Is Providing A Product For Gays Condoning Gays?

[koshergrl]

Is Providing A Product For Gays Condoning Gays? Because it seems like if you deny those people the sale just because they are gay you are being JUDGMENTAL. Do not judge or be judged.

Which is the bigger sin?

Sacrilege. Which is what endorsing homo marriage is.

 

[koshergrl]

Is Providing A Product For Gays Condoning Gays? Because it seems like if you deny those people the sale just because they are gay you are being JUDGMENTAL. Do not judge or be judged.

Which is the bigger sin?

Why would someone be in favor of government forcing another person to go against their religious beliefs? It seems govt is being judgmental.

I'm sure people said the same thing back when government gave the finger to some's religious beliefs re: segregation, interracial marriage, and slavery.

What part of history are you trying to revise? segregation, interracial marriage and slavery had nothing to do with anyone's religion. It had to do with the Democrats view on the worth of the black man. Religious belief freed the black man from democrat tyranny.

Religious belief was also used to justify slavery, segregation, interracial marriage, etc., as well.

Is Providing A Product For Gays Condoning Gays? Because it seems like if you deny those people the sale just because they are gay you are being JUDGMENTAL. Do not judge or be judged.

Which is the bigger sin?

Why would someone be in favor of government forcing another person to go against their religious beliefs? It seems govt is being judgmental.

I'm sure people said the same thing back when government gave the finger to some's religious beliefs re: segregation, interracial marriage, and slavery.

Cripes how'd I un-ignore this jackass? Back on ignore he goes. I can't stand lying ignorami.

What part of history are you trying to revise? segregation, interracial marriage and slavery had nothing to do with anyone's religion. It had to do with the Democrats view on the worth of the black man. Religious belief freed the black man from democrat tyranny.

Religious belief was also used to justify slavery, segregation, interracial marriage, etc., as well.

 

[Siete]

If you are so concerned about slavery why would you want a baker to labor against his will like any other slave?

You're more demented than I thought, and that was already a pretty high bar.

A baker who cannot resist the desire to discriminate can get another job. A slave couldn't. Duh.

The bakery (not baker, dumbfuck) has invested a lot of time, money and sweat into the business and doesn't need needle dicks like you trying to ruin them. How about you get another life?

Why doesn't a bakery want to bake? What the heck is up with that? False advertising?

that LONG line at the cash register allows the bakery to choose their customers ...

 

[OKTexas]

Is providing arms to a country showing support for that country? Answer this and you'll have your answer.

I think it would depend (in both cases) on whether it is the government providing arms (cake) or a private vendor providing arms (cake).

I hope you aren't trying to say that an arms vendor is showing support for that country....when they quite frequently sell arms to any and all comers.

Funny, I noticed you didn't say they always sell to any and all comers. So in you opinion even arms dealers have a right to discriminate? But a supposedly free citizen doesn't have the right to chose who they associate with in all circumstances. How's if feel to have a tyrant mentality?

 

[mikegriffith1]

Is Providing A Product For Gays Condoning Gays? Because it seems like if you deny those people the sale just because they are gay you are being JUDGMENTAL. Do not judge or be judged.

Which is the bigger sin?

Oh, sheesh. You can't see a huge difference between serving a gay couple a meal in your restaurant and hosting or servicing their wedding? Really? You just don't get it?

So if a 60-year-old man walked into your bakery with a 15-year-old girl to order a cake for their upcoming "commitment ceremony" to celebrate the fact that the girl's parents had consented to let her start living with the perverted geezer in a sexual relationship in one month, you would be perfectly okay with baking their cake? Better yet, how about if you were a photographer and they asked you to come photograph the ceremony?

Well, according to you folks, such a baker or photographer would be guilty of "discrimination" for refusing to do something that they found morally offensive.

 

[Freewill]

Is Providing A Product For Gays Condoning Gays? Because it seems like if you deny those people the sale just because they are gay you are being JUDGMENTAL. Do not judge or be judged.

Which is the bigger sin?

Why would someone be in favor of government forcing another person to go against their religious beliefs? It seems govt is being judgmental.

I'm sure people said the same thing back when government gave the finger to some's religious beliefs re: segregation, interracial marriage, and slavery.

What part of history are you trying to revise? segregation, interracial marriage and slavery had nothing to do with anyone's religion. It had to do with the Democrats view on the worth of the black man. Religious belief freed the black man from democrat tyranny.

Religious belief was also used to justify slavery, segregation, interracial marriage, etc., as well.

The only burden you have is to prove it. Show us in the Bible justification for segregation. Shows us the justification for a band on interracial marriage...etc whatever the hell etc means. THINK, THINK, about the time that the Bible was written and IMAGINE any of that foolishness be taught. Democrats may have SAID that there was justification in their religion but their religion was not Christianity. Christianity ENDED slavery.

