Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If there had been any, ir any evidence to support the accusation Mueller would have acted on it by now. Instead, here we are going on year 2...with Mueller violating the Contitution with his witch hunt, trying to indict / take down a sitting President.Obviously there was no "collusion" which was the original intent of the investigation.
LOL (Obviously????..............Really???)
View attachment 191379
Unlike Mueller, actual crime / criminal activity was found...Read all the menorandums and full contexts.
A single (and obviously buased and parisan) prosecutor does not have the authority to 'Un-elect' a sitting President.
Furthermore, according to the DOJ memoranduns, a sitting President can not be indicted because the demands of abswering accusations and judicially defend his case would put undue pressure on the Chief Executive Officer / President whose job and all his focus and effort must be on the service to and defense of this country.
What the Democrats have been and are doing are undermining the Preident and his ability to carry out his elected duties based ontheir own hatred and prejudices, not on any piece of evidence that exists, not based on any evidence of any crime committed warranting an investigation at all.
As I have repeatedly said for a long while, what we are witnessing now is the largest, collaborated internal coup / act of treason / threat to this nation's democracy in our nation's history...all because a power-hungry, bitter minority - proven enemies of the state within - refuses to accept the outcome of the legal democratic 2016 election!
Nobody is trying to unelect Trump. That will be up to congress when they impeach him.
Impeach him for what?
Perhaps nothing at all. Mueller's report will make all that clear. The anticipation is delicious, isn't it?
Impeach him for "nothing at all"? Seriously, you leftists have taken off your masks and are showing the world just what petite despots your people really are.
Have you never heard of the "presumption of innocence" or the "rule of law"? Obviously there was no "collusion" which was the original intent of the investigation. So now what? You're hoping for some trumped up charges totally unrelated to anything, in order to unseat a standing President? Perhaps a perjury trap because one or two words didn't match a previous deposition?
You have just shown the world how truly desperate you people really are.
What did Bill's blowjob have to do with Whitewater? It's amazing how investigations tend to uncover lots of stuff.
Unlike Mueller, actual crime / criminal activity was found...Nobody is trying to unelect Trump. That will be up to congress when they impeach him.
Impeach him for what?
Perhaps nothing at all. Mueller's report will make all that clear. The anticipation is delicious, isn't it?
Impeach him for "nothing at all"? Seriously, you leftists have taken off your masks and are showing the world just what petite despots your people really are.
Have you never heard of the "presumption of innocence" or the "rule of law"? Obviously there was no "collusion" which was the original intent of the investigation. So now what? You're hoping for some trumped up charges totally unrelated to anything, in order to unseat a standing President? Perhaps a perjury trap because one or two words didn't match a previous deposition?
You have just shown the world how truly desperate you people really are.
What did Bill's blowjob have to do with Whitewater? It's amazing how investigations tend to uncover lots of stuff.
I take that back - Mueller HAS found lots of crime...but he refuses to go after the Democrats proven to have perpetratedthe crimes....
You can not even justify the witch hunt because you have no evidence yourself. You just blindly follow and believe the empty, unsupported steaming pile they keep feeding you.Unlike Mueller, actual crime / criminal activity was found...Impeach him for what?
Perhaps nothing at all. Mueller's report will make all that clear. The anticipation is delicious, isn't it?
Impeach him for "nothing at all"? Seriously, you leftists have taken off your masks and are showing the world just what petite despots your people really are.
Have you never heard of the "presumption of innocence" or the "rule of law"? Obviously there was no "collusion" which was the original intent of the investigation. So now what? You're hoping for some trumped up charges totally unrelated to anything, in order to unseat a standing President? Perhaps a perjury trap because one or two words didn't match a previous deposition?
You have just shown the world how truly desperate you people really are.
What did Bill's blowjob have to do with Whitewater? It's amazing how investigations tend to uncover lots of stuff.
I take that back - Mueller HAS found lots of crime...but he refuses to go after the Democrats proven to have perpetratedthe crimes....
Realy? How do you know that. Are you part of the investigative team?
You can not even justify the witch hunt because you have no evidence yourself. You just blindly follow and believe the empty, unsupported steaming pile they keep feeding you.Unlike Mueller, actual crime / criminal activity was found...Perhaps nothing at all. Mueller's report will make all that clear. The anticipation is delicious, isn't it?
Impeach him for "nothing at all"? Seriously, you leftists have taken off your masks and are showing the world just what petite despots your people really are.
Have you never heard of the "presumption of innocence" or the "rule of law"? Obviously there was no "collusion" which was the original intent of the investigation. So now what? You're hoping for some trumped up charges totally unrelated to anything, in order to unseat a standing President? Perhaps a perjury trap because one or two words didn't match a previous deposition?
You have just shown the world how truly desperate you people really are.
What did Bill's blowjob have to do with Whitewater? It's amazing how investigations tend to uncover lots of stuff.
I take that back - Mueller HAS found lots of crime...but he refuses to go after the Democrats proven to have perpetratedthe crimes....
Realy? How do you know that. Are you part of the investigative team?
Innocent until PROVEN guilty. Mueller has proven nothing, bot even tbat a crime was committed warranti g an investigation, let alone Trump was involved. That is why Rosenstein continues to illegally non-comply with the Congressional subpoena. They have nothing to show Congress...
