🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Indictment dismissed with prejudice for Cliven Bundy Ammon Bundy Ryan Bundy and Ryan Paine

2-16-16 Doc 4 - U.S.A. v CLIVEN BUNDY - USA Detention Memorandum for Cliven Bundy | Crime & Justice | Criminal Justice

While Bundy claims he is a cattle rancher, his ranching operation – to the extent it can be called that – is unconventional if not bizarre. Rather than manage and control his cattle, he lets them run wild on the public lands with little, if any, human interaction until such time when he traps them and hauls them off to be sold or slaughtered for his own consumption. He does not vaccinate or treat his cattle for disease; does not employ cowboys to control and herd them; does not manage or control breeding; has no knowledge of where all the cattle are located at any given time; rarely brands them before he captures them; and has to bait them into traps in order to gather them.

Nor does he bring his cattle off the public lands in the off-season to feed them when the already sparse food supply in the desert is even scarcer. Raised in the wild, Bundy’s cattle are left to fend for themselves year-round, fighting off predators and scrounging for the meager amounts of food and water available in the difficult and arid terrain that comprises the public lands in that area of the country. Bereft of human interaction, his cattle that manage to survive are wild, mean and ornery. At the time of the events giving rise to the charges, Bundy’s cattle numbered over 1,000 head, straying as far as 50 miles from his ranch and into the Lake Mead National Recreation Area (“LMNRA”), getting stuck in mud, wandering onto golf courses, straying onto the freeway (causing accidents on occasion) – foraging aimlessly and wildly, roaming in small groups over hundreds of thousands of acres of federal lands that exist for the use of the general public for many other types of commercial and recreational uses such as camping, hunting, and hiking. Bundy claims he has strong anti-federal government views, proclaiming that the federal government cannot own land under the U.S. Constitution. These are not principled views – and certainly they have no merit legally – but nonetheless serve conveniently as a way for Bundy to somehow try to convince others that he has some reason for acting lawlessly, other than the obvious one: it serves his own ends and benefits him financially. Untethering himself from the law, Bundy claims he can do with his cattle as he pleases, including not incurring the expenses to manage or control them and not paying for the forage they consume at the expense of federal taxpayers.
The charges were dropped with Prejudice because the BLM SYSTEMATICALLY LIED, they attacked the Bundy's they threatened the Bundy's they even tried to incite the Bundy's into firing on law enforcement all while LYING about it. The Lawyers in the case hid information refused to turn over information and even called the Bundy's liars in court rooms.
cLive Bundy for Bishop
 
Bundy and his gang is nothing more than the rightwing Antifa.
And that's exactly why they were released. Right? LOL! People standing up for themselves are always criminals to regressive butt stains unless they are the one persecuted.

They were released due to the bumbling incompetence of the feds. Read it.

So Antifa aren't people standing up for themselves?

Or...do only rightwingnuts fall into that special category?
Holy shit. You're admitting the feds are a bunch of bumbling fools using nothing but arrogance and titles to fuck people over?

That's a step in the right direction.
 
Bundy and his gang is nothing more than the rightwing Antifa.

Except antifa doesn't produce a single thing. Bundy who is a rancher, actually feeds people.

You do like beef, don't you?

Except you have no idea what members of Antifa do or what jobs they hold.

Bundy just wants to graze his cows for free on someone else's land.

Most antifa member go to school or live with their parents. The land Bundy was letting his cattle graze on was federal land. The states, in forming the Constitution, did not give the federal government power to own land.


Did he pay the very modest grazing fees to graze on it? Was it his personal property? What gave him the right to take it? Ans. He's an asshole who thinks he's entitled to free shit.
The grass over there not being used by anyone? That's the heist of the decade?
 
As a related aside, this may be a good time for right wingers to contemplate their own biases and why someone like Trump is a closeted xenophobic and you may not be quite that bad….maybe.

Remember that Trump denigrated Judge Gonzalo Curiel, because of his Mexican heritage

BUT…….in this Bundy case, here’s a judge ALSO of Mexican heritage that ruled the way you like….(U.S. District Court Judge Gloria Navarro dismissed the case against the rancher.)
 
