John Troutbeck, British Middle East Office in Cairo, noted in cables to superiors (1948-49) that the refugees (in Gaza) have no bitterness against Jews, but harbor intense hatred toward Egyptians: "They say 'we know who our enemies are (referring to the Egyptians)', declaring that their Arab brethren persuaded them unnecessarily to leave their homes…I even heard it said that many of the refugees would give a welcome to the Israelis if they were to come in and take the district over."

You mean fabricated quotes from Zionist websites are a leg to stand on?

No I mean actual quotes used by historians, which blows a hole in your bogus claim, fraudster.

View attachment 43190

Eric Sundquist

Andrew W. Mellon Professor of the Humanities

Department Chair


Johns Hopkins University

26 Gilman Hall

3400 N. Charles Street

Baltimore, MD 21218


Phone: (410) 516-1103

Email: [email protected]


Eric J. Sundquist teaches courses in American literature and culture, with special interests in African American literature, Jewish American literature, and the literature of the Holocaust. Before returning to Johns Hopkins, where he received his Ph.D. in 1978, he taught at Berkeley, Vanderbilt, UCLA, and Northwestern, where he was also Dean of the College of Arts and Sciences.


Professor Sundquist’s books include King’s Dream (2009); Strangers in the Land: Blacks, Jews, Post-Holocaust America (2005), which received the Weinberg Judaic Studies Institute Book Award; To Wake the Nations: Race in the Making of American Literature (1992), which received the Christian Gauss Award from Phi Beta Kappa and the James Russell Lowell Award from the Modern Language Association; The Hammers of Creation: Folk Culture in Modern African American Literature (1993); Faulkner: The House Divided (1985); and Home as Found: Authority and Genealogy in Nineteenth-Century American Literature (1979), which received the Gustave Arlt Award from the Council of Graduate Schools in the United States. He has edited essay collections devoted to Mark Twain, Ralph Ellison, Harriet Beecher Stowe, and W. E. B. Du Bois, and contributed to the Cambridge History of American Literature (reprinted as Empire and Slavery in American Literature, 1820-1865). He is a member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, and in 2007 was named a recipient of a Distinguished Achievement Award from the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation.

The writings of a committed Zionist have no status as a historical record. Without the intervention of the neighboring states, the eviction of the non-Jews would have been more complete given that as confirmed in the official record (the British report to the UN), the Jews began their attacks on the non-Jews as early as in January of 1948. Months before the late and unsuccessful intervention designed to prevent the eviction of the non-Jews.


(c) The representative of the Mandatory Power informed the Commission at its sixteenth meeting on 21 January 1948, that

• • 
    
    
    “in the present circumstances the Jewish story that the Arabs are the attackers and the Jews the attacked is not tenable. The Arabs are determined to show that they will not submit tamely to the United Nations Plan of Partition; while the Jews are trying to consolidate the advantages gained at the General Assembly by a succession of drastic operations designed to intimidate and cure the Arabs of any desire for further conflict."
    
    A AC.21 7 of 29 January 1948

 

[Roudy]

And like clockwork he posts the same irrelevant crap that negates his claim, one more time. Seems like insanity is a prerequisite for being a Pali Nazi supporter.

 

[montelatici]

And like clockwork he posts the same irrelevant crap that negates his claim, one more time. Seems like insanity is a prerequisite for being a Pali Nazi supporter.

Nothing irrelevant about it, in fact, it appears you do not understand what "irrelevant" means. What the British report to the UN does, is negate your bullshit propaganda.

Let's repeat:

c) The representative of the Mandatory Power informed the Commission at its sixteenth meeting on 21 January 1948, that

• • 
    
    
    “in the present circumstances the Jewish story that the Arabs are the attackers and the Jews the attacked is not tenable. The Arabs are determined to show that they will not submit tamely to the United Nations Plan of Partition; while the Jews are trying to consolidate the advantages gained at the General Assembly by a succession of drastic operations designed to intimidate and cure the Arabs of any desire for further conflict."
    
