Introducing the "Ilhan Omar Act"

We need an "Ilhan Omar Act" right now.

Ms. Omar clearly stated she cares more about Somalia than America.



This is what the Ilhan Omar Act would state...


If you are convicted of articulating that you care more about another country than the United States, you are DEPORTED TO THAT COUNTRY.



This way, Ms. Omar would be punted back to Somalia....

and ALL SUBS would be deported to ISRAEL.


And THAT would truly MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!!!


Deported by who? If its the government, I think you may run afoul of the 1st amendment.
 
New here, apparently.

The dominant GOP voter base consists of self proclaimed SUB humans, those who believe there is a demographic "chosen by Gawd" and while they aren't chosen they are commanded to serve the chosen by Gawd... according to a 2000 year old book.... written by the chosen....

now how convenient is that???

Does SOON mean MORE THAN 2000 years from now?

Are stars really the same size as figs?

Should the US base foreign policy on a 2000 year old book that claims stars are the same size as figs?
where does "stars are the same size as figs" come from? PS--what book is 2000 years old? Even the NT is not that old and the books of the OT are older----as is the Bhagavad Gita
 
good point----what is it and why is she
petting a machine gun

Who says its her? Again, she's only 41. The woman in that photo looks about 20. So....2003?

The picture looks like its from the 1960s.

So who is that, where, doing what, according to who?

These seem reasonable questions, given the claims being made, backed by nothing.
 
yes it is WHAT? I searched and found no
reference to "stars the size of figs" in either OT or NT
The age of the writings in the old and new testament. The Bhagavad gita is 500 to 200 bc says scholars.
NIV
and the stars in the sky fell to earth, as figs drop from a fig tree when shaken by a strong wind. Revelation.
 
where does "stars are the same size as figs" come from?

Revelation ch 6

13 And the stars of heaven fell unto the earth, even as a fig tree casteth her untimely figs, when she is shaken of a mighty wind.
 
Yeah, you may want to read the first word of the first amendment to see the folly of that reasoning.

And the first 5 if you really want to drive home why you're wrong.


Treason is treason. Giving aid and comfort. Waging war. Somalia is hardly an ally, but they haven't killed nearly as many Americans as Israel has.
 
Treason is treason. Giving aid and comfort. Waging war. Somalia is hardly an ally, but they haven't killed nearly as many Americans as Israel has.

Treason is making war against the United States. Its the only crime defined by the constitution itself.

Nothing you've described is treason. Or even close. Nothing Ilhan Omar has said is treason.

And the 1st amendment explicitly forbids the government for punishing someone for free speech.

What you're calling for is unconstitutional.
 
Treason is making war against the United States. Its the only crime defined by the constitution itself.

Nothing you've described is treason. Or even close. Nothing Ilhan Omar has said is treason.

And the 1st amendment explicitly forbids the government for punishing someone for free speech.

What you're calling for is unconstitutional.


According to you... but real legal scholars may disagree with you...
 
Who says its her? Again, she's only 41. The woman in that photo looks about 20. So....2002?

The picture looks like its from the 1960s.

So who is that, where, doing what, according to who?

These seem reasonable questions, given the claims being made, backed by nothing.
oh----ok no evidence of nuthin'
The age of the writings in the old and new testament. The Bhagavad gita is 500 to 200 bc says scholars.
Oh---I thought that the Bhagavad Gita is older
Revelation ch 6

13 And the stars of heaven fell unto the earth, even as a fig tree casteth her untimely figs, when she is shaken of a mighty wind.
SHEEESH---that's poetic imagery. Did you pass 10th grade English Literature class?. Kinda nice even for the questionable BOOK OF REVULSIONS
 
According to you... but real legal scholars may disagree with you...
Name two.

Because "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press;" is pretty clear.

You can't violate the 1st amendment. Even if you create a new law.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top