Is John Bolton Manipulating Trump to Attack Iran ?

I'm all for war getting rid of the Mullahs in Iran. The Iranian Citizens would help do this.

So you are for risking the lives of tens of thousands of brave American soldiers just to 'get rid of the Mullahs of Iran'?

Any other places you want brave Americans to die just so they can fulfill your neocon fantasies?
Soldiers die in war. They know that's a possibility when they sign up.
I know - but that doesn’t mean their lives should be just thrown away for neocon goals. Or die in the middle of nowhere trying to fight a war that makes no sense.
 
John Bolton does not belong in any level of government.
He is a war monging neocon
 
The simplistic, paranoid interpretation of what’s happening with Iran — wherein the U.S. is floating plans for an invasion and hyping intelligence of Iranian attacks — is that ultrahawkish aides are trying to manipulate their toddler president into war. Unfortunately, there is a lot of evidence suggesting this interpretation is correct.

The driving force is national security adviser John Bolton. During the Bush administration, Bolton sought without success to ramp up conflict with Iran. President Trump hired Bolton because he liked his tough-talking Fox News persona, but made him promise when he took the national security adviser job not to start any wars. Trump has repeatedly expressed his concern in private that Bolton is in fact trying to start wars, especially with Iran.
Is John Bolton Manipulating Trump to Attack Iran?

The voice of sanity as usual, Bernie Sanders;

Sanders introduces petition to prohibit war with Iran without Congress' approval


Here is the thing: IF Trump would have done his home work, which we all know Trump NEVER does, Trump would have already known that John Bolton is a war mongering chicken hawk.

As bad as Bolton is, this is all on Trump.

Yet again another fiasco that proves Trump is as ignorant as a tick on a dog's ass.
 
Really? Because it only took shrub 2 years to shove off to the never ending middle east adventure. Bush was an idiot.

Bush II's problem is that he was naive and trusting of his advisers.

You ever see W. on netflix? Its a few years old but I think that was probably accurate even though it was a
The simplistic, paranoid interpretation of what’s happening with Iran — wherein the U.S. is floating plans for an invasion and hyping intelligence of Iranian attacks — is that ultrahawkish aides are trying to manipulate their toddler president into war. Unfortunately, there is a lot of evidence suggesting this interpretation is correct.

The driving force is national security adviser John Bolton. During the Bush administration, Bolton sought without success to ramp up conflict with Iran. President Trump hired Bolton because he liked his tough-talking Fox News persona, but made him promise when he took the national security adviser job not to start any wars. Trump has repeatedly expressed his concern in private that Bolton is in fact trying to start wars, especially with Iran.
Is John Bolton Manipulating Trump to Attack Iran?

The voice of sanity as usual, Bernie Sanders;

Sanders introduces petition to prohibit war with Iran without Congress' approval


Here is the thing: IF Trump would have done his home work, which we all know Trump NEVER does, Trump would have already known that John Bolton is a war mongering chicken hawk.

As bad as Bolton is, this is all on Trump.

Yet again another fiasco that proves Trump is as ignorant as a tick on a dog's ass.

And yet trump isnt quagmired in the ME like his two predecessors w and o.
 
And yet trump isnt quagmired in the ME like his two predecessors w and o.

He's not?

do we not still have troops in Syria and Afghanistan? Pretty sure there are more troops in Afghanistan today than there was the day he took office.
 
Really? Because it only took shrub 2 years to shove off to the never ending middle east adventure. Bush was an idiot.

Bush II's problem is that he was naive and trusting of his advisers.

You ever see W. on netflix? Its a few years old but I think that was probably accurate even though it was a
The simplistic, paranoid interpretation of what’s happening with Iran — wherein the U.S. is floating plans for an invasion and hyping intelligence of Iranian attacks — is that ultrahawkish aides are trying to manipulate their toddler president into war. Unfortunately, there is a lot of evidence suggesting this interpretation is correct.

The driving force is national security adviser John Bolton. During the Bush administration, Bolton sought without success to ramp up conflict with Iran. President Trump hired Bolton because he liked his tough-talking Fox News persona, but made him promise when he took the national security adviser job not to start any wars. Trump has repeatedly expressed his concern in private that Bolton is in fact trying to start wars, especially with Iran.
Is John Bolton Manipulating Trump to Attack Iran?