    A AC.21 7 of 29 January 1948

 

[Phoenall]

You guys have no leg to stand on, here is the truth:

“The Arab armies entered Palestine to protect the Palestinians from the Zionist tyranny but, instead, they abandoned them, forced them to emigrate and to leave their homeland, and threw them into prisons similar to the ghettos in which the Jews used to live.”

— Palestinian Authority (then) Prime Minister Mahmoud Abbas (Abu Mazen) (Falastin a-Thaura, (March 1976)


Arabs Urged to Flee from Palestine in 1948:

"It must not be forgotten that the Arab Higher Committee encouraged the refugees' flight from their homes in Jaffa, Haifa, and Jerusalem."
-- Near East Arabic Broadcasting Station, Cyprus, April 3, 1949

"Every effort is being made by the Jews to persuade the Arab populace to stay and carry on with their normal lives, to get their shops and businesses open and to be assured that their lives and interests will be safe."
-- Haifa District HQ of the British Police, April 26, 1948, (quoted in Battleground by Samuel Katz).


"The Arabs of Haifa fled in spite of the fact that the Jewish authorities guaranteed their safety and rights as citizens of Israel."
-- Monsignor George Hakim, Greek Catholic Bishop of Galilee, New York Herald Tribune, June 30, 1949

Sir John Troutbeck, British Middle East Office in Cairo, noted in cables to superiors (1948-49) that the refugees (in Gaza) have no bitterness against Jews, but harbor intense hatred toward Egyptians: "They say 'we know who our enemies are (referring to the Egyptians)', declaring that their Arab brethren persuaded them unnecessarily to leave their homes…I even heard it said that many of the refugees would give a welcome to the Israelis if they were to come in and take the district over."

You mean fabricated quotes from Zionist websites are a leg to stand on?

No I mean actual quotes used by historians, which blows a hole in your bogus claim, fraudster.

View attachment 43190

Eric Sundquist

Andrew W. Mellon Professor of the Humanities

Department Chair


Johns Hopkins University

26 Gilman Hall

3400 N. Charles Street

Baltimore, MD 21218


Phone: (410) 516-1103

Email: [email protected]


Eric J. Sundquist teaches courses in American literature and culture, with special interests in African American literature, Jewish American literature, and the literature of the Holocaust. Before returning to Johns Hopkins, where he received his Ph.D. in 1978, he taught at Berkeley, Vanderbilt, UCLA, and Northwestern, where he was also Dean of the College of Arts and Sciences.


Professor Sundquist’s books include King’s Dream (2009); Strangers in the Land: Blacks, Jews, Post-Holocaust America (2005), which received the Weinberg Judaic Studies Institute Book Award; To Wake the Nations: Race in the Making of American Literature (1992), which received the Christian Gauss Award from Phi Beta Kappa and the James Russell Lowell Award from the Modern Language Association; The Hammers of Creation: Folk Culture in Modern African American Literature (1993); Faulkner: The House Divided (1985); and Home as Found: Authority and Genealogy in Nineteenth-Century American Literature (1979), which received the Gustave Arlt Award from the Council of Graduate Schools in the United States. He has edited essay collections devoted to Mark Twain, Ralph Ellison, Harriet Beecher Stowe, and W. E. B. Du Bois, and contributed to the Cambridge History of American Literature (reprinted as Empire and Slavery in American Literature, 1820-1865). He is a member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, and in 2007 was named a recipient of a Distinguished Achievement Award from the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation.

The writings of a committed Zionist have no status as a historical record. Without the intervention of the neighboring states, the eviction of the non-Jews would have been more complete given that as confirmed in the official record (the British report to the UN), the Jews began their attacks on the non-Jews as early as in January of 1948. Months before the late and unsuccessful intervention designed to prevent the eviction of the non-Jews.


(c) The representative of the Mandatory Power informed the Commission at its sixteenth meeting on 21 January 1948, that

• • 
    
    
    “in the present circumstances the Jewish story that the Arabs are the attackers and the Jews the attacked is not tenable. The Arabs are determined to show that they will not submit tamely to the United Nations Plan of Partition; while the Jews are trying to consolidate the advantages gained at the General Assembly by a succession of drastic operations designed to intimidate and cure the Arabs of any desire for further conflict."
    