 

[Roadrunner]

Is Providing A Product For Gays Condoning Gays? Because it seems like if you deny those people the sale just because they are gay you are being JUDGMENTAL. Do not judge or be judged.

Which is the bigger sin?

Is providing hoods and cloaks for the Klan condoning the Klan?

 

[paperview]

Is Providing A Product For Gays Condoning Gays? Because it seems like if you deny those people the sale just because they are gay you are being JUDGMENTAL. Do not judge or be judged.

Which is the bigger sin?

Why would someone be in favor of government forcing another person to go against their religious beliefs? It seems govt is being judgmental.

I'm sure people said the same thing back when government gave the finger to some's religious beliefs re: segregation, interracial marriage, and slavery.

What part of history are you trying to revise? segregation, interracial marriage and slavery had nothing to do with anyone's religion. It had to do with the Democrats view on the worth of the black man. Religious belief freed the black man from democrat tyranny.

Religious belief was also used to justify slavery, segregation, interracial marriage, etc., as well.

The only burden you have is to prove it. Show us in the Bible justification for segregation. Shows us the justification for a band on interracial marriage...etc whatever the hell etc means. THINK, THINK, about the time that the Bible was written and IMAGINE any of that foolishness be taught. Democrats may have SAID that there was justification in their religion but their religion was not Christianity. Christianity ENDED slavery.

Are you that stupid to not know millions and millions of people used the bible to justify slavery, segregation and interracial marriage?

"Shows us the justification for a band on interracial marriage...etc whatever the hell etc means."

Look up Loving v Virgina.

 

[rdean]

Gun companies provide a product to mass murderers. Do they condone mass murder? Republicans support the NRA. Do Republicans support mass murder? OK, you got me there. Not sure.

 

[paperview]

More current:

"Maurice Bessinger built his fortune serving barbecue. At the half-dozen locations of his Piggie Park restaurants, customers could enjoy meats slathered in the yellow, mustard-based sauce unique to South Carolina.

That is, of course, unless they were black, for Bessinger was also a proud racist. As late as the twenty-first century, Piggie Park distributed tracts to its customers claiming that the Bible is a pro-slavery document — one of them claimed that African slaves “blessed the Lord for allowing them to be enslaved and sent to America.”

After Congress banned whites-only restaurants in 1964, Bessinger reportedly put up an uncensored version of a sign warning that “[t]he law makes us serve <n-word>, but any money we get from them goes to the Ku Klux Klan.”


And Bessinger wasn’t just an unapologetic racist, he also believed that his right to discriminate flowed from the Lord Almighty himself. The Civil Rights Act of 1964, which banned whites-only lunch counters, “contravenes the will of God,” according to a lawsuit Bessinger brought claiming he should be exempt from the law. The Supreme Court disagreed, ruling 8-0 in Newman v. Piggie Park Enterprises that Bessinger’s claim that a religious objection could authorize discrimination was “patently frivolous.”

FindLaw | Cases and Codes

Are you going to tell him his biblical interpretation was wrong?

Be careful when you try to answer this question.

 

[eots]

Is Providing A Product For Gays Condoning Gays? Because it seems like if you deny those people the sale just because they are gay you are being JUDGMENTAL. Do not judge or be judged.

Which is the bigger sin?

why would anyone want to force someone to create and bake decorate something they did not feel comfortable with ? its like asking an artist paint a picture he has no desire to paint..go find someone who is into it ,not be hard to find...what is next make pro-life people make congratulations on your abortion cakes ?

 

[Iceweasel]

Is providing hoods and cloaks for the Klan condoning the Klan?

No SUH! We gets right on dat massa!

 

[The Rabbi]

More current:

"Maurice Bessinger built his fortune serving barbecue. At the half-dozen locations of his Piggie Park restaurants, customers could enjoy meats slathered in the yellow, mustard-based sauce unique to South Carolina.

That is, of course, unless they were black, for Bessinger was also a proud racist. As late as the twenty-first century, Piggie Park distributed tracts to its customers claiming that the Bible is a pro-slavery document — one of them claimed that African slaves “blessed the Lord for allowing them to be enslaved and sent to America.”

After Congress banned whites-only restaurants in 1964, Bessinger reportedly put up an uncensored version of a sign warning that “[t]he law makes us serve <n-word>, but any money we get from them goes to the Ku Klux Klan.”


And Bessinger wasn’t just an unapologetic racist, he also believed that his right to discriminate flowed from the Lord Almighty himself. The Civil Rights Act of 1964, which banned whites-only lunch counters, “contravenes the will of God,” according to a lawsuit Bessinger brought claiming he should be exempt from the law. The Supreme Court disagreed, ruling 8-0 in Newman v. Piggie Park Enterprises that Bessinger’s claim that a religious objection could authorize discrimination was “patently frivolous.”

FindLaw | Cases and Codes

Are you going to tell him his biblical interpretation was wrong?