...and if they showed they have nothing Congress would neuter Mueller and his witch hunt, stop him from threatening to jail the President if he refuses to step into his trap.
Which is their real purpose. Which is an improper purpose.Not a chance.
The real bonus is that whether or not it bears fruit, it tarnishes Trump for a long time.
That, according to the policy of the Department of Justice, and its own memorandums regarding policy, it is Un-Constitutional for a Prosecutor / Grand Jury to attempt to 'Un-Elect' a Sitting Presiden through attenpted indictment /conviction.
What Mueller is attempting to do, in essence, is 'by-pass Congress and their constitutional authority to remove a president through Impeachment, on his own as an independent prosecutor with his own Grand Jury.
Whatever Powers he may have been given as a Special Counsel prosecutor, he was not given the authority to violate the Constitution and by-pass Congress to take down a sitting president.
The Democrats, the former Obama administration officials who are in on this, and Mueller are seditiously and treasonously attempting to UN-ELECT a sitting US president based on no proven crime (zero evidence) having been committed. Mueller is attempting to use the accusation of a crime, that is not supported by any existing evidence, to subpoena a sitting president, forcing him into an interview in which he hopes to entrap the president, thereby then indicting that president for a crime in order to 'un-elect' him, basically, as president.
THAT IS WHAT IS GOING ON RIGHT NOW!
Mueller has already violated many of these principles of the Memorandums of the DOJ, such as the one mentioned above.
Indicting the President: President Clinton’s Justice Department Says No
On June 20, 2012, President Barack Obama asserted executive privilege in order to withhold certain Department of Justice documents related to the Operation Fast and Furious controversy ahead of a United States House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform vote to hold Attorney General Eric Holder in contempt of Congress for refusing to produce the documents.[27][28] Later the same day, the House Committee voted 23–17 along party lines to hold Holder in contempt of Congress over not releasing the documents.[29]
Executive privilege was also used in a lawsuit stemming from the 2012 implementation of the "Net Worth Sweep" against Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The Obama administration did not disclose roughly 11,000 documents from the plaintiffs in the discovery process as they related to the reasoning behind the 2012 actions.[citation needed]
Clinton did not appear before a grand jury....and 'didn't see sex the same way Starr did'?! Bwuhahahaha. Come on, dude!!! The President lied his ass off about not having sex with Lewinski...and was not Impeached because of Lewinski.That, according to the policy of the Department of Justice, and its own memorandums regarding policy, it is Un-Constitutional for a Prosecutor / Grand Jury to attempt to 'Un-Elect' a Sitting Presiden through attenpted indictment /conviction.
What Mueller is attempting to do, in essence, is 'by-pass Congress and their constitutional authority to remove a president through Impeachment, on his own as an independent prosecutor with his own Grand Jury.
Whatever Powers he may have been given as a Special Counsel prosecutor, he was not given the authority to violate the Constitution and by-pass Congress to take down a sitting president.
The Democrats, the former Obama administration officials who are in on this, and Mueller are seditiously and treasonously attempting to UN-ELECT a sitting US president based on no proven crime (zero evidence) having been committed. Mueller is attempting to use the accusation of a crime, that is not supported by any existing evidence, to subpoena a sitting president, forcing him into an interview in which he hopes to entrap the president, thereby then indicting that president for a crime in order to 'un-elect' him, basically, as president.
THAT IS WHAT IS GOING ON RIGHT NOW!
Mueller has already violated many of these principles of the Memorandums of the DOJ, such as the one mentioned above.
Indicting the President: President Clinton’s Justice Department Says No
Okay, here's the thing, you lost this argument in the 1990's when Ken Starr got Clinton in front of a grand jury and then accused him of lying because he didn't see sex the same way Ken Starr did.
So this argument has been had and lost.
But here's the bigger problem you guys have. If Trump really did nothing wrong, then there would be no problem for him to get in front of a Grand Jury and say as much. The problem is, Trump can't keep his story straight one day to the next.
Clinton did not appear before a grand jury....and 'didn't see sex the same way Starr did'?! Bwuhahahaha. Come on, dude!!! The President lied his ass off about not having sex with Lewinski...and was not Impeached because of Lewinski.
you have nothing to worry about, IF Trump committed no crimes....what's mueller going to indict Trump for....?Read all the menorandums and full contexts.From the cited article......
Charles Pinckney, a signer of the Constitution, said, “No privilege of this kind [given to Congress] was intended for your Executive” because “no subject had been more abused than privilege.” Gravel v. United States (1973) said, “executive privilege has never been applied to shield executive officers from prosecution for crime.”
A single (and obviously buased and parisan) prosecutor does not have the authority to 'Un-elect' a sitting President.
Furthermore, according to the DOJ memoranduns, a sitting President can not be indicted because the demands of abswering accusations and judicially defend his case would put undue pressure on the Chief Executive Officer / President whose job and all his focus and effort must be on the service to and defense of this country.
What the Democrats have been and are doing are undermining the Preident and his ability to carry out his elected duties based ontheir own hatred and prejudices, not on any piece of evidence that exists, not based on any evidence of any crime committed warranting an investigation at all.
As I have repeatedly said for a long while, what we are witnessing now is the largest, collaborated internal coup / act of treason / threat to this nation's democracy in our nation's history...all because a power-hungry, bitter minority - proven enemies of the state within - refuses to accept the outcome of the legal democratic 2016 election!