    A AC.21 7 of 29 January 1948

Out of context manipulated partial cur and paste because the rest destroys his POV .


Typical islamocatholic Nazi propaganda

 

[Phoenall]

You guys have no leg to stand on, here is the truth:

“The Arab armies entered Palestine to protect the Palestinians from the Zionist tyranny but, instead, they abandoned them, forced them to emigrate and to leave their homeland, and threw them into prisons similar to the ghettos in which the Jews used to live.”

— Palestinian Authority (then) Prime Minister Mahmoud Abbas (Abu Mazen) (Falastin a-Thaura, (March 1976)


Arabs Urged to Flee from Palestine in 1948:

"It must not be forgotten that the Arab Higher Committee encouraged the refugees' flight from their homes in Jaffa, Haifa, and Jerusalem."
-- Near East Arabic Broadcasting Station, Cyprus, April 3, 1949

"Every effort is being made by the Jews to persuade the Arab populace to stay and carry on with their normal lives, to get their shops and businesses open and to be assured that their lives and interests will be safe."
-- Haifa District HQ of the British Police, April 26, 1948, (quoted in Battleground by Samuel Katz).


"The Arabs of Haifa fled in spite of the fact that the Jewish authorities guaranteed their safety and rights as citizens of Israel."
-- Monsignor George Hakim, Greek Catholic Bishop of Galilee, New York Herald Tribune, June 30, 1949

Sir John Troutbeck, British Middle East Office in Cairo, noted in cables to superiors (1948-49) that the refugees (in Gaza) have no bitterness against Jews, but harbor intense hatred toward Egyptians: "They say 'we know who our enemies are (referring to the Egyptians)', declaring that their Arab brethren persuaded them unnecessarily to leave their homes…I even heard it said that many of the refugees would give a welcome to the Israelis if they were to come in and take the district over."

You mean fabricated quotes from Zionist websites are a leg to stand on?

No I mean actual quotes used by historians, which blows a hole in your bogus claim, fraudster.

View attachment 43190

Eric Sundquist

Andrew W. Mellon Professor of the Humanities

Department Chair


Johns Hopkins University

26 Gilman Hall

3400 N. Charles Street

Baltimore, MD 21218


Phone: (410) 516-1103

Email: [email protected]


Eric J. Sundquist teaches courses in American literature and culture, with special interests in African American literature, Jewish American literature, and the literature of the Holocaust. Before returning to Johns Hopkins, where he received his Ph.D. in 1978, he taught at Berkeley, Vanderbilt, UCLA, and Northwestern, where he was also Dean of the College of Arts and Sciences.


Professor Sundquist’s books include King’s Dream (2009); Strangers in the Land: Blacks, Jews, Post-Holocaust America (2005), which received the Weinberg Judaic Studies Institute Book Award; To Wake the Nations: Race in the Making of American Literature (1992), which received the Christian Gauss Award from Phi Beta Kappa and the James Russell Lowell Award from the Modern Language Association; The Hammers of Creation: Folk Culture in Modern African American Literature (1993); Faulkner: The House Divided (1985); and Home as Found: Authority and Genealogy in Nineteenth-Century American Literature (1979), which received the Gustave Arlt Award from the Council of Graduate Schools in the United States. He has edited essay collections devoted to Mark Twain, Ralph Ellison, Harriet Beecher Stowe, and W. E. B. Du Bois, and contributed to the Cambridge History of American Literature (reprinted as Empire and Slavery in American Literature, 1820-1865). He is a member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, and in 2007 was named a recipient of a Distinguished Achievement Award from the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation.

The writings of a committed Zionist have no status as a historical record. Without the intervention of the neighboring states, the eviction of the non-Jews would have been more complete given that as confirmed in the official record (the British report to the UN), the Jews began their attacks on the non-Jews as early as in January of 1948. Months before the late and unsuccessful intervention designed to prevent the eviction of the non-Jews.


