Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
FALSE! No there is NOT "a red line representing the thousands of votes Trump GAINED," That is a lie.
As anyone can plainly see, Trump's 4am redline could not be "thousands of votes gained - the red line is flat as a pancake. NO VOTES GAINED. The DUMPS (Vertical lines) were 100% Biden.
![]()
![]()
All that is relevant is Trump's flat redline, and Biden's LARGE VERTICAL blue line. Ho hum.
Let's try this again, shall we? Starting from the top...
In the thread >> Trump: Stronger Than Ever
in Post # 676, I said >> "
last paragraph of Post # 460. Of course you'll say that it's not proof. LOL Well, nothing is "proof" to a liberal, unless it says what he wants to hear".
And to the very end of that thread, you never quoted that post, never acknowldged it, never responded to it. And, after that illustrious display of cyber cowardice, you now pretend that I didn't provide my proof, when I did do that in that post # 460.
So instead of me lying as you claim, YOU were lying, and ARE lying now in this thread, and the truth caught up with you. It has a way of doing that.
And since you will probably DODGE that post # 460, and wait a while, and then again pretend it didn't exist, I'm going to copy/paste it for you right here, now >>
"An anonymous email sent to the Justice Department criminal division and Arizona legislature alleged that in Pima County, 35,000 votes were fraudulently embedded in advance of the election, on behalf of each Democratic candidate at the local and federal level. The allegation coincides with a spike or "injection" of 143,000 votes noted at 8:06 p.m. on election night"
"In advance of the election" means anytime before the election, which naturally could be well before the Sept 10 meeting, also. Could have been in August, Or July. Or June. Could actually have been in 2019.
Back to the 8th grade for you.
And where's the evidence ? Well, liberals have a habit of dismissing evidence if it doesn't point favorably for them, This doesn't. Most objective observers would say that the combination of the report of the DOJ criminal division, and the "coincidence" (yeah right) of the coincide with a spike or "injection" of 143,000 votes noted at 8:06 p.m. on election night", is pretty worthwhile. People are serving time in prisons on circumstantial evidence less than that."
I'm an idiot because I actually read the links you provided?Stop being such an idiot!
Those links didn't identify who the people committing the violence were.They say about the left wingers committing the crimes, including the criminal mayors who allow the crimes to happen, and then get kicked out on their butts, like Lori Lightfoot.
Can you read (charts or words) ? I said Trump's 4am red line is "flat as a pancake" (flat - not ascending - get it ?) Look at the charts. Pheeeew! (high-pitched whistle)You're out of your mind, gramps. Batshit level.
If 100% of those ballots were for Biden and none, zero, went for Trump, how did the red line ascend?
Again >> Most objective observers would say that the combination of the report of the DOJ criminal division, and the "coincidence" (yeah right) of the coincide with a spike or "injection" of 143,000 votes noted at 8:06 p.m. on election night", is pretty worthwhile. People are serving time in prisons on circumstantial evidence less than that. Ho hum.Poor gramps. You offered zero evidence there was a spike of 143,000 votes for Democrats at 8:06. You just said it. That doesn't make it true. That's all you ever do. Is make baseless claims with no evidence but still expect others to simply accept your baseless claims as fact.
All needed to know about them, is that they were protesting against police, and the death of George Floyd, which they were MISLED into thinking was police brutality, WHICH IT WAS NOT.Those links didn't identify who the people committing the violence were.
These leftards cretins will never get it, and even if by some miracle they did, they'd never admit it.Can you read (charts or words) ? I said Trump's 4am red line is "flat as a pancake" (flat - not ascending - get it ?) Look at the charts. Pheeeew! (high-pitched whistle)
![]()
How in the fuck was that not police brutality?All needed to know about them, is that they were protesting against police, and the death of George Floyd, which they were MISLED into thinking was police brutality, WHICH IT WAS NOT.
That's what YOU do.You mean the lines you lied about?
It's very telling how you cover your ears when someone tries giving you a dose of reality.
How was it police brutality ?How in the fuck was that not police brutality?
Can you read (charts or words) ? I said Trump's 4am red line is "flat as a pancake" (flat - not ascending - get it ?) Look at the charts. Pheeeew! (high-pitched whistle)
![]()
Again >> Most objective observers would say that the combination of the report of the DOJ criminal division, and the "coincidence" (yeah right) of the coincide with a spike or "injection" of 143,000 votes noted at 8:06 p.m. on election night", is pretty worthwhile. People are serving time in prisons on circumstantial evidence less than that. Ho hum.![]()
These leftards cretins will never get it, and even if by some miracle they did, they'd never admit it.
That's why I insist the leftards are STUPID. They look at a blatantly obvious piece of evidence and their minds draw a blank. (If you can call that half a brain cell a mind).
That chart is evidence of SOMETHING inappropriate, there are still many possibilities as to what it might actually be, and the only purpose of the continual leftard bleating is to stop it from being investigated.
How was it police brutality ?
Gee, maybe you can audit the votes. Oh wait...you guys did that in Arizona. How'd it turn out?These leftards cretins will never get it, and even if by some miracle they did, they'd never admit it.
That's why I insist the leftards are STUPID. They look at a blatantly obvious piece of evidence and their minds draw a blank. (If you can call that half a brain cell a mind).
That chart is evidence of SOMETHING inappropriate, there are still many possibilities as to what it might actually be, and the only purpose of the continual leftard bleating is to stop it from being investigated.