- Feb 12, 2007
- 59,439
- 24,106
- 2,290
The Lerner story is getting more interesting by the day.
This women has all the hallmarks of someone who refuses to be the scapegoat. Maybe.
Her refusal to talk certainly would seem to indicate guilt, but not always. She may also be afraid to reveal what she knows. She may not want to reveal what she knows because perhaps it could damage a set of people she believes in.
Her second refusal to resign, again shows clear defiance.
Perhaps her little talk at the beginning of the hearing that waved her 5th amendment rights - was not an accident.
Perhaps. Perhaps this woman is the key to it all.
Villain no doubt about it.
Biggie right here. Lerner told "mistruths" to the House Committee four times in the past year.
And Lerner's insanity became crystal clear when she was crazy enough to have a question planted at the ABA meeting about targeting Tea Party groups and Conservative groups so she could issue an apology before the Inspector General of the Treasury Department's findings were released showing the misconduct of the IRS.
And she has a history of aggressive behaviour that has been uncovered over her tenure at the FEC and continually used her position there to target Conservatives and Christians.
I wouldn't give her the benefit of the doubt of "insanity". What we have in DC how is a tyrannical government that doesn't recognize limits to its power. Anyone who questions or resists the reach of government is an "enemy".
This is why we had a revolution in the first place.