(c) The representative of the Mandatory Power informed the Commission at its sixteenth meeting on 21 January 1948, that

• • 
    
    
    “in the present circumstances the Jewish story that the Arabs are the attackers and the Jews the attacked is not tenable. The Arabs are determined to show that they will not submit tamely to the United Nations Plan of Partition; while the Jews are trying to consolidate the advantages gained at the General Assembly by a succession of drastic operations designed to intimidate and cure the Arabs of any desire for further conflict."
    
    A AC.21 7 of 29 January 1948

Out of context manipulated partial cur and paste because the rest destroys his POV .


Typical islamocatholic Nazi propaganda

And like clockwork he posts the same irrelevant crap that negates his claim, one more time. Seems like insanity is a prerequisite for being a Pali Nazi supporter.

Nothing irrelevant about it, in fact, it appears you do not understand what "irrelevant" means. What the British report to the UN does, is negate your bullshit propaganda.

Let's repeat:

c) The representative of the Mandatory Power informed the Commission at its sixteenth meeting on 21 January 1948, that

• • 
    
    
    “in the present circumstances the Jewish story that the Arabs are the attackers and the Jews the attacked is not tenable. The Arabs are determined to show that they will not submit tamely to the United Nations Plan of Partition; while the Jews are trying to consolidate the advantages gained at the General Assembly by a succession of drastic operations designed to intimidate and cure the Arabs of any desire for further conflict."
    
    A AC.21 7 of 29 January 1948

And the full in context transcript reads


7. Consultations with the Representative of the Mandatory Power
(a) Sir Alexander Cadogan, the representative designated by the Mandatory Power, has appeared before the commission at its sixth and sixteenth meetings on 14 and 21 January 1948, respectively.

(b) In his review of the present situation in Palestine, on 14 January 1948, Sir Alexander stated that the Arabs had made it clear that “they proposed to resist with all the forces at their disposal the implementation of the partition plane. Moreover, since the first week in December the situation in Palestine had deteriorated rapidly. Violence conflict between the two communities had been intensified, courts and essential government services had been either unable to operate or were seriously crippled; there was but one month’s supply of certain types of fuel oil in the country; there was general insecurity; communications were obstructed; the collection of public revenue was expected to drop sharply. Sir Alexander described the situation as one in which generally speaking, there has been a very severe diminution in the functions and authority of Civil Government, and in view of recent developments, it would be optimistic to hope for any improvement in the future.


(c) The representative of the Mandatory Power informed the Commission at its sixteenth meeting on 21 January 1948, that

• • 
    
    
    “in the present circumstances the Jewish story that the Arabs are the attackers and the Jews the attacked is not tenable. The Arabs are determined to show that they will not submit tamely to the United Nations Plan of Partition; while the Jews are trying to consolidate the advantages gained at the General Assembly by a succession of drastic operations designed to intimidate and cure the Arabs of any desire for further conflict. Elements on each side are thus engaged in attacking or in taking reprisals indistinguishable from attacks…The Government of Palestine fear that strife in Palestine will be greatly intensified when the Mandate is terminated, and that the international status of the United Nations Commission will mean little or nothing to the Arabs in Palestine, to whom the killing of Jews now transcends all other considerations. Thus, the Commission will be faced with the problem of how to avert certain bloodshed on a very much wider scale than prevails at present.”
  (d) Mr. Fletcher-Cooke of the United Kingdom delegation elaborated on the above by further informing the commission that:
  • • 
      “The view held by the Government of Palestine is that the arrival of the Commission will be the signal for widespread attacks by the Arabs both on the Jews and on the members of Commission itself. In addition, some 62 per cent of the present Government staff in Palestine are Arabs, and there is reason to believe that none of these will be willing or able to serve the commission. The Arabs have made it quite clear and have told the Palestine government that the do not propose to co-operate or to assist the Commission, and that, far from it, they propose to attack and impede its work in every possible way. We have no reason to suppose that they do not mean what they say.”
    • 
      .
    • 
      .
    • 
      .
    • 
      .
    • 
      Negating the partial reworking and manipulation of the text.by the islamocatholic nazi

 

[aris2chat]

You guys have no leg to stand on, here is the truth:

“The Arab armies entered Palestine to protect the Palestinians from the Zionist tyranny but, instead, they abandoned them, forced them to emigrate and to leave their homeland, and threw them into prisons similar to the ghettos in which the Jews used to live.”