The voice of sanity as usual, Bernie Sanders;

Sanders introduces petition to prohibit war with Iran without Congress' approval


Here is the thing: IF Trump would have done his home work, which we all know Trump NEVER does, Trump would have already known that John Bolton is a war mongering chicken hawk.

As bad as Bolton is, this is all on Trump.

Yet again another fiasco that proves Trump is as ignorant as a tick on a dog's ass.

And yet trump isnt quagmired in the ME
like his two predecessors w and o.

If John Bolton & Pompeo get their way that will change in quick order
 
Here is the thing: IF Trump would have done his home work, which we all know Trump NEVER does, Trump would have already known that John Bolton is a war mongering chicken hawk.

As bad as Bolton is, this is all on Trump.

Yet again another fiasco that proves Trump is as ignorant as a tick on a dog's ass.
Us average citizens are clueless on how the big game actually works behind those big closed doors, but I'd bet my left arm and one of my nuts that Trump did not personally choose John Bolton to be his National Security Advisor. ( or most of the others in his cabinet for that matter )

Sometimes being smart is less important than knowing when to play dumb. I think Obama and Trump are both good at it in their own unique ways.
 
Here is the thing: IF Trump would have done his home work, which we all know Trump NEVER does, Trump would have already known that John Bolton is a war mongering chicken hawk.

As bad as Bolton is, this is all on Trump.

Yet again another fiasco that proves Trump is as ignorant as a tick on a dog's ass.
Us average citizens are clueless on how the big game actually works behind those big closed doors, but I'd bet my left arm and one of my nuts that Trump did not personally choose John Bolton to be his National Security Advisor. ( or most of the others in his cabinet for that matter )

Trump promised to 'drain the swamp' but I know that is pure bullshit.

That was nothing more than a slick ass slogan to snare naive rubes into voting for a malevolent carnival barker.

American voters have to be the dumbest shit on a stick.

Trump is JUST AS SWAMP as any other POTUS, maybe more.
 
And yet trump isnt quagmired in the ME like his two predecessors w and o.

He's not?

do we not still have troops in Syria and Afghanistan? Pretty sure there are more troops in Afghanistan today than there was the day he took office.

No......not yet. Nothing like w or o. But then relevance is about the best that one can ask for in our quest for perpetual conflict.
 
I'm all for war getting rid of the Mullahs in Iran. The Iranian Citizens would help do this.

So you are for risking the lives of tens of thousands of brave American soldiers just to 'get rid of the Mullahs of Iran'?

Any other places you want brave Americans to die just so they can fulfill your neocon fantasies?
Soldiers die in war. They know that's a possibility when they sign up.
I know - but that doesn’t mean their lives should be just thrown away for neocon goals. Or die in the middle of nowhere trying to fight a war that makes no sense.
Iran has killed over 1000 American military And harassed the US and Israel since 1979. You may think that's okay, but many Americans are fed up.
 
The simplistic, paranoid interpretation of what’s happening with Iran — wherein the U.S. is floating plans for an invasion and hyping intelligence of Iranian attacks — is that ultrahawkish aides are trying to manipulate their toddler president into war. Unfortunately, there is a lot of evidence suggesting this interpretation is correct.

The driving force is national security adviser John Bolton. During the Bush administration, Bolton sought without success to ramp up conflict with Iran. President Trump hired Bolton because he liked his tough-talking Fox News persona, but made him promise when he took the national security adviser job not to start any wars. Trump has repeatedly expressed his concern in private that Bolton is in fact trying to start wars, especially with Iran.
Is John Bolton Manipulating Trump to Attack Iran?

The voice of sanity as usual, Bernie Sanders;

Sanders introduces petition to prohibit war with Iran without Congress' approval
Wartime tax rates if the right wing wants to go to war. No excuses and no financing.
 
I'm all for war getting rid of the Mullahs in Iran. The Iranian Citizens would help do this.

So you are for risking the lives of tens of thousands of brave American soldiers just to 'get rid of the Mullahs of Iran'?

Any other places you want brave Americans to die just so they can fulfill your neocon fantasies?
Soldiers die in war. They know that's a possibility when they sign up.
I know - but that doesn’t mean their lives should be just thrown away for neocon goals. Or die in the middle of nowhere trying to fight a war that makes no sense.
Iran has killed over 1000 American military And harassed the US and Israel since 1979. You may think that's okay, but many Americans are fed up.

