🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Is Israel the Same as South Africa?

It looks like Georgie Boy is so, so obsessed with demonizing Israel and America, and doesn't even concern himself with what is happening in Libya (we realize that he has no concern for the Black tribes being murdered in the Sudan since the Jews are not involved.. What a great dhimmi he is showing us he has become when he can't even be concerned for his own. Perhaps Georgie Boy, to continue his dhimmitude should move to some Muslim country and maybe they too will set him up with a subsidized apartment.

More Sunni ?rebels?: Libya Blacks Treated Like Apes In The Zoo By Racist Rebels |
"The agreement effectively divided the Arab provinces of the Ottoman Empire outside the Arabian peninsula into areas of future British and French control or influence.[4]

"The terms were negotiated by the French diplomat François Georges-Picot and British Sir Mark Sykes.

"The Russian Tsarist government was a minor party to the Sykes–Picot agreement, and when, following the Russian Revolution of October 1917, the Bolsheviks exposed the agreement, 'the British were embarrassed, the Arabs dismayed and the Turks delighted.'"

No mention of the Libyans or which white parasites drew their borders?

Sykes?Picot Agreement - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
We get you, Georgie Boy. You are not interested in the Blacks being treated like apes in a zoo in Libya (nor are you interested in the Blacks who have been killed there during the uprising). Of course, you are not interested in the Black tribes being eliminated in the Sudan. In your mind, the "White Parasites" did you in so you get back at them on forums. How nice that you are able to use the Arabs as pawns in your fight against the "White Parasites." Oh, by the way, Georgie Boy, Wikipedia is trying to raise funds; and since you use that site repeatedly, why not send them a few bucks to keep them going. What, oh what, would Georgie Boy do if he didn't have Wikipedia to run to.
Cotesia glomerata - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
antique4xpu, et al,

I thought the "International Law" in question was governed by the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT).

THE TREATY ON THE NON-PROLIFERATION OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS ( NPT ) said:
Article IX

3. This Treaty shall enter into force after its ratification by the States, the Governments of which are designated Depositaries of the Treaty, and forty other States signatory to this Treaty and the deposit of their instruments of ratification. For the purposes of this Treaty, a nuclear-weapon State is one which has manufactured and exploded a nuclear weapon or other nuclear explosive device prior to 1 January 1967.
Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties 1969 said:
Article 12 Consent to be bound by a treaty expressed by signature

1. The consent of a State to be bound by a treaty is expressed by the signature of its representative when:

(a) the treaty provides that signature shall have that effect;

(b) it is otherwise established that the negotiating States were agreed that signature should have that effect; or

(c) the intention of the State to give that effect to the signature appears from the full powers of its representative or was expressed during the negotiation.

SOURCE: Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties Done at Vienna on 23 May 1969

(OBSERVATION)

  • IRAN (ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF): Is a signatory to the NPT:
    Page 34 of NPT
    Address: Permanent Mission of the Islamic Republic of Iran to the United Nations
    622 Third Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10017
    Telephone: (212) 687-2020​

  • ISRAEL (STATE OF): Is NOT a signatory to the NPT

(QUESTION)

Is the STATE of ISRAEL, which is not a party to the NPT, subject to the same requirements as the ISLAMIC REPUBLIC of IRAN, which is a party to the NPT?


(COMMENT)

All states, especially the US, operated in their own best interest. Fairness and international politics rarely have an intercept point.

perhaps no one remembers that the nation of israel was founded on acts of terrorism , i remind you that menachem begin was wanted for terrorist crimes against the british. can you not see the similarity of the king david hotel massacre by the jews and acts or terrorism committed by hezbollah ?
(OBSERVATION)

The Universality of the Islamic Resistance Movement: said:
Article Seven:

The Islamic Resistance Movement is one of the links in the chain of the struggle against the Zionist invaders. It goes back to 1939, to the emergence of the martyr Izz al-Din al Kissam and his brethren the fighters, members of Moslem Brotherhood. It goes on to reach out and become one with another chain that includes the struggle of the Palestinians and Moslem Brotherhood in the 1948 war and the Jihad operations of the Moslem Brotherhood in 1968 and after.​

SOURCE: The Covenant of the Islamic Resistance Movement

(COMMENT)

I have stated several times that neither side has clean hands. But some hands are a bit more dirty than others.