— Palestinian Authority (then) Prime Minister Mahmoud Abbas (Abu Mazen) (Falastin a-Thaura, (March 1976)


Arabs Urged to Flee from Palestine in 1948:

"It must not be forgotten that the Arab Higher Committee encouraged the refugees' flight from their homes in Jaffa, Haifa, and Jerusalem."
-- Near East Arabic Broadcasting Station, Cyprus, April 3, 1949

"Every effort is being made by the Jews to persuade the Arab populace to stay and carry on with their normal lives, to get their shops and businesses open and to be assured that their lives and interests will be safe."
-- Haifa District HQ of the British Police, April 26, 1948, (quoted in Battleground by Samuel Katz).


"The Arabs of Haifa fled in spite of the fact that the Jewish authorities guaranteed their safety and rights as citizens of Israel."
-- Monsignor George Hakim, Greek Catholic Bishop of Galilee, New York Herald Tribune, June 30, 1949

Sir John Troutbeck, British Middle East Office in Cairo, noted in cables to superiors (1948-49) that the refugees (in Gaza) have no bitterness against Jews, but harbor intense hatred toward Egyptians: "They say 'we know who our enemies are (referring to the Egyptians)', declaring that their Arab brethren persuaded them unnecessarily to leave their homes…I even heard it said that many of the refugees would give a welcome to the Israelis if they were to come in and take the district over."

Most of us know they were forced by Israel to become refugees. They remained refugees because the state of Israel was not destroyed (that is Israel's fault).
Yes, some were forced because of terrorist activities or support. Yes, some had to relocate within Israel for a number of reason. Yes, some villages were cleared and used by the state for other purposes. Yes, some villages were renamed. So what?

The vast majority of the refugees left on their own or out of fear of what 'might' happen. Propaganda was misused on both sides for scare tactics. From the part of Israel, it was to make those thinking about violence against Israel to imagine what might he consequences could be. On the part of the arabs it was used to incite and scare the arabs that they faced extermination. Obviously the arabs within Israel were not exterminated, but are protected and share the same rights as other Israelis.

Terrorist are the only ones to face any kind of extermination, Israel will fight back when attacked. Today palestinians use their civilians as human shield, but they are not 'intentionally' targeted by Israel. War has always been hard on civilians, but Israel is and was no ISIS.

Now arabs in Israel have a much higher standard of living that most of their palestinians 'brothers'. Arabs could have and should have stayed and lived in peace with Israel. Israel asked them to stay and invited them back, if they had not engaged in attacks against Israel. The offers were refused. Three offers of statehood by Israel were also refused...............while arabs states keep the refugees in a type of 'prison camps' that are kept slowly simmering on the heat of hate for half a century. A heat funneled at Israel, not the ones keeping them contained in the camps and not allowing them rights outside the camps.

 

[montelatici]

1. Thank you for admitting that the Palestinians were either evicted or had to run for their lives.

2. You present the pro-Apartheid South Africa almost exactly as the supporters of Apartheid did decades ago. You must have been a pro-Apartheid partisan back in the day.

"Yet South Africa is the only country in Sub-Saharan Africa that can feed itself. Blacks possess one of the highest living standards in all of Africa. Although black living conditions in South Africa (as in America) cover a wide spectrum, the housing is unequalled anywhere on the continent. Soweto is a proper city complete with schools, stores, theaters, sport stadiums and tennis courts. In some areas, blacks drive their children to private schools in German cars. Few states in black Africa can boast such a range of features. In Mamelodi (Pretoria) four bedroom houses are made available to blacks at a total purchase price of $250."