Be careful when you try to answer this question.

Do you think he does not have a right to his interpretation?

 

[mikegriffith1]

Ok, liberals, let's see if this helps: Eating a meal or renting a hotel room is not a ceremony. Marriage, on the other hand, is a ceremony. When a religious vendor serves a gay couple a meal or rents them a hotel room, or provides some other basic service, he is not in any way supporting/hosting/attending a ceremony. But when a gay couple asks a religious vendor to host or service their wedding, they are asking him to support/host/attend a ceremony--one that they find offensive and uncomfortable.

No one has any "right" to force another person to support/host/attend a ceremony against their will.

As for the attacks on the Bible because some misguided folks MISused it to support slavery and to oppose interracial marriage, I would point out that many American abolitionists were Bible-believing Christians--quite a few were pastors. Most of the leaders of the Abolitionist movement were practicing Christians. And many if not most of those who opposed interracial marriage did so mainly for secular reasons, not religious ones.

 

[paperview]

More current:

"Maurice Bessinger built his fortune serving barbecue. At the half-dozen locations of his Piggie Park restaurants, customers could enjoy meats slathered in the yellow, mustard-based sauce unique to South Carolina.

That is, of course, unless they were black, for Bessinger was also a proud racist. As late as the twenty-first century, Piggie Park distributed tracts to its customers claiming that the Bible is a pro-slavery document — one of them claimed that African slaves “blessed the Lord for allowing them to be enslaved and sent to America.”

After Congress banned whites-only restaurants in 1964, Bessinger reportedly put up an uncensored version of a sign warning that “[t]he law makes us serve <n-word>, but any money we get from them goes to the Ku Klux Klan.”


And Bessinger wasn’t just an unapologetic racist, he also believed that his right to discriminate flowed from the Lord Almighty himself. The Civil Rights Act of 1964, which banned whites-only lunch counters, “contravenes the will of God,” according to a lawsuit Bessinger brought claiming he should be exempt from the law. The Supreme Court disagreed, ruling 8-0 in Newman v. Piggie Park Enterprises that Bessinger’s claim that a religious objection could authorize discrimination was “patently frivolous.”

FindLaw | Cases and Codes

Are you going to tell him his biblical interpretation was wrong?

Be careful when you try to answer this question.

Do you think he does not have a right to his interpretation?

Ask Freewill that.

 

[The Rabbi]

More current:

"Maurice Bessinger built his fortune serving barbecue. At the half-dozen locations of his Piggie Park restaurants, customers could enjoy meats slathered in the yellow, mustard-based sauce unique to South Carolina.

That is, of course, unless they were black, for Bessinger was also a proud racist. As late as the twenty-first century, Piggie Park distributed tracts to its customers claiming that the Bible is a pro-slavery document — one of them claimed that African slaves “blessed the Lord for allowing them to be enslaved and sent to America.”

After Congress banned whites-only restaurants in 1964, Bessinger reportedly put up an uncensored version of a sign warning that “[t]he law makes us serve <n-word>, but any money we get from them goes to the Ku Klux Klan.”


And Bessinger wasn’t just an unapologetic racist, he also believed that his right to discriminate flowed from the Lord Almighty himself. The Civil Rights Act of 1964, which banned whites-only lunch counters, “contravenes the will of God,” according to a lawsuit Bessinger brought claiming he should be exempt from the law. The Supreme Court disagreed, ruling 8-0 in Newman v. Piggie Park Enterprises that Bessinger’s claim that a religious objection could authorize discrimination was “patently frivolous.”

FindLaw | Cases and Codes

Are you going to tell him his biblical interpretation was wrong?

Be careful when you try to answer this question.

Do you think he does not have a right to his interpretation?

Ask Freewill that.

Im asking you.
Are you going to wimp out and demonstrate your stupidity like in the last thread when you couldnt explain how bills become law?

 

[paperview]

Said the idiot who thinks

"Being voted on by Congress makes it a law."




Miss a step there rebbit?

 

[The Rabbi]

Said the idiot who thinks

"Being voted on by Congress makes it a law."




Miss a step there rebbit?

Are you wimping out again and failing to articulate your point because you have no fucking clue? Yes.

 

[paperview]

Said the idiot who thinks

"Being voted on by Congress makes it a law."




Miss a step there rebbit?

Are you wimping out again and failing to articulate your point because you have no fucking clue? Yes.

You are obviously too stupid to even know how a bill becomes a law.


"Being voted on by Congress makes it a law" -Rabbit

 

[The Rabbi]

Said the idiot who thinks

"Being voted on by Congress makes it a law."




Miss a step there rebbit?

Are you wimping out again and failing to articulate your point because you have no fucking clue? Yes.

You are obviously too stupid to even know how a bill becomes a law.


"Being voted on by Congress makes it a law" -Rabbit

Repeating yourself makes you look stupid.
Why can't you explain why I am wrong?