2-16-16 Doc 4 - U.S.A. v CLIVEN BUNDY - USA Detention Memorandum for Cliven Bundy | Crime & Justice | Criminal Justice

While Bundy claims he is a cattle rancher, his ranching operation – to the extent it can be called that – is unconventional if not bizarre. Rather than manage and control his cattle, he lets them run wild on the public lands with little, if any, human interaction until such time when he traps them and hauls them off to be sold or slaughtered for his own consumption. He does not vaccinate or treat his cattle for disease; does not employ cowboys to control and herd them; does not manage or control breeding; has no knowledge of where all the cattle are located at any given time; rarely brands them before he captures them; and has to bait them into traps in order to gather them.

Nor does he bring his cattle off the public lands in the off-season to feed them when the already sparse food supply in the desert is even scarcer. Raised in the wild, Bundy’s cattle are left to fend for themselves year-round, fighting off predators and scrounging for the meager amounts of food and water available in the difficult and arid terrain that comprises the public lands in that area of the country. Bereft of human interaction, his cattle that manage to survive are wild, mean and ornery. At the time of the events giving rise to the charges, Bundy’s cattle numbered over 1,000 head, straying as far as 50 miles from his ranch and into the Lake Mead National Recreation Area (“LMNRA”), getting stuck in mud, wandering onto golf courses, straying onto the freeway (causing accidents on occasion) – foraging aimlessly and wildly, roaming in small groups over hundreds of thousands of acres of federal lands that exist for the use of the general public for many other types of commercial and recreational uses such as camping, hunting, and hiking. Bundy claims he has strong anti-federal government views, proclaiming that the federal government cannot own land under the U.S. Constitution. These are not principled views – and certainly they have no merit legally – but nonetheless serve conveniently as a way for Bundy to somehow try to convince others that he has some reason for acting lawlessly, other than the obvious one: it serves his own ends and benefits him financially. Untethering himself from the law, Bundy claims he can do with his cattle as he pleases, including not incurring the expenses to manage or control them and not paying for the forage they consume at the expense of federal taxpayers.
The charges were dropped with Prejudice because the BLM SYSTEMATICALLY LIED, they attacked the Bundy's they threatened the Bundy's they even tried to incite the Bundy's into firing on law enforcement all while LYING about it. The Lawyers in the case hid information refused to turn over information and even called the Bundy's liars in court rooms.

Actually, that is the only reason the charges were dropped. The rest is just opinion.
Actually a judge ruled. It's now fact.
 
As a related aside, this may be a good time for right wingers to contemplate their own biases and why someone like Trump is a closeted xenophobic and you may not be quite that bad….maybe.

Remember that Trump denigrated Judge Gonzalo Curiel, because of his Mexican heritage

BUT…….in this Bundy case, here’s a judge ALSO of Mexican heritage that ruled the way you like….(U.S. District Court Judge Gloria Navarro dismissed the case against the rancher.)
Racist, that thing you can never stop being.
 
2-16-16 Doc 4 - U.S.A. v CLIVEN BUNDY - USA Detention Memorandum for Cliven Bundy | Crime & Justice | Criminal Justice

While Bundy claims he is a cattle rancher, his ranching operation – to the extent it can be called that – is unconventional if not bizarre. Rather than manage and control his cattle, he lets them run wild on the public lands with little, if any, human interaction until such time when he traps them and hauls them off to be sold or slaughtered for his own consumption. He does not vaccinate or treat his cattle for disease; does not employ cowboys to control and herd them; does not manage or control breeding; has no knowledge of where all the cattle are located at any given time; rarely brands them before he captures them; and has to bait them into traps in order to gather them.

Nor does he bring his cattle off the public lands in the off-season to feed them when the already sparse food supply in the desert is even scarcer. Raised in the wild, Bundy’s cattle are left to fend for themselves year-round, fighting off predators and scrounging for the meager amounts of food and water available in the difficult and arid terrain that comprises the public lands in that area of the country. Bereft of human interaction, his cattle that manage to survive are wild, mean and ornery. At the time of the events giving rise to the charges, Bundy’s cattle numbered over 1,000 head, straying as far as 50 miles from his ranch and into the Lake Mead National Recreation Area (“LMNRA”), getting stuck in mud, wandering onto golf courses, straying onto the freeway (causing accidents on occasion) – foraging aimlessly and wildly, roaming in small groups over hundreds of thousands of acres of federal lands that exist for the use of the general public for many other types of commercial and recreational uses such as camping, hunting, and hiking. Bundy claims he has strong anti-federal government views, proclaiming that the federal government cannot own land under the U.S. Constitution. These are not principled views – and certainly they have no merit legally – but nonetheless serve conveniently as a way for Bundy to somehow try to convince others that he has some reason for acting lawlessly, other than the obvious one: it serves his own ends and benefits him financially. Untethering himself from the law, Bundy claims he can do with his cattle as he pleases, including not incurring the expenses to manage or control them and not paying for the forage they consume at the expense of federal taxpayers.
The charges were dropped with Prejudice because the BLM SYSTEMATICALLY LIED, they attacked the Bundy's they threatened the Bundy's they even tried to incite the Bundy's into firing on law enforcement all while LYING about it. The Lawyers in the case hid information refused to turn over information and even called the Bundy's liars in court rooms.