South Africa Shouldn t be Singled Out - CSMonitor.com

 

[Art__Allm]

I have read the entire thread.
It seems to me that Zionist supremacists live in their parallel world, that they have constructed with their hasbara, and that they do not care about the real world.

But the real world is the only thing that counts, and people, who live in the world of mythology, will some day have to face the real world.

That are the laws of nature, and they cannot be changed by hasbara.

 

[Roudy]

The laws of nature are that Arabs attacked the Jewish state not because of this mythical Palestine but to destroy it, commit genocide on the Jews, and then divide the proceeds between themselves. They threatened the "Palestinians" to clear out of the way with false promises. When they failed, they occupied the West Bank and Gaza for 20 years and kept the so called Palestinians in prison like conditions, again, with no mention of a mythical Palestine from either side. In 1967 they attacked Israel again, and this time lost the West Bank and Gaza.

The evidence proves irrefutably that it was the Arabs, not the Israelis who are the most responsible for what has happened with the Palestinians.

 

[Roudy]

Even the phrase that Monte keeps posting, totally shatters his claim: "in the present circumstances the Jewish story that the Arabs are the attackers and the Jews the attacked is not tenable."

Meaning, that the Jews are starting to defend themselves, despite the fact that the Arabs were the initial attackers. There is no other way to interpret this. That's why Monte cut out the phrase that came right after that sentence:

"Elements on each side are thus engaged in attacking or in taking reprisals indistinguishable from attacks."

Meaning, the Arabs can no longer be considered the only attackers. The Jews are also engaging in counter attacks and defending themselves against the savages now.

Monte hangs himself with his own rope! Ha ha ha.

 

[montelatici]

What is shattered is the fairy tale you are attempting to revive. The Zionist fairy tale is believed by no one except Zionists and their supporters.

You are becoming pathetic. If it were as your Hasbara handlers say, it would have indicated that there had been a change in who the attacker was and who the attacked were. It would have stated "is no longer tenable", or something to that effect. Try again. Go back to your Hasbara handlers to see if they come up with something else.

 

[Roudy]

No longer tenable means that it behave was tenable before (that the Arabs were the attackers, but now that the Jews are attacking the attackers, it's no longer tenable, DUMBASS. Even a sixth grader would understand what that text means. You just shot yourself in the foot with that quote. Ha ha ha.

Here's Monte's quote, which totally shatters his claim: "in the present circumstances the Jewish story that the Arabs are the attackers and the Jews the attacked is no longer tenable."

Meaning, that the Jews are starting to defend themselves, despite the fact that the Arabs were the initial attackers. There is no other way to interpret this. That's why Monte cut out the phrase that came right after that sentence:

"Elements on each side are thus engaged in attacking or in taking reprisals indistinguishable from attacks."

Meaning, the Arabs can no longer be considered the only attackers. The Jews are also engaging in counter attacks and defending themselves against the savages now.

So conclude, the Jew hater Monte has nothing but bullshit, lies, and mutilated documents. If there's anybody that's obviously getting paid for spreading lies and false propaganda it would be Monte. I wonder if he's posting from the basement of some mosque that's on the FBI's radar?

 

[Billo_Really]

And which NAZI site did you get this manipulated cut and paste from.

If you're too pussy the click the link I provided, here's what you do...

...go down to your local sporting goods store, go over to aisle 5, pick yourself up a set of balls, then come back here and finish the debate.

 

[toastman]

No mutilated documents, just the exact text. Quit lying. You lost, as usual. I am posting from my home in the U.S., I am a US Army combat veteran and I see you as supporting a foreign country over the U.S. Maybe the FBI is watching you as a possible spy for Israel.

You support a group of people who are rabid anti Americans and have had many "Death to America" rallies while burning the American flag. You support people who cheered and celebrated on the streets upon hearing about the Twin Towers being hit. You're a traitor to your country.

 

[Phoenall]

I have read the entire thread.
It seems to me that Zionist supremacists live in their parallel world, that they have constructed with their hasbara, and that they do not care about the real world.

But the real world is the only thing that counts, and people, who live in the world of mythology, will some day have to face the real world.