"Izz al-Din al-Qissam was killed by British Police in Palestine on November 20, 1935; after a decade (plus) of anti-Jewish/Zionist and anti-Mandate terrorism operations. In 1930 al-Qassam formed the Palestinian Black Hand after the 1929 Palestine Western Wall Uprising riot.

Arguments suggest that the Israelis started the (alleged) ethnic cleansing "before the war." Yet the first engagement was Hebron (1929) and 1929 Safed riots (1929); not excluding the Palestinian namesake today recognizes Izz ad-Din al-Qassam as well as Haj Amin Al-Husseini (the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem).

But even before then, one of the major incidents that triggered regimentation of Jewish Defense Forces was the inflammatory anti-Zionist rhetoric of Amin al-Husseini which instigated the April 1920, uprising in the Old City (Nebi Musa riots) that caused 50,000 Arabs to attack Jews. It was after these attacks that the Haganah (1920) emerged as a defense force. The Irgun (1931) did not emerge until the Black Hand of al-Qassam began operations.

Yes, eight decades ago, both side employed terrorism. One side evolved beyond that tactic, while the other side still endorses it today.

In this argument, it must be remembered that the Hostile Arab Palestinians (HoAP) attempted to bring forth an Islamic State through terrorism and aggression; but failed. You cannot (with any dignity) claim foul just because you are weaker than your adversary which beat you at your own game.

While Israel does not have any terrorist organizations today, the HoAP pledges to violate law:

  • "There is no solution for the Palestinian question except through Jihad."
  • "Armed struggle is the only way to liberate Palestine." ... ... ... the "Commando (Feday'ee) action constitutes the nucleus of the Palestinian popular liberation war."

Most Respectfully,
R
The biggest difference between terror inflicted by Jews with that repaid by their victims is simply the star-spangled skirts one side hides behind:

"It has been suggested that a striking similarity between the Jewish groups, and jihad networks in Western democracies is their alienation and isolation from the values of the majority, mainstream culture, which they view as an existential threat to their own community.

"Other similarities between these groups are that their terrorist ideology is not exclusively religious, as it attempts to achieve political, territorial and nationalistic goals as well, e.g. the disruption of the Camp David accords.

"However, the newer of these Jewish groups have tended to emphasise religious motives for their actions at the expense of secular ones.

"In the case of Jewish terrorism most networks consist of religious Zionists and ultra-orthodox Jews living in isolated, homogenous communities.[9]

"The following groups have been considered religious terrorist organizations in Israel:

"Gush Emunim Underground (1979–84): formed by members of the Israeli political movement Gush Emunim.[10] This group is most well known for two actions. Firstly, for bomb attacks on the mayors of West Bank cities on June 2, 1980, and secondly, an abandoned plot to blow up the Temple Mount mosques.

"The Israeli Judge Zvi Cohen, heading the sentencing panel at the group’s trial, stated that they had three motives, ‘not necessarily shared by all the defendants. The first motive, at the heart of the Temple Mount conspiracy, is religious.’[11]

"Keshet (Kvutza Shelo Titpasher) (1981–1989): A Tel Aviv anti-Zionist haredi group focused on bombing property without loss of life.[12][13]:101 Yigal Marcus, Tel Aviv District Police commander, said that he considered the group a gang of criminals, not a terrorist group."

Jewish religious terrorism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
P F Tinmore, et al,

Sorry, I misunderstood what you wanted.



