Is Providing A Product For Gays Condoning Gays?

what can be more deranged than packing fudge
Answer: Hypocritical sanctimony.
Libs are the biggest hypocrites to walk the planet.
convert.jpg
 
Is Providing A Product For Gays Condoning Gays? Because it seems like if you deny those people the sale just because they are gay you are being JUDGMENTAL. Do not judge or be judged.

Which is the bigger sin?
Serving individual gays is not forbidden by the Bible. Christians are told to reach out to them "making a difference"

Enabling a gay culture to take over a normal one IS expressly forbidden in the Bible. Gravely forbidden. It carries the punishment of eternal damnation for Christians who fail to act in opposition. Marriage is the hub of any culture.

So, to answer the obvious question in the OP: Serving gays in day to day stuff = yes. Participating in a "gay wedding" = no.

Read all of Jude 1 in the New Testament for details.

Why don't you quote us from Jude 1 where it says expressly that 'gay culture' must be wiped out.


It doesn't and you misunderstood.

Well then you quote the passage and tell us exactly what it means.
 
what can be more deranged than packing fudge
Answer: Hypocritical sanctimony.
Libs are the biggest hypocrites to walk the planet.
convert.jpg

Who thinks Muslims should be given privileges in business that Christians shouldn't get?
Muslims.
Do you practice being stupid when you're not on here?

Oh, so no Christians want the right to special business privileges based on their claim of special status as Christians?
 
what can be more deranged than packing fudge
Answer: Hypocritical sanctimony.
Libs are the biggest hypocrites to walk the planet.
convert.jpg

Who thinks Muslims should be given privileges in business that Christians shouldn't get?
Muslims.
Do you practice being stupid when you're not on here?

Oh, so no Christians want the right to special business privileges based on their claim of special status as Christians?
No. How stupid are you, again?
 
It's not the providing of a product...it is being personally involved.

If a photographer believes gay marriage is a sin, the law should not require them to ATTEND a gay marriage and be a participant. Same for a caterer, or a florist. Basically, it is a requirement to be a party to sinful behavior...and that is the definition of restricting freedom of religion.

That is far different from simply "providing a product". If a car dealership refused to sell a gay citizen a car because they were gay, that would be a whole nother story.

Catering a wedding is no more 'being a participant' than selling hotdogs at a ballgame is being a participant in the game.

By your 'logic' anyone who had a home related business - cleaning carpets, pest control, pool cleaning, landscaping, plumbing, electrician, housekeeping, and on and on,

could refuse to do business with a gay married couple because they were 'participating' in their lifestyle.


So, if there were 10 hot dog stands in new york, you would be cool with govt forcing one of them to attend a gay wedding to serve hot dogs?

If a hotdog vendor offers a wedding catering service, then yes, he should not be able to discriminate against gay weddings.

If gay weddings bother him, then he needs to get out of the wedding catering business.

I am not even disagreeing but why should they not?
 
Is Providing A Product For Gays Condoning Gays? Because it seems like if you deny those people the sale just because they are gay you are being JUDGMENTAL. Do not judge or be judged.

Which is the bigger sin?

Why would someone be in favor of government forcing another person to go against their religious beliefs? It seems govt is being judgmental.

I'm sure people said the same thing back when government gave the finger to some's religious beliefs re: segregation, interracial marriage, and slavery.

What part of history are you trying to revise? segregation, interracial marriage and slavery had nothing to do with anyone's religion. It had to do with the Democrats view on the worth of the black man. Religious belief freed the black man from democrat tyranny.
 
Is Providing A Product For Gays Condoning Gays? Because it seems like if you deny those people the sale just because they are gay you are being JUDGMENTAL. Do not judge or be judged.

Which is the bigger sin?

Why would someone be in favor of government forcing another person to go against their religious beliefs? It seems govt is being judgmental.

I'm sure people said the same thing back when government gave the finger to some's religious beliefs re: segregation, interracial marriage, and slavery.

What part of history are you trying to revise? segregation, interracial marriage and slavery had nothing to do with anyone's religion. It had to do with the Democrats view on the worth of the black man. Religious belief freed the black man from democrat tyranny.
Religious belief was also used to justify slavery, segregation, interracial marriage, etc., as well.
 
Is providing arms to a country showing support for that country? Answer this and you'll have your answer.
I think it would depend (in both cases) on whether it is the government providing arms (cake) or a private vendor providing arms (cake).

I hope you aren't trying to say that an arms vendor is showing support for that country....when they quite frequently sell arms to any and all comers.
 
Is Providing A Product For Gays Condoning Gays? Because it seems like if you deny those people the sale just because they are gay you are being JUDGMENTAL. Do not judge or be judged.

Which is the bigger sin?

The biggest sin is being stupid and a shit disturbing idiot.
Any normal person would go to an other store if he/she can't find what they want in the store they started with.
A shit disturbing idiot is too stupid to do so, instead relies on the government to correct an imaginary wrong, just as they rely on government for their food stamps.
Yeah...many thought those black college students at Woolworths were shit disturbing idiots.
 
Is Providing A Product For Gays Condoning Gays? Because it seems like if you deny those people the sale just because they are gay you are being JUDGMENTAL. Do not judge or be judged.

Which is the bigger sin?
Imo, you have to fairly take them at face value. Their choosing not to service a gay wedding is not based on condoning or not condoning. Rather, they say that providing a service would effectively require they participate in a gay wedding. Whether one disagrees with that stance or not is immaterial.
 
If you are so concerned about slavery why would you want a baker to labor against his will like any other slave?

You're more demented than I thought, and that was already a pretty high bar.

A baker who cannot resist the desire to discriminate can get another job. A slave couldn't. Duh.
The bakery (not baker, dumbfuck) has invested a lot of time, money and sweat into the business and doesn't need needle dicks like you trying to ruin them. How about you get another life?
Why doesn't a bakery want to bake? What the heck is up with that? False advertising?
 

Forum List

Back
Top