Actually, that is the only reason the charges were dropped. The rest is just opinion.
Actually a judge ruled. It's now fact.


The judge ruled on this? they attacked the Bundy's they threatened the Bundy's they even tried to incite the Bundy's into firing on law enforcement all while LYING about it.

I thought the ruling was on the lawyers hiding critical information - a serious no no.
 
Bundy and his gang is nothing more than the rightwing Antifa.
And that's exactly why they were released. Right? LOL! People standing up for themselves are always criminals to regressive butt stains unless they are the one persecuted.

They were released due to the bumbling incompetence of the feds. Read it.

So Antifa aren't people standing up for themselves?

Or...do only rightwingnuts fall into that special category?
Holy shit. You're admitting the feds are a bunch of bumbling fools using nothing but arrogance and titles to fuck people over?

That's a step in the right direction.

They seriously fucked up the case - no one to blame but themselves.
 
Except antifa doesn't produce a single thing. Bundy who is a rancher, actually feeds people.


Now THAT is a great "defense"......LOL
I bet you said that with your mouth full


No, no, its is a "great defense"......question, however,

If I mug some little old lady, take $80 from her wallet....but give her $10 back for a cab home and give another $10 to some beggar......do I get some kudos from you guys for only keeping $60 of what I stole?
 
Did he pay the very modest grazing fees to graze on it? Was it his personal property? What gave him the right to take it? Ans. He's an asshole who thinks he's entitled to free shit.

I can hunt or fish on federal land without paying anything. I also pay taxes so in theory, I own that federal land.

I see no problem with him grazing his cattle on it, because it wasn't being used for anything else. Beside I like beef. :biggrin:

Yup...but...you have to pay for a license right? And there are limits to what you can catch and when? Kind of needed in order to keep it sustainable and not overly damage the environment and the fees pay for that management.

Cattle can and do create a lot of damage if not well managed and Bundy owes over a million in grazing fees.

Why should the rest of us have to pay our fees...our taxes etc and he doesn't?
He offered to pay and for is trouble the BLM attacked his family had snipers take aim at his family, they systematically lied about everything about the entire case, the case was not thrown out cause some body did not cross a t or dot an I it was thrown out because BLM and the Government lawyers all LIED about what happened over several YEARS. They lied in COURT, they with held information and they abused the legal system all while terrorizing a family.

Why didn't he pay?
Because BLM was threatening him he refused to pay them after they started threatening him and his family and offered to pay another entity BLM would have none of it. It was all in the files the Attorneys and BLM were forced to give the Judge.

If he had flat out payed - they wouldn't have a foot to stand on.
 
Bundy and his gang is nothing more than the rightwing Antifa.

Except antifa doesn't produce a single thing. Bundy who is a rancher, actually feeds people.

You do like beef, don't you?

Except you have no idea what members of Antifa do or what jobs they hold.

Bundy just wants to graze his cows for free on someone else's land.


The Anti-First Amendment terrorists exist to use violence to silence the expression of any who oppose the agenda of the Maoist democrat party.

Whether they hold a job at McDonalds or sell heroin in their off hours is not relevant.

Standard Disclaimer: I'm sure there are other jobs these terrorist are qualified for, but those two sprang to mind.
 
Mistrial declared in Bundy trial over withheld evidence

Had the evidence been provided in a timely manner, Navarro said, defense attorneys would have asked different questions of the jury, selected jurors differently and made stronger arguments during their opening statements.


Navarro said she wanted to be clear that her order did not mean that the evidence was in fact exculpatory or that the defendants were not guilty.



“That’s not my technical position, and it’s not a factual decision to be made by this court,” she said. “The defense has a right to information so it can provide it to the jury so the jury can decide.”