The United Nations Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy was adopted by Member States on 8 September 2006. The strategy said:
We resolve to undertake the following measures to prevent and combat terrorism, in particular by denying terrorists access to the means to carry out their attacks, to their targets and to the desired impact of their attacks:

To refrain from organizing, instigating, facilitating, participating in, financing, encouraging or tolerating terrorist activities and to take appropriate practical measures to ensure that our respective territories are not used for terrorist installations or training camps, or for the preparation or organization of terrorist acts intended to be committed against other States or their citizens.

To cooperate fully in the fight against terrorism, in accordance with our obligations under international law, in order to find, deny safe haven and bring to justice, on the basis of the principle of extradite or prosecute, any person who supports, facilitates, participates or attempts to participate in the financing, planning, preparation or perpetration of terrorist acts or provides safe havens.

SOURCE: United Nations General Assembly Adopts Global Counter Terrorism Strategy

v/r
R

OK, so how is that applicable to the Palestinians?

Still nothing, huh?
 
antique4xpu, et al,

I thought the "International Law" in question was governed by the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT).

THE TREATY ON THE NON-PROLIFERATION OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS ( NPT ) said:
Article IX

3. This Treaty shall enter into force after its ratification by the States, the Governments of which are designated Depositaries of the Treaty, and forty other States signatory to this Treaty and the deposit of their instruments of ratification. For the purposes of this Treaty, a nuclear-weapon State is one which has manufactured and exploded a nuclear weapon or other nuclear explosive device prior to 1 January 1967.

(OBSERVATION)

  • IRAN (ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF): Is a signatory to the NPT:
    Page 34 of NPT
    Address: Permanent Mission of the Islamic Republic of Iran to the United Nations
    622 Third Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10017
    Telephone: (212) 687-2020​

  • ISRAEL (STATE OF): Is NOT a signatory to the NPT

(QUESTION)

Is the STATE of ISRAEL, which is not a party to the NPT, subject to the same requirements as the ISLAMIC REPUBLIC of IRAN, which is a party to the NPT?


(COMMENT)

All states, especially the US, operated in their own best interest. Fairness and international politics rarely have an intercept point.


(OBSERVATION)

The Universality of the Islamic Resistance Movement: said:
Article Seven:

The Islamic Resistance Movement is one of the links in the chain of the struggle against the Zionist invaders. It goes back to 1939, to the emergence of the martyr Izz al-Din al Kissam and his brethren the fighters, members of Moslem Brotherhood. It goes on to reach out and become one with another chain that includes the struggle of the Palestinians and Moslem Brotherhood in the 1948 war and the Jihad operations of the Moslem Brotherhood in 1968 and after.​

SOURCE: The Covenant of the Islamic Resistance Movement

(COMMENT)

I have stated several times that neither side has clean hands. But some hands are a bit more dirty than others.

"Izz al-Din al-Qissam was killed by British Police in Palestine on November 20, 1935; after a decade (plus) of anti-Jewish/Zionist and anti-Mandate terrorism operations. In 1930 al-Qassam formed the Palestinian Black Hand after the 1929 Palestine Western Wall Uprising riot.

Arguments suggest that the Israelis started the (alleged) ethnic cleansing "before the war." Yet the first engagement was Hebron (1929) and 1929 Safed riots (1929); not excluding the Palestinian namesake today recognizes Izz ad-Din al-Qassam as well as Haj Amin Al-Husseini (the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem).

But even before then, one of the major incidents that triggered regimentation of Jewish Defense Forces was the inflammatory anti-Zionist rhetoric of Amin al-Husseini which instigated the April 1920, uprising in the Old City (Nebi Musa riots) that caused 50,000 Arabs to attack Jews. It was after these attacks that the Haganah (1920) emerged as a defense force. The Irgun (1931) did not emerge until the Black Hand of al-Qassam began operations.

Yes, eight decades ago, both side employed terrorism. One side evolved beyond that tactic, while the other side still endorses it today.