That are the laws of nature, and they cannot be changed by hasbara.

You do realise that as soon as you use the terms Zionist and hasbara you show that you are nothing but a Nazi throwback and racist Jew hater don't you.
The world of reality cant be altered by your anti Jew hatred and propaganda, the world is watching for just such a thing to happen again, so it can finish the job it started in 1944

 

[Art__Allm]

You do realise that as soon as you use the terms Zionist and hasbara you show that you are nothing but a Nazi throwback and racist Jew hater don't you.
The world of reality cant be altered by your anti Jew hatred and propaganda, the world is watching for just such a thing to happen again, so it can finish the job it started in 1944

That was the usual Zionist supremasist hasbara, they never address the arguments of their opponents, they immediately attack the person, and they constantly use empty words, like "Nazi", "Jew-Hater", "Racist", etc.

BTW, Zionism is a form of Racism!
UN voted for that definition!!!

 

[Challenger]

No longer tenable means that it behave was tenable before (that the Arabs were the attackers, but now that the Jews are attacking the attackers, it's no longer tenable, DUMBASS. Even a sixth grader would understand what that text means. You just shot yourself in the foot with that quote. Ha ha ha.

Here's Monte's quote, which totally shatters his claim: "in the present circumstances the Jewish story that the Arabs are the attackers and the Jews the attacked is no longer tenable."

Meaning, that the Jews are starting to defend themselves, despite the fact that the Arabs were the initial attackers. There is no other way to interpret this. That's why Monte cut out the phrase that came right after that sentence:

"Elements on each side are thus engaged in attacking or in taking reprisals indistinguishable from attacks."

Meaning, the Arabs can no longer be considered the only attackers. The Jews are also engaging in counter attacks and defending themselves against the savages now.

So conclude, the Jew hater Monte has nothing but bullshit, lies, and mutilated documents. If there's anybody that's obviously getting paid for spreading lies and false propaganda it would be Monte. I wonder if he's posting from the basement of some mosque that's on the FBI's radar?

No longer tenable in this context means the Zionists lied. "THE JEWISH STORY" is what is UNTENABLE. Here check this out, it might help you Word order and sentence structure Clear English grammar

 

[Phoenall]

You do realise that as soon as you use the terms Zionist and hasbara you show that you are nothing but a Nazi throwback and racist Jew hater don't you.
The world of reality cant be altered by your anti Jew hatred and propaganda, the world is watching for just such a thing to happen again, so it can finish the job it started in 1944

That was the usual Zionist supremasist hasbara, they never address the arguments of their opponents, they immediately attack the person, and they constantly use empty words, like "Nazi", "Jew-Hater", "Racist", etc.

BTW, Zionism is a form of Racism!
UN voted for that definition!!!

Half the story again by a Jew hater as the UN then realised that it was a racist resolution brought by islamonazi Jew haters and promptly removed it from the list.


Ifv you are going to do this expect to be called out on your RACISM, ANTI SEMITISM and NAZI JEW HATRED

 

[Art__Allm]

UN then realised that it was a racist resolution ...

No, the lapdog of Israel (USA) pressed for the revocation of this resolution.
Israel made this to the condition of its participation in the Madrid Peace Conference.

Zionists managed to blackmail the governments, but Israel is still one of the most hated states, according to polls.

BBC poll Israel among world s least popular nations - World - Haaretz Daily Newspaper Israel News

 

[montelatici]

No mutilated documents, just the exact text. Quit lying. You lost, as usual. I am posting from my home in the U.S., I am a US Army combat veteran and I see you as supporting a foreign country over the U.S. Maybe the FBI is watching you as a possible spy for Israel.

You support a group of people who are rabid anti Americans and have had many "Death to America" rallies while burning the American flag. You support people who cheered and celebrated on the streets upon hearing about the Twin Towers being hit. You're a traitor to your country.

I support the right of the Palestinians to be free, the Christians especially. I do not support Islamists. I would be very careful about calling people traitors, it is libel, particularly U.S. military veterans.