In other words it says nothing about whether or not he's guilty but that the prosecuters willfully withheld evidence that might have helped the defense and that is a serious ethical breech. They deserved to be tossed out on their butts for that.
 
Last edited:
Bundy and his gang is nothing more than the rightwing Antifa.

Except antifa doesn't produce a single thing. Bundy who is a rancher, actually feeds people.

You do like beef, don't you?


I think the more salient point is that ANTIFA exists to violently silence those with views contrary to the party.

Bundy just wanted to graze cattle.

On someone else's land, with out paying for it...oh wait. That's theft.
 
2-16-16 Doc 4 - U.S.A. v CLIVEN BUNDY - USA Detention Memorandum for Cliven Bundy | Crime & Justice | Criminal Justice

While Bundy claims he is a cattle rancher, his ranching operation – to the extent it can be called that – is unconventional if not bizarre. Rather than manage and control his cattle, he lets them run wild on the public lands with little, if any, human interaction until such time when he traps them and hauls them off to be sold or slaughtered for his own consumption. He does not vaccinate or treat his cattle for disease; does not employ cowboys to control and herd them; does not manage or control breeding; has no knowledge of where all the cattle are located at any given time; rarely brands them before he captures them; and has to bait them into traps in order to gather them.

Nor does he bring his cattle off the public lands in the off-season to feed them when the already sparse food supply in the desert is even scarcer. Raised in the wild, Bundy’s cattle are left to fend for themselves year-round, fighting off predators and scrounging for the meager amounts of food and water available in the difficult and arid terrain that comprises the public lands in that area of the country. Bereft of human interaction, his cattle that manage to survive are wild, mean and ornery. At the time of the events giving rise to the charges, Bundy’s cattle numbered over 1,000 head, straying as far as 50 miles from his ranch and into the Lake Mead National Recreation Area (“LMNRA”), getting stuck in mud, wandering onto golf courses, straying onto the freeway (causing accidents on occasion) – foraging aimlessly and wildly, roaming in small groups over hundreds of thousands of acres of federal lands that exist for the use of the general public for many other types of commercial and recreational uses such as camping, hunting, and hiking. Bundy claims he has strong anti-federal government views, proclaiming that the federal government cannot own land under the U.S. Constitution. These are not principled views – and certainly they have no merit legally – but nonetheless serve conveniently as a way for Bundy to somehow try to convince others that he has some reason for acting lawlessly, other than the obvious one: it serves his own ends and benefits him financially. Untethering himself from the law, Bundy claims he can do with his cattle as he pleases, including not incurring the expenses to manage or control them and not paying for the forage they consume at the expense of federal taxpayers.
The charges were dropped with Prejudice because the BLM SYSTEMATICALLY LIED, they attacked the Bundy's they threatened the Bundy's they even tried to incite the Bundy's into firing on law enforcement all while LYING about it. The Lawyers in the case hid information refused to turn over information and even called the Bundy's liars in court rooms.

Actually, that is the only reason the charges were dropped. The rest is just opinion.
Actually a judge ruled. It's now fact.


The judge ruled on this? they attacked the Bundy's they threatened the Bundy's they even tried to incite the Bundy's into firing on law enforcement all while LYING about it.

I thought the ruling was on the lawyers hiding critical information - a serious no no.
The ruling was because the feds actually had them in the site's of snipers and they lied about it. How the hell are you actually arguing the government was right in this?
 
They were released due to the bumbling incompetence of the feds. Read it.

So Antifa aren't people standing up for themselves?

Or...do only rightwingnuts fall into that special category?

Beating up old people for wearing "Make America Great Again" hats is not "standing up for yourself, " Comrade.

It's terrorism.

The Anti-First Amendment thugs are terrorists - irrefutable fact.

 
Bundy and his gang is nothing more than the rightwing Antifa.
And that's exactly why they were released. Right? LOL! People standing up for themselves are always criminals to regressive butt stains unless they are the one persecuted.

They were released due to the bumbling incompetence of the feds. Read it.

So Antifa aren't people standing up for themselves?

Or...do only rightwingnuts fall into that special category?
Holy shit. You're admitting the feds are a bunch of bumbling fools using nothing but arrogance and titles to fuck people over?

That's a step in the right direction.

They seriously fucked up the case - no one to blame but themselves.
Sending snipers in after some guy grazing cows is fucked up? Crazy.
 

Forum List

Back
Top