In this argument, it must be remembered that the Hostile Arab Palestinians (HoAP) attempted to bring forth an Islamic State through terrorism and aggression; but failed. You cannot (with any dignity) claim foul just because you are weaker than your adversary which beat you at your own game.

While Israel does not have any terrorist organizations today, the HoAP pledges to violate law:

  • "There is no solution for the Palestinian question except through Jihad."
  • "Armed struggle is the only way to liberate Palestine." ... ... ... the "Commando (Feday'ee) action constitutes the nucleus of the Palestinian popular liberation war."

Most Respectfully,
R
The biggest difference between terror inflicted by Jews with that repaid by their victims is simply the star-spangled skirts one side hides behind:

"It has been suggested that a striking similarity between the Jewish groups, and jihad networks in Western democracies is their alienation and isolation from the values of the majority, mainstream culture, which they view as an existential threat to their own community.

"Other similarities between these groups are that their terrorist ideology is not exclusively religious, as it attempts to achieve political, territorial and nationalistic goals as well, e.g. the disruption of the Camp David accords.

"However, the newer of these Jewish groups have tended to emphasise religious motives for their actions at the expense of secular ones.

"In the case of Jewish terrorism most networks consist of religious Zionists and ultra-orthodox Jews living in isolated, homogenous communities.[9]

"The following groups have been considered religious terrorist organizations in Israel:

"Gush Emunim Underground (1979–84): formed by members of the Israeli political movement Gush Emunim.[10] This group is most well known for two actions. Firstly, for bomb attacks on the mayors of West Bank cities on June 2, 1980, and secondly, an abandoned plot to blow up the Temple Mount mosques.

"The Israeli Judge Zvi Cohen, heading the sentencing panel at the group’s trial, stated that they had three motives, ‘not necessarily shared by all the defendants. The first motive, at the heart of the Temple Mount conspiracy, is religious.’[11]

"Keshet (Kvutza Shelo Titpasher) (1981–1989): A Tel Aviv anti-Zionist haredi group focused on bombing property without loss of life.[12][13]:101 Yigal Marcus, Tel Aviv District Police commander, said that he considered the group a gang of criminals, not a terrorist group."

Jewish religious terrorism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
At least we "White Parasites" (as Georgie Boy has called us) can be aghast at what is happening to the Blacks by the Muslims, but Georgie Boy is still fixated on the Jews and Israel. The viewers can see the hypocrisy here when there is so much terrorism going on in so many different areas of the world and some posters want you to believe that Israel and America are the most evil countries in the world. Meanwhile, every poster whose roots are in Africa should be sick about things like this. By the way, regarding your previous post, I guess you are not going to throw Wikipedia a couple of bucks for your constant use of that site when they are calling for some help. It shows you that there are parasites which come in every color.
BosNewsLife ? Christian News Agency » Blog Archive » Islamists Kill Five Nigeria Christians In Roadside Attack
 
antique4xpu, et al,

I thought the "International Law" in question was governed by the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT).

THE TREATY ON THE NON-PROLIFERATION OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS ( NPT ) said:
Article IX

3. This Treaty shall enter into force after its ratification by the States, the Governments of which are designated Depositaries of the Treaty, and forty other States signatory to this Treaty and the deposit of their instruments of ratification. For the purposes of this Treaty, a nuclear-weapon State is one which has manufactured and exploded a nuclear weapon or other nuclear explosive device prior to 1 January 1967.

(OBSERVATION)

  • IRAN (ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF): Is a signatory to the NPT:
    Page 34 of NPT
    Address: Permanent Mission of the Islamic Republic of Iran to the United Nations
    622 Third Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10017
    Telephone: (212) 687-2020​

  • ISRAEL (STATE OF): Is NOT a signatory to the NPT

(QUESTION)

Is the STATE of ISRAEL, which is not a party to the NPT, subject to the same requirements as the ISLAMIC REPUBLIC of IRAN, which is a party to the NPT?


