Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Are you saying something must have made the universe? Then what made the thing that made the universe? You can't have it both ways. If something must have made us, something must have made what made us. And since it takes a woman and a man to make something, there must be more than one god. Who are god's parents?
Definition of Belief says: Belief is a state of the mind in which a subject roughly regards a thing to be true.
It is flagrantly pretentious to employ a writing style that incomprehensible to even the intelligent,
Human sacrifice was a part of the religion of many cultures at one time, which effectively made it a part of their moral code.
One might argue, on the other hand, that human sacrifice is absolutely immoral.
Then list the reasons you think I think.
No.
It is flagrantly pretentious to employ a writing style that incomprehensible to even the intelligent,
What makes you think intelligent people cannot understand Rawling's writing?
Human sacrifice was a part of the religion of many cultures at one time, which effectively made it a part of their moral code.
One might argue, on the other hand, that human sacrifice is absolutely immoral.
Or you could argue that they were trading one for many, which would make it absolutely moral under your personal morality where the many always gets to tell the one what to do.
So you can't defend your statement with anything of substance?
Dog bites man.
Because I'm smarter than you are.
So you can't defend your statement with anything of substance?
Dog bites man.
I can defend it, I just refuse to let you dictate what I meant.
So there's no absolute moral standard on the issue of human sacrifice.
You should be arguing with Rawlings then, not me.
Because I'm smarter than you are.
I know you think you are, but I bet you can't prove it.
All I did is ask you what you meant. You claimed to know why I said what I said. All I would like to hear is why you think I said it.
So there's no absolute moral standard on the issue of human sacrifice.
You should be arguing with Rawlings then, not me.
People view a man who jumps on a grenade to save his friends as a hero. Funny thing, I bet you can't find a single person on this forum who will disagree with that, including you.
Maybe you should be arguing with yourself.
My proof, to my own satisfaction, is that I am right on the issues more often than you are.
The issue is whether or not there are moral absolutes. Try to focus.
All I did is ask you what you meant. You claimed to know why I said what I said. All I would like to hear is why you think I said it.
I suggest you go back and reread your post, you never asked what I meant.
After that, you can reread mind and discover I never said I knew why you said what you did.
Don't worry though, you are still more intelligent than I am, which is why I can't confuse you.
The issue is whether or not there are moral absolutes. Try to focus.
I just provided an example, try to focus.
You said
"You are correct, just not for the reasons you think".
you're claiming you know my reasons.
State them.
