🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Is a second american revolution now inevitable?

In the case of a second American Teabagger Republican Revolution, do you think that the government won't be using US military personnel to defend vital pieces of our infrastructure?

Do you think that old, fat, stupid, lazy, FOX-watching American Teabagger Republicans actually have the courage, will or ability to fight a guerrilla war against the US government?

A couple days ago these big talkers were running helter skelter to distance themselves from their latest two 'guerrillas' in their war against America;

now they're slowly sliding back into their fake 'revolutionary' posture.
 
Who else is going to fight a revolution? Occupiers? They're too busy wiggling their fingers and not electing candidates to public office. Democrats? Democrats are half of the US power structure so they don't want a revolution. Republicans? Yes. Stupid, racist, gun-toting, Bible-waving, maniacal, "survivalist" Southern neo-Confederate Teabagger Republicans who think that Obama is a Marxist. They will be the ones who are dumb enough to try to start another civil war, just like they did last time.

And just like last time, they will claim for 100 years that it was all about "states' rights" instead of their overt racism and outdated patriarchal bullshit belief system.
 
.

Perhaps all the ugly stuff could be diverted. Maybe we'll see partisan ideologues from both ends decide to bury their egos and narcissism and open a honest, honorable, constructive dialogue in the best interest of our children and our country. It will certainly take someone to be first, to be the adult in the room.

Any takers?

.
 
Who else is going to fight a revolution? Occupiers? They're too busy wiggling their fingers and not electing candidates to public office. Democrats? Democrats are half of the US power structure so they don't want a revolution. Republicans? Yes. Stupid, racist, gun-toting, Bible-waving, maniacal, "survivalist" Southern neo-Confederate Teabagger Republicans who think that Obama is a Marxist. They will be the ones who are dumb enough to try to start another civil war, just like they did last time.

And just like last time, they will claim for 100 years that it was all about "states' rights" instead of their overt racism and outdated patriarchal bullshit belief system.

hahahahha..your reasonable, thoughtful and unbiased assessment of the situation shows a great deal of maturity and clearheadedness. /sarcasm
 
Perhaps all the ugly stuff could be diverted. Maybe we'll see partisan ideologues from both ends decide to bury their egos and narcissism and open a honest, honorable, constructive dialogue in the best interest of our children and our country. It will certainly take someone to be first, to be the adult in the room.

Any takers?

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=71FveedEmkg]Snot - Snooze Button - YouTube[/ame]
 
Perhaps all the ugly stuff could be diverted. Maybe we'll see partisan ideologues from both ends decide to bury their egos and narcissism and open a honest, honorable, constructive dialogue in the best interest of our children and our country. It will certainly take someone to be first, to be the adult in the room.

Any takers?

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=71FveedEmkg]Snot - Snooze Button - YouTube[/ame]

I don't know what this means, and I'm not interested in clicking on your link.

Is that a yes or a "no, I'm not up to it"?

.
 
If revolutions could be fought without having to stray more than a few yards from a refrigerator, maybe.

Do you nutters really think that you can get people DUMBER THAN YOU to start some shit?

Quit laughing, a few here are flirting with advocating armed insurrection against the nation. TREASON is the term for this.

That's what the british said about the colonists in 1776. Traitors and treasonous.

We call them patriots.
Were they wrong to secede from england? Were they traitors?
Was what they did "treason"?..in your opinion.

Yeah right...like you right wing internet warriors are Sons of Liberty .

:lol:
 
A "Spanish Civil War" type revolution certainly is possible:

The continued hording of wealth by a tiny minority will continue to cause a degradation in the quality of life for the majority of Americans.

They will respond by electing an increasingly liberal government which will implement liberal and semi-socialist programs, regulations, tax codes and other laws.

Ever paranoid wing nuts will (as always) grossly exaggerate the government actions and declare that all their freedoms have been taken away, the government is run by communists etc., etc....the usual diatribe we hear from them...only with much more adamacy.

Small groups of wingnut extremists will attack government installations, but the government will not use the federal army against them. They'll treat it as a law enforcement issue.