(COMMENT)

All states, especially the US, operated in their own best interest. Fairness and international politics rarely have an intercept point.


(OBSERVATION)

The Universality of the Islamic Resistance Movement: said:
Article Seven:

The Islamic Resistance Movement is one of the links in the chain of the struggle against the Zionist invaders. It goes back to 1939, to the emergence of the martyr Izz al-Din al Kissam and his brethren the fighters, members of Moslem Brotherhood. It goes on to reach out and become one with another chain that includes the struggle of the Palestinians and Moslem Brotherhood in the 1948 war and the Jihad operations of the Moslem Brotherhood in 1968 and after.​

SOURCE: The Covenant of the Islamic Resistance Movement

(COMMENT)

I have stated several times that neither side has clean hands. But some hands are a bit more dirty than others.

"Izz al-Din al-Qissam was killed by British Police in Palestine on November 20, 1935; after a decade (plus) of anti-Jewish/Zionist and anti-Mandate terrorism operations. In 1930 al-Qassam formed the Palestinian Black Hand after the 1929 Palestine Western Wall Uprising riot.

Arguments suggest that the Israelis started the (alleged) ethnic cleansing "before the war." Yet the first engagement was Hebron (1929) and 1929 Safed riots (1929); not excluding the Palestinian namesake today recognizes Izz ad-Din al-Qassam as well as Haj Amin Al-Husseini (the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem).

But even before then, one of the major incidents that triggered regimentation of Jewish Defense Forces was the inflammatory anti-Zionist rhetoric of Amin al-Husseini which instigated the April 1920, uprising in the Old City (Nebi Musa riots) that caused 50,000 Arabs to attack Jews. It was after these attacks that the Haganah (1920) emerged as a defense force. The Irgun (1931) did not emerge until the Black Hand of al-Qassam began operations.

Yes, eight decades ago, both side employed terrorism. One side evolved beyond that tactic, while the other side still endorses it today.

In this argument, it must be remembered that the Hostile Arab Palestinians (HoAP) attempted to bring forth an Islamic State through terrorism and aggression; but failed. You cannot (with any dignity) claim foul just because you are weaker than your adversary which beat you at your own game.

While Israel does not have any terrorist organizations today, the HoAP pledges to violate law:

  • "There is no solution for the Palestinian question except through Jihad."
  • "Armed struggle is the only way to liberate Palestine." ... ... ... the "Commando (Feday'ee) action constitutes the nucleus of the Palestinian popular liberation war."

Most Respectfully,
R
The biggest difference between terror inflicted by Jews with that repaid by their victims is simply the star-spangled skirts one side hides behind:

"It has been suggested that a striking similarity between the Jewish groups, and jihad networks in Western democracies is their alienation and isolation from the values of the majority, mainstream culture, which they view as an existential threat to their own community.

"Other similarities between these groups are that their terrorist ideology is not exclusively religious, as it attempts to achieve political, territorial and nationalistic goals as well, e.g. the disruption of the Camp David accords.

"However, the newer of these Jewish groups have tended to emphasise religious motives for their actions at the expense of secular ones.

"In the case of Jewish terrorism most networks consist of religious Zionists and ultra-orthodox Jews living in isolated, homogenous communities.[9]

"The following groups have been considered religious terrorist organizations in Israel:

"Gush Emunim Underground (1979–84): formed by members of the Israeli political movement Gush Emunim.[10] This group is most well known for two actions. Firstly, for bomb attacks on the mayors of West Bank cities on June 2, 1980, and secondly, an abandoned plot to blow up the Temple Mount mosques.

"The Israeli Judge Zvi Cohen, heading the sentencing panel at the group’s trial, stated that they had three motives, ‘not necessarily shared by all the defendants. The first motive, at the heart of the Temple Mount conspiracy, is religious.’[11]

"Keshet (Kvutza Shelo Titpasher) (1981–1989): A Tel Aviv anti-Zionist haredi group focused on bombing property without loss of life.[12][13]:101 Yigal Marcus, Tel Aviv District Police commander, said that he considered the group a gang of criminals, not a terrorist group."