Save the attitude please...you know damn well I did not in any way say killing Americans is okay.
But those Americans should not have been there in the first place. They should not have been in Iraq or Syria (I assume that is what you are referring to).
If America simply minded it’s own business...most/all of those soldiers you mentioned would still be alive.

Outside of mass genocide, what goes on in the Middle East is NONE of America’s business. Same with NATO (that should have disbanded after the Soviet Union did) and the same with North Korea and Venezuela and every other place in the world that is not called America.

You want to play neocon - go ahead. I am 100% against it.

If you have anything more to say about it - I suggest you contact/listen to Dr. Ron Paul. I don’t agree with everything he says - but on foreign policy? I agree with his present stances 100% and he can talk about them far better then I.
Also, I sense your mind is closed on this - you seem to want Iranian blood/vengeance on Iran.
I do not.


We are done here (for now).

Good day.
 
I'm all for war getting rid of the Mullahs in Iran. The Iranian Citizens would help do this.

So you are for risking the lives of tens of thousands of brave American soldiers just to 'get rid of the Mullahs of Iran'?

Any other places you want brave Americans to die just so they can fulfill your neocon fantasies?
Soldiers die in war. They know that's a possibility when they sign up.
I know - but that doesn’t mean their lives should be just thrown away for neocon goals. Or die in the middle of nowhere trying to fight a war that makes no sense.
Iran has killed over 1000 American military And harassed the US and Israel since 1979. You may think that's okay, but many Americans are fed up.

Save the attitude please...you know damn well I did not in any way say killing Americans is okay.
But those Americans should not have been there in the first place. They should not have been in Iraq or Syria (I assume that is what you are referring to).
If America simply minded it’s own business...most/all of those soldiers you mentioned would still be alive.

Outside of mass genocide, what goes on in the Middle East is NONE of America’s business. Same with NATO (that should have disbanded after the Soviet Union did) and the same with North Korea and Venezuela and every other place in the world that is not called America.

You want to play neocon - go ahead. I am 100% against it.

If you have anything more to say about it - I suggest you contact/listen to Dr. Ron Paul. I don’t agree with everything he says - but on foreign policy? I agree with his present stances 100% and he can talk about them far better then I.
Also, I sense your mind is closed on this - you seem to want Iranian blood/vengeance on Iran.
I do not.


We are done here (for now).

Good day.
They were sent there by the President and Congress. That is their job. They know what their job is and volunteered for it. You don't like it, fine. But you're not involved in their decisions. Stop using brave Americans doing their duty as political pawns. Sick.
 
BTW - for the record - I thing John Bolton is absolute scum (for a human).

An absolutely, terrible human being.

And I have thought that for MANY years...long before Trump hired him.
 
I'm all for war getting rid of the Mullahs in Iran. The Iranian Citizens would help do this.

So you are for risking the lives of tens of thousands of brave American soldiers just to 'get rid of the Mullahs of Iran'?

Any other places you want brave Americans to die just so they can fulfill your neocon fantasies?
Soldiers die in war. They know that's a possibility when they sign up.
I know - but that doesn’t mean their lives should be just thrown away for neocon goals. Or die in the middle of nowhere trying to fight a war that makes no sense.
Iran has killed over 1000 American military And harassed the US and Israel since 1979. You may think that's okay, but many Americans are fed up.

Prove that?? over 1000 Americans, and also how they harassed us since 1979, have you forgot about the coup we did on them?
 
BTW - for the record - I thing John Bolton is absolute scum (for a human).

An absolutely, terrible human being.

And I have thought that for MANY years...long before Trump hired him.
He's an American patriot.

This POS:
BTW - for the record - I thing John Bolton is absolute scum (for a human).

An absolutely, terrible human being.

And I have thought that for MANY years...long before Trump hired him.


He's an American patriot.
Though Bolton supported the Vietnam War, he declined to enter combat duty, instead enlisting in the National Guard and attending law school after his 1970 graduation. “I confess I had no desire to die in a Southeast Asian rice paddy,” Bolton wrote of his decision in the 25th reunion book. “I considered the war in Vietnam already lost.”


Bolton’s conservative ideology has roots in Yale experience

Really you think he is an American Patriot? Really, well that tells a lot about you.

To the OP:
I think tramp knows fully that Bolton wants war with Iran, that is why he put him in, tramp wants to appease Israel and SA , Never believe tramp is telling the truth.
 

Forum List

Back
Top