Decepticon
Rookie
- Jan 11, 2012
- 1,138
- 189
- 0
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #21
How does one reply to a thread where the poster suggests throwing out "precedent" as a legal precept?
By quoting from dissenting judges...duh!
Here's another one:
"If Congress can regulate this under the Commerce Clause, then it can regulate virtually anything ... quilting bees, clothes drives, and potluck suppers throughout the 50 States."
-- Justice Clarence Thomas
U. S. Supreme Court Justice
dissenting judges = precedent should be thrown out?
In what universe?
Oh, the one where you make sense or know what you're talking about.