Jewish religious terrorism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I think Rocco really nailed it on the head. One group evolved, developed a modern country and evolved their militias into a modern army, while the other group....well....you know :lol:
 
antique4xpu, et al,

I thought the "International Law" in question was governed by the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT).


(OBSERVATION)

  • IRAN (ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF): Is a signatory to the NPT:
    Page 34 of NPT
    Address: Permanent Mission of the Islamic Republic of Iran to the United Nations
    622 Third Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10017
    Telephone: (212) 687-2020​

  • ISRAEL (STATE OF): Is NOT a signatory to the NPT

(QUESTION)

Is the STATE of ISRAEL, which is not a party to the NPT, subject to the same requirements as the ISLAMIC REPUBLIC of IRAN, which is a party to the NPT?


(COMMENT)

All states, especially the US, operated in their own best interest. Fairness and international politics rarely have an intercept point.


(OBSERVATION)



(COMMENT)

I have stated several times that neither side has clean hands. But some hands are a bit more dirty than others.

"Izz al-Din al-Qissam was killed by British Police in Palestine on November 20, 1935; after a decade (plus) of anti-Jewish/Zionist and anti-Mandate terrorism operations. In 1930 al-Qassam formed the Palestinian Black Hand after the 1929 Palestine Western Wall Uprising riot.

Arguments suggest that the Israelis started the (alleged) ethnic cleansing "before the war." Yet the first engagement was Hebron (1929) and 1929 Safed riots (1929); not excluding the Palestinian namesake today recognizes Izz ad-Din al-Qassam as well as Haj Amin Al-Husseini (the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem).

But even before then, one of the major incidents that triggered regimentation of Jewish Defense Forces was the inflammatory anti-Zionist rhetoric of Amin al-Husseini which instigated the April 1920, uprising in the Old City (Nebi Musa riots) that caused 50,000 Arabs to attack Jews. It was after these attacks that the Haganah (1920) emerged as a defense force. The Irgun (1931) did not emerge until the Black Hand of al-Qassam began operations.

Yes, eight decades ago, both side employed terrorism. One side evolved beyond that tactic, while the other side still endorses it today.

In this argument, it must be remembered that the Hostile Arab Palestinians (HoAP) attempted to bring forth an Islamic State through terrorism and aggression; but failed. You cannot (with any dignity) claim foul just because you are weaker than your adversary which beat you at your own game.

While Israel does not have any terrorist organizations today, the HoAP pledges to violate law:

  • "There is no solution for the Palestinian question except through Jihad."
  • "Armed struggle is the only way to liberate Palestine." ... ... ... the "Commando (Feday'ee) action constitutes the nucleus of the Palestinian popular liberation war."

Most Respectfully,
R
The biggest difference between terror inflicted by Jews with that repaid by their victims is simply the star-spangled skirts one side hides behind:

"It has been suggested that a striking similarity between the Jewish groups, and jihad networks in Western democracies is their alienation and isolation from the values of the majority, mainstream culture, which they view as an existential threat to their own community.

"Other similarities between these groups are that their terrorist ideology is not exclusively religious, as it attempts to achieve political, territorial and nationalistic goals as well, e.g. the disruption of the Camp David accords.

"However, the newer of these Jewish groups have tended to emphasise religious motives for their actions at the expense of secular ones.

"In the case of Jewish terrorism most networks consist of religious Zionists and ultra-orthodox Jews living in isolated, homogenous communities.[9]

"The following groups have been considered religious terrorist organizations in Israel:

"Gush Emunim Underground (1979–84): formed by members of the Israeli political movement Gush Emunim.[10] This group is most well known for two actions. Firstly, for bomb attacks on the mayors of West Bank cities on June 2, 1980, and secondly, an abandoned plot to blow up the Temple Mount mosques.