The failure of government to react strongly against these wing nut extremists will encourage other wing nuts to join the extremists - including some military officers..

Then we'll have a full blown "Spanish Civil War".
 
Quit laughing, a few here are flirting with advocating armed insurrection against the nation. TREASON is the term for this.

That's what the british said about the colonists in 1776. Traitors and treasonous.

We call them patriots.
Were they wrong to secede from england? Were they traitors?
Was what they did "treason"?..in your opinion.

[Yeah right...like you right wing internet warriors are Sons of Liberty .

I don't see where anyone made a claim like that.

In your opinion, were the colonists "traitors" or "patriots"? Simple question.
 
yes, there will be a revolution, and its already started. It will be a revolution at the polling place. the good ole boys are being kicked out and a new generation of patriotic americans is taking over.

This applies to both parties. The american people are fed up with govt greed, corruption, and incompetence. The are demanding change.

If peaceful change does not come, then we will see what comes next.

I really think that some form of secession or division of the country is more likely than an armed rebellion, however, for you libs, if it comes to violence, the military and the police will side with the people, not a tyranical dictatorial government.

We are at a crossroads, obama has put us there.
 
Perhaps all the ugly stuff could be diverted. Maybe we'll see partisan ideologues from both ends decide to bury their egos and narcissism and open a honest, honorable, constructive dialogue in the best interest of our children and our country. It will certainly take someone to be first, to be the adult in the room.

Any takers?



I don't know what this means, and I'm not interested in clicking on your link.

Is that a yes or a "no, I'm not up to it"?

That is a really kick-ass song from a band that was literally too short-lived.

The message is "We don't need another armed revolution. We achieved women's rights, civil rights, voting rights, we got children out of mines and factories and into public schools, we unionized our workers, we achieved an eight-hour workday and a minimum wage, all without full-scale armed insurrection. The new American police state was created by the super-rich to protect their fortunes. The global change in the world economy that will take place once Cannabis Sativa is legalized by the US and therefore the UN will redistribute the gargantuan amounts of wealth on this planet away from the moneyed class back to the world's poor. When even the most rural areas of the globe are allowed to provide their basic necessities without foreign or domestic governmental aid, and each locality is more independent, the standard of living will raise across the board, but at the expense of the global super-rich.

In short, if we legalize marijuana again, we won't need another armed revolution."

If you say that it won't work, I'll put up a wall of links to major university and government reports from all over the world, including the US, that say that it will. But since no one will read them anyway, what's the point?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

I don't know what this means, and I'm not interested in clicking on your link.

Is that a yes or a "no, I'm not up to it"?
That is a really kick-ass song from a band that was literally too short-lived.

The message is "We don't need another armed revolution. We achieved women's rights, civil rights, voting rights, we got children out of mines and factories and into public schools, we unionized our workers, we achieved an eight-hour workday and a minimum wage, all without full-scale armed insurrection. The new American police state was created by the super-rich to protect their fortunes. The global change in the world economy that will take place once Cannabis Sativa is legalized by the US and therefore the UN will redistribute the gargantuan amounts of wealth on this planet away from the moneyed class back to the world's poor. When even the most rural areas of the globe are allowed to provide their basic necessities without foreign or domestic governmental aid, and each locality is more independent, the standard of living will raise across the board, but at the expense of the global super-rich.

In short, if we legalize marijuana again, we won't need another armed revolution."

If you say that it won't work, I'll put up a wall of links to major university and government reports from all over the world, including the US, that say that it will. But since no one will read them anyway, what's the point?


What in the world does that have to do with my post?

.
 
You wanted to know how all of the ugly stuff can be averted. I told you how:

1942_USDA.jpg


Oh, wait. You said "Perhaps the ugly stuff can be diverted", not "averted". My mistake. Carry on planning your civil war.
 
Last edited:
yea it is coming, america is so divisive. it will start with tow small groups against each other. it's not going to start all libs against all cons. but unrest is rising. people are frustrated. people are tired of having their rights trampled. people are tired of one group putting pressure on politicians to limit the rights of another group. yea, something is going to boil over
 

Forum List

Back
Top