"The Israeli Judge Zvi Cohen, heading the sentencing panel at the group’s trial, stated that they had three motives, ‘not necessarily shared by all the defendants. The first motive, at the heart of the Temple Mount conspiracy, is religious.’[11]

"Keshet (Kvutza Shelo Titpasher) (1981–1989): A Tel Aviv anti-Zionist haredi group focused on bombing property without loss of life.[12][13]:101 Yigal Marcus, Tel Aviv District Police commander, said that he considered the group a gang of criminals, not a terrorist group."

Jewish religious terrorism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I think Rocco really nailed it on the head. One group evolved, developed a modern country and evolved their militias into a modern army, while the other group....well....you know :lol:

Indeed, Israel could steal, kill, lie, and mooch at exceptional levels.

The Palestinians lacked those skills.
 
The biggest difference between terror inflicted by Jews with that repaid by their victims is simply the star-spangled skirts one side hides behind:

"It has been suggested that a striking similarity between the Jewish groups, and jihad networks in Western democracies is their alienation and isolation from the values of the majority, mainstream culture, which they view as an existential threat to their own community.

"Other similarities between these groups are that their terrorist ideology is not exclusively religious, as it attempts to achieve political, territorial and nationalistic goals as well, e.g. the disruption of the Camp David accords.

"However, the newer of these Jewish groups have tended to emphasise religious motives for their actions at the expense of secular ones.

"In the case of Jewish terrorism most networks consist of religious Zionists and ultra-orthodox Jews living in isolated, homogenous communities.[9]

"The following groups have been considered religious terrorist organizations in Israel:

"Gush Emunim Underground (1979–84): formed by members of the Israeli political movement Gush Emunim.[10] This group is most well known for two actions. Firstly, for bomb attacks on the mayors of West Bank cities on June 2, 1980, and secondly, an abandoned plot to blow up the Temple Mount mosques.

"The Israeli Judge Zvi Cohen, heading the sentencing panel at the group’s trial, stated that they had three motives, ‘not necessarily shared by all the defendants. The first motive, at the heart of the Temple Mount conspiracy, is religious.’[11]

"Keshet (Kvutza Shelo Titpasher) (1981–1989): A Tel Aviv anti-Zionist haredi group focused on bombing property without loss of life.[12][13]:101 Yigal Marcus, Tel Aviv District Police commander, said that he considered the group a gang of criminals, not a terrorist group."

Jewish religious terrorism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I think Rocco really nailed it on the head. One group evolved, developed a modern country and evolved their militias into a modern army, while the other group....well....you know :lol:

Indeed, Israel could steal, kill, lie, and mooch at exceptional levels.

The Palestinians lacked those skills.

Typical drivel propaganda.
Do you disagree with what I said ?
 
I think Rocco really nailed it on the head. One group evolved, developed a modern country and evolved their militias into a modern army, while the other group....well....you know :lol:

Indeed, Israel could steal, kill, lie, and mooch at exceptional levels.

The Palestinians lacked those skills.

Typical drivel propaganda.
Do you disagree with what I said ?

Not at all. I was merely clarifying how that happened.
 
The biggest difference between terror inflicted by Jews with that repaid by their victims is simply the star-spangled skirts one side hides behind:

"It has been suggested that a striking similarity between the Jewish groups, and jihad networks in Western democracies is their alienation and isolation from the values of the majority, mainstream culture, which they view as an existential threat to their own community.

"Other similarities between these groups are that their terrorist ideology is not exclusively religious, as it attempts to achieve political, territorial and nationalistic goals as well, e.g. the disruption of the Camp David accords.

"However, the newer of these Jewish groups have tended to emphasise religious motives for their actions at the expense of secular ones.

"In the case of Jewish terrorism most networks consist of religious Zionists and ultra-orthodox Jews living in isolated, homogenous communities.[9]

"The following groups have been considered religious terrorist organizations in Israel:

"Gush Emunim Underground (1979–84): formed by members of the Israeli political movement Gush Emunim.[10] This group is most well known for two actions. Firstly, for bomb attacks on the mayors of West Bank cities on June 2, 1980, and secondly, an abandoned plot to blow up the Temple Mount mosques.

"The Israeli Judge Zvi Cohen, heading the sentencing panel at the group’s trial, stated that they had three motives, ‘not necessarily shared by all the defendants. The first motive, at the heart of the Temple Mount conspiracy, is religious.’[11]

"Keshet (Kvutza Shelo Titpasher) (1981–1989): A Tel Aviv anti-Zionist haredi group focused on bombing property without loss of life.[12][13]:101 Yigal Marcus, Tel Aviv District Police commander, said that he considered the group a gang of criminals, not a terrorist group."

Jewish religious terrorism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I think Rocco really nailed it on the head. One group evolved, developed a modern country and evolved their militias into a modern army, while the other group....well....you know :lol:

Indeed, Israel could steal, kill, lie, and mooch at exceptional levels.

The Palestinians lacked those skills.

Lacked those skills?
1) Arafart and his cohorts stole from their own ppl, to fill their Swiss bank accounts.
2) Palestinians slit the throats of infants.
3) Pallywood is exceptional lying.
4) Palestinians mooch from many donor nations.
 
Last edited:
I think Rocco really nailed it on the head. One group evolved, developed a modern country and evolved their militias into a modern army, while the other group....well....you know :lol:

Indeed, Israel could steal, kill, lie, and mooch at exceptional levels.

The Palestinians lacked those skills.

Lacked those skills?
1) Arafart and his cohorts stole from their own ppl, to fill their Swiss bank accounts.
2? Palestinians slit the throats of infants.
3) Pallywood is exceptional lying.
4) Palestinians mooch from many donor nations.

Arafat was brought back from exile by Israel to outsource the occupation. He was paid well.
 
Indeed, Israel could steal, kill, lie, and mooch at exceptional levels.

The Palestinians lacked those skills.

Lacked those skills?
1) Arafart and his cohorts stole from their own ppl, to fill their Swiss bank accounts.
2? Palestinians slit the throats of infants.
3) Pallywood is exceptional lying.
4) Palestinians mooch from many donor nations.

Arafat was brought back from exile by Israel to outsource the occupation. He was paid well.

What is your opinion on Arafat,
 
Lacked those skills?
1) Arafart and his cohorts stole from their own ppl, to fill their Swiss bank accounts.
2? Palestinians slit the throats of infants.
3) Pallywood is exceptional lying.
4) Palestinians mooch from many donor nations.

Arafat was brought back from exile by Israel to outsource the occupation. He was paid well.

What is your opinion on Arafat,
You have to give Tinny credit for his animosity toward Arafart. He's a Hamas man from his boots to his neck.
 
Lacked those skills?
1) Arafart and his cohorts stole from their own ppl, to fill their Swiss bank accounts.
2? Palestinians slit the throats of infants.
3) Pallywood is exceptional lying.
4) Palestinians mooch from many donor nations.

Arafat was brought back from exile by Israel to outsource the occupation. He was paid well.

What is your opinion on Arafat,

I think he sold out or was duped or both.

Abbas is just a sell out. He is rich too.
 
Arafat was brought back from exile by Israel to outsource the occupation. He was paid well.
A rare misconception, ie. drivel is that, says Yoda. Bush and Baker in their peace frenzy twisted Shamir's arms by suspending $400 mln. in loan guarantees, refusing to provide $10 bln. in other loan guarantees, freezing legislative moves aimed at expanding the US-Israeli cooperation strategically and smearing AIPAC and Shamir through deliberate leaks and innuendo. That's what brought Arafat to palistan and he got "paid" well by the United States of America, of course.
 

Forum